为什么会这样?与我能做什么?,这是我们遇到问题之后常会出现的两种心态。从表面上看,这两种反应都是自然而发,贴合常情,然而往深里去想,你却会发现,这两种想法代表着两种截然相反的工作和生活态度。而《问题背后的问题》一书如暮鼓晨钟,用一种清越敦实的声音敲醒了我,让我明白的明白了提高个人职责意识,是解决所有问题的核心。
俗话说众人拾柴火焰高,也有众人同心,其利断金的说法,可见群众的力量之大。(veryok但是如果试想一下,那些负责拾柴的总是想着拾柴的辛苦,而看火的又不断的抱怨看火的无聊,这把火还能烧的那么旺吗?是的,群众是由我们这样一个个的人组成的,如果人失去了主观能动性,那群众力量的叠加效果又怎样能体现的出来?为什么一个和尚、两个和尚都有水喝,三个和尚就没水喝呢?这归根结底还是一个职责心的问题,如果个个和尚都是有职责心,懂得主动做事的和尚,泉水自然是用之不竭的。
不积跬步,无以至千里;不积小流,无以成江海。我们平时的工作就是从一点一滴的小事做起,很多人都重复着平凡的工作,尤其是我们图书馆人。我们每排好一本书,每服务一个读者,每做完一个方案,无不都包含着对馆里、对岗位、对自我的一份职责。我们的工作,需要一份默默地坚持,还有一份对工作和生活用心的态度。
在这本书中,有句话给我的启发最大,就是把焦点从他人与周遭环境中移转开,聚焦在自我本身如何能做得更好上方,这才是最有益于问题解决的做法。
是的,相较于被动地期望环境向对自我有益的方向发展,还不如主动地改变自我,实际上,人唯一能改变的只有自我。当我们学会谦逊地生活和工作,为了工作随时准备改变自我的现状,包括思想、潜力、习惯等等,我们就会发现,我们的付出换来的是个人的进步和境界的提升,这将是我们人生最宝贵的财富之一。
在仔细地看完了这本书后,有很多想法在脑袋里转圈,也有一些东西沉淀在了脑海里,忽然间记起了前国足主教练老米的那句明言态度决定一切!
This is a story about a special and unreserved woman who has been exposed to a hostile environment but continuously and fearlessly struggling for her ideal life. The story can be interpreted as a symbol of the independent spirit.
It seems to me that many readers’ English reading experience starts with Jane Eyer. I am of no exception. As we refer to the movie “Jane Eyer”, it is not surprising to find some differences because of its being filmized and retold in a new way, but the spirit of the novel remains----to be an independent person, both physically and mentally.
Jane Eyer was a born resister, whose parents went off when she was very young, and her aunt,the only relative she had,treated her as badly as a ragtag. Since Jane’s education in Lowwood Orphanage began, she didn’t get what she had been expecting——simply being regarded as a common person, just the same as any other girl around. The suffers from being humiliated and devastated teach Jane to be persevering and prize dignity over anything else.As a reward of revolting the ruthless oppression, Jane got a chance to be a tutor in Thornfield Garden. There she made the acquaintance of lovely Adele and that garden’s owner, Rochester, a man with warm heart despite a cold face outside. Jane expected to change the life from then on, but fate had decided otherwise: After Jane and Rochester fell in love with each other and got down to get marry, she unfortunately came to know in fact Rochester had got a legal wife, who seemed to be the shadow following Rochester and led to his moodiness all the time ----Rochester was also a despairing person in need of salvation. Jane did want to give him a hand, however, she made up her mind to leave, because she didn’t want to betray her own principles, because she was Jane Eyer. The film has finally got a symbolist end: Jane inherited a large number of legacies and finally returned. After finding Rochester ’s misfortune brought by his original mad wife, Jane chose to stay with him forever.
I don’t know what others feel, but frankly speaking, I would rather regard the section that Jane began her teaching job in Thornfield as the film’s end----especially when I heard Jane’s words “Never in my life have I been awaken so happily. ” For one thing, this ideal and brand-new beginning of life was what Jane had been imagining for long as a suffering person; for another, this should be what the audiences with my views hoped her to get. But the professional judgment of producing films reminded me to wait for a totally different result: There must be something wrong coming with the excellence----perhaps not only should another section be added to enrich the story, but also we may see from the next transition of Jane’s life that “Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you would get.”
