大学生兼职利弊的英文作文（大学生做兼职有好处英语作文） - 学习作文网

大学生兼职利弊的英文作文【一】

上世纪八十年代，手机开始使用，但只有有钱人家才有手机，到了九十年代，手机开始普及但却很笨重，随着时代的快速发展，人们的通讯工具日益增加，手机变得小巧了，功能也增加了很多，不管男女老少几乎人手一台，成为了我们日常必不可少的物品。然而手机却有利有弊。

在我们的日常生活中，首先，手机可以让我们随时随地和家人联系，这不仅在我们外出时可以使父母放心，也可以在我们遇到危险时及时求助；其次，手机可以便于朋友交流，能够增进友谊，在我们学习遇到困难时，还可以与同学讨论；再次，手机小巧方便携带，我们可以看到有价值的拍下来并及时与朋友进行分享；然后，手机中还有闹钟功能，我们不必再使用笨重的闹钟，不管在哪里手机里的闹钟都可以提醒我们，这个时间给做什么事情了。最后，我们还可在手机上浏览信息，及时知道面面俱到的最新消息。

手机固然便利，然而也有弊端。

首先，健康是大家共同关心的问题手机对人类的健康有着一定的影响。睡觉时，很多人把手机放枕边，手机的辐射会对人类的中枢神经系统造成机能性障碍，引起头痛、头昏、失眠、多梦和脱发等症状，有的人面部还会有刺激感。很多人经常熄灯后玩手机，手机的强光，会是黄斑部病变，轻者眼睛干涩，重者失明。其次，现在很多人得了“手机依赖症”，这严重耽误学习和工作。再次，现在学生们都有手机，档次各不相同，这极容易造成心里不平衡，引起攀比之风，给父母造成经济负担。最后，手机是贵重物品，这不仅给不法分子带来了偷窃的机会，还有可能引起一些不良学生偷盗的现象。严重影响了校园治安。

手机有利有弊，但只要我们合理的使用手机，扬长避短，发挥它应有的多用，造福我们的学习、工作、生活。我们应管理好自己的生活，作为一名中学生，我们应从我做起，对于合理使用，并用它传播正能量。

大学生兼职利弊的英文作文【二】

现代化的设会有许多现代化工具。电话、手机、电视、电脑等电子工具越来普及，对人们的生活越来越方便。有了电话我们可以和任何人通话；有了手机我们可以把它放在口袋里，随时随地的与别人交流，不受时间、地点等各种因素的限制；有了电视我们可以坐在家里旅游世界；有了电脑更是对我们有问必答。但今天我决定着重介绍一下手机和手机的利端与弊端。

手机大约在八几年开始使用，但只是使用在一些大城市中比较富裕的有钱人家和一些有特别需要的人。到了九几年手机开始普遍化、大重化、流行化，而不只是局限于个别的人。青年人、中年人、老年人都可以拥有自己的手机，甚至手机在一些学生中都拥有一定的低位、受到一定的青睐。手机的功能也随着时间的发展、社会的进步而越来广泛。一开始只能用于通电话、发短信，渐渐地我们可以用手机听音乐、玩游戏。而现在的手机除了那些简单的功能以外还加入了现代化元素，除了手机可以看电视以外还可以上网、上qq还可以与别人视频通话聊天。如此可见手机在人们日常中的地位与需求。

走在大街上，你会看到很多人都在使用手机，有了手机无论遥远还是很近，无论内地还是海外交流都畅通无阻；有了手机通话变得越来越方便，世界变得越来越小；有了手机你在哪里别人都可以找到你，与你通话；有了手机你不用坐在家里等别人的电话，在外面照样交流。手机让我们的联系更简单，通话更方便，我们的交流需要也得到了更高标准的满足。手机上网也实现了很多人的现实需求，手机随着时代的进步所延伸出来的各种现代化功能给人们带来了诸多益惠。手机虽然有这么多的优点但缺点也一定是固然存在的。有的学生过早的使用手机而引发了诸多的弊端。利如：长时间的玩手机中的游戏会始我们的眼睛因缺乏休息而酸累，甚至这会成为我们视力下降得元凶、长时间的玩手机中的游戏更有可能使我们忘记了学习，而导致我们的学习下降、手机中的电子书会使我们过早的成熟、不利于我们的身心发展更不利于我们的健康成长。如果这样手机就不是为我们的生活带来便利而是对更多人的'成长带来阻力。

