怎样适应大学生活的英文作文【一】
《学会适应生活的百变》生活，听似很简单；说生活二字，的确非常简单。但真正的做起来，想存活在这个世上，却很难，除非你适应了这个生活中的一切。 首先，每个人必须有一个完整的家，让我们感受到家的温暖，才会有信心做任何一件事情。然而，在我7岁那年，我失去了父亲。后来，我做一些事情很沮丧，做事不乐观，遇到伤心事就会不由得大哭，也许是个人脾气问题，但我觉得是生活环境。 就在这时候，出现了我人生中第二个觉得重要的东西——友谊。友谊是什么？是伤心时一句亲切的问候，是沉默时一个幽默的笑话，是寒冷是的暖流。是孤独时的陪伴！这是我和两个最要好的朋友结交后总结的道理。 我们之后聊了很多，我把我的事情告诉她们，因为我受到环境的干扰，使我感到局促、压抑，再加上我天生内向，不爱说话，便难免形单影只。她们听了之后，伸出友谊之手，帮我从丧父之痛的阴影中走出来。 以后，我们就像学校里的“三人行”一样，总是在一起，而且不管什么事情都很爱笑，也很像“开心果”。 每个人必须拥有自己的事业，要为将来的梦想而奋斗，去努力，但是现在要好好学习。“书犹药也，善读之可以医愚”是我学习目标的，我读书就像吃药一样，如果不读书，你就像一个白痴，整天只知道吃喝睡，那样人生还有什么色彩？生活还有什么滋味？ 冰心说过“读书可以，但是要读好书，多读书！”读书，能扩展自己的视野，增长自己的知识。别人有较好的语句，取长补短，摘抄过来，同时也要学会运用。 生活中最注重的是诚信；“人而无信，不知其可也。”诚信受到人们的注视不是很好。在2008年9月“三鹿”奶粉被污染，使许多小孩子不幸离世，多少无辜的生命啊！那些人让金钱蒙了眼睛吗？可怜天下父母亲呀！他们心里有多伤心呐！ 让可怜的人们讨回一个公道，他们怎么能适应过来，这生活急速的变化？呜呼！今日欢呼诚信在，只缘妖雾又重来！ 圣湖一如打翻的五味瓶，酸甜苦辣咸五味俱全，现在2009之季，又将接受怎样的挫折和疾病的危害？！现在全国甲型病毒蔓延的很厉害，也预防的积极，在这里，我给大家讲几条预防甲型病毒的忠告：1。长洗手。2。手决不碰脸……除非是吃东西和洗脸。3。每天用温盐水漱口两次。4。多喝温开水或热汤，功效和漱口一样，只是方向相反。随着热水和汤水被喝到胃里的病毒是无法生存，传染或发作的。 大家不用害怕，也不必惊慌，加入命运之神无情的关上了生命的大门，那么我们就点亮自己的心灯，用自己的信念和智慧之光，驱散眼前的黑暗，用勇敢之光熄灭疾病的灯光，用坚强之神去打败命运之神！ 假如生活遇到坎坷，有什么不如意，就想一句俗语：人生不如意之时常一二，明媚之日常八九。用乐观向上的心境去面对生活，体验生活吧！
怎样适应大学生活的英文作文【二】
??应生活儿童寓言故事
一匹狼吃饱了，安逸地躺在草地上睡觉。另一匹狼气喘吁吁地从它身边经过。这使它十分惊奇。它问：“你在追赶羚羊吗?”
“没有!”
“有人在追赶你吗?”
“没有!”
“那你为什么没命地奔跑呢?”
那匹狼说：“狮子要来了。”
狮子要来?听了这话它放下心来，也禁不住笑出了声，“我以为什么了不起的事这么大惊小怪的，原来是狮子要来了，狮
子是我们的朋友，有什么可怕的呢?”
“听说狮子跑得很快!”
