关于疫情的英文作文大学【一】
在这个特殊的“寒假”里，人人自危。我们在3月9日这一天，全体大学生同上一堂思政大课。
我想，我们大家都一样，每天早上起床第一件事，就是打开手机。我们不是在刷抖音，不是看微博，不是娱乐，而是去看看最新数据。截至3月8日，全国累计报告确诊病例80859例，累计死亡病例3100例，累计治愈出院57172例，现有疑似病例458例.....冰冷的数字，像一张张病危通知书，一张张死亡证明一样，在我的心里划过。
在这样的环境之中，作为学生，我们又应该以一种什么样的心态和行为面对这次疫情?同时如何利用这段时间，让自己变得更加勇敢，更加积极向上，获得成长和进步呢?
第一，就是注意在日常的学习生活中的个人防护，要做到勤洗手，出入时佩戴口罩，合理地掌握自己的作息时间。保护自己，保护身边的人，保护生命该是我们生而为人的首要任务。
第二，保持一个合理健康的情绪,当人处于一个密闭的空间时间过长之后，多多少少就会有一些自我的负面情绪。但是在面对这些负面情绪的时候，应该保持-种开放的状态，只有这样才能够更好地调节。
第三，以一个科学的角度来看待这次的疫情,不随意听信在网络上面出现的一些谣言，尽量从官方渠道了解和疫情相关的信息。
第四，和亲友加强线上联系，同时和自己的一些同学朋友互相鼓励和支持，消除孤独感。
越是特殊时期，越能检验一个人的本性。
以前常说，要利用碎片化时间进行学习，我们总觉得太累，现在受疫情影响，时间不碎片化了，我又有什么理由拒绝学习呢？
关于疫情的英文作文大学【二】
在大家喜迎2020年，张灯结彩的时候，迎来的不是过年的欢声笑语，而是冠状肺炎病毒的蔓延。触目惊心的数字与日俱增，四千、五千、一万，每增一点都牵动着国人的心。
磨难压不垮、奋起正当时。在举国上下万众一心、众志成城做好新冠肺炎疫情防控工作的特殊时刻。
灾情就是命令，防疫就是责任。“白衣天使”是战“疫”一线“最美逆行者”，他们舍小家为大家，义无反顾地奔赴疫情防控一线，用专业的医疗技术与病毒抢时间，用强大的责任心守护着每一个病人的生命安全。
总有一种力量激励我们前行，总有一种精神让我们泪流满面，自新型冠状病毒感染的肺炎疫情发生以来，亿万中华儿女万众一心，众志成城，共克时艰，战“疫”路上的'一个个“好人”，一件件“好事”走进我们的视野，他们的事迹，他们的名字……感动着我们，凝聚起社会正能量，号召着我们必有信心和决心打赢这场疫情防控阻击战。我们普通人虽不能亲临主战场，但我们能坚持在大战中坚定信心、明确了理想，今后的岁月定将不负韶华。
虽然新型冠状病毒肺炎来势汹汹，给我们的生活蒙上了厚厚的阴影。但是作为学生的我们，作为社会主义的接班人，要把这次的疫情当作学习的机会，去学习前辈们这种处变不惊，舍己为人的精神，我们要利用好这个机会，静下心来想一想自己的人生规划，树立正确的人生观，价值观，把我们的祖国建设得更加强大，是我们每个人的使命。
另外，还要学会如何做好防护措施：第一。尽量不出门，如果必须要去公共场所记得佩戴口罩;第二要勤洗手;第三不要过度疲劳，这样会降低免疫力。
最后为逆行的勇士祈福，愿平安归来!加油!