我们如何让手机的弊端转化为利端呢？我想这就要靠人们的约束力了。如过我们合理的利用手机管理好自己，不做游戏的奴隶而做手机的主人，我想哪么手机一定会给我们带来无穷的福利。

大学生兼职利弊的英文作文【三】

手机，通讯时代的代言词，潮流的代养人，现如今，全国约有2。4亿人在使用手机，这看起来似乎很帅。但是，孰不知任何事物都有两面性，手机亦是如此，他也有利弊两面。

现如今，手机已成为人们生活中的一样必不可少的一样工具。一提出这个观点，很多人会无视他，也有人会反驳说，手机的好处很多，它可以方便人们的联系，有利于人们的生活，还有很多功能可以帮助人们生活，这是不假但是，现象过他的危害吗。吸烟的危害，相信已经无人不知无人不晓，但如果有人跟你说，每年因为手机而死亡的人数，比因为香烟而死亡的人数还要多时，你是否会大吃一惊？！

有英国一名癌症研究专家发出了迄今为止最严重的手机警告：因使用手机致死的人数将超过吸烟受害者！

有统计显示，全世界手机用户已达吸烟人数的3倍。因此，专家认为，手机的危害将比香烟更严重。目前全球每年有500万人因吸烟导致的疾病死亡。

1977年，记者劳德首次发表提出使用手机可能会对大脑产生不良影响。由于当时使用手机的人很少，这篇文章没有引起人们的普遍关注。1985年，美国科学家林恩推测，长期用手机可能会诱发脑瘤。他还建议，尽量只用手机接电话，而不要往外拨打。所以说手机不尽危害自己还危害家人。而且，现在有的学生上课玩手机，用手机做题。令成绩一落千丈。我不能阻止别人买，但这还不能说明问题吗。

在这，我要告诉大家，任何事都有两面性，换一个角度思考会更好。

大学生兼职利弊的英文作文【四】

I read the Chinese version of “Camille” a few years ago. At that time I was deeply moved by the main character Marguerite Gautier. “Camille” or “The Lady of the Camellias” by Alexandre Dumas, fils, is the story of Marguerite Gautier, a young courtesan, or kept woman, in Paris in the mid 1800's, and how she falls in love with a young man, Armand Duval, and then tries to escape from her questionable past. Unfortunately, it comes back to haunt her and she ends up returning to that life and dies painfully and alone, but with the knowledge that she was a noble woman at heart. When I first began to read the book, I did not care for Marguerite or her attitude or lifestyle, but as I got further into the narrative, I realized that her saucy attitude was a front to cover the lonely woman that she really was. She felt used, abused and unloved, until the gentle Armand Duval came into her life and showed her that he loved her as a person and not for what she could do for him. It must have taken great courage for Marguerite to leave the life she had lived for so long, knowing all along that it was probably too good to be true and would not last indefinitely. And it also showed that Marguerite really loved Armand Duval for she could even change herself for him.

However, happiness didn’t last for long. When M. Duval, Armand's father, came to her, pleading for her to leave Armand to save both Armand's reputation and that of his younger innocent sister, Marguerite saw a way to become pure of heart, if not in body. She felt that it was her duty, because she loved Armand so much, to do this even though it meant giving up her own happiness and hurting Armand temporarily. She reluctantly returned to her former life, knowing that.some day Armand would forgive her. Sadly, she died in debt and basically alone, except for her one female friend, Julie Duprat, who helped her during her illness. She had her journal sent to Armand after her death, explaining why she had made the choices she had. I think Dumas's last few lines about Marguerite being the exception, not the rule were quite true, and I also agreed with his view that while her lifestyle could not be condoned, we as a society assume that all of these type of women are cold and heartless, while this may not always be the case. A person can make the wrong choices in life when they are young, and try to redeem themselves, but sometimes past situations prevent them from changing their lives, even though they desperately wish to do so. This applies to both men and women in many different types of circumstances: involvement in crime; drug or alcohol abuse; gambling; prostitution; financial problems; poor marriage choices; etc. And this is the fact, which exists in the whole society.

