大学恋爱英文作文120字【一】
Many people simply regard Pride and Prejudice as a love story, but in my opinion, this book is an illustration of the society at that time. She perfectly reflected the relation between money and marriage at her time and gave the people in her works vivid characters. The characters have their own personalities. Mrs. Bennet is a woman who makes great efforts to marry off her daughters. Mr. Bingley is a friendly young man, but his friend, Mr. Darcy, is a very proud man who seems to always feel superior. Even the five daughters in Bennet family are very different. Jane is simple, innocent and never speaks evil of others. Elizabeth is a clever girl who always has her own opinion. Mary likes reading classic books. (Actually she is a pedant. Kitty doesn’t have her own opinion but likes to follow her sister, Lydia. Lydia is a girl who follows exotic things, handsome man, and is somehow a little profligate. When I read the book, I can always find the same personalities in the society now. That is why I think this book is indeed the representative of the society in Britain in the 18th century.
The family of gentleman in the countryside is Jane Austen’s favourite topic. But this little topic can reflect big problems. It concludes the stratum situation and economic relationships in Britain in her century. You can find these from the very beginning of this book.
The first sentence in this book is impressive. It reads: “It is a truth well known to all the world that an unmarried man in poss ession of a large fortune must be in need of a wife”. The undertone is very clear: the foundation of the marriage at that time is not emotion but possession.
People always think that Austen was an expert at telling love stories. In fact, the marriage in her book is not the result of love, but the result of economic needs. After reading this book, I know the truth is that a poor woman must be in need of a husband, a wealthy man.
I couldn’t forget how eager Mrs. Bennet wants to marry off her daughte rs. If you want to know why she is so crazy about these things, I must mention the situation in Britain at that time. Only the eldest son had the privilege of inheriting his father’s possessions. Younger sons and daughters who are used to luxurious lives have no choice but marry a man or woman in possession of a large fortune to continue their comfortable lives. Thus, we can see that getting married is a way to become wealthier, particularly for women without many possessions. Jane Austen told us that money and possession determined everything, including marriage and love in her century.
In “Pride and Prejudice”, the sister of Mr. Bingley strongly opposed his plan of marrying Jane because the Bennets don’t have many possessions and their social positions are much lower than them. From this, we can see there are a lot of obstacles for a not very rich woman to marry a wealthy husband. The society, the relatives would not allow them to get married.
In modern society, although the marriages of economic needs have decreased rapidly, the concept of “money determines everything” is still rooted in some people’s mind. A lot of parents try hard to interfere their children’s marriages. Education background, possessions, jobs remains the main reason that may influence one’s marriage. Marry for money is still a big problem in our
society. We can’t help thinking: can money determine everything?
Austen left this problem for us to think. The genius of Jane Austen lies in this perfect simplicity, the simplicity that reflects big problems. Although Austen was only 21 when she wrote “Pride and Prejudice”, her sharp observation of social lives makes the style of this book surprisingly mature and lively. The plots in her works are always very natural. The development of the plot is as inevitable as a problem in mathematics. I think the depth of Pride and Prejudice is the reason that makes this book prominent and classic. Today, her book still can be the guide telling us the economic relationships both at her time and in modern time.