关于疫情的英文作文大学【三】
关于疫情的英文作文大学【四】
今天，艾四林、秦宣、王炳林、冯秀军四位教授向我们全国大学生上了一堂疫情防控思政大课，他们对高校思政课的讲授教学发人深省，令我感悟良多。
“灾难是一所学校”，大事难事见担当，危难时刻显本色。它总会教给我们什么，告诉我们什么，让我们更加明白该坚定什么、自信什么。在这个特殊时期，每个人都被卷入了这场特殊的战役。在这场人民战争中，每个行业、每个人都应该拿出自己最强的气势，以最好的状态投入到战斗中。
从古至今，中华民族历经过许多磨难，但我们从未被压倒过，而且越挫越勇，赫然挺立在世界东方。这次疫情虽然来的突然，但我坚信在国家和党的领导下，我们一定能打赢这场疫情防控战。中国历史上也有着多次的灾难病害，多难兴邦，每当磨难当头，都能激发出中国人的爱国情怀和无穷的斗争力量。中国建国以来，就经历过三年自然灾害、唐山大地震、洪水灾害、非典疫情、汶川地震等许多或大或小的灾害，中国则在克服这一次次灾难的道路上不断磨炼成长，这些灾难既是危机，也是机遇。
现在正是疫情防控的关键时期，我们一定要继续坚持战疫，不能让最后一步毁了前面的九十九步，始终坚持党的领导，让中华民族以最快的速度恢复起来，彰显民族坚毅的品性。同时，作为一名青年大学生，我们更应该响应组织举措，积极配合，若无必要绝不出门，安心在家，不成为潜在的传染源，这便是对国家的贡献。也可以借此在家抗疫的时间认真思考一下自己对未来的规划，找准目标与方向。相信待春暖花开之时，大家都能摘下口罩，露出最美好的笑脸。实现中国民族伟大复兴的道路上不会一帆风顺，中国人民必须战胜各种艰难险阻，才能最终实现中华民族伟大复兴。
关于疫情的英文作文大学【五】
Many people simply regard Pride and Prejudice as a love story, but in my opinion, this book is an illustration of the society at that time. She perfectly reflected the relation between money and marriage at her time and gave the people in her works vivid characters. The characters have their own personalities. Mrs. Bennet is a woman who makes great efforts to marry off her daughters. Mr. Bingley is a friendly young man, but his friend, Mr. Darcy, is a very proud man who seems to always feel superior. Even the five daughters in Bennet family are very different. Jane is simple, innocent and never speaks evil of others. Elizabeth is a clever girl who always has her own opinion. Mary likes reading classic books. (Actually she is a pedant. Kitty doesn’t have her own opinion but likes to follow her sister, Lydia. Lydia is a girl who follows exotic things, handsome man, and is somehow a little profligate. When I read the book, I can always find the same personalities in the society now. That is why I think this book is indeed the representative of the society in Britain in the 18th century.
The family of gentleman in the countryside is Jane Austen’s favourite topic. But this little topic can reflect big problems. It concludes the stratum situation and economic relationships in Britain in her century. You can find these from the very beginning of this book.
The first sentence in this book is impressive. It reads: “It is a truth well known to all the world that an unmarried man in poss ession of a large fortune must be in need of a wife”. The undertone is very clear: the foundation of the marriage at that time is not emotion but possession.
People always think that Austen was an expert at telling love stories. In fact, the marriage in her book is not the result of love, but the result of economic needs. After reading this book, I know the truth is that a poor woman must be in need of a husband, a wealthy man.
I couldn’t forget how eager Mrs. Bennet wants to marry off her daughte rs. If you want to know why she is so crazy about these things, I must mention the situation in Britain at that time. Only the eldest son had the privilege of inheriting his father’s possessions. Younger sons and daughters who are used to luxurious lives have no choice but marry a man or woman in possession of a large fortune to continue their comfortable lives. Thus, we can see that getting married is a way to become wealthier, particularly for women without many possessions. Jane Austen told us that money and possession determined everything, including marriage and love in her century.
In “Pride and Prejudice”, the sister of Mr. Bingley strongly opposed his plan of marrying Jane because the Bennets don’t have many possessions and their social positions are much lower than them. From this, we can see there are a lot of obstacles for a not very rich woman to marry a wealthy husband. The society, the relatives would not allow them to get married.
In modern society, although the marriages of economic needs have decreased rapidly, the concept of “money determines everything” is still rooted in some people’s mind. A lot of parents try hard to interfere their children’s marriages. Education background, possessions, jobs remains the main reason that may influence one’s marriage. Marry for money is still a big problem in our
society. We can’t help thinking: can money determine everything?
Austen left this problem for us to think. The genius of Jane Austen lies in this perfect simplicity, the simplicity that reflects big problems. Although Austen was only 21 when she wrote “Pride and Prejudice”, her sharp observation of social lives makes the style of this book surprisingly mature and lively. The plots in her works are always very natural. The development of the plot is as inevitable as a problem in mathematics. I think the depth of Pride and Prejudice is the reason that makes this book prominent and classic. Today, her book still can be the guide telling us the economic relationships both at her time and in modern time.