What ’s more, this film didn’t end when Jane left Thornfield. For Jane Eyer herself, there should always be somewhere to realize her great ideal of being independent considering her fortitude, but for Rochester, how he can get salvation? The film gives the answer tentatively: Jane eventually got back to Rochester. In fact, when Jane met Rochester for the first time, she scared his horse and made his heel strained, to a certain extent, which meant Rochester would get retrieval because of Jane. We can consider Rochester’s experiences as that of religion meaning. The fire by his frantic wife was the punishment for the cynicism early in his life. After it, Rochester got the mercy of the God and the love of the woman whom he loved. Here we can say: human nature and divinity get united perfectly in order to let such a story accord with the requirements of both two sides. The value of this film may be due to its efforts to explore a new way for the development of humanism under the faith of religion.
读完《问题背后的问题》这本书,掩卷沉思,不经意回想起了自我成长中所走的每一步,豁然之中有一种感悟:人生道路的许多不如意、挫折、失败,其实都是能够避免的,从《QBQ问题背后的问题》书中的案例均可找到其共同原因---那就是问题出现后未对自我彻底的剖析、归纳、总结,从中找出原因,进而改善,避免犯重复性的错误,而是常常责怪他人,抱怨客观环境,最终问题重复性的出现,构成恶性循环,结果可想而知。
前中国足球教练米卢有句话:“态度决定一切”,本人十分认同,这句话强调的其实也是一种个人职责,在自身中找原因从而采取用心主动的态度的一种正面思维方式。
目前许多公司都在讲:团队建设、团队精神、大局利益。但请不要忘了:团队是由各个个体组成的,如果个人缺乏对团队的认同感,自我意识强烈,个人目标与团队目标达成不了共识,又何来团队合作,而且团队中的大多数人毕竟都是凡人,不是伟人***、名人韦尔奇那样的优秀领导者,能够有效的影响他人,使一个国家、一个公司、一个团队在发展过程中能不断的修正偏差,引领正确的方向,共同朝既定的目标迈进。既然如此,我们就就应承认现状,认清自我,用心主动的改变自我,使自我的行为、目标、价值观贴合团队组织的行为、目标、价值观。(当然你是优秀的天才领导者,另当别论。
相反推诿、抱怨、拖延、执行不力已成为现代管理所不允许的,现代管理者需要的是正面思维,敢于承担职责,用心行动,有效解决问题。不是要求别人为你做些什么,而是改变自我,自我能为别人做些什么,此刻是一个讲究职责的时代,我们每个都就应做个有职责感的人。
“改变世界很难,改变自我容易,心若改变,态度就会改变。”而态度决定一切,所以改变要从我做起,从点滴做起,持之以恒,方可有所作为!
医疗卫生事业的发展使得人口出生率和成活率迅速提高,死亡率大幅度下降,引起全球人口急剧增长。
世界人口递增的时间越来越短。工业革命时期1800年到1839年,世界人口由10亿增加到20亿,到1960年为30亿,1975年为40亿,1987年7月为50亿。发展中国家占世界人口比重由50年代的66,8%上升到80年代的74,9%。至20xx年全球人口增加到61亿,其中85%的增加大多集中在亚洲、非洲和拉丁美洲。
而在未来的30年中,人口增加率将会减缓,到20xx年时,世界人口的总数将为80亿。人口增长率将达到历史性的低点。
从文化教育程度看,目前,全球有9,6亿文盲,其中1,3亿儿童。发达国家许多成绩优秀的高中毕业生不愿选择理工等相对艰苦的专业,使得在培养艰苦岗位上所需合格人才陷于困境。发展中国家无力培养更多的人才,而人才从发展中国家向发达国家的流失更加剧了发展中国家的人才危机。以印度为例,到1990年为止,在外谋生的科学家和熟练技术人员达41万,到20xx年达54万。
从健康的.角度看人口素质,许多疑难病、奇特病的增加表明人口素质的下降。如艾滋病、变异链球菌、奥罗凯病毒、登革热病毒、非典病毒等,正以惊人的速度吞噬人类的生命。
发达国家的人口问题:人口总规模萎缩,人口老龄化。1991年,瑞典老人比重18%,英国16%,日本12%。造成的问题:①社会经济负担加重②劳动力老龄化③生产率低④社会问题多。
发展中国家的人口问题:农业人口多,出生率高,“越穷越生,越生越穷”恶性循环。引发的社会问题是,①贫穷与饥饿②失业③奇型城市化,其后果是失业加剧,人口分布奇型,出现大量工棚区。
Many people simply regard Pride and Prejudice as a love story, but in my opinion, this book is an illustration of the society at that time. She perfectly reflected the relation between money and marriage at her time and gave the people in her works vivid characters. The characters have their own personalities. Mrs. Bennet is a woman who makes great efforts to marry off her daughters. Mr. Bingley is a friendly young man, but his friend, Mr. Darcy, is a very proud man who seems to always feel superior. Even the five daughters in Bennet family are very different. Jane is simple, innocent and never speaks evil of others. Elizabeth is a clever girl who always has her own opinion. Mary likes reading classic books. (Actually she is a pedant. Kitty doesn’t have her own opinion but likes to follow her sister, Lydia. Lydia is a girl who follows exotic things, handsome man, and is somehow a little profligate. When I read the book, I can always find the same personalities in the society now. That is why I think this book is indeed the representative of the society in Britain in the 18th century.
