暑假兼职英文作文大学【一】
暑假兼职英文作文大学【二】
《1984》是一部经典的反乌托邦小说，一个在老大哥的独裁之下完全的思想操控社会，读完后我们不由得发问，我们所知道的“真相”究竟是我们在探索与实践中得到的，还是某个集体经过精心设计和操作后，将其故意摆在我们面前，刻意让我们发现后，操纵我们的思想呢?
普通民众往往是信息的接受者，媒体成为了我们对于外界信息接受的最广泛渠道，主流媒体放出的新闻往往代表了“真相”，而在这则新闻浓重的标题之下，当事人的声音往往被压抑、甚至抹***，试图去探求我们目所不能及领域的人，也随着时间渐渐淡去，石沉大海，而接收不到信息的我们，默默认定了这份无法被确认的真实。这是一种对于获取真相自由的抹***。
自由是什么，“2+2=4”就是起码的自由，人是追求自由的生物，在密闭的环境中，只要存在一条缝隙，人都会拼命向着那点光爬去，所以在重压之下被限制的自由无法控制体制中的人，而最好的方法就是，将这份自由本身进行限定，让人们在一套体系之中肆意追求他们渴望的自由，怀抱着大量“被设计的真相”，沉浸在对统治者的感恩与赞颂之中。在《1984》中，奥威尔为我们构筑了一个完美的集权统治社会，通过“思想警察”这一重要系统设定，他们对于跑出体制之外的人强制进行洗脑，用近乎残酷的方式扭转他们的思想，只留下彻底的认同，彻底毁灭个体思维的多样性，使本真的思维只存在于统治者的脑中，人们宛如家畜一样简单地活着。
谈及《1984》就忍不住说起《肖申克的救赎》，典狱长将监狱设计成了他的小王国，老布在入狱50年之后反而对外界的“自由”充满了恐惧，就像在鸟笼中的鸟儿，尽管憧憬着广阔的蓝天，但一旦走出了牢笼，就不再知道世界的边缘在哪里，走向自由的世界，意味着失去曾经的“了解”，变得孤立无援。人最可怕的，就是将自身化为体制的一部分，一方面厌恶着体系剥夺他的'自由，另一方面却又害怕失去对体制的依靠，被一只大手向一处牵引，失去选择固然残忍，但当选择不再受限，踏出的任何一步却又像是徒步深渊，这就是自由的代价，这也是为什么，老布在走出监狱后，最终出于对自由的恐惧，选择了自***。
鸟笼中的自由终究不是真正的自由，人永远不能放弃独立思考的能力，对于《1984》有这么一句评价，“多一个人读这本书，就多一份自由的保障”，只要今天个体思考的多样性不被抹***，独裁就难以降临。人是有思想的芦苇，人的可贵之处就在于他们会思考，新闻也好、教育也好，如果人只能成为单纯的接收者，便也缺失了作为人的意义，所谓的“真理”、“真相”都值得我们剥丝抽茧、反复推敲，不惧怕质疑，不畏惧改变，正是这份思考才一直推动着社会的前进，使人们能够掌握唯一的真实。
暑假兼职英文作文大学【三】
This is a story about a special and unreserved woman who has been exposed to a hostile environment but continuously and fearlessly struggling for her ideal life. The story can be interpreted as a symbol of the independent spirit.
It seems to me that many readers’ English reading experience starts with Jane Eyer. I am of no exception. As we refer to the movie “Jane Eyer”, it is not surprising to find some differences because of its being filmized and retold in a new way, but the spirit of the novel remains----to be an independent person, both physically and mentally.