关于疫情的英文作文大学【六】
I read the Chinese version of “Camille” a few years ago. At that time I was deeply moved by the main character Marguerite Gautier. “Camille” or “The Lady of the Camellias” by Alexandre Dumas, fils, is the story of Marguerite Gautier, a young courtesan, or kept woman, in Paris in the mid 1800's, and how she falls in love with a young man, Armand Duval, and then tries to escape from her questionable past. Unfortunately, it comes back to haunt her and she ends up returning to that life and dies painfully and alone, but with the knowledge that she was a noble woman at heart. When I first began to read the book, I did not care for Marguerite or her attitude or lifestyle, but as I got further into the narrative, I realized that her saucy attitude was a front to cover the lonely woman that she really was. She felt used, abused and unloved, until the gentle Armand Duval came into her life and showed her that he loved her as a person and not for what she could do for him. It must have taken great courage for Marguerite to leave the life she had lived for so long, knowing all along that it was probably too good to be true and would not last indefinitely. And it also showed that Marguerite really loved Armand Duval for she could even change herself for him.
However, happiness didn’t last for long. When M. Duval, Armand's father, came to her, pleading for her to leave Armand to save both Armand's reputation and that of his younger innocent sister, Marguerite saw a way to become pure of heart, if not in body. She felt that it was her duty, because she loved Armand so much, to do this even though it meant giving up her own happiness and hurting Armand temporarily. She reluctantly returned to her former life, knowing that.some day Armand would forgive her. Sadly, she died in debt and basically alone, except for her one female friend, Julie Duprat, who helped her during her illness. She had her journal sent to Armand after her death, explaining why she had made the choices she had. I think Dumas's last few lines about Marguerite being the exception, not the rule were quite true, and I also agreed with his view that while her lifestyle could not be condoned, we as a society assume that all of these type of women are cold and heartless, while this may not always be the case. A person can make the wrong choices in life when they are young, and try to redeem themselves, but sometimes past situations prevent them from changing their lives, even though they desperately wish to do so. This applies to both men and women in many different types of circumstances: involvement in crime; drug or alcohol abuse; gambling; prostitution; financial problems; poor marriage choices; etc. And this is the fact, which exists in the whole society.
As far as the other characters in the book, I think Marguerite was right in saying that no one truly cared about her, but only wanted something from her, the only exceptions being Armand and Julie Duprat. Of course, the Comte de G. and Comte de N. wanted her body and appearance. The
Duke needed to “wake up and smell the coffee” and realize that she could never replace his dead daughter. If he truly cared, he could have helped her leave her lifestyle without “keeping” her himself. And lastly, Prudence was a blood-sucking leech who used Marguerite almost worse than the men. I also think she was jealous of the fact that Marguerite had so much more courage than herself and someone truly loved her.
Last morning, when tiding my bookshelf, I took this book out of the shelf, and a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. I held it against the morning light and blew on it. The soft breeze carried it away. Camille is just like the camellia, she could never escape from the destiny of withering. But it wasn’t her fault; it’s because of the evil of Capitalism and the hideousness of that society.
Suddenly, I remembered a saying: “Women are like the flowers”. Those pretty women are like those beautiful flowers; their delicate beauty makes people feel they are the miracle of life. However, even the God envies their beauty. It seems that beautiful women always have tragic endings. As we are normal persons, even we can see the hideousness of humanity that results in their fate of withering, we can at most ask quietly in our hearts: Where have those beautiful flowers gone? Where have they gone?
