18世纪中叶到20世纪初,经济运行几乎完全凭借市场机制进行调节,其中价格机制的调节则影响着经济运行的始末,市场在自由竞争的观点主导下蓬勃发展。然而,绝对的自由竞争,只是市场经济的一种理想化模式,非完全自由竞争逐渐成为市场经济发展的常规态势。随着工业革命的深入发展和社会化大生产的广泛开展,市场自身难以克服的弱点渐渐暴露出来,尤其是在20世纪20年代末到30年代初的全球经济大危机中,市场失灵给全世界的社会化大生产带来了重创,价格主导、自由竞争等相继失去了调节作用,市场也无法克服和弥补自身的弱点。此时,“外力”介入市场,拯救日渐萎靡的主要经济体,维持经济运行就成为了必然需求。“需求”决定“供给”,国家以其特有的优势当仁不让地成为介入干预市场失灵的供给主体。然而,如同市场失灵一样,当国家充分介入经济生活调整经济秩序、决定资源分配后,政府同样会出现失灵。政府本身的有限性使其在对市场进行过分干预和指导时,必然导致市场自由和竞争的弱化,加之政府本身不追逐经济利益,当面临公共政策失效时,对市场问题处理不恰当会带来后续诸多严重问题。为此,需在法律的框架内约束政府行为,以维护社会整体利益并促进和实现市场的经济自由。
一切法律都是基于某种利益而生,依靠维系社会上某种利益而存在的。经济法就是维护社会利益的法的部门。经济法的产生源于市场长期无序竞争导致市场普遍失去活力。伴随着垄断资本主义的崛起, 市场不正当竞争现象愈演愈烈,在传统的民法、行政法等法律部门调整个人利益和社会利益出现困境并失去优势时,经济法以其特有的功能担负起调整其他法律难以克服的“市场失灵”的历史使命,同时经济法通过维护和实现社会利益最大化的价值选择,最大限度地担负起抵减和弥补因政府干预过大带来的社会经济效率下降等“政府失灵”的历史使命。因而,经济法的出现是历史发展的必然。
经济法是国家根据社会整体的经济发展阶段,针对社会生产和再生产过程进行系统、全面、综合调整的一个法律部门。经济法更多地强调保护社会公共利益,并以此为基本价值目标,通过对公权和私权的平衡协调,促进社会整体效益的提升。这与民法和行政法的价值取向有着非常明确的差异。国家通过经济法的实施来调节社会资源和利益的分配,最大限度地控制和降低不正当的市场竞争,使市场经济秩序回归自由、公平、合理与安全。
When I was a freshman in college I watched the film Gua Sha Treatment for the first time, now I am a junior student and I come back to review the movie from a multicultural aspect, I have many different feelings after watching the film again.
At the beginning of the film, XuDatong is given an award and later he delivers a speech. What makes me impressed most is in his speech he says “one day I will become one of you, a truly successful American, today this award proved that America is a true land of opportunity and I am the living proof of that.” At that moment Xu thinks he has realized his American Dream totally with his lovingly wife and adorable son. However, I think it is ironical that to make a speech like that and I assume it is made on purpose to hind a clue for the story's development. How many non—American people have such a beautiful American dream? One of my classmate studies in American now and before he went aboard he told me his American dream is he can stand at the top of the New York. To be honest, I also dream that one day I can get the Green Card living there happily and successfully maybe working at the Wall Street. When Xu gets the award he thinks he entirely melted in the melting pot neglecting the multicultural obstruct, later the plot goes against the way he thinks. And later Quinlan asked Xu'why you be the scapegoat of your father?' Xu answers 'because he is Chinese.' Then maybe Xu knows that there is always a wide gap between Chinese and American cultures.
The second scene is Xu hit his son Denis because Denis hit the son of xu's boss, at the middle of the film xu tells his boss that he hit his own son is only to show his respect to his boss John Quinlan, that time Quinlan feels puzzled “what a Chinese logic”,yes, American can never understand such a logic full of Chinese characteristic, because they respect everyone including the children, they won't beat a child to please the boss, and there is no such a conception of degree between employee and employer, they feel everyone is equal, which is quite different from china.
