暑假生活英文作文大学【一】
我是个初二的学生，这个暑假一结束，我的年级就升一升了，暑假一结束我就是个初三的学生了，在初一、初二时看到初三的学长学姐们为中考奋斗着，为中考努力着，烦恼着，早早的就上学了，很晚才回家，一天的时间大多都在学校度过，可想而知初三的生活是艰苦的！暑假一结束就要过上初三的生活，所以很不舍，很不想暑假的结束，想要暑假能够再延长些，延长些！
无论是在几年级都希望暑假的来临，希望暑假快些到来，这样就不用上学，不用面对老师交代的大量作业和练习，不用早起，不用面对老师的批评，不用面对竞争的压力，暑假给我带来的只是快乐，美好时光，笑声，无忧无虑的生活，没有烦恼的日子，忙碌后期待的生活！
暑假我们不用早起，我们在一起放风筝，晚上聚在一起看星星，说说心里话，没有学习上的烦恼，不用担心明天上什么课，不用担心又没有完成老师交代的练习，不用担心又没有预习课本内容，更不用看到父母望子成龙望女成凤的愿望，暑假充满的只是我们的笑声，笑声中是我们快乐的证据，是我们没有烦恼而发出的声音，虽然只是暂时的快乐，但那笑声我们会永远记住，那段快乐的回忆我们会珍藏，那是我们宝贵的回忆啊！
暑假别结束，暑假别结束好吗？虽然你给于我的快乐只是暂时的，但那却是我们忙碌后烦恼后发出的笑声，那是我们宝贵的回忆，就让我再多听听那笑声，多发出那笑声，让这回忆再长久些好吗？
时间！时间！时间为什么不能停留呢？
眼看着暑假快结束了，真不舍，真不舍，过了这个暑假我的学习生活就会更艰苦，更累了，真不舍暑假结束，真不舍暑假的离去，暑假！暑假！暑假！
时间！我跟你商量件事好吗？能不能，能不能将暑假延长些，延长些！
暑假生活英文作文大学【二】
This is a story about a special and unreserved woman who has been exposed to a hostile environment but continuously and fearlessly struggling for her ideal life. The story can be interpreted as a symbol of the independent spirit.
It seems to me that many readers’ English reading experience starts with Jane Eyer. I am of no exception. As we refer to the movie “Jane Eyer”, it is not surprising to find some differences because of its being filmized and retold in a new way, but the spirit of the novel remains----to be an independent person, both physically and mentally.
Jane Eyer was a born resister, whose parents went off when she was very young, and her aunt，the only relative she had，treated her as badly as a ragtag. Since Jane’s education in Lowwood Orphanage began, she didn’t get what she had been expecting——simply being regarded as a common person, just the same as any other girl around. The suffers from being humiliated and devastated teach Jane to be persevering and prize dignity over anything else.As a reward of revolting the ruthless oppression, Jane got a chance to be a tutor in Thornfield Garden. There she made the acquaintance of lovely Adele and that garden’s owner, Rochester, a man with warm heart despite a cold face outside. Jane expected to change the life from then on, but fate had decided otherwise: After Jane and Rochester fell in love with each other and got down to get marry, she unfortunately came to know in fact Rochester had got a legal wife, who seemed to be the shadow following Rochester and led to his moodiness all the time ----Rochester was also a despairing person in need of salvation. Jane did want to give him a hand, however, she made up her mind to leave, because she didn’t want to betray her own principles, because she was Jane Eyer. The film has finally got a symbolist end: Jane inherited a large number of legacies and finally returned. After finding Rochester ’s misfortune brought by his original mad wife, Jane chose to stay with him forever.
I don’t know what others feel, but frankly speaking, I would rather regard the section that Jane began her teaching job in Thornfield as the film’s end----especially when I heard Jane’s words “Never in my life have I been awaken so happily. ” For one thing, this ideal and brand-new beginning of life was what Jane had been imagining for long as a suffering person; for another, this should be what the audiences with my views hoped her to get. But the professional judgment of producing films reminded me to wait for a totally different result: There must be something wrong coming with the excellence----perhaps not only should another section be added to enrich the story, but also we may see from the next transition of Jane’s life that “Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you would get.”
What ’s more, this film didn’t end when Jane left Thornfield. For Jane Eyer herself, there should always be somewhere to realize her great ideal of being independent considering her fortitude, but for Rochester, how he can get salvation? The film gives the answer tentatively: Jane eventually got back to Rochester. In fact, when Jane met Rochester for the first time, she scared his horse and made his heel strained, to a certain extent, which meant Rochester would get retrieval because of Jane. We can consider Rochester’s experiences as that of religion meaning. The fire by his frantic wife was the punishment for the cynicism early in his life. After it, Rochester got the mercy of the God and the love of the woman whom he loved. Here we can say: human nature and divinity get united perfectly in order to let such a story accord with the requirements of both two sides. The value of this film may be due to its efforts to explore a new way for the development of humanism under the faith of religion.