“跑得快又有什么了不起的呢，追一只羚羊用不了多大力气!”那匹狼还要说什么，它却不耐烦地摆了摆手，“行了行
了，你去跑你的，我要睡觉了。”那匹狼摇了摇头就走了，它却继续睡它的.大觉。
后来，狮子真的来了，只来了一只，然而由于它的到来，整个草原上的羚羊奔跑速度变得极快。这匹狼不再那么容易得到食物，不久便饿死了。死时它不住地怨恨，是狮子破坏了它宁静的生活。寓言故事
这则寓言所包含的深意，值得我们每个人细细咀嚼、细细品味。居安思危，永不懈怠，竞争永远是生活的真正主题，生活不可能时时处处都适应你，但是你却必须学会时时处处适应生活。也只有这样，你才能永远立于不败之地。
怎样适应大学生活的英文作文【三】
I read the Chinese version of “Camille” a few years ago. At that time I was deeply moved by the main character Marguerite Gautier. “Camille” or “The Lady of the Camellias” by Alexandre Dumas, fils, is the story of Marguerite Gautier, a young courtesan, or kept woman, in Paris in the mid 1800's, and how she falls in love with a young man, Armand Duval, and then tries to escape from her questionable past. Unfortunately, it comes back to haunt her and she ends up returning to that life and dies painfully and alone, but with the knowledge that she was a noble woman at heart. When I first began to read the book, I did not care for Marguerite or her attitude or lifestyle, but as I got further into the narrative, I realized that her saucy attitude was a front to cover the lonely woman that she really was. She felt used, abused and unloved, until the gentle Armand Duval came into her life and showed her that he loved her as a person and not for what she could do for him. It must have taken great courage for Marguerite to leave the life she had lived for so long, knowing all along that it was probably too good to be true and would not last indefinitely. And it also showed that Marguerite really loved Armand Duval for she could even change herself for him.
However, happiness didn’t last for long. When M. Duval, Armand's father, came to her, pleading for her to leave Armand to save both Armand's reputation and that of his younger innocent sister, Marguerite saw a way to become pure of heart, if not in body. She felt that it was her duty, because she loved Armand so much, to do this even though it meant giving up her own happiness and hurting Armand temporarily. She reluctantly returned to her former life, knowing that.some day Armand would forgive her. Sadly, she died in debt and basically alone, except for her one female friend, Julie Duprat, who helped her during her illness. She had her journal sent to Armand after her death, explaining why she had made the choices she had. I think Dumas's last few lines about Marguerite being the exception, not the rule were quite true, and I also agreed with his view that while her lifestyle could not be condoned, we as a society assume that all of these type of women are cold and heartless, while this may not always be the case. A person can make the wrong choices in life when they are young, and try to redeem themselves, but sometimes past situations prevent them from changing their lives, even though they desperately wish to do so. This applies to both men and women in many different types of circumstances: involvement in crime; drug or alcohol abuse; gambling; prostitution; financial problems; poor marriage choices; etc. And this is the fact, which exists in the whole society.
As far as the other characters in the book, I think Marguerite was right in saying that no one truly cared about her, but only wanted something from her, the only exceptions being Armand and Julie Duprat. Of course, the Comte de G. and Comte de N. wanted her body and appearance. The
Duke needed to “wake up and smell the coffee” and realize that she could never replace his dead daughter. If he truly cared, he could have helped her leave her lifestyle without “keeping” her himself. And lastly, Prudence was a blood-sucking leech who used Marguerite almost worse than the men. I also think she was jealous of the fact that Marguerite had so much more courage than herself and someone truly loved her.
Last morning, when tiding my bookshelf, I took this book out of the shelf, and a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. I held it against the morning light and blew on it. The soft breeze carried it away. Camille is just like the camellia, she could never escape from the destiny of withering. But it wasn’t her fault; it’s because of the evil of Capitalism and the hideousness of that society.
