After reading Jane Eyre, I think Jane Eyre is a great woman. Through a serious of troublesome situations between Jane Eyre and Mr. Rochester, the author set up a great female image before readers: insisting on maintaining an independent personality, pursuing individual freedom, advocating equality of life and being confident before hard conditions.
Her early life at Gateshead was terrible, everyone seems harsh on her. She survives her parents at an early age, and has to live with her ugly aunt and three cousins. She suffers large quantities of bad conditions that others may not experience. However, she does not give up in despair, she does not destroy herself mentally, instead, Jane Eyre is filled with unlimited confidence, and she is a strong spirit, a victory over the inner personality.
She is then forced to send to Lowood Institution, unfortunately, life there turns out to be terrible, too. She is still under physical and spiritual punishment. Mr Brocklehurst insults her to be a liar before all pupils and teachers. But there she meets one sincere friend Helen Burns and one sincere teacher Miss Temple. They always treat her well. She then behaves very well and get many people’s recognition. Six years later, she makes a teacher there.
After two years teaching life at Lowood Institution, she plans to leave there to pursuit her own life and happiness. She was in a position of governess through a letter from Thornfield. Her life was totally changed after that. There she met a lovely girl, Adele and her master, Mr. Rochester. She has a special feeling about them. With the development of the plots, Jane Eyre succeed a large sum of money from his uncle, and through all bitter things which was caused by Rochester’s wife in Thornfield, Jane Eyre and Mr.Rockester finally get married and lead an ideal life.
I think Jane Eyre is an autobiography of Charlotte Bronte. Although the story is made up, the heroine and people's life and the environment in the story were taken from the details of real people around and experience. Charlotte Bronte described a young girl’s struggling life to express her inner thought: everyone is equal regardless of his or her gender. The uniqueness of Jane Eyre is not only lies in its truth and the strong artistic appeal, but also lies in the particular female image. The love story of Rochester and Jane Eyre vividly shows the fire of passion and sincere heart strongly reveals their notions of love. She looks down upon the upper class who only use their power to do what they intend to do and laughs at their stupid to show her independent character and beauty dream.
In the actual fact, she wasn’t pretty, even herself knows that, and of course, the ordinary appearance make others have bad opinion on her, even her own aunt dislike her. And some others even thought that she was easy to look down upon and tease, but she was totally much more than “the plain and ugly tutor”. And as a little governess she said to her master: “Do you think my poor, obscure, plain, and little has led me to be a soulless and heartless person? You have done a wrong thing!”Underneath these lines sees the equality of human in Jane Eyre’s mind. She has affection towards her master, Mr. Rochester, but when she finds that he has already had a wife, she leaves him and her love place without consideration. Although God did not grant her a beauty and wealth person, instead, God gave her a kind mind and a thoughtful brain. Her idea of equality and self-respect impressed us extremely much and make us feel the power inside her small body.
In my mind, a person’s beauty on the face can only make others feel that he or she is attractive or charming, if his or her mind isn’t the same noble as the appearance, beauty of this kind cannot last for a long time, because other people will one day find that the beauty which had charmed them was only a superficial one, it’s not sincere, they will not like the person any more. For a long time, only a person’s great virtue, a noble soul, a beautiful heart can be called as an everlasting beauty, just as Albert Einstein said: “A person must be held accountable for their biological survival or all of the meaning or purpose, from an objective point of view, I think it is ridiculous. Everyone can have a certain ideal, which determines the ideal and his efforts to determine the direction. In this sense, I never easy and the enjoyment of life as an end in itself, the ethical basis of this, I call it the ideal pigsty. I lit up the road, and continue to give me new courage to face up to the pleasure of the ideal life is good and the beautiful and true. If it were not for like-minded between the warm feelings, but focus on the objective world, the arts and sciences in the field of work will never reach the target, and then it seems to me that life would be empty. There are efforts to pursue the goal of the vulgar - property, vanity, luxury living, I think it is despicable.”
Now I get a better understanding of what real beauty is, as we are all human-beings, so we should distinguish whether a man is noble or vulgar.
Jane Eyre’s story makes me thinking about our future life and I learn much from her experiences, I know everyone will have a better tomorrow if one holds his beliefs, regardless of one’s status and the situation he is in.