暑假生活英文作文大学【三】
《一九八四》是英国左翼作者乔治·奥威尔于1949年出版的反乌托邦式政治小说。小说刻画了一个令人感到窒息和恐怖的，以追逐权力为最终目标的假想的极权主义社会。1984年的世界被三个超级大国所瓜分，三个国家之间的战争不断，国家内部社会结构被彻底打破，均实行高度集权统治，以改变历史、改变语言、打破家庭等极端手段钳制人们的思想和本能，以具有监视与监听功能的“电幕”控制人们的行为，以对领袖的个人崇拜和对国内外敌人的仇恨维持社会的运转。故事中主人公所在的国家“大洋国”只有一个政党——英格兰社会主义，。社会也根据与党的关系被分为核心党员、外围党员和无产者三个阶层。政府机构分为四个部门：和平部负责军备和战争，友爱部负责维持秩序、镇压和严刑拷打，真理部负责宣传、文教和篡改历史，富裕部负责生产和分配。在大洋国“真理部”从事篡改历史工作的外围党员温斯顿因为在工作中逐渐对其所处的社会和领袖“老大哥”产生怀疑，并与另一位外围党员裘利亚产生感情，因而成为思想犯，在经历了专门负责内部清洗的“友爱部”的思想改造之后最终成为了“思想纯洁者”。
整个小说的剧情颇为极端夸张，甚至还有一些荒诞。你无法想像那样一种生活：人与人之间没有情感的交流，每个人身上看不到人性，每天都是麻木的生活全心全意的信奉着他们的“老大哥”;按时出操，按时工作，按时吃饭睡觉，每个人都过着看似井井有条的同样的生活，却又显得那么压抑，他们的生活中看不到一丝自由。这就是乔治·奥威尔想要向我们展现的一种极权统治之下的高压生活，整个国家就像一座监狱，电幕、巡警无时无刻不在监视着人们的一举一动，但更有过于监狱的是集权政府对思想的钳制，即“老大哥”鼓吹的“双重思想”——一个人的脑子里同时拥有两种相反的信念，并且两种都接受。人民一方面面对科学时抱有客观的态度，但一旦面对政治便无条件的信奉“老大哥”。这样的思想钳制是最为可怕的，因为它割离开了人们的理性，让人们在看似清醒的状态下放弃了对真相的追求。所有人都别有用心地编织着谎言，却又真心实意地相信着谎言。真相是什么，真相就是谎言包装下的谎言，记忆扭曲下的记忆。
但是人们是否真的被关在社会大监狱里就从未想过越狱。是他们不知道自己被愚弄了吗?非也。事实上，许许多多的人十分享受这样一种思想被奴役的感觉。“思想警察”奥布兰就是如此。他清楚地知道社会在倒退，谎言充满世界，却甘愿做体制机器里的一颗螺丝钉，同时又受着“老大哥”的监视。奥布兰所理解的自由不仅是对自己的统治，还有对别人的支配。然而，这种病态的自由既是对自由精神的异化，也是对他人的不尊重。同时，他又把极权社会所宣扬的“真理”内化为自身的思想，把自己镶嵌在这个病态的体制中，将自己的自由体现为对他人的控制，成为环境的一部分。他受制于环境，又依靠着环境，甚至享受着环境。可以说，像奥布兰这类人，是一种在长期奴役中被异化的人。
暑假生活英文作文大学【四】
《1984》是一部经典的反乌托邦小说，一个在老大哥的独裁之下完全的思想操控社会，读完后我们不由得发问，我们所知道的“真相”究竟是我们在探索与实践中得到的，还是某个集体经过精心设计和操作后，将其故意摆在我们面前，刻意让我们发现后，操纵我们的思想呢?