Suddenly, I remembered a saying: “Women are like the flowers”. Those pretty women are like those beautiful flowers; their delicate beauty makes people feel they are the miracle of life. However, even the God envies their beauty. It seems that beautiful women always have tragic endings. As we are normal persons, even we can see the hideousness of humanity that results in their fate of withering, we can at most ask quietly in our hearts: Where have those beautiful flowers gone? Where have they gone?
The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe
It seemed to be such a coincidence that the night after I finished reading The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe, I was to dine in a restaurant distinctly related to the book itself. This restaurant was no other than the famous American-styled “Friday ’s. ” The reason for mentioning this restaurant is quite straightforward to all the gentlemen, ladies and children who have read the novel and enjoyed it, which is the fact that this restaurant was, most likely, named after the American Native in Robinson Crusoe, called Friday. This restaurant offers very exceptional service, for instance when the waitresses are asked to order dishes they kneel rather than stand, which, unlike the other restaurants I have been to, makes it easier for the customers to hear them speak. Moreover, Friday’s friendly services to the customers help them to make better choices when ordering dishes. I remembered when I went to Friday ’s last time; the waitress kindly described the items on the menu with precise details. It turned out that the combo I initially wanted was designed to be shared among a large group, not to be eaten by one person. I think this restaurant shows many commendable features similar to that of Friday. Friday brought emotional warmth to the people around him with his appealing personality. I think it was this personality that affected Crusoe and made him say that he loved Friday when Crusoe didn ’t express love for his parents, brothers, sisters, or even his wife. “When he espied me, he came running to me, laying himself down again upon the ground, with all the possible signs of an humble, thankful disposition, making many antic gestures to show it to let me know how he would serve me as long as he lived.” This was what Friday did after Crusoe had rescued him from the two savages chasing him. It was easy for me to see why Crusoe had loved Friday. After sometime, Crusoe and Friday were to rescue Friday’s father. When Friday reunited with his father, the scene was easy to move anyone: “It would have moved anyone to tears to have seen how Friday kissed him, embraced him, hugged him, cried, laughed, halloed, jumped about, danced,
sung; and then sung and jumped about again, like a distracted creature. It was a good while before I could make him speak to me.” This is my favourite chapter in the whole book. It is hard to see why Friday is an ex-savage when he can have personalities more praiseworthy than many civilized people, viz. Crusoe himself. “When he (Friday went to him (Friday’s father, he would sit down by him, open his breast, and hold his father’s head close to his bosom, half an hour together, to nourish it; then he took his arms and ankles, which were numbed and stiff with the binding, and rubbed them with his hands.” Furthermore, Friday’s expression of loyalty in asking Crusoe to kill him rather than leave him is more heartfelt than anything Crusoe ever says or does.
Crusoe, on the absolute contrary, seems incapable of deep feelings, as shown by his account of leaving his family—he never shows any emotions. After a moving lecture from Robinson’s father about his future, he still decided to follow his own wandering ambition. Careless was he about the wishes of his parents to keep him alive and prosperous, as he was the only child left in the family. When he came back from the island which he had lived on for twenty eight years, he found that it had been too late to tell his parents that he was still alive, but yet again he did not feel sorry for them; he also did not feel sorry for the two people who had to live in misery for nearly thirty years under the allusion all of their sons were dead. He had the same feelings for his wife: when he was married, he said it was “not either to my disadvantage or dissatisfaction”, implying that it was also neither to his advantage nor his satisfaction. Moreover, after his wife died, Robinson did not think of looking after the three children they had, but went back to the island, which he had lived on for twenty-eight years. It was on this trip which Robinson Crusoe revisited “His Island ” as he called it. I feel that Robinson ’s indifference to his family is almost emotionally cruel.
Before had clearly shown the contrast between Crusoe’s and Friday’s personalities, as when Friday, in his joyful reunion with his father, displayed far more emotion toward his family members than Crusoe, whereas Crusoe never mentions missing his family or dreams about the happiness of seeing them again. I think Defore is very successful in introducing Friday as part of the novel, it makes the whole novel seem much more complete and gripping to the reader, as well as proving that Defoe’s ideology of racism is civilized unlike many other Europeans at that time; natives and savages are not worse than others but can perhaps even be more modern and civilized. Those are the reasons of why I like The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe and Friday.