Connected to the second scene, the third difference I want to analyze is the care for the children. In America, people pay more attention to the right of children which can be seen from the law—leaving children alone at home is illegal, while in China it is so common that almost everyone may experience such loneliness. And Children Welfare Agency does work in America which shows the importance Americans attach to children's right. What's more, I remember a line 'No one won the case, especially the child.' In my opinion, it also manifests the universal concern from the American public to the children.
The fourth aspect is following the procedure, in the film, more than there times, the people focus on the rule, the law, the procedure. At the Christmas Eve Xu wants to return back to his home pretending as a Santa Claus, what a pity, the security recognizes him and persuades 'you are always a good tenement, never causes troubles for me.' And another scene is at the end of the film , the judge says 'I have to follow the procedure.' However, in China people always have to ask for a favor to do something, and later you have to pay back the favor,for myself, I prefer the American style, strict to the procedure.
The fifth and the last point is the humors, Quinlan says 'you can't fall, your health security is the company paid.' 'Datong, welcome home, maybe next time, you can come from the front door.' 'dady, why you come from the window' ' because we don't have a chimney.' I really adore this distinguished American humor, especially in dangerous situations, which is quite rare in China.
That's my whole reaction to Gua Sha Treatment.
……又……又……,……一面……一面……,……有时……有时……,……一会儿……一会儿……,……既……又……
(一保障经济权利的相对自由
市场活动的基本原则是, 以财产权为核心,以维护经济自由为目的,排除国家权力的越界侵犯,体现经济自由的内涵。以财产权为代表的私权在得到尊重和保护的同时,不应无限扩大和推崇。当私权损害或可能损害其他人的权利和公共利益,甚至违反了法律的规定时,国家就应当对这些行为进行适度的干预和规范,让私权在法律秩序下实现相对的经济自由。经济权利的相对自由不仅彰显了国家在法治社会里的价值目标,也是经济法调整和干预市场秩序的重要平衡点。
(二促进市场竞争秩序的相对公平
自由平等的市场竞争决定了市场经济的效率和发展水平,而经济法的终极价值目标之一就是要确保司法环境的平等公正和市场竞争秩序的自由公平。
市场持续发展的关键动力来源于自由竞争能否发挥主要作用,经济法的存在和发展正是为了保障这一基本需求而设置了均衡的调整规则,以确保市场竞争者之间公平竞争。通过经济法的约束和调整实现经营者与经营者之间、经营者与消费者之间的利益平衡,使个体行为和国家行为在合理的范围内进行,从而促进市场竞争的自由公平。通过市场诚信和符合规则的竞争,维持自由公平的市场竞争秩序,对不正当竞争行为进行约束和制裁,最大限度地保障市场竞争秩序的自由公平。
(三建立适应经济社会发展的利益平衡机制
经济法以社会公共利益为其法益目标,以“社会本位” 为其核心价值, 在确保市场自由选择和个体利益得到充分尊重与满足的同时,也应维护社会公共利益,实现社会利益的基本平衡。规定国家机关在各个经济领域的权限范围,不得超越公民基本权利是国家干预权行使的底线,是公民权利与政府权力之间维持平衡的标尺,也是维护公共利益的必要前提。规定公民在法律面前人人平等,是公民权利和义务之间维持平衡的重要体现,不可为实现自我利益最大化而侵犯他人权益,公民在行使自己权利的同时不得超越经济法的规定和边界。个人自由、社会正义、民主法治、社会福利及建立利益平衡机制是经济法的重要目标。因此,对部分公民权利和政府职责进行的必要限制和约束是经济法发展的应有之义。
(四实现经济自由与经济秩序的辩证统一
自由和秩序作为自治和他治,是一对与生俱来的矛盾,超出一定秩序范围的自由从来都是不存在的,而社会经济发展又不断引出新的自由要求,对旧的秩序时时构成挑战和冲击。经济法作为调和、平衡经济自由与经济秩序矛盾,实现经济自由与经济秩序统一的必要手段,目的是建立起一个相对稳定和公平的市场竞争秩序,维护经济自由和民主,凭借国家干预和经济法的约束来限制个体的无度自由和滥用权利。同时,经济法的设定必须符合一定的经济规律,必须建立在经济性和专业性的基础之上,并通过协调、引导来实现经济自由、经济平等和经济民主的辩证统一,进而为建立经济秩序和促进经济自由提供可靠的法律保障。
© 2022 xuexicn.net,All Rights Reserved.