Jane Eyer was a born resister, whose parents went off when she was very young, and her aunt，the only relative she had，treated her as badly as a ragtag. Since Jane’s education in Lowwood Orphanage began, she didn’t get what she had been expecting——simply being regarded as a common person, just the same as any other girl around. The suffers from being humiliated and devastated teach Jane to be persevering and prize dignity over anything else.As a reward of revolting the ruthless oppression, Jane got a chance to be a tutor in Thornfield Garden. There she made the acquaintance of lovely Adele and that garden’s owner, Rochester, a man with warm heart despite a cold face outside. Jane expected to change the life from then on, but fate had decided otherwise: After Jane and Rochester fell in love with each other and got down to get marry, she unfortunately came to know in fact Rochester had got a legal wife, who seemed to be the shadow following Rochester and led to his moodiness all the time ----Rochester was also a despairing person in need of salvation. Jane did want to give him a hand, however, she made up her mind to leave, because she didn’t want to betray her own principles, because she was Jane Eyer. The film has finally got a symbolist end: Jane inherited a large number of legacies and finally returned. After finding Rochester ’s misfortune brought by his original mad wife, Jane chose to stay with him forever.
I don’t know what others feel, but frankly speaking, I would rather regard the section that Jane began her teaching job in Thornfield as the film’s end----especially when I heard Jane’s words “Never in my life have I been awaken so happily. ” For one thing, this ideal and brand-new beginning of life was what Jane had been imagining for long as a suffering person; for another, this should be what the audiences with my views hoped her to get. But the professional judgment of producing films reminded me to wait for a totally different result: There must be something wrong coming with the excellence----perhaps not only should another section be added to enrich the story, but also we may see from the next transition of Jane’s life that “Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you would get.”
What ’s more, this film didn’t end when Jane left Thornfield. For Jane Eyer herself, there should always be somewhere to realize her great ideal of being independent considering her fortitude, but for Rochester, how he can get salvation? The film gives the answer tentatively: Jane eventually got back to Rochester. In fact, when Jane met Rochester for the first time, she scared his horse and made his heel strained, to a certain extent, which meant Rochester would get retrieval because of Jane. We can consider Rochester’s experiences as that of religion meaning. The fire by his frantic wife was the punishment for the cynicism early in his life. After it, Rochester got the mercy of the God and the love of the woman whom he loved. Here we can say: human nature and divinity get united perfectly in order to let such a story accord with the requirements of both two sides. The value of this film may be due to its efforts to explore a new way for the development of humanism under the faith of religion.
暑假兼职英文作文大学【四】
孔雀在国际舞蹈表演竞赛上获得了大奖，引起了极大轰动。回国后，《鸟国日报》杜鹃记者访问孔雀，发表了长篇访问记。《舞坛》杂志还派人协助孔雀写出了自传《我的道路》，在《舞坛》杂志显著位置刊出。
孔雀成了知名度很高的舞蹈艺术家，各个协会、学会和社会团体的会议通知、请柬、聘书，纷至沓来，推选孔雀担任领导职务或荣誉职务，而且都提出了不容推卸的理由。独舞研究会和民间舞蹈研究会推选孔雀担任副会长，因为它是著名独舞和民间舞蹈家;美化生活研究会和服装研究会，推选孔雀担任名誉理事，是因为它的服装精美绝伦;水文地质研究会聘请孔雀为顾问，是因为孔雀肯定熟悉孔雀河，且孔雀河在水文地质学上有很高的.学术研究价值;有色金属研究学会聘请孔雀为名誉顾问，是因为孔雀石是提炼铜矿的重要原料;印度史研究学会聘请孔雀为名誉顾问，是因为孔雀肯定与孔雀工有瓜葛甚至有血缘关系，而研究印度史肯定是要研究孔雀王的……
孔雀兼任的各种社会职务多达三四十种，各种各样的理事会、年会、学术讨论会应接不暇，几乎天天都有。孔雀往返于各个会场之间，疲于奔命，再也没有时间练功，体型越来越胖，后来竟步履蹒跚，根本跳不成舞了。
暑假兼职英文作文大学【五】
I read the Chinese version of “Camille” a few years ago. At that time I was deeply moved by the main character Marguerite Gautier. “Camille” or “The Lady of the Camellias” by Alexandre Dumas, fils, is the story of Marguerite Gautier, a young courtesan, or kept woman, in Paris in the mid 1800's, and how she falls in love with a young man, Armand Duval, and then tries to escape from her questionable past. Unfortunately, it comes back to haunt her and she ends up returning to that life and dies painfully and alone, but with the knowledge that she was a noble woman at heart. When I first began to read the book, I did not care for Marguerite or her attitude or lifestyle, but as I got further into the narrative, I realized that her saucy attitude was a front to cover the lonely woman that she really was. She felt used, abused and unloved, until the gentle Armand Duval came into her life and showed her that he loved her as a person and not for what she could do for him. It must have taken great courage for Marguerite to leave the life she had lived for so long, knowing all along that it was probably too good to be true and would not last indefinitely. And it also showed that Marguerite really loved Armand Duval for she could even change herself for him.