怎样适应大学生活的英文作文【四】
Many people simply regard Pride and Prejudice as a love story, but in my opinion, this book is an illustration of the society at that time. She perfectly reflected the relation between money and marriage at her time and gave the people in her works vivid characters. The characters have their own personalities. Mrs. Bennet is a woman who makes great efforts to marry off her daughters. Mr. Bingley is a friendly young man, but his friend, Mr. Darcy, is a very proud man who seems to always feel superior. Even the five daughters in Bennet family are very different. Jane is simple, innocent and never speaks evil of others. Elizabeth is a clever girl who always has her own opinion. Mary likes reading classic books. (Actually she is a pedant. Kitty doesn’t have her own opinion but likes to follow her sister, Lydia. Lydia is a girl who follows exotic things, handsome man, and is somehow a little profligate. When I read the book, I can always find the same personalities in the society now. That is why I think this book is indeed the representative of the society in Britain in the 18th century.
The family of gentleman in the countryside is Jane Austen’s favourite topic. But this little topic can reflect big problems. It concludes the stratum situation and economic relationships in Britain in her century. You can find these from the very beginning of this book.
The first sentence in this book is impressive. It reads: “It is a truth well known to all the world that an unmarried man in poss ession of a large fortune must be in need of a wife”. The undertone is very clear: the foundation of the marriage at that time is not emotion but possession.
People always think that Austen was an expert at telling love stories. In fact, the marriage in her book is not the result of love, but the result of economic needs. After reading this book, I know the truth is that a poor woman must be in need of a husband, a wealthy man.
I couldn’t forget how eager Mrs. Bennet wants to marry off her daughte rs. If you want to know why she is so crazy about these things, I must mention the situation in Britain at that time. Only the eldest son had the privilege of inheriting his father’s possessions. Younger sons and daughters who are used to luxurious lives have no choice but marry a man or woman in possession of a large fortune to continue their comfortable lives. Thus, we can see that getting married is a way to become wealthier, particularly for women without many possessions. Jane Austen told us that money and possession determined everything, including marriage and love in her century.
In “Pride and Prejudice”, the sister of Mr. Bingley strongly opposed his plan of marrying Jane because the Bennets don’t have many possessions and their social positions are much lower than them. From this, we can see there are a lot of obstacles for a not very rich woman to marry a wealthy husband. The society, the relatives would not allow them to get married.
In modern society, although the marriages of economic needs have decreased rapidly, the concept of “money determines everything” is still rooted in some people’s mind. A lot of parents try hard to interfere their children’s marriages. Education background, possessions, jobs remains the main reason that may influence one’s marriage. Marry for money is still a big problem in our
society. We can’t help thinking: can money determine everything?
Austen left this problem for us to think. The genius of Jane Austen lies in this perfect simplicity, the simplicity that reflects big problems. Although Austen was only 21 when she wrote “Pride and Prejudice”, her sharp observation of social lives makes the style of this book surprisingly mature and lively. The plots in her works are always very natural. The development of the plot is as inevitable as a problem in mathematics. I think the depth of Pride and Prejudice is the reason that makes this book prominent and classic. Today, her book still can be the guide telling us the economic relationships both at her time and in modern time.
