大学选修课英文作文【一】
在孩子们每个人的学习和生活中，都会有第一次的尝试与体验，它不断地激励和启发我们，让我们不断地获得成长。
这是我的第一次亲自下厨的故事。
那是在一个傍晚，我从外面游玩回到家后，发现桌上有一张便条，上面写着：儿子，爸妈晚上有重要的饭局，你爷爷奶奶又出去看表演，今晚你就自己照顾一下你自己吧！读完后，心想：看来今晚得自己做饭给自己吃了。
我连忙带上钱去菜场，转了一圈后就买了点西红柿和鸡蛋回来。于是，我拿出了西红柿，快步走进了厨房。
首先，我拿出两只鸡蛋，相互间“啪”的一声，只见那蛋黄和蛋清随即“哧哧”的流入锅中，我先让鸡蛋在平底锅上煎，但却发现怎么都没法煎，又是忙活了一阵子，这才知道原来是煤气开关忘了开了，于是赶忙把开关拧开。
这时我把煤气的开关拧开，等锅里的鸡蛋熟了，我用锅铲有模有样地将煎蛋“噌噌噌”地取出，此时此刻我的内心很紧张，生怕将煎蛋给弄糊了。
接着，我又拿出了西红柿，把它放在洗菜盆里用开水烫了下，我又将西红柿的皮剥了，小心翼翼地将切盘取出，然后又拿出刀，慢慢地切着西红柿，下了一番功夫后总算是切好了。只不过切得是“参差不齐，大小各异”啊！准备再做一道美味可口的糖拌西红柿。
菜总算是做好了，接着我又把中午的米饭放在微波炉中热了一下，随着微波炉“啪”的一声，米饭热好了。这一顿由我独自下厨且“不一样”的晚餐就大功告成了。我很兴奋的、迫不急待的尝了尝自己的“劳动成果”，心里还是美滋滋的！
在我们的生活中，我们会遇到很多的第一次尝试，只要我们认真尝试地做了，那我们所收获到的正是面对诸多新生事物的勇气和想把事情做好的决心。
大学选修课英文作文【二】
(一髙中语文新课标中有关选修课程的要求
高中课程设置中已有相当长的一段历史，但还没有哪一个课程标准(教学大纲像这次的新课程标准一样对选修课程作了如此详尽的说明,可见国家对选修课程的重视。按照三级课程管理模式，选修课程包括国家选修课程、地方选修课程和校本选修课程。高中语文选修课程的特点已出台的《普通高中语文课程标准(实验>作了详细的说明。
(二新课标理念下语文选修课程的特点
按照《普通高中语文课程标准(实验》的要求，国家高中语文选修课程分为“与散文、小说与戏剧、新闻与传记、语言文字应用、文化论著研读”五个系列，每个系列可设计若干模块，学校应按照各个系列的课程目标，根据本校的课程资源特点和学生的需求有选择地设计模块，开设选修课课程。对于模块的内容组合以及编排方式，学校可以根据实际情况灵活处理。从总体上看，新的高中语文选修课程具有如下特点：
1.性质上的工具性与人文性统一。新的高中语文课程标准明确规定语文课程的性质是工具性与人文性的统一。作为语文课程的重要组成部分之一，选修课程必然体现工具性与人文性的统一,“工具性的核心是培养学生的工具性，人文性的核心是培养学生的人文精神”。高中语文选修课程分为五个系列，即“诗歌与散文、小说与戏剧、新闻与传记、语言文字应用、文化论著研读”，它们的设置就很好地体现了工具性与人文性的结合。
2.设置上的专题性与针对性。课程标准明确规定选修课程的开设应遵循多样选择的原则:既要注重基础性,又要关注学生学习的选择性和差异性。五个课程系列的开设其选材范围必然很广也很自由，但这并不是说选修课程处于无序状态，五个系列可以视为是五个专题,它们之间具有相对的独立性与完整性。语文选修课程的设置除了专题性以外还有一个重要特点就是针对性，这主要表现在三个方面。首先我们知道语文选修课程是针对必修课程的重要补充;其次选修课程是针对语文的实际应用;再次选修课程是针对学生的探究式、研究性学习方式设置的。
3.实施上的灵活性。语文选修课程的实施具有灵活性。我们知道新的课程改革实行三级的'课程管理模式，这就给课程的直接实施者学校带来很大的自主权。灵活性一方面指的是学校可以根据本校的课程资源和学生的学习需求根据系列设计模块，开设选修课。灵活性的另一方面是指学生可以以根据自己的学习需要及能力灵活地选择自己所需的课程，使学生能够在保证统一的基本要求的前提下,满足不同地区，不同层次的学生的多样的广泛的不同要求,这也说明了语文选修课程比必修课程具有更大的发展空间和灵活性。
大学选修课英文作文【三】
I read the Chinese version of “Camille” a few years ago. At that time I was deeply moved by the main character Marguerite Gautier. “Camille” or “The Lady of the Camellias” by Alexandre Dumas, fils, is the story of Marguerite Gautier, a young courtesan, or kept woman, in Paris in the mid 1800's, and how she falls in love with a young man, Armand Duval, and then tries to escape from her questionable past. Unfortunately, it comes back to haunt her and she ends up returning to that life and dies painfully and alone, but with the knowledge that she was a noble woman at heart. When I first began to read the book, I did not care for Marguerite or her attitude or lifestyle, but as I got further into the narrative, I realized that her saucy attitude was a front to cover the lonely woman that she really was. She felt used, abused and unloved, until the gentle Armand Duval came into her life and showed her that he loved her as a person and not for what she could do for him. It must have taken great courage for Marguerite to leave the life she had lived for so long, knowing all along that it was probably too good to be true and would not last indefinitely. And it also showed that Marguerite really loved Armand Duval for she could even change herself for him.