大学恋爱英文作文120字【二】
对于孟京辉的戏剧早有耳闻，而且常常被冠于“先锋”或者“实验”戏剧之名。周末应朋友之邀看了正在上演的《恋爱的犀牛》，看过之后备感失望。导演想揭示执着与坚持之于当代社会的价值和意义，无论是生命、爱情或是事业莫不如是，甚至还扮演起上帝的角色给守此信念的人带来好运。
如此主题并无不妥，就看如何建构这个故事，对主题进行挖掘和演绎。遗憾的是导演对社会的认知过于表面和粗浅，带来的是内容的杂乱和结构的松散，对主题的演绎缺乏深度的支持。插科打诨似的无厘头表演内容，除了说明该戏的社会背景外，能够支持导演这么做和选择的恐怕也就是商业因素了，作品深刻不深刻不重要，让大家傻乐一下，钱收回来就好。
说起“先锋”或者“实验”戏剧，从这个戏中看不出有什么能体现出先锋的概念。也许这个标签也不是孟京辉自己要的，是别人硬给他贴上的。戏中看到的是过多的手法和技巧，缺乏一个大的理念来统一整个戏的方向和灵魂。想到了电影镜头在戏剧中的'表现方法、充分利用表演的场地与空间、沉浸式地表演体验，男主人公与犀牛符号化般地隐喻等等，可这些只是手段而已，而且国外很多年前就在玩这些了，如果这也叫“先锋”的话，那在我们这里就真不知谁是傻子了。让我印象深刻的倒是导演对性交这个话题很是热衷，借着戏剧舞台自己过瘾的同时，也让有点文化的小资们在这个貌似高雅的殿堂里听到自己心里久违的放纵。同乐，同乐！
我国与西方的戏剧发展水平相比有较大差距，我们需要学的东西还很多。从这个意义上来说，每一个戏剧工作者的努力都是要多加支持和鼓励的。加油吧！我相信孟京辉们的努力工作会让越来越多的观众走进剧场。
大学恋爱英文作文120字【三】
I read the Chinese version of “Camille” a few years ago. At that time I was deeply moved by the main character Marguerite Gautier. “Camille” or “The Lady of the Camellias” by Alexandre Dumas, fils, is the story of Marguerite Gautier, a young courtesan, or kept woman, in Paris in the mid 1800's, and how she falls in love with a young man, Armand Duval, and then tries to escape from her questionable past. Unfortunately, it comes back to haunt her and she ends up returning to that life and dies painfully and alone, but with the knowledge that she was a noble woman at heart. When I first began to read the book, I did not care for Marguerite or her attitude or lifestyle, but as I got further into the narrative, I realized that her saucy attitude was a front to cover the lonely woman that she really was. She felt used, abused and unloved, until the gentle Armand Duval came into her life and showed her that he loved her as a person and not for what she could do for him. It must have taken great courage for Marguerite to leave the life she had lived for so long, knowing all along that it was probably too good to be true and would not last indefinitely. And it also showed that Marguerite really loved Armand Duval for she could even change herself for him.
However, happiness didn’t last for long. When M. Duval, Armand's father, came to her, pleading for her to leave Armand to save both Armand's reputation and that of his younger innocent sister, Marguerite saw a way to become pure of heart, if not in body. She felt that it was her duty, because she loved Armand so much, to do this even though it meant giving up her own happiness and hurting Armand temporarily. She reluctantly returned to her former life, knowing that.some day Armand would forgive her. Sadly, she died in debt and basically alone, except for her one female friend, Julie Duprat, who helped her during her illness. She had her journal sent to Armand after her death, explaining why she had made the choices she had. I think Dumas's last few lines about Marguerite being the exception, not the rule were quite true, and I also agreed with his view that while her lifestyle could not be condoned, we as a society assume that all of these type of women are cold and heartless, while this may not always be the case. A person can make the wrong choices in life when they are young, and try to redeem themselves, but sometimes past situations prevent them from changing their lives, even though they desperately wish to do so. This applies to both men and women in many different types of circumstances: involvement in crime; drug or alcohol abuse; gambling; prostitution; financial problems; poor marriage choices; etc. And this is the fact, which exists in the whole society.
As far as the other characters in the book, I think Marguerite was right in saying that no one truly cared about her, but only wanted something from her, the only exceptions being Armand and Julie Duprat. Of course, the Comte de G. and Comte de N. wanted her body and appearance. The
Duke needed to “wake up and smell the coffee” and realize that she could never replace his dead daughter. If he truly cared, he could have helped her leave her lifestyle without “keeping” her himself. And lastly, Prudence was a blood-sucking leech who used Marguerite almost worse than the men. I also think she was jealous of the fact that Marguerite had so much more courage than herself and someone truly loved her.
Last morning, when tiding my bookshelf, I took this book out of the shelf, and a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. I held it against the morning light and blew on it. The soft breeze carried it away. Camille is just like the camellia, she could never escape from the destiny of withering. But it wasn’t her fault; it’s because of the evil of Capitalism and the hideousness of that society.