怎样适应大学生活的英文作文【五】
经常听到不少初一的学生家长这样抱怨：“原先在小学成绩很好，可一上初中成绩就出现滑坡。”对此，教育专家指出，孩子升入初中，将面临着诸如环境、学习方法和学习科目设置的不同，家长应针对小学和初中在这些方面的不同，提前帮助孩子做好调整，让孩子能够更快地适应初中生活。
1.多提问、多思考、多总结
“小学生的学习主要是眼看、手写、记忆。而到了初中，则要生对知识充分理解，并学会用思维去分析这些知识点。”金水区一所中学初一年级班主任张老师说，“进入初中以后，学生要学的内容由直观的、感性的、零碎的知识点变成了更为完整、系统的知识体系，并更加突出能力要求。这就要求学生在学习方法上做出相应调整。”
据了解，由于小学本身知识量少且时间充裕，所以小学老师的教学进度较慢，讲解也更详细具体，往往让学生用较多的时间对新知识进行探究，用多种方式尝试解决。“小学课堂上，往往热热闹闹，学生独立思考的时间比较少，而初中课堂教学则相对安静，留给学生独立思考的时间增多。”张老师说，“初中课堂还要求学生要有一边听讲、一边看书、一边思考的本领，调动多种感官，听课难度自然增加不少。同时，初中科目增多，每个老师的讲课时间都是规定好的，老师必然要改变授课方式。因此，建议家长从现在开始就培养孩子多提问、多思考、多总结的学习习惯。”
2.学会预习，提高主动性
初中老师有时会听到家长抱怨：“我的小孩到初中怎么变得不爱学习了？”对此，教育专家分析，初一学生出现学习兴趣的降低，原因是多方面的，主要原因是小学内容简单、有趣，比较容易有成就感，所以兴趣较浓、积极性高。而中学科目繁多，知识技能较强，获得成就感也较小学要难很多，同时，初中老师的关注也没有小学老师及时，学生的受挫感、无助感、无趣感一旦产生，学习积极性必然下降。
“小学阶段的学习主要依赖老师的安排，学生只要完成写字、造句、背课文这些老师下达的简单‘学习指令’就行。但初中则要求学生自觉主动并且有计划地学习。”多年从事小学升初中衔接教学的张老师说，“一般的学生只是单纯完成学校和老师交给的作业就觉得完成了学习任务，而优秀的学生基本上都有预习课本的学习习惯。”她进一步介绍，每一个学科都有不同的预习要求，与小学有较大不同。掌握正确的预习方法，做好充分的预习工作，能使课堂效率事半功倍。从小学升入初中，要求学生的学习态度实现从“要我学”到“我要学”的转变。
怎样适应大学生活的英文作文【六】
家家一本难念经，想用文字去诉说可是当用文字去速写时却不知道该如何去写我也知道你也很为难我也很想帮你去分担，可是当去面对了有心不在焉了，我真的好像有能替你分担，有不会为此事去争吵不停父母给予我们生命我们应该去好好的对待，可是我们不能没有我们自己的空间我们在这个社会生活，不仅仅是为他们而去活重要的是为我们自己去生活生存。
其实我真的想说一句活这么大真的是白活了，什么时候为自己的儿女考虑过呢，什么事先给自己着想你配么，儿女什么事都为你们想，他们要的不是金钱和物质而是家庭的幸福而是做父母的`爱，是父母真心问候你们这样让我们去如何处理你为你们的事情争争吵吵，我们呢-当然是为你们的事争吵不停，我们能做到的定会尽心去做，至于该用什么样的姿态去活还是让他们自己去领悟吧
该以怎样的一种姿态存在于人世，该以怎样的方式渡过我的人生，该以怎样的态度坦然的面对自己。这些问题我已自问了几许，却怎么也找不到合适的回答和适合自己的理由。