普通民众往往是信息的接受者，媒体成为了我们对于外界信息接受的最广泛渠道，主流媒体放出的新闻往往代表了“真相”，而在这则新闻浓重的标题之下，当事人的声音往往被压抑、甚至抹***，试图去探求我们目所不能及领域的人，也随着时间渐渐淡去，石沉大海，而接收不到信息的我们，默默认定了这份无法被确认的真实。这是一种对于获取真相自由的抹***。
自由是什么，“2+2=4”就是起码的自由，人是追求自由的生物，在密闭的环境中，只要存在一条缝隙，人都会拼命向着那点光爬去，所以在重压之下被限制的自由无法控制体制中的人，而最好的方法就是，将这份自由本身进行限定，让人们在一套体系之中肆意追求他们渴望的自由，怀抱着大量“被设计的真相”，沉浸在对统治者的感恩与赞颂之中。在《1984》中，奥威尔为我们构筑了一个完美的集权统治社会，通过“思想警察”这一重要系统设定，他们对于跑出体制之外的人强制进行洗脑，用近乎残酷的方式扭转他们的思想，只留下彻底的认同，彻底毁灭个体思维的多样性，使本真的思维只存在于统治者的脑中，人们宛如家畜一样简单地活着。
谈及《1984》就忍不住说起《肖申克的救赎》，典狱长将监狱设计成了他的小王国，老布在入狱50年之后反而对外界的“自由”充满了恐惧，就像在鸟笼中的鸟儿，尽管憧憬着广阔的蓝天，但一旦走出了牢笼，就不再知道世界的边缘在哪里，走向自由的世界，意味着失去曾经的“了解”，变得孤立无援。人最可怕的，就是将自身化为体制的一部分，一方面厌恶着体系剥夺他的'自由，另一方面却又害怕失去对体制的依靠，被一只大手向一处牵引，失去选择固然残忍，但当选择不再受限，踏出的任何一步却又像是徒步深渊，这就是自由的代价，这也是为什么，老布在走出监狱后，最终出于对自由的恐惧，选择了自***。
鸟笼中的自由终究不是真正的自由，人永远不能放弃独立思考的能力，对于《1984》有这么一句评价，“多一个人读这本书，就多一份自由的保障”，只要今天个体思考的多样性不被抹***，独裁就难以降临。人是有思想的芦苇，人的可贵之处就在于他们会思考，新闻也好、教育也好，如果人只能成为单纯的接收者，便也缺失了作为人的意义，所谓的“真理”、“真相”都值得我们剥丝抽茧、反复推敲，不惧怕质疑，不畏惧改变，正是这份思考才一直推动着社会的前进，使人们能够掌握唯一的真实。
暑假生活英文作文大学【五】
Many people simply regard Pride and Prejudice as a love story, but in my opinion, this book is an illustration of the society at that time. She perfectly reflected the relation between money and marriage at her time and gave the people in her works vivid characters. The characters have their own personalities. Mrs. Bennet is a woman who makes great efforts to marry off her daughters. Mr. Bingley is a friendly young man, but his friend, Mr. Darcy, is a very proud man who seems to always feel superior. Even the five daughters in Bennet family are very different. Jane is simple, innocent and never speaks evil of others. Elizabeth is a clever girl who always has her own opinion. Mary likes reading classic books. (Actually she is a pedant. Kitty doesn’t have her own opinion but likes to follow her sister, Lydia. Lydia is a girl who follows exotic things, handsome man, and is somehow a little profligate. When I read the book, I can always find the same personalities in the society now. That is why I think this book is indeed the representative of the society in Britain in the 18th century.
The family of gentleman in the countryside is Jane Austen’s favourite topic. But this little topic can reflect big problems. It concludes the stratum situation and economic relationships in Britain in her century. You can find these from the very beginning of this book.
The first sentence in this book is impressive. It reads: “It is a truth well known to all the world that an unmarried man in poss ession of a large fortune must be in need of a wife”. The undertone is very clear: the foundation of the marriage at that time is not emotion but possession.
People always think that Austen was an expert at telling love stories. In fact, the marriage in her book is not the result of love, but the result of economic needs. After reading this book, I know the truth is that a poor woman must be in need of a husband, a wealthy man.
I couldn’t forget how eager Mrs. Bennet wants to marry off her daughte rs. If you want to know why she is so crazy about these things, I must mention the situation in Britain at that time. Only the eldest son had the privilege of inheriting his father’s possessions. Younger sons and daughters who are used to luxurious lives have no choice but marry a man or woman in possession of a large fortune to continue their comfortable lives. Thus, we can see that getting married is a way to become wealthier, particularly for women without many possessions. Jane Austen told us that money and possession determined everything, including marriage and love in her century.
In “Pride and Prejudice”, the sister of Mr. Bingley strongly opposed his plan of marrying Jane because the Bennets don’t have many possessions and their social positions are much lower than them. From this, we can see there are a lot of obstacles for a not very rich woman to marry a wealthy husband. The society, the relatives would not allow them to get married.
In modern society, although the marriages of economic needs have decreased rapidly, the concept of “money determines everything” is still rooted in some people’s mind. A lot of parents try hard to interfere their children’s marriages. Education background, possessions, jobs remains the main reason that may influence one’s marriage. Marry for money is still a big problem in our
society. We can’t help thinking: can money determine everything?
Austen left this problem for us to think. The genius of Jane Austen lies in this perfect simplicity, the simplicity that reflects big problems. Although Austen was only 21 when she wrote “Pride and Prejudice”, her sharp observation of social lives makes the style of this book surprisingly mature and lively. The plots in her works are always very natural. The development of the plot is as inevitable as a problem in mathematics. I think the depth of Pride and Prejudice is the reason that makes this book prominent and classic. Today, her book still can be the guide telling us the economic relationships both at her time and in modern time.