Suddenly, I remembered a saying: “Women are like the flowers”. Those pretty women are like those beautiful flowers; their delicate beauty makes people feel they are the miracle of life. However, even the God envies their beauty. It seems that beautiful women always have tragic endings. As we are normal persons, even we can see the hideousness of humanity that results in their fate of withering, we can at most ask quietly in our hearts: Where have those beautiful flowers gone? Where have they gone?
The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe
It seemed to be such a coincidence that the night after I finished reading The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe, I was to dine in a restaurant distinctly related to the book itself. This restaurant was no other than the famous American-styled “Friday ’s. ” The reason for mentioning this restaurant is quite straightforward to all the gentlemen, ladies and children who have read the novel and enjoyed it, which is the fact that this restaurant was, most likely, named after the American Native in Robinson Crusoe, called Friday. This restaurant offers very exceptional service, for instance when the waitresses are asked to order dishes they kneel rather than stand, which, unlike the other restaurants I have been to, makes it easier for the customers to hear them speak. Moreover, Friday’s friendly services to the customers help them to make better choices when ordering dishes. I remembered when I went to Friday ’s last time; the waitress kindly described the items on the menu with precise details. It turned out that the combo I initially wanted was designed to be shared among a large group, not to be eaten by one person. I think this restaurant shows many commendable features similar to that of Friday. Friday brought emotional warmth to the people around him with his appealing personality. I think it was this personality that affected Crusoe and made him say that he loved Friday when Crusoe didn ’t express love for his parents, brothers, sisters, or even his wife. “When he espied me, he came running to me, laying himself down again upon the ground, with all the possible signs of an humble, thankful disposition, making many antic gestures to show it to let me know how he would serve me as long as he lived.” This was what Friday did after Crusoe had rescued him from the two savages chasing him. It was easy for me to see why Crusoe had loved Friday. After sometime, Crusoe and Friday were to rescue Friday’s father. When Friday reunited with his father, the scene was easy to move anyone: “It would have moved anyone to tears to have seen how Friday kissed him, embraced him, hugged him, cried, laughed, halloed, jumped about, danced,
sung; and then sung and jumped about again, like a distracted creature. It was a good while before I could make him speak to me.” This is my favourite chapter in the whole book. It is hard to see why Friday is an ex-savage when he can have personalities more praiseworthy than many civilized people, viz. Crusoe himself. “When he (Friday went to him (Friday’s father, he would sit down by him, open his breast, and hold his father’s head close to his bosom, half an hour together, to nourish it; then he took his arms and ankles, which were numbed and stiff with the binding, and rubbed them with his hands.” Furthermore, Friday’s expression of loyalty in asking Crusoe to kill him rather than leave him is more heartfelt than anything Crusoe ever says or does.
Crusoe, on the absolute contrary, seems incapable of deep feelings, as shown by his account of leaving his family—he never shows any emotions. After a moving lecture from Robinson’s father about his future, he still decided to follow his own wandering ambition. Careless was he about the wishes of his parents to keep him alive and prosperous, as he was the only child left in the family. When he came back from the island which he had lived on for twenty eight years, he found that it had been too late to tell his parents that he was still alive, but yet again he did not feel sorry for them; he also did not feel sorry for the two people who had to live in misery for nearly thirty years under the allusion all of their sons were dead. He had the same feelings for his wife: when he was married, he said it was “not either to my disadvantage or dissatisfaction”, implying that it was also neither to his advantage nor his satisfaction. Moreover, after his wife died, Robinson did not think of looking after the three children they had, but went back to the island, which he had lived on for twenty-eight years. It was on this trip which Robinson Crusoe revisited “His Island ” as he called it. I feel that Robinson ’s indifference to his family is almost emotionally cruel.
Before had clearly shown the contrast between Crusoe’s and Friday’s personalities, as when Friday, in his joyful reunion with his father, displayed far more emotion toward his family members than Crusoe, whereas Crusoe never mentions missing his family or dreams about the happiness of seeing them again. I think Defore is very successful in introducing Friday as part of the novel, it makes the whole novel seem much more complete and gripping to the reader, as well as proving that Defoe’s ideology of racism is civilized unlike many other Europeans at that time; natives and savages are not worse than others but can perhaps even be more modern and civilized. Those are the reasons of why I like The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe and Friday.