However, happiness didn’t last for long. When M. Duval, Armand's father, came to her, pleading for her to leave Armand to save both Armand's reputation and that of his younger innocent sister, Marguerite saw a way to become pure of heart, if not in body. She felt that it was her duty, because she loved Armand so much, to do this even though it meant giving up her own happiness and hurting Armand temporarily. She reluctantly returned to her former life, knowing that.some day Armand would forgive her. Sadly, she died in debt and basically alone, except for her one female friend, Julie Duprat, who helped her during her illness. She had her journal sent to Armand after her death, explaining why she had made the choices she had. I think Dumas's last few lines about Marguerite being the exception, not the rule were quite true, and I also agreed with his view that while her lifestyle could not be condoned, we as a society assume that all of these type of women are cold and heartless, while this may not always be the case. A person can make the wrong choices in life when they are young, and try to redeem themselves, but sometimes past situations prevent them from changing their lives, even though they desperately wish to do so. This applies to both men and women in many different types of circumstances: involvement in crime; drug or alcohol abuse; gambling; prostitution; financial problems; poor marriage choices; etc. And this is the fact, which exists in the whole society.
As far as the other characters in the book, I think Marguerite was right in saying that no one truly cared about her, but only wanted something from her, the only exceptions being Armand and Julie Duprat. Of course, the Comte de G. and Comte de N. wanted her body and appearance. The
Duke needed to “wake up and smell the coffee” and realize that she could never replace his dead daughter. If he truly cared, he could have helped her leave her lifestyle without “keeping” her himself. And lastly, Prudence was a blood-sucking leech who used Marguerite almost worse than the men. I also think she was jealous of the fact that Marguerite had so much more courage than herself and someone truly loved her.
Last morning, when tiding my bookshelf, I took this book out of the shelf, and a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. I held it against the morning light and blew on it. The soft breeze carried it away. Camille is just like the camellia, she could never escape from the destiny of withering. But it wasn’t her fault; it’s because of the evil of Capitalism and the hideousness of that society.
Suddenly, I remembered a saying: “Women are like the flowers”. Those pretty women are like those beautiful flowers; their delicate beauty makes people feel they are the miracle of life. However, even the God envies their beauty. It seems that beautiful women always have tragic endings. As we are normal persons, even we can see the hideousness of humanity that results in their fate of withering, we can at most ask quietly in our hearts: Where have those beautiful flowers gone? Where have they gone?