The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe
It seemed to be such a coincidence that the night after I finished reading The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe, I was to dine in a restaurant distinctly related to the book itself. This restaurant was no other than the famous American-styled “Friday ’s. ” The reason for mentioning this restaurant is quite straightforward to all the gentlemen, ladies and children who have read the novel and enjoyed it, which is the fact that this restaurant was, most likely, named after the American Native in Robinson Crusoe, called Friday. This restaurant offers very exceptional service, for instance when the waitresses are asked to order dishes they kneel rather than stand, which, unlike the other restaurants I have been to, makes it easier for the customers to hear them speak. Moreover, Friday’s friendly services to the customers help them to make better choices when ordering dishes. I remembered when I went to Friday ’s last time; the waitress kindly described the items on the menu with precise details. It turned out that the combo I initially wanted was designed to be shared among a large group, not to be eaten by one person. I think this restaurant shows many commendable features similar to that of Friday. Friday brought emotional warmth to the people around him with his appealing personality. I think it was this personality that affected Crusoe and made him say that he loved Friday when Crusoe didn ’t express love for his parents, brothers, sisters, or even his wife. “When he espied me, he came running to me, laying himself down again upon the ground, with all the possible signs of an humble, thankful disposition, making many antic gestures to show it to let me know how he would serve me as long as he lived.” This was what Friday did after Crusoe had rescued him from the two savages chasing him. It was easy for me to see why Crusoe had loved Friday. After sometime, Crusoe and Friday were to rescue Friday’s father. When Friday reunited with his father, the scene was easy to move anyone: “It would have moved anyone to tears to have seen how Friday kissed him, embraced him, hugged him, cried, laughed, halloed, jumped about, danced,
sung; and then sung and jumped about again, like a distracted creature. It was a good while before I could make him speak to me.” This is my favourite chapter in the whole book. It is hard to see why Friday is an ex-savage when he can have personalities more praiseworthy than many civilized people, viz. Crusoe himself. “When he (Friday went to him (Friday’s father, he would sit down by him, open his breast, and hold his father’s head close to his bosom, half an hour together, to nourish it; then he took his arms and ankles, which were numbed and stiff with the binding, and rubbed them with his hands.” Furthermore, Friday’s expression of loyalty in asking Crusoe to kill him rather than leave him is more heartfelt than anything Crusoe ever says or does.
Crusoe, on the absolute contrary, seems incapable of deep feelings, as shown by his account of leaving his family—he never shows any emotions. After a moving lecture from Robinson’s father about his future, he still decided to follow his own wandering ambition. Careless was he about the wishes of his parents to keep him alive and prosperous, as he was the only child left in the family. When he came back from the island which he had lived on for twenty eight years, he found that it had been too late to tell his parents that he was still alive, but yet again he did not feel sorry for them; he also did not feel sorry for the two people who had to live in misery for nearly thirty years under the allusion all of their sons were dead. He had the same feelings for his wife: when he was married, he said it was “not either to my disadvantage or dissatisfaction”, implying that it was also neither to his advantage nor his satisfaction. Moreover, after his wife died, Robinson did not think of looking after the three children they had, but went back to the island, which he had lived on for twenty-eight years. It was on this trip which Robinson Crusoe revisited “His Island ” as he called it. I feel that Robinson ’s indifference to his family is almost emotionally cruel.
Before had clearly shown the contrast between Crusoe’s and Friday’s personalities, as when Friday, in his joyful reunion with his father, displayed far more emotion toward his family members than Crusoe, whereas Crusoe never mentions missing his family or dreams about the happiness of seeing them again. I think Defore is very successful in introducing Friday as part of the novel, it makes the whole novel seem much more complete and gripping to the reader, as well as proving that Defoe’s ideology of racism is civilized unlike many other Europeans at that time; natives and savages are not worse than others but can perhaps even be more modern and civilized. Those are the reasons of why I like The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe and Friday.