也许，这是我们此生的宿命，怨不了任何人，每每下笔总情不自禁的写着写着就有一种伤感涌上心头。那怕在平常又简单的风和日丽的日子，纵然阳光洒落一身，喜悦也总是在心头淡然而过，微笑的过后总涌动着深深的失落和淡然若失的空虚。也许前一秒那前方的楼群和远处的山岭还在心底灿然如花，可细细的捉摸却感觉山不是山，楼也非楼。那当中也许有无穷的故事与无数的悲喜，心情渐渐的忧伤起来。
这是一种从骨髓里渗出的忧伤，这是我们一生也更改不了的伤痛。非我寡情薄欢，也许只因情太多。一首伤感的歌会让我感伤的回想起遥远了的往昔，一篇感性的文章也会让我心伤，更别提红尘中的悲欢离合，更别说世俗里的流言蜚语。伤感的人总会情不由已的软弱，感性的人总会一往情深的执着自己的多情与寂寞。
怎样适应大学生活的英文作文【七】
《学会适应》生活是不公平的，要去适应它——题记小时候，我们一直生活在父母的羽翼下，根本不需要考虑什么是烦恼，什么是忧愁；每天只需要开开心心的。进入学堂后，我们每天要学习，要做作业。起初，谁愿意？在学校，我们脑子里想的不单有学习，还有反思和苦恼。无数的大考小考如冰雹一般砸向我们，厚重的课本像小山似得堆积在我们面前，可我们终究要站在这山峰上，傲视群雄。可在这过程中，谁曾想过，这就是我们的生活；那谁又知道，在这生活中，我们已经适应，学会了默默承受。然而，当你不出校门时，你会发现，原来自以为良好的你，站在十字路口，人潮一波又一波，汽车一辆又一辆，而你是什么？你就像沙漠中的一粒沙子，可有可无，你的方向在哪儿？你从不知道，仿佛一夜时间，被上帝遗忘了！没有人会上前去安慰你，当你跌倒时，也不会有人伸手扶你。因为这就是生活，它并不容易，而你必须学会适应。初三:张梦悦
怎样适应大学生活的英文作文【八】
先明确一下读书笔记的原则：
1. 不要为了做笔记而做笔记。笔记是帮助构建知识体系的工具。笔记代替不了思考，只能作为思考的补充。
2. 做了笔记，要多看，否则，毫无作用。
3. 不要依赖笔记。笔记的作用就是让你不再需要笔记。
再说一下读书笔记的几个误区：
1. 笔记就是摘抄
摘抄是最没效率的方法。如果需要记录大段的原文以供引用，请拍照。这就是数码时代的便利。
2. 笔记就是给一本书画大纲
这同样是效率极低的方法。一本书的内容，不可能全部都使你感兴趣，能纳入你的知识体系。而且，仅仅因为“这本书里有这样的内容”，就记下自己不喜欢也不需要的东西，会影响做笔记的积极性。
3. 笔记要保存起来，时时翻看
前期确实如此，但如果一本笔记做了几年，当你需要时，还得翻开笔记去查——那这笔记做了有什么用？你的知识是储存在大脑里的，不是储存在笔记里的。笔记只有两种：一种是原文，以备查询（拍照或者用电脑录入即可）；一种是思维架构，帮助完善知识体系，用完就可以丢弃。
说说我的笔记方法。
当你看一本书，读罢一章，觉得信息量巨大，醍醐灌顶，拍案叫绝，恨不得马上把这一章画大纲、抄下来——这时，先别忙着这样做。
先问自己：这一章里面，感兴趣的是哪些？有哪些能纳入自己的知识体系之中？
比如，读古希腊史，你也许不会对克里特宫殿里有什么器皿、迈锡尼人驯养了什么家畜、伊奥尼亚人种植了什么作物感兴趣，你比较感兴趣的是：希波战争的整个过程。它是如何发生的？双方的实力对比如何？有哪些经典的小战役？
那么，带着这个问题，再读一遍，其他无关的信息，不要理会。
读的时候，看到任何一个不懂的词、不清楚的概念，立刻上网查，务必弄明白。
当你把这个过程梳理清楚了，好，眼睛离开书。现在，请你在心中想象一个听众，用你的话把这个知识点解释给他听。