大学恋爱英文作文120字【四】
《恋爱先生》是一部都市情感剧，是一部男女之间交往需要锦囊妙计，需要大招、绝招和因人而异变换法宝的大片。故事里面的男主人公程皓是专门为人解决疑难杂症的情感专家，是专门研究女性的心理学家，更是高端牙科医院有名望的主治医生。可他在三十四集中却为自己的情感一直困惑。他暗恋了他的大学同学顾遥七年，如今他又碰上了因为他而失去工作的罗玥？现在他在她们两个之间来回的逢源。每一个人都不舍得伤害，却又在无意中伤害着她们。罗玥是因为无意中的插足，把顾遥的家庭给毁了。作为顾遥怎么会善罢甘休？因此这部电视剧的核心，他们几个在三十四集中各有自己的'算盘，各自各的打着心理战。
张铭阳，曾经喜欢在女人圈里走来晃去，那种一夜清欢的段段画面很是让程皓反感。某一天，张铭阳自从遇上了刚从美国回来的顾遥之后，他的漂荡之心开始了收敛，也开始了荡漾他深藏已久的真心。为了能够追上刚离过婚的顾遥，张铭阳使出了浑身解数，但还是被顾遥婉言拒绝。张铭阳在没有办法的情况下，也只有抱着无可奈何的态度等待。顾遥为了给毁了自己家庭的罗玥制造麻烦，有一天她找到了张铭阳，便与张铭阳提议，她想在他们牙科医院做助理？张铭阳一听顾遥的提议，可把他高兴坏了，因为他正处于无招可使，这下刚好有机会接触了。顾遥的到来，程皓和罗玥有点不太乐意。乐意不乐意，他们两个说了不算，因为张铭阳是这个医院的大***。再说了，顾遥也是程皓大学时期暗恋的女神，他也不能说什么。
这部电视剧还有其他的角色，邹北业是高科公司的一个总裁，因为他晚上失眠的原因，就在夜晚用自己的私家车拉客。一个晚上，模特乔依林坐了他的车。当他和乔依林聊天，感觉到了乔依林的独立、自爱、自重、自强的精神他是深深喜欢。因为在闲聊中他没有说出自己真实的身份，所以在后来的追求中难以圆满曾经撒下的谎言。在现今的社会，有几个女孩像乔依林这样自重、自爱，凭借自己的能力来成就自己。电视剧《恋爱先生》说的是追求期间的过程需要如何判断、处理，需要如何去做、去追求、去辨别，才能达到完美的一个过程。
大学恋爱英文作文120字【五】
大学恋爱英文作文120字【六】
很好看，甜蜜的诗人的话语混合着犀利的很紧跟时代的台词，网络用语还有脏话，连说带唱呵呵；
很先锋，悬空的床，灌满水的舞台（模拟雨后的大地），花洒模拟的雨，传送带模拟的“大路”，奔跑，尖叫，都给人别样的感受，你获得一种“通感”，看完这部话剧的感受，就好像你坐在吧台，喝下了一杯特别的饮料，似酒非酒，似茶非茶，不过可以确定里面一定不会少了柠檬和蜜糖，它的名字就叫做：爱情在想为什么是犀牛而不是河马或着长颈鹿，哦，对了，犀牛顶着一个牛角尖啊，是的，这是一个钻牛角尖的恋爱的故事。
故事很简单，简单讲，A爱B，B爱C，爱前面的状语均为疯狂的。
爱情令人盲目，并且诗兴大发，呵呵，有个妞说她渴望被一个诗人爱上，因为可以收到热辣辣的情诗，真没这个必要，呵呵，就算他不会写也会抄，就算写的很烂也没事，因为一颗充满爱情的心太容易被打动，这就是为什么那些诸如《老婆老公我爱你》的恶俗的歌能够流行的原因。要是空心人那还是免了吧，哈哈
具体的故事就是，这个疯狂的男主角的充满了纯美的爱情和世俗的麻痹的心灵之间的征战，当然了，这个作为动物园饲养犀牛的.饲养员的男孩子为了坚持自己美好的爱情对自己进行了一系列符合世俗化标准的改造，学英语，学电脑，，，呵呵，想起那个娶了瑞典公主的健身教练。
最否定这个男主角的疯狂行为的一句台词就是：“盲目的夸大一个女人和另一个女人之间的差异就是你痛苦生活的根源”其实这句话很有道理，盲目的爱情是不值得提倡的，爱情应该是两情相悦的，要是很痛苦那还是算了吧。坚持美好固然很重要，但是还是坚持应该并且能够坚持的吧。所以年轻的时候该疯狂的就好好的疯狂吧，到了该结婚的时候就踏踏实实的结婚吧。
演员谢幕后，一直被男主角最后大段台词所吸引很沉静的gy非常动情的说：“真好啊！！！”，她的表情深深的触动了我，我突然意识到，很多观众都被拉入了这疯狂的炙热的爱情里被深深的被打动了，而我，不过在旁边看戏，如此淡然。
“让我轻抚你的后背，让你重新长出天使的翅膀”，我最喜欢这句台词，我特别喜欢这句台词。
这份爱，也许每个人都可以彼此给予。我轻抚你的后背，让你重新长出天使的翅膀。
大学恋爱英文作文120字【七】
This is a story about a special and unreserved woman who has been exposed to a hostile environment but continuously and fearlessly struggling for her ideal life. The story can be interpreted as a symbol of the independent spirit.
It seems to me that many readers’ English reading experience starts with Jane Eyer. I am of no exception. As we refer to the movie “Jane Eyer”, it is not surprising to find some differences because of its being filmized and retold in a new way, but the spirit of the novel remains----to be an independent person, both physically and mentally.
Jane Eyer was a born resister, whose parents went off when she was very young, and her aunt，the only relative she had，treated her as badly as a ragtag. Since Jane’s education in Lowwood Orphanage began, she didn’t get what she had been expecting——simply being regarded as a common person, just the same as any other girl around. The suffers from being humiliated and devastated teach Jane to be persevering and prize dignity over anything else.As