As far as the other characters in the book, I think Marguerite was right in saying that no one truly cared about her, but only wanted something from her, the only exceptions being Armand and Julie Duprat. Of course, the Comte de G. and Comte de N. wanted her body and appearance. The

Duke needed to “wake up and smell the coffee” and realize that she could never replace his dead daughter. If he truly cared, he could have helped her leave her lifestyle without “keeping” her himself. And lastly, Prudence was a blood-sucking leech who used Marguerite almost worse than the men. I also think she was jealous of the fact that Marguerite had so much more courage than herself and someone truly loved her.

Last morning, when tiding my bookshelf, I took this book out of the shelf, and a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. I held it against the morning light and blew on it. The soft breeze carried it away. Camille is just like the camellia, she could never escape from the destiny of withering. But it wasn’t her fault; it’s because of the evil of Capitalism and the hideousness of that society.

Suddenly, I remembered a saying: “Women are like the flowers”. Those pretty women are like those beautiful flowers; their delicate beauty makes people feel they are the miracle of life. However, even the God envies their beauty. It seems that beautiful women always have tragic endings. As we are normal persons, even we can see the hideousness of humanity that results in their fate of withering, we can at most ask quietly in our hearts: Where have those beautiful flowers gone? Where have they gone?

The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe

It seemed to be such a coincidence that the night after I finished reading The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe, I was to dine in a restaurant distinctly related to the book itself. This restaurant was no other than the famous American-styled “Friday ’s. ” The reason for mentioning this restaurant is quite straightforward to all the gentlemen, ladies and children who have read the novel and enjoyed it, which is the fact that this restaurant was, most likely, named after the American Native in Robinson Crusoe, called Friday. This restaurant offers very exceptional service, for instance when the waitresses are asked to order dishes they kneel rather than stand, which, unlike the other restaurants I have been to, makes it easier for the customers to hear them speak. Moreover, Friday’s friendly services to the customers help them to make better choices when ordering dishes. I remembered when I went to Friday ’s last time; the waitress kindly described the items on the menu with precise details. It turned out that the combo I initially wanted was designed to be shared among a large group, not to be eaten by one person. I think this restaurant shows many commendable features similar to that of Friday. Friday brought emotional warmth to the people around him with his appealing personality. I think it was this personality that affected Crusoe and made him say that he loved Friday when Crusoe didn ’t express love for his parents, brothers, sisters, or even his wife. “When he espied me, he came running to me, laying himself down again upon the ground, with all the possible signs of an humble, thankful disposition, making many antic gestures to show it to let me know how he would serve me as long as he lived.” This was what Friday did after Crusoe had rescued him from the two savages chasing him. It was easy for me to see why Crusoe had loved Friday. After sometime, Crusoe and Friday were to rescue Friday’s father. When Friday reunited with his father, the scene was easy to move anyone: “It would have moved anyone to tears to have seen how Friday kissed him, embraced him, hugged him, cried, laughed, halloed, jumped about, danced,

sung; and then sung and jumped about again, like a distracted creature. It was a good while before I could make him speak to me.” This is my favourite chapter in the whole book. It is hard to see why Friday is an ex-savage when he can have personalities more praiseworthy than many civilized people, viz. Crusoe himself. “When he (Friday went to him (Friday’s father, he would sit down by him, open his breast, and hold his father’s head close to his bosom, half an hour together, to nourish it; then he took his arms and ankles, which were numbed and stiff with the binding, and rubbed them with his hands.” Furthermore, Friday’s expression of loyalty in asking Crusoe to kill him rather than leave him is more heartfelt than anything Crusoe ever says or does.

Crusoe, on the absolute contrary, seems incapable of deep feelings, as shown by his account of leaving his family—he never shows any emotions. After a moving lecture from Robinson’s father about his future, he still decided to follow his own wandering ambition. Careless was he about the wishes of his parents to keep him alive and prosperous, as he was the only child left in the family. When he came back from the island which he had lived on for twenty eight years, he found that it had been too late to tell his parents that he was still alive, but yet again he did not feel sorry for them; he also did not feel sorry for the two people who had to live in misery for nearly thirty years under the allusion all of their sons were dead. He had the same feelings for his wife: when he was married, he said it was “not either to my disadvantage or dissatisfaction”, implying that it was also neither to his advantage nor his satisfaction. Moreover, after his wife died, Robinson did not think of looking after the three children they had, but went back to the island, which he had lived on for twenty-eight years. It was on this trip which Robinson Crusoe revisited “His Island ” as he called it. I feel that Robinson ’s indifference to his family is almost emotionally cruel.