关于疫情的英文作文大学【七】
岁末年初，一场突如其来的疫情肆虐神州大地，严重威胁人民群众生命健康安全。连日来，从中央到地方，从医院到社区，全国上下多方力量投入到这场疫情防控阻击战中;也唯有人人行动起来，守责尽责，才能在没有硝烟的战场上赢得主动，获得最终胜利。
减少出行，防护知情。疫情防控阻击战是一场人民战争，广大人民群众都应是一名英勇无畏的战士，而减少外出、做好防护就是普通人对最终战胜疫情做出的最大贡献。此次疫情发生正值春节假期，人员流动性大，走亲访友、聚会聚餐等聚集性场合多，还有一些农村地区群众防疫认识不足、防护本领不强，无疑给遏止疫情蔓延带来了更大的困难和挑战。要加强对群众的教育引导，增强措施的针对性、有效性，精准化、人性化综合施策，劝导群众减少外出、非必需不外出，避免在人员密集的场合逗留，隔离病毒而不隔离“爱”;帮助群众提高防护本领，让戴口罩、勤洗手成为群众的自觉行动，在人民群众中筑起一道坚固的安全防线。
明辨言行，善察实情。面对突发疫情，群众产生恐惧心理本是情理之中，但如果此时谣言满天飞，不仅会加剧群众的恐慌，更对疫情防控带来巨大的'消极影响。“抽烟喝酒能***灭病毒”“钟南山院士建议用盐水漱口”……如此种种谣言，一度在网上疯传，消费着大家的感情和信任，以致“乱花渐欲迷人眼”。坚持人民群众在哪里，舆论宣传就覆盖到哪里，让科学和事实“跑”在前面，驳斥谣言，以正视听;广大群众要提高信息鉴别能力，多从官方渠道获得权威信息，不听小道消息、不“转发”未经证实的消息，善于在铺天盖地的疫情信息中辨真伪，达到“柳暗花明又一村”;有关部门要加强信息发布特别是互联网内容监管，对造谣、传谣的行为坚决依法予以打击。
携手同行，共抗疫情。非常时期需要采取非常措施。延长春节假期、稳定市场秩序、加强交通管制、调配人员物资，从一线到后方，一连串的务实举措，迅速编织起一张防护大网“围追堵截”，力求将疫情尽快控制。当今社会，各方面高度交融，牵一发而动全身。消灭疫情，不是哪一个部门、哪一个群体的事，需要全社会、全要素密切配合、共同参与。要调动一切有利资源，全力保障前方需要，让一线战斗人员有信心、有力量，以更加饱满的状态和精力投入到紧张斗争之中;要加强各部门之间的协调配合，充实后方保障，“十个指头弹钢琴”，形成战斗“梯队”态势，各方面恪尽职守、各尽其责，形成战胜疫情的强大合力。
我们完全相信，胜利只是时间问题，前进道路上的挫折只会让中国人民更加团结，更加能够掌握自己的命运，实现我们的奋斗目标。
关于疫情的英文作文大学【八】
This is a story about a special and unreserved woman who has been exposed to a hostile environment but continuously and fearlessly struggling for her ideal life. The story can be interpreted as a symbol of the independent spirit.
It seems to me that many readers’ English reading experience starts with Jane Eyer. I am of no exception. As we refer to the movie “Jane Eyer”, it is not surprising to find some differences because of its being filmized and retold in a new way, but the spirit of the novel remains----to be an independent person, both physically and mentally.
Jane Eyer was a born resister, whose parents went off when she was very young, and her aunt，the only relative she had，treated her as badly as a ragtag. Since Jane’s education in Lowwood Orphanage began, she didn’t get what she had been expecting——simply being regarded as a common person, just the same as any other girl around. The suffers from being humiliated and devastated teach Jane to be persevering and prize dignity over anything else.As a reward of revolting the ruthless oppression, Jane got a chance to be a tutor in Thornfield Garden. There she made the acquaintance of lovely Adele and that garden’s owner, Rochester, a man with warm heart despite a cold face outside. Jane expected to change the life from then on, but fate had decided otherwise: After Jane and Rochester fell in love with each other and got down to get marry, she unfortunately came to know in fact Rochester had got a legal wife, who seemed to be the shadow following Rochester and led to his moodiness all the time ----Rochester was also a despairing person in need of salvation. Jane did want to give him a hand, however, she made up her mind to leave, because she didn’t want to betray her own principles, because she was Jane Eyer. The film has finally got a symbolist end: Jane inherited a large number of legacies and finally returned. After finding Rochester ’s misfortune brought by his original mad wife, Jane chose to stay with him forever.
I don’t know what others feel, but frankly speaking, I would rather regard the section that Jane began her teaching job in Thornfield as the film’s end----especially when I heard Jane’s words “Never in my life have I been awaken so happily. ” For one thing, this ideal and brand-new beginning of life was what Jane had been imagining for long as a suffering person; for another, this should be what the audiences with my views hoped her to get. But the professional judgment of producing films reminded me to wait for a totally different result: There must be something wrong coming with the excellence----perhaps not only should another section be added to enrich the story, but also we may see from the next transition of Jane’s life that “Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you would get.”
What ’s more, this film didn’t end when Jane left Thornfield. For Jane Eyer herself, there should always be somewhere to realize her great ideal of being independent considering her fortitude, but for Rochester, how he can get salvation? The film gives the answer tentatively: Jane eventually got back to Rochester. In fact, when Jane met Rochester for the first time, she scared his horse and made his heel strained, to a certain extent, which meant Rochester would get retrieval because of Jane. We can consider Rochester’s experiences as that of religion meaning. The fire by his frantic wife was the punishment for the cynicism early in his life. After it, Rochester got the mercy of the God and the love of the woman whom he loved. Here we can say: human nature and divinity get united perfectly in order to let such a story accord with the requirements of both two sides. The value of this film may be due to its efforts to explore a new way for the development of humanism under the faith of religion.