在《基地》系列里,作者阿西莫夫大约描述了三十个左右的星际文明。这些文明各有各的特色。但如果我们忽略那些稀奇或不稀奇的强大科技,就会发现这些表面千奇百怪的文明,其现实基础仍是二十世纪四十年代的世界各国(重点是欧美大国)。只是在星际文明这个大背景下,阿西莫夫从艺术的视角对文明的特点进行了浓缩、放大、提炼以及极端化。
在三十多个星际文明中,我印象最深的有两个:盖娅生命体和索拉利文明。它们一个极度统一,一个极度自由,可以理解为人类社会组织形式的两个极端。
盖娅生命体的进化,使得在盖娅星球上的所有有机物和无机物,都是一个整体。所有物体都有意识,所有的意识都可以实现共享。每个个体不但是个体,更是共体。以集体之意志为意志,从而实现极度的`统一。
索拉利文明展现的则是极度的自由。在一个三倍于地球体积的星球上,只生活了几千索拉利人成熟体。他们有着极端先进的生物基因改造技术,从而进化出了“转化叶突”,一个个体利用“转化叶突”所转换的能量,足以支持成千上万的机器人用于管理土地、家务等事。他们相信“他人即是地狱”这样的信条,所以连同类也不相来往。为了达到这点,实现真正的自由,他们以基因改造进化技术进化出雌雄同体。为了自身之自由,他们不谋任何形式的扩张。
在《基地》系列的最后一本《基地与地球》中,阿西莫夫以各种场景和讨论,似乎在说服读者或他自己,盖娅文明虽和人类所向往的自由完全背道而驰,但也是可以接受的。甚至在最后,他设计出一个“不需要完全信息就可以做出正确选择”的崔维兹进行选择的场景。崔维兹要选择以盖娅生命体作为蓝本建立新人类社会组织结构,或选择索拉利文明建立人类新秩序。最后,他选择了盖娅。其原因就是,在即将到来的宇宙侵略中,他们需要统一意志!
也许,这就是阿西莫夫借《基地》系列、“心理学史”以及崔维兹、机器人丹尼尔、吉斯卡,来对人类社会组织形式的思考做出的结论。在二十世纪40年代二战一触即发的情况下,阿西莫夫对世界各国的呼吁。现在的科技已经在正是他所提出的“学科交融”了。如果阿西莫夫一直生活至今,不知他所做出的带有强烈寓言性质的结尾会如何修改呢?
自从有了孩子,我常常陷入一种两难的境地,既想当个好妈妈,把孩子陪好照顾好,又想把自己管理好,工作好,想学的能去学,想做的能去做。唉,两头都想做好,几乎是一件不太可能完成的任务。
每天一睁开眼,我就祈祷,“孩子孩子千万别醒。”可早睡早起的她常常和我一起睁眼。勾着你的脖子,眼泪婆娑,一个劲的叫妈妈。“妈妈要上班,下班陪你玩,好不好?”真是一句挺无奈的话。
下了班,一溜小跑,赶快回家。如果有个小聚会,得挣扎半天,打个电话都气虚。
那么放不下,当个全职妈妈好了。唉,当过的人都知道,那感觉真是把你彻底淹没掉。自己的时间?想得美!自己的兴趣?放下吧。自己想做点什么?想都别想!自己?没有自己,只有妈妈。
所以,尽管有那么些内疚,我还是愿意上班,享受这份有点喘息的生活。
我一直以为,上面这种情绪是我个人特有的。源于太想做个好妈妈而不得的负罪感,还有那颗躁动不死的心。
看了这本书,心里释然了,原来这感觉不是我独创的,很多女人都这样,如此成功的谢丽尔·桑德伯格也纠结。
作为facebook的首席执行官,谢丽尔·桑德伯格可能更能女性、企业管理者和妈妈这几个角色的不协调,即使美国的文明程度比较高,平等早已深入人心,即使老公对她没有任何责怪和谴责,而且愿意承担更多家庭事务,她还是难以面对自己的道德审判。
谢丽尔·桑德伯格没有把这种审判加到自己的身上,她更敏锐的察觉到在男女平等大旗下,男女诸多不平等。她深入的分析了几代人,几代女人们面临的选择。职场的高层为什么女人越来越少?是什么阻挡了女人的职位晋升?研究数据从来不支持女性脑袋不够使,那么到底是什么成为女性的玻璃天花板?