The family of gentleman in the countryside is Jane Austen’s favourite topic. But this little topic can reflect big problems. It concludes the stratum situation and economic relationships in Britain in her century. You can find these from the very beginning of this book.
The first sentence in this book is impressive. It reads: “It is a truth well known to all the world that an unmarried man in poss ession of a large fortune must be in need of a wife”. The undertone is very clear: the foundation of the marriage at that time is not emotion but possession.
People always think that Austen was an expert at telling love stories. In fact, the marriage in her book is not the result of love, but the result of economic needs. After reading this book, I know the truth is that a poor woman must be in need of a husband, a wealthy man.
I couldn’t forget how eager Mrs. Bennet wants to marry off her daughte rs. If you want to know why she is so crazy about these things, I must mention the situation in Britain at that time. Only the eldest son had the privilege of inheriting his father’s possessions. Younger sons and daughters who are used to luxurious lives have no choice but marry a man or woman in possession of a large fortune to continue their comfortable lives. Thus, we can see that getting married is a way to become wealthier, particularly for women without many possessions. Jane Austen told us that money and possession determined everything, including marriage and love in her century.
In “Pride and Prejudice”, the sister of Mr. Bingley strongly opposed his plan of marrying Jane because the Bennets don’t have many possessions and their social positions are much lower than them. From this, we can see there are a lot of obstacles for a not very rich woman to marry a wealthy husband. The society, the relatives would not allow them to get married.
In modern society, although the marriages of economic needs have decreased rapidly, the concept of “money determines everything” is still rooted in some people’s mind. A lot of parents try hard to interfere their children’s marriages. Education background, possessions, jobs remains the main reason that may influence one’s marriage. Marry for money is still a big problem in our
society. We can’t help thinking: can money determine everything?
Austen left this problem for us to think. The genius of Jane Austen lies in this perfect simplicity, the simplicity that reflects big problems. Although Austen was only 21 when she wrote “Pride and Prejudice”, her sharp observation of social lives makes the style of this book surprisingly mature and lively. The plots in her works are always very natural. The development of the plot is as inevitable as a problem in mathematics. I think the depth of Pride and Prejudice is the reason that makes this book prominent and classic. Today, her book still can be the guide telling us the economic relationships both at her time and in modern time.
法律伴随着我们成长,如果有人硬要违反,我们就应该去警告他,不能任由他纵横。同样的事情也遭遇过。
有一天,爸爸邀请了他的几个好朋友来我们家做客,他们都开了小轿车过来。爸爸事先就准备好了饮料、啤酒……叔叔几个一来,跟爸爸寒暄了几句,便热热闹闹的坐在凳子上吃起饭来。叔叔几个开样子很喜欢喝酒,他们开始只喝了几小口,我看见了,联系了一下法律知识,知道这是犯法的,连忙劝道:“叔叔,你们都开了车过来,要开车回家,应该不能喝酒的,如果你们喝了酒要开车的话,那就犯法了,法律是神圣的,我们每个人都应该遵循!”叔叔们听了我的话,好像不在乎似得,继续喝。在一旁的爸爸听了,觉得有道理,用四川方言跟他的朋友们说:“少喝点,喝点饮料。”他们看在是爸爸的\'面子是,连忙放下啤酒,用杯子重新到起了饮料……同学们,像这样把法律法则置之度外的话,就应该受到惩罚,如果看到了,当时就应该提醒他,不能让他放肆。
以下便是值得表扬的事件。
公路上,红绿灯按秩序的工作着。一辆辆机动车在公路上奔驰着。我坐在一辆白色的面包车,一家人准备去泉州闽台缘博物馆玩耍。我们在离红绿一百米时,司机正在聚精会神的开车。“嗖”的一声,就在红灯出现的下一秒,面包车司机冲了过去,糟糕,闯红灯了。司机毫不在意,我愤怒极了,“叔叔,你为什么要闯红绿灯呢?”“我……我看错了,小朋友,我一定会去交警大队去承认错误的!”……一下车,突然发现博物馆的喷泉好艳丽呀!法律法则就应该像司机一样主动认错,司机对法律负责任的态度值得我们表扬!
是呀,法律是公正的,是神圣的,我们就应该遵守法律法规,在犯法的情况下应该主动认错!
© 2022 xuexicn.net,All Rights Reserved.