说的过程中，遇到任何不清楚的地方，停下来，上网查，马上弄明白。
等你可以流畅地把“希波战争发生的全过程”解释清楚了，打开笔记本，在本子上记下要点。这些要点，就是你在叙述时，那些比较重要的节点，那些“牵一发而动全身”的点。
下一步，请你思考，这个东西，可以跟知识体系中的.什么联系起来？
你通过这个知识点，可以联想到什么你已经知道了的东西？
以这个点为圆心，把它们记在它的周围。
这就是你关于这个知识点的图式。
好了，这个知识点已经告一段落，请在笔记下面标明日期、书名、页码，然后就可以翻开下一章了。
接下来，只需要每周一次，或者几天一次，翻开这几天做的笔记，根据自己记下的图式，将这个知识点完完整整地回忆出来。
然后，根据周围的联系元素，将它在你整个知识图式中过一遍。
直到你对这个点已经烂熟于心，这则笔记也就完成它的使命了。
文/杨绛（注：钱钟书夫人）
许多人说，钱钟书记忆力特强，过目不忘。他本人却并不以为自己有那么“神”。他只是好读书，肯下功夫，不仅读，还做笔记；不仅读一遍两遍，还会读三遍四遍，笔记上不断地添补。所以他读的书虽然很多，也不易遗忘。
他做笔记的习惯是在牛津大学图书馆（Bodleian他译为饱蠹楼）读书时养成的。因为饱蠹楼的图书向例不外借。到那里去读书，只准携带笔记本和铅笔，书上不准留下任何痕迹，只能边读边记。钟书的“饱蠹楼书记”第一册上写着如下几句：“廿五年（一九三六年）二月起，与绛约间日赴大学图书馆读书，各携笔札，露钞雪纂、聊补三箧之无，铁画银钩，虚说千毫之秃，是为引。”第二册有题辞如下：“心如椰子纳群书，金匮青箱总不如，提要勾玄留指爪，忘筌他日并无鱼。（默存题，季康以狼鸡杂毫笔书于灯下）”这都是用毛笔写的，显然不是在饱蠹楼边读边记，而是经过反刍，然后写成的笔记。
做笔记很费时间。钟书做一遍笔记的时间，约莫是读这本书的一倍。他说，一本书，第二遍再读，总会发现读第一遍时会有很多疏忽。最精彩的句子，要读几遍之后才发现。
钟书读书做笔记成了习惯。但养成这习惯，也因为我们多年来没个安顿的居处，没地方藏书。他爱买书，新书的来源也很多，不过多数的书是从各图书馆借的。他读完并做完笔记，就把借来的书还掉，自己的书往往随手送人了。钟书深谙“书非借不能读也”的道理，有书就赶紧读，读完总做笔记。无数的书在我家流进流出，存留的只是笔记，所以我家没有大量藏书。
钟书的笔记从国外到国内，从上海到北京，从一个宿舍到另一个宿舍，从铁箱、木箱、纸箱，以至麻袋、枕套里出出进进，几经折磨，有部分笔记本已字迹模糊，纸张破损。钟书每天总爱翻阅一两册中文或外文笔记，常把精彩的片段读给我听。我曾想为他补裰破旧笔记，他却阻止了我。他说：“有些都没用了。”哪些没用了呢？对谁都没用了吗？我当时没问，以后也没想到问。
钟书去世后，我找出大量笔记，经反复整理，分出三类。
第一类是外文笔记（外文包括英、法、德、意、西班牙、拉丁文）。除了极小部分是钟书用两个指头在打字机上打的，其余全是手抄。笔记上还记有书目和重要的版本以及原文的页数。他读书也不忽略学术刊物。凡是著名作家有关文学、哲学、政治的重要论文，他读后都做笔记，并记下刊物出版的年、月、日。钟书自从摆脱了读学位的羁束，就肆意读书。英国文学，在他已有些基础。他又循序攻读法国文学，从十五世纪到十九世纪而二十世纪；也同样攻读德国文学、意大利文学的历代重要作品，一部一部细读，并勤勤谨谨地做笔记。这样，他又为自己打下了法、德、意大利的文学基础。以后，他就随遇而读。他的笔记，常前后互相引证参考，所以这些笔记本很难编排。而且我又不懂德文、意大利文和拉丁文。恰逢翻译《围城》的德国汉学家莫宜佳博士（ProfessorDr.MonikaMotsch）来北京。我就请她帮我编排。她看到目录和片断内容，“馋”得下一年暑假借机会又到北京来，帮我编排了全部外文笔记。笔记本共一百七十八册，还有打字稿若干页，全部外文笔记共三万四千多页。