The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe
It seemed to be such a coincidence that the night after I finished reading The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe, I was to dine in a restaurant distinctly related to the book itself. This restaurant was no other than the famous American-styled “Friday ’s. ” The reason for mentioning this restaurant is quite straightforward to all the gentlemen, ladies and children who have read the novel and enjoyed it, which is the fact that this restaurant was, most likely, named after the American Native in Robinson Crusoe, called Friday. This restaurant offers very exceptional service, for instance when the waitresses are asked to order dishes they kneel rather than stand, which, unlike the other restaurants I have been to, makes it easier for the customers to hear them speak. Moreover, Friday’s friendly services to the customers help them to make better choices when ordering dishes. I remembered when I went to Friday ’s last time; the waitress kindly described the items on the menu with precise details. It turned out that the combo I initially wanted was designed to be shared among a large group, not to be eaten by one person. I think this restaurant shows many commendable features similar to that of Friday. Friday brought emotional warmth to the people around him with his appealing personality. I think it was this personality that affected Crusoe and made him say that he loved Friday when Crusoe didn ’t express love for his parents, brothers, sisters, or even his wife. “When he espied me, he came running to me, laying himself down again upon the ground, with all the possible signs of an humble, thankful disposition, making many antic gestures to show it to let me know how he would serve me as long as he lived.” This was what Friday did after Crusoe had rescued him from the two savages chasing him. It was easy for me to see why Crusoe had loved Friday. After sometime, Crusoe and Friday were to rescue Friday’s father. When Friday reunited with his father, the scene was easy to move anyone: “It would have moved anyone to tears to have seen how Friday kissed him, embraced him, hugged him, cried, laughed, halloed, jumped about, danced,
sung; and then sung and jumped about again, like a distracted creature. It was a good while before I could make him speak to me.” This is my favourite chapter in the whole book. It is hard to see why Friday is an ex-savage when he can have personalities more praiseworthy than many civilized people, viz. Crusoe himself. “When he (Friday went to him (Friday’s father, he would sit down by him, open his breast, and hold his father’s head close to his bosom, half an hour together, to nourish it; then he took his arms and ankles, which were numbed and stiff with the binding, and rubbed them with his hands.” Furthermore, Friday’s expression of loyalty in asking Crusoe to kill him rather than leave him is more heartfelt than anything Crusoe ever says or does.
Crusoe, on the absolute contrary, seems incapable of deep feelings, as shown by his account of leaving his family—he never shows any emotions. After a moving lecture from Robinson’s father about his future, he still decided to follow his own wandering ambition. Careless was he about the wishes of his parents to keep him alive and prosperous, as he was the only child left in the family. When he came back from the island which he had lived on for twenty eight years, he found that it had been too late to tell his parents that he was still alive, but yet again he did not feel sorry for them; he also did not feel sorry for the two people who had to live in misery for nearly thirty years under the allusion all of their sons were dead. He had the same feelings for his wife: when he was married, he said it was “not either to my disadvantage or dissatisfaction”, implying that it was also neither to his advantage nor his satisfaction. Moreover, after his wife died, Robinson did not think of looking after the three children they had, but went back to the island, which he had lived on for twenty-eight years. It was on this trip which Robinson Crusoe revisited “His Island ” as he called it. I feel that Robinson ’s indifference to his family is almost emotionally cruel.
Before had clearly shown the contrast between Crusoe’s and Friday’s personalities, as when Friday, in his joyful reunion with his father, displayed far more emotion toward his family members than Crusoe, whereas Crusoe never mentions missing his family or dreams about the happiness of seeing them again. I think Defore is very successful in introducing Friday as part of the novel, it makes the whole novel seem much more complete and gripping to the reader, as well as proving that Defoe’s ideology of racism is civilized unlike many other Europeans at that time; natives and savages are not worse than others but can perhaps even be more modern and civilized. Those are the reasons of why I like The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe and Friday.