a reward of revolting the ruthless oppression, Jane got a chance to be a tutor in Thornfield Garden. There she made the acquaintance of lovely Adele and that garden’s owner, Rochester, a man with warm heart despite a cold face outside. Jane expected to change the life from then on, but fate had decided otherwise: After Jane and Rochester fell in love with each other and got down to get marry, she unfortunately came to know in fact Rochester had got a legal wife, who seemed to be the shadow following Rochester and led to his moodiness all the time ----Rochester was also a despairing person in need of salvation. Jane did want to give him a hand, however, she made up her mind to leave, because she didn’t want to betray her own principles, because she was Jane Eyer. The film has finally got a symbolist end: Jane inherited a large number of legacies and finally returned. After finding Rochester ’s misfortune brought by his original mad wife, Jane chose to stay with him forever.
I don’t know what others feel, but frankly speaking, I would rather regard the section that Jane began her teaching job in Thornfield as the film’s end----especially when I heard Jane’s words “Never in my life have I been awaken so happily. ” For one thing, this ideal and brand-new beginning of life was what Jane had been imagining for long as a suffering person; for another, this should be what the audiences with my views hoped her to get. But the professional judgment of producing films reminded me to wait for a totally different result: There must be something wrong coming with the excellence----perhaps not only should another section be added to enrich the story, but also we may see from the next transition of Jane’s life that “Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you would get.”
What ’s more, this film didn’t end when Jane left Thornfield. For Jane Eyer herself, there should always be somewhere to realize her great ideal of being independent considering her fortitude, but for Rochester, how he can get salvation? The film gives the answer tentatively: Jane eventually got back to Rochester. In fact, when Jane met Rochester for the first time, she scared his horse and made his heel strained, to a certain extent, which meant Rochester would get retrieval because of Jane. We can consider Rochester’s experiences as that of religion meaning. The fire by his frantic wife was the punishment for the cynicism early in his life. After it, Rochester got the mercy of the God and the love of the woman whom he loved. Here we can say: human nature and divinity get united perfectly in order to let such a story accord with the requirements of both two sides. The value of this film may be due to its efforts to explore a new way for the development of humanism under the faith of religion.