钟书在国内外大学攻读外国文学，在大学教书也教外国文学，“院系调整”后，他也是属于文学研究所外国文学组的。但他多年被派去做别的工作，以后又借调中国古典文学组，始终未能回外文组工作。他原先打算用英文写一部论外国文学的著作，也始终未能如愿。那些外文笔记，对他来说，该是“没用了”。但是对于学习外国文学的人，对于研究钱钟书著作的人，能是没用吗？
第二是中文笔记。他开始把中文的读书笔记和混在一起。一九五二年知识分子第一次受“思想改造”时，他风闻学生可检查“老先生”的日记。日记属私人私事，不宜和学术性的笔记混在一起。他用小剪子把日记部分剪掉毁了。这部分笔记支离破碎，而且都散乱了，整理很费功夫。他这些笔记，都附带自己的议论，亦常常前后参考、互相引证。以后的笔记他都亲自记下书目，也偶有少许批语。中文笔记和外文笔记的数量，大致不相上下。
第三类是“日札”钟书的读书心得。日札想是“思想改造”运动之后开始的。最初的本子上还有涂抹和剪残处。以后他就为日札题上各种名称，如“容安馆日札”、“容安室日札”、“容安斋日札”；署名也多种多样，如“容安馆主”、“容安斋居士”、“槐聚居士”等等；还郑重其事，盖上各式图章。我先还分门别类，后来才明白，这些“馆”、“斋”、“室”等，只是一九五三年“院系调整”后，我家居住的中关园小平房（引用陶渊明《归去来辞》“审容膝之易安”）。以后屡次迁居，在钟书都是“容膝易安”的住所，所以日札的名称一直没改。
日札共二十三册、二千多页，分八百零二则。每一则只有数目，没有篇目。日札基本上是用中文写的，杂有大量外文，有时连着几则都是外文。不论古今中外，从博雅精深的历代经典名著，到通俗的小说院本，以至村谣俚语，他都互相参考引证，融会贯通，而心有所得，但这点“心得”还待写成文章，才能成为他的著作。《管锥编》里，在在都是日札里的心得，经发挥充实而写成的文章。例如：《管锥编。楚辞洪兴祖补注》十八则，共九十五页，而日札里读《楚辞》的笔记一则，只疏疏朗朗记了十六页；《管锥编。周易正义》二十七则，共一百零九页，而日札里读《周易》的笔记，只有一则，不足十二页；《管锥编。毛诗正义》六十则，共一百九十四页，而日札里读《毛诗》的笔记二则，不足十七页。
钟书在《管锥编》的序文中说：“……遂料简其较易理董者，锥指管窥，先成一辑”、 “初计此辑尚有《全唐文》等书五种，而多病意懒，不能急就。”读《全唐文》等书的心得，日札里都有。他曾对我说：“我至少还想写一篇《韩愈》、一篇《杜甫》。”这两篇，想是“不易理董者”，再加“多病意懒”，都没有写出来。日札里的心得，没有写成文章的还不少呢。
这大量的中、外文笔记和读书心得，钟书都“没用了”。但是他一生孜孜石乞石乞积聚的知识，对于研究他学问和研究中外文化的人，总该是一份有用的遗产。我应当尽我所能，为有志读书求知者，把钟书留下的笔记和日札妥为保存。
感谢商务印书馆愿将钱钟书的全部手稿扫描印行，保留着手稿原貌，公之于众。我相信公之于众是最妥善的保存。但愿我这办法，“死者如生，生者无愧”。
杨绛敬序 二零零一年五月四日
