This afternoon I went to the park which was built recently near my home.In the park,I saw many beautiful flowers and trees.The air was quite fresh and brids sang happyly.All the people there were singing,dancing and playing games.What a lovely place!
今天是五天。我去公园与我的家人庆祝这个节日。那里是许多人在公园里。他们中的一些人被拍照,别人是去观光。多么幸福地看着他们。
今天下午我去最近建成的我家附近的公园。在公园里,我看见许多漂亮的`花和树。空气很新鲜,鸟儿地歌唱。所有的人那里是唱歌,跳舞和玩游戏。多可爱的地方!
This is a story about a special and unreserved woman who has been exposed to a hostile environment but continuously and fearlessly struggling for her ideal life. The story can be interpreted as a symbol of the independent spirit.
It seems to me that many readers’ English reading experience starts with Jane Eyer. I am of no exception. As we refer to the movie “Jane Eyer”, it is not surprising to find some differences because of its being filmized and retold in a new way, but the spirit of the novel remains----to be an independent person, both physically and mentally.
Jane Eyer was a born resister, whose parents went off when she was very young, and her aunt,the only relative she had,treated her as badly as a ragtag. Since Jane’s education in Lowwood Orphanage began, she didn’t get what she had been expecting——simply being regarded as a common person, just the same as any other girl around. The suffers from being humiliated and devastated teach Jane to be persevering and prize dignity over anything else.As a reward of revolting the ruthless oppression, Jane got a chance to be a tutor in Thornfield Garden. There she made the acquaintance of lovely Adele and that garden’s owner, Rochester, a man with warm heart despite a cold face outside. Jane expected to change the life from then on, but fate had decided otherwise: After Jane and Rochester fell in love with each other and got down to get marry, she unfortunately came to know in fact Rochester had got a legal wife, who seemed to be the shadow following Rochester and led to his moodiness all the time ----Rochester was also a despairing person in need of salvation. Jane did want to give him a hand, however, she made up her mind to leave, because she didn’t want to betray her own principles, because she was Jane Eyer. The film has finally got a symbolist end: Jane inherited a large number of legacies and finally returned. After finding Rochester ’s misfortune brought by his original mad wife, Jane chose to stay with him forever.
I don’t know what others feel, but frankly speaking, I would rather regard the section that Jane began her teaching job in Thornfield as the film’s end----especially when I heard Jane’s words “Never in my life have I been awaken so happily. ” For one thing, this ideal and brand-new beginning of life was what Jane had been imagining for long as a suffering person; for another, this should be what the audiences with my views hoped her to get. But the professional judgment of producing films reminded me to wait for a totally different result: There must be something wrong coming with the excellence----perhaps not only should another section be added to enrich the story, but also we may see from the next transition of Jane’s life that “Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you would get.”
What ’s more, this film didn’t end when Jane left Thornfield. For Jane Eyer herself, there should always be somewhere to realize her great ideal of being independent considering her fortitude, but for Rochester, how he can get salvation? The film gives the answer tentatively: Jane eventually got back to Rochester. In fact, when Jane met Rochester for the first time, she scared his horse and made his heel strained, to a certain extent, which meant Rochester would get retrieval because of Jane. We can consider Rochester’s experiences as that of religion meaning. The fire by his frantic wife was the punishment for the cynicism early in his life. After it, Rochester got the mercy of the God and the love of the woman whom he loved. Here we can say: human nature and divinity get united perfectly in order to let such a story accord with the requirements of both two sides. The value of this film may be due to its efforts to explore a new way for the development of humanism under the faith of religion.
我们奔跑在一条长路上,我们奔波在一条长路上。
初中就开始看校运会,高二参加过一次校运会,大一以工作人员的身份观察校运会,在我成长的过程中,我对校运会的认知也逐渐深刻。我小时候很羡慕那些能力超群的人,他们以过人的天赋和超凡的努力成就自己,他们是赢得比赛的人。
初中的时候看着别人在赛场上奔跑跳跃,我总有种跃跃欲试的冲动。我没有强大的心脏,却有过分的心气,我觉得上赛场就是要赢得比赛的,其他的一切都没有意义。我认为,要么赢得比赛,要么不去比赛。
后来我上了高中,我从繁重的学习任务中感受到了压力,也正因为有了压力,我才开始寻找喘息的空隙,我开始了一些关于人生的思考。我开始知道,每一个出现了的事物一定要有意义,这意义可能不分好坏,但却影响我们的选择。我开始在意那些“更仅存”的东西,我开始想努力抓住一些东西。其实每一个事物都是绝无仅有的,只是他们在我们心中的位置不同。
高一春季运动会,同班的一个男生拿了110米栏的冠军奖。我一度觉得自己也能行的,我羡慕他,也决定参加下一年的校运会。我参加了高二的运动会,跨栏、跳高、4*100米接力。任何一项我都没有名次,练习跨栏的时候受伤了,接力跑的时候接棒的时候摔倒了,跳高跟跨栏冲突了,跨栏试跑的时候腿部肌肉拉伤。我没有赢得名次,我是最差的。但是我却很满足,因为我把握住了一次我认为重要的“仅有”,我认为这对我是一件有积极影响的事情,是一件有意义的事情。
再后来我就上了大学,作为学生会宣传部的工作人员,我参与了这次春季校运会,事实证明高二的校运会不是我人生所参与的最后一个。
我看着操场上的队列经过,我感受到了一种令我无法抗拒的生命力。我在之前真的还没有亲眼见过这么大场面的运动会,漫天的气球,被放飞的白鸽。这些意象触碰着我的心弦,让我激动地浑身颤抖。这次的我并没有考虑太多关于“意义”的东西,而是直接地陷入了一种像是宗教的东西。我在一种强烈的气氛里产生了共振,我无法解释这种气氛的产生机制,但我意念的确还不够强大,很容易就被影响了。
我担任拍摄的工作,照了不少照片,却都不满意。照片无法记录树枝树叶随风摇动的频率,录像也无法描摹出春风的质感。我故作出一副哲学家的姿态开始试图用思想记录这一切,然而我是一个深陷其中的人。我的这种试图是一种成长的体现,我从一个试图抓住“仅有的事物”的人成长为一个试图抓住感觉的人。
两天后运动会结束,说实话这两天下来并不是一直在享受体验神圣的感觉,而是灵魂在断断续续地出窍。他们表现的很棒,我事后才能给予这么中肯的赞扬。