However, happiness didn’t last for long. When M. Duval, Armand's father, came to her, pleading for her to leave Armand to save both Armand's reputation and that of his younger innocent sister, Marguerite saw a way to become pure of heart, if not in body. She felt that it was her duty, because she loved Armand so much, to do this even though it meant giving up her own happiness and hurting Armand temporarily. She reluctantly returned to her former life, knowing that.some day Armand would forgive her. Sadly, she died in debt and basically alone, except for her one female friend, Julie Duprat, who helped her during her illness. She had her journal sent to Armand after her death, explaining why she had made the choices she had. I think Dumas's last few lines about Marguerite being the exception, not the rule were quite true, and I also agreed with his view that while her lifestyle could not be condoned, we as a society assume that all of these type of women are cold and heartless, while this may not always be the case. A person can make the wrong choices in life when they are young, and try to redeem themselves, but sometimes past situations prevent them from changing their lives, even though they desperately wish to do so. This applies to both men and women in many different types of circumstances: involvement in crime; drug or alcohol abuse; gambling; prostitution; financial problems; poor marriage choices; etc. And this is the fact, which exists in the whole society.
As far as the other characters in the book, I think Marguerite was right in saying that no one truly cared about her, but only wanted something from her, the only exceptions being Armand and Julie Duprat. Of course, the Comte de G. and Comte de N. wanted her body and appearance. The
Duke needed to “wake up and smell the coffee” and realize that she could never replace his dead daughter. If he truly cared, he could have helped her leave her lifestyle without “keeping” her himself. And lastly, Prudence was a blood-sucking leech who used Marguerite almost worse than the men. I also think she was jealous of the fact that Marguerite had so much more courage than herself and someone truly loved her.
Last morning, when tiding my bookshelf, I took this book out of the shelf, and a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. I held it against the morning light and blew on it. The soft breeze carried it away. Camille is just like the camellia, she could never escape from the destiny of withering. But it wasn’t her fault; it’s because of the evil of Capitalism and the hideousness of that society.
Suddenly, I remembered a saying: “Women are like the flowers”. Those pretty women are like those beautiful flowers; their delicate beauty makes people feel they are the miracle of life. However, even the God envies their beauty. It seems that beautiful women always have tragic endings. As we are normal persons, even we can see the hideousness of humanity that results in their fate of withering, we can at most ask quietly in our hearts: Where have those beautiful flowers gone? Where have they gone?