暑假兼职英文作文大学【六】
《源氏物语》紫式部这本在日本争议很大的小说。
第一次看的时候在大学，当然简直震碎了我的三观。感觉哪里是日本的红楼梦，简直是日本的金瓶梅!现在再看，终究看到些许不同的地方。经历了葵姬和桐壶帝的相继死亡，源氏也变得脆弱起来，有抛舍红尘，遁入空门之感，然而羁绊良多，安能散乎? 对于源氏来说，从出身到才华再到外貌都是无上尊贵，世人皆以为是缥缈神人，说不定他也真是方外之人不过来遭受情劫罢了。
但他也是个软弱的人，每当亲人离世，都有遁入空门逃避俗世的想法，而这想法却也不坚定，他放不下俗世中这些如花美眷，放不下可爱可怜的紫姬、娇媚可人的胧月夜、多情典雅的六条、心之所向的藤壶皇后。可怜之人必有可恨之处。不知等我四十在读，又有何感想。
暑假兼职英文作文大学【七】
成名后由于各种社会制度体系的制约和环境的约束，迫使其放弃了研究专业的机会，最终导致专而不精。
暑假兼职英文作文大学【八】
《一九八四》是英国左翼作者乔治·奥威尔于1949年出版的反乌托邦式政治小说。小说刻画了一个令人感到窒息和恐怖的，以追逐权力为最终目标的假想的极权主义社会。1984年的世界被三个超级大国所瓜分，三个国家之间的战争不断，国家内部社会结构被彻底打破，均实行高度集权统治，以改变历史、改变语言、打破家庭等极端手段钳制人们的思想和本能，以具有监视与监听功能的“电幕”控制人们的行为，以对领袖的个人崇拜和对国内外敌人的仇恨维持社会的运转。故事中主人公所在的国家“大洋国”只有一个政党——英格兰社会主义，。社会也根据与党的关系被分为核心党员、外围党员和无产者三个阶层。政府机构分为四个部门：和平部负责军备和战争，友爱部负责维持秩序、镇压和严刑拷打，真理部负责宣传、文教和篡改历史，富裕部负责生产和分配。在大洋国“真理部”从事篡改历史工作的外围党员温斯顿因为在工作中逐渐对其所处的社会和领袖“老大哥”产生怀疑，并与另一位外围党员裘利亚产生感情，因而成为思想犯，在经历了专门负责内部清洗的“友爱部”的思想改造之后最终成为了“思想纯洁者”。
整个小说的剧情颇为极端夸张，甚至还有一些荒诞。你无法想像那样一种生活：人与人之间没有情感的交流，每个人身上看不到人性，每天都是麻木的生活全心全意的信奉着他们的“老大哥”;按时出操，按时工作，按时吃饭睡觉，每个人都过着看似井井有条的同样的生活，却又显得那么压抑，他们的生活中看不到一丝自由。这就是乔治·奥威尔想要向我们展现的一种极权统治之下的高压生活，整个国家就像一座监狱，电幕、巡警无时无刻不在监视着人们的一举一动，但更有过于监狱的是集权政府对思想的钳制，即“老大哥”鼓吹的“双重思想”——一个人的脑子里同时拥有两种相反的信念，并且两种都接受。人民一方面面对科学时抱有客观的态度，但一旦面对政治便无条件的信奉“老大哥”。这样的思想钳制是最为可怕的，因为它割离开了人们的理性，让人们在看似清醒的状态下放弃了对真相的追求。所有人都别有用心地编织着谎言，却又真心实意地相信着谎言。真相是什么，真相就是谎言包装下的谎言，记忆扭曲下的记忆。
但是人们是否真的被关在社会大监狱里就从未想过越狱。是他们不知道自己被愚弄了吗?非也。事实上，许许多多的人十分享受这样一种思想被奴役的感觉。“思想警察”奥布兰就是如此。他清楚地知道社会在倒退，谎言充满世界，却甘愿做体制机器里的一颗螺丝钉，同时又受着“老大哥”的监视。奥布兰所理解的自由不仅是对自己的统治，还有对别人的支配。然而，这种病态的自由既是对自由精神的异化，也是对他人的不尊重。同时，他又把极权社会所宣扬的“真理”内化为自身的思想，把自己镶嵌在这个病态的体制中，将自己的自由体现为对他人的控制，成为环境的一部分。他受制于环境，又依靠着环境，甚至享受着环境。可以说，像奥布兰这类人，是一种在长期奴役中被异化的人。