是认识,男人对女人的认识,还有女人对自己的认识。我想这是一种集体潜意识。它们不被放在桌面上谈论,却时时刻刻环绕我们。它们就像空气,无所不在的影响你。就算你可以忽略别人的观点,也没有办法置身事外,局限住女人的常常是我们自己。
谢丽尔·桑德伯格鼓励每个女人成为更好的自己,她给职场女性提出了很多现实的建议,很贴心也很实用。对我来说,这份坦白更可贵。能否看清并接受那些让我内疚、焦虑的情绪,能不能在比较苛责的环境里放自己一马。万事完美只是一个神话,有些事情马虎,有些事情才能绚丽。能不能做和能不能放下一样重要。
如果没有这百感杂陈的味道,做妈妈也未免太单薄。也许,正是那些内疚和焦虑,是我应该静静心,好好品一品的味道。在冥想的入定时刻,真该问问自己,为什么你对自己那么不满意?
今天把影响力这本书读完了。它不像一般的书籍总是很肤浅的在表象探讨问题,这本书的可贵之处就是透过一个很普遍的现象然后很深刻的探讨现象背后的本质,让人很受启发。但技巧是中立的,如同刀是中立的。如果有人用刀来伤人,那么刀就是凶器如果用来切菜,那么它就是工具。
这本书主要讲了六方面的内容。
首先讲到互惠原理。互惠原理认为我们应该尽量以相同的方式报答他人为我们所做的一切。简单地说,就是对他人的某种行为,我们要以一种类似的行为去回报。如果人家给了我们某种好处,我们就应该以另外一种好处来报答他人的恩惠,而不能对此无动于衷,就像孔子说的要以德报德,而不是以怨报德。我们身边的很多人都运用了此原理来为自己谋取利益。病人想要医生在做手术时能更认真更细心的照顾,就塞很多的红包,医生由于受到好处,根据互惠原理他们做手术时会更认真细心。企业为了更好的销售业绩,往往贿赂一些官员或者一些采购部经理,而这些官员或采购部经理由于互惠原理会给这些企业更多的订单和利润。
第二个是承诺和一致原理。此原理认为一旦我们做出了某个决定,或选择了某种立场,就会面对来自个人和外部的压力迫使我们的言行与它保持一致。就像有宗教信仰的人,他们在公众场合总是表现的很虔诚,因为要受他们信仰的约束。比如和尚在饭店吃饭如果大鱼大肉的吃,人家就认为他不是一个虔诚的信徒。
第三是社会认同原理。此原理认为我们进行是非判断的标准之一就是看到别人是怎么想的,尤其是当我们要决定什么是正确的行为时。当很多人都去做某事的时候,原本觉得不对的事,只因做的人多了,这事也变成了对的了。在初中的时候,我们的英语老师订婚了还没有结婚就先***了,当时她挺着个大肚子来给我们上课,很多学生老师背后都对她指指点点。现在很多女人订婚了然后挺着个大肚子走进结婚的殿堂,也没有人说三道四,原因就是这太普遍了,没必要大惊小怪的。这样的转变,就是做的人多了,自然的被认同了。第四是喜好原理。人们总是愿意答应自己认识和喜爱的人提出的要求,这应该是很自然的事,没有谁会对此感到惊讶。第五是权威原理。权威所具有的强大力量会影响我们的行为,即使是具有独立思考能力的成年人也会为了服从权威的命令而做出一些完全丧失理智的事情来。让我知道了,你要想影响别人的看法就先亮明身份,你不想影响别人的看法就不要告诉他你的地位。第六是短缺原理。“机会越少,价值就越高”的短缺原理会对我们的行为造成全面的影响,害怕失去某种东西的想法比希望得到同等价值东西的想法对人们的激励作用更大。
我是一个不太愿意从众的人,通常别人鼓掌,不会引起我的鼓掌,我只会对自己认为值得的情况给予掌声,这使我主观上去忽略别人对其他事情的看法,也忽略了别人的感受。
如果我是生活在群次很低的人当中,我的这种做法会给我带来一部分的收获与不同,可能让我鹤立鸡群,让我变得出众,但是,一旦我生活在群次高的人当中的时候,结果就完全相反了,比如,别人都去上课,而我在寝室里逃课,别人都去参加讲座,我却悠哉的找朋友玩,我的这种做法遵循着一致性原理,让我为仍然做着出众事情而感到与众不同,使我失去了应该有的从众感。
© 2022 xuexicn.net,All Rights Reserved.