The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe
It seemed to be such a coincidence that the night after I finished reading The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe, I was to dine in a restaurant distinctly related to the book itself. This restaurant was no other than the famous American-styled “Friday ’s. ” The reason for mentioning this restaurant is quite straightforward to all the gentlemen, ladies and children who have read the novel and enjoyed it, which is the fact that this restaurant was, most likely, named after the American Native in Robinson Crusoe, called Friday. This restaurant offers very exceptional service, for instance when the waitresses are asked to order dishes they kneel rather than stand, which, unlike the other restaurants I have been to, makes it easier for the customers to hear them speak. Moreover, Friday’s friendly services to the customers help them to make better choices when ordering dishes. I remembered when I went to Friday ’s last time; the waitress kindly described the items on the menu with precise details. It turned out that the combo I initially wanted was designed to be shared among a large group, not to be eaten by one person. I think this restaurant shows many commendable features similar to that of Friday. Friday brought emotional warmth to the people around him with his appealing personality. I think it was this personality that affected Crusoe and made him say that he loved Friday when Crusoe didn ’t express love for his parents, brothers, sisters, or even his wife. “When he espied me, he came running to me, laying himself down again upon the ground, with all the possible signs of an humble, thankful disposition, making many antic gestures to show it to let me know how he would serve me as long as he lived.” This was what Friday did after Crusoe had rescued him from the two savages chasing him. It was easy for me to see why Crusoe had loved Friday. After sometime, Crusoe and Friday were to rescue Friday’s father. When Friday reunited with his father, the scene was easy to move anyone: “It would have moved anyone to tears to have seen how Friday kissed him, embraced him, hugged him, cried, laughed, halloed, jumped about, danced,
sung; and then sung and jumped about again, like a distracted creature. It was a good while before I could make him speak to me.” This is my favourite chapter in the whole book. It is hard to see why Friday is an ex-savage when he can have personalities more praiseworthy than many civilized people, viz. Crusoe himself. “When he (Friday went to him (Friday’s father, he would sit down by him, open his breast, and hold his father’s head close to his bosom, half an hour together, to nourish it; then he took his arms and ankles, which were numbed and stiff with the binding, and rubbed them with his hands.” Furthermore, Friday’s expression of loyalty in asking Crusoe to kill him rather than leave him is more heartfelt than anything Crusoe ever says or does.
Crusoe, on the absolute contrary, seems incapable of deep feelings, as shown by his account of leaving his family—he never shows any emotions. After a moving lecture from Robinson’s father about his future, he still decided to follow his own wandering ambition. Careless was he about the wishes of his parents to keep him alive and prosperous, as he was the only child left in the family. When he came back from the island which he had lived on for twenty eight years, he found that it had been too late to tell his parents that he was still alive, but yet again he did not feel sorry for them; he also did not feel sorry for the two people who had to live in misery for nearly thirty years under the allusion all of their sons were dead. He had the same feelings for his wife: when he was married, he said it was “not either to my disadvantage or dissatisfaction”, implying that it was also neither to his advantage nor his satisfaction. Moreover, after his wife died, Robinson did not think of looking after the three children they had, but went back to the island, which he had lived on for twenty-eight years. It was on this trip which Robinson Crusoe revisited “His Island ” as he called it. I feel that Robinson ’s indifference to his family is almost emotionally cruel.
Before had clearly shown the contrast between Crusoe’s and Friday’s personalities, as when Friday, in his joyful reunion with his father, displayed far more emotion toward his family members than Crusoe, whereas Crusoe never mentions missing his family or dreams about the happiness of seeing them again. I think Defore is very successful in introducing Friday as part of the novel, it makes the whole novel seem much more complete and gripping to the reader, as well as proving that Defoe’s ideology of racism is civilized unlike many other Europeans at that time; natives and savages are not worse than others but can perhaps even be more modern and civilized. Those are the reasons of why I like The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe and Friday.