跑、跳、投、掷,还是这些内容,还是有些人跑得不够精彩,也还是排出了第一名到最后一名的名次;还是有的人兴奋,有的人失落;但有些东西变了。
我在初中观看校运会的时候,赢家是第一名,剩下的都是失败者;在我高二参加运动会的时候,我抓住“仅有”的***得到了满足,我虽然在比赛中失败,但却也塞翁失马;我这次作为工作人员参与运动会,我却觉得名次与是否胜利无关了。
每个人都有自己的长处,但大多数人的长处都不是天下第一。有些人依靠天赋,有的依靠努力,也有的人努力一辈子也做不了第一。
人生是这样的,这个世界上绝大多数的人叫做平凡的人。这些人从满怀憧憬到面对现实的过程中,有的人变庸俗了,有的人变超脱了。
在跑道上奔跑着的人们,他们都在各自的跑道上努力地跑着,跑进了别人的跑道就算犯规。
我们也一样,我们奔波在一条长路上,在慢慢地领悟做好自己的方法。
It has been two weeks since I last wrote to you. I am so sorry that I don‘t write you very often.
However, I have been busy with my preparation
for the final exams. As you know, I‘m coming home on Jan.14th. But before that, I have to take the final exams for all six classes I‘m taking this semester. Recently I have been in and out of the library a lot to do some research on the term paper for one of the classes. Most professors gave out the review problems already so that the students can study for the final. I think I‘m doing okay studying for the final.
Besides reviewing materials, I‘m also planning to host the New Year party of my department. You know there are so many talented people in my Communications major, but they picked me to host the party! Great, isn‘t it?
Well gotta go talk to you soon.
Love you,
XXX
Many people simply regard Pride and Prejudice as a love story, but in my opinion, this book is an illustration of the society at that time. She perfectly reflected the relation between money and marriage at her time and gave the people in her works vivid characters. The characters have their own personalities. Mrs. Bennet is a woman who makes great efforts to marry off her daughters. Mr. Bingley is a friendly young man, but his friend, Mr. Darcy, is a very proud man who seems to always feel superior. Even the five daughters in Bennet family are very different. Jane is simple, innocent and never speaks evil of others. Elizabeth is a clever girl who always has her own opinion. Mary likes reading classic books. (Actually she is a pedant. Kitty doesn’t have her own opinion but likes to follow her sister, Lydia. Lydia is a girl who follows exotic things, handsome man, and is somehow a little profligate. When I read the book, I can always find the same personalities in the society now. That is why I think this book is indeed the representative of the society in Britain in the 18th century.
The family of gentleman in the countryside is Jane Austen’s favourite topic. But this little topic can reflect big problems. It concludes the stratum situation and economic relationships in Britain in her century. You can find these from the very beginning of this book.
The first sentence in this book is impressive. It reads: “It is a truth well known to all the world that an unmarried man in poss ession of a large fortune must be in need of a wife”. The undertone is very clear: the foundation of the marriage at that time is not emotion but possession.
People always think that Austen was an expert at telling love stories. In fact, the marriage in her book is not the result of love, but the result of economic needs. After reading this book, I know the truth is that a poor woman must be in need of a husband, a wealthy man.
I couldn’t forget how eager Mrs. Bennet wants to marry off her daughte rs. If you want to know why she is so crazy about these things, I must mention the situation in Britain at that time. Only the eldest son had the privilege of inheriting his father’s possessions. Younger sons and daughters who are used to luxurious lives have no choice but marry a man or woman in possession of a large fortune to continue their comfortable lives. Thus, we can see that getting married is a way to become wealthier, particularly for women without many possessions. Jane Austen told us that money and possession determined everything, including marriage and love in her century.
In “Pride and Prejudice”, the sister of Mr. Bingley strongly opposed his plan of marrying Jane because the Bennets don’t have many possessions and their social positions are much lower than them. From this, we can see there are a lot of obstacles for a not very rich woman to marry a wealthy husband. The society, the relatives would not allow them to get married.
In modern society, although the marriages of economic needs have decreased rapidly, the concept of “money determines everything” is still rooted in some people’s mind. A lot of parents try hard to interfere their children’s marriages. Education background, possessions, jobs remains the main reason that may influence one’s marriage. Marry for money is still a big problem in our
society. We can’t help thinking: can money determine everything?
Austen left this problem for us to think. The genius of Jane Austen lies in this perfect simplicity, the simplicity that reflects big problems. Although Austen was only 21 when she wrote “Pride and Prejudice”, her sharp observation of social lives makes the style of this book surprisingly mature and lively. The plots in her works are always very natural. The development of the plot is as inevitable as a problem in mathematics. I think the depth of Pride and Prejudice is the reason that makes this book prominent and classic. Today, her book still can be the guide telling us the economic relationships both at her time and in modern time.
© 2022 xuexicn.net,All Rights Reserved.