Before had clearly shown the contrast between Crusoe’s and Friday’s personalities, as when Friday, in his joyful reunion with his father, displayed far more emotion toward his family members than Crusoe, whereas Crusoe never mentions missing his family or dreams about the happiness of seeing them again. I think Defore is very successful in introducing Friday as part of the novel, it makes the whole novel seem much more complete and gripping to the reader, as well as proving that Defoe’s ideology of racism is civilized unlike many other Europeans at that time; natives and savages are not worse than others but can perhaps even be more modern and civilized. Those are the reasons of why I like The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe and Friday.

大学生兼职利弊的英文作文【五】

Many people simply regard Pride and Prejudice as a love story, but in my opinion, this book is an illustration of the society at that time. She perfectly reflected the relation between money and marriage at her time and gave the people in her works vivid characters. The characters have their own personalities. Mrs. Bennet is a woman who makes great efforts to marry off her daughters. Mr. Bingley is a friendly young man, but his friend, Mr. Darcy, is a very proud man who seems to always feel superior. Even the five daughters in Bennet family are very different. Jane is simple, innocent and never speaks evil of others. Elizabeth is a clever girl who always has her own opinion. Mary likes reading classic books. (Actually she is a pedant. Kitty doesn’t have her own opinion but likes to follow her sister, Lydia. Lydia is a girl who follows exotic things, handsome man, and is somehow a little profligate. When I read the book, I can always find the same personalities in the society now. That is why I think this book is indeed the representative of the society in Britain in the 18th century.

The family of gentleman in the countryside is Jane Austen’s favourite topic. But this little topic can reflect big problems. It concludes the stratum situation and economic relationships in Britain in her century. You can find these from the very beginning of this book.

The first sentence in this book is impressive. It reads: “It is a truth well known to all the world that an unmarried man in poss ession of a large fortune must be in need of a wife”. The undertone is very clear: the foundation of the marriage at that time is not emotion but possession.

People always think that Austen was an expert at telling love stories. In fact, the marriage in her book is not the result of love, but the result of economic needs. After reading this book, I know the truth is that a poor woman must be in need of a husband, a wealthy man.

I couldn’t forget how eager Mrs. Bennet wants to marry off her daughte rs. If you want to know why she is so crazy about these things, I must mention the situation in Britain at that time. Only the eldest son had the privilege of inheriting his father’s possessions. Younger sons and daughters who are used to luxurious lives have no choice but marry a man or woman in possession of a large fortune to continue their comfortable lives. Thus, we can see that getting married is a way to become wealthier, particularly for women without many possessions. Jane Austen told us that money and possession determined everything, including marriage and love in her century.

In “Pride and Prejudice”, the sister of Mr. Bingley strongly opposed his plan of marrying Jane because the Bennets don’t have many possessions and their social positions are much lower than them. From this, we can see there are a lot of obstacles for a not very rich woman to marry a wealthy husband. The society, the relatives would not allow them to get married.

In modern society, although the marriages of economic needs have decreased rapidly, the concept of “money determines everything” is still rooted in some people’s mind. A lot of parents try hard to interfere their children’s marriages. Education background, possessions, jobs remains the main reason that may influence one’s marriage. Marry for money is still a big problem in our

society. We can’t help thinking: can money determine everything?

Austen left this problem for us to think. The genius of Jane Austen lies in this perfect simplicity, the simplicity that reflects big problems. Although Austen was only 21 when she wrote “Pride and Prejudice”, her sharp observation of social lives makes the style of this book surprisingly mature and lively. The plots in her works are always very natural. The development of the plot is as inevitable as a problem in mathematics. I think the depth of Pride and Prejudice is the reason that makes this book prominent and classic. Today, her book still can be the guide telling us the economic relationships both at her time and in modern time.