大学跟高中的不同英文作文【一】
This is a story about a special and unreserved woman who has been exposed to a hostile environment but continuously and fearlessly struggling for her ideal life. The story can be interpreted as a symbol of the independent spirit.
It seems to me that many readers’ English reading experience starts with Jane Eyer. I am of no exception. As we refer to the movie “Jane Eyer”, it is not surprising to find some differences because of its being filmized and retold in a new way, but the spirit of the novel remains----to be an independent person, both physically and mentally.
Jane Eyer was a born resister, whose parents went off when she was very young, and her aunt，the only relative she had，treated her as badly as a ragtag. Since Jane’s education in Lowwood Orphanage began, she didn’t get what she had been expecting——simply being regarded as a common person, just the same as any other girl around. The suffers from being humiliated and devastated teach Jane to be persevering and prize dignity over anything else.As a reward of revolting the ruthless oppression, Jane got a chance to be a tutor in Thornfield Garden. There she made the acquaintance of lovely Adele and that garden’s owner, Rochester, a man with warm heart despite a cold face outside. Jane expected to change the life from then on, but fate had decided otherwise: After Jane and Rochester fell in love with each other and got down to get marry, she unfortunately came to know in fact Rochester had got a legal wife, who seemed to be the shadow following Rochester and led to his moodiness all the time ----Rochester was also a despairing person in need of salvation. Jane did want to give him a hand, however, she made up her mind to leave, because she didn’t want to betray her own principles, because she was Jane Eyer. The film has finally got a symbolist end: Jane inherited a large number of legacies and finally returned. After finding Rochester ’s misfortune brought by his original mad wife, Jane chose to stay with him forever.
I don’t know what others feel, but frankly speaking, I would rather regard the section that Jane began her teaching job in Thornfield as the film’s end----especially when I heard Jane’s words “Never in my life have I been awaken so happily. ” For one thing, this ideal and brand-new beginning of life was what Jane had been imagining for long as a suffering person; for another, this should be what the audiences with my views hoped her to get. But the professional judgment of producing films reminded me to wait for a totally different result: There must be something wrong coming with the excellence----perhaps not only should another section be added to enrich the story, but also we may see from the next transition of Jane’s life that “Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you would get.”
What ’s more, this film didn’t end when Jane left Thornfield. For Jane Eyer herself, there should always be somewhere to realize her great ideal of being independent considering her fortitude, but for Rochester, how he can get salvation? The film gives the answer tentatively: Jane eventually got back to Rochester. In fact, when Jane met Rochester for the first time, she scared his horse and made his heel strained, to a certain extent, which meant Rochester would get retrieval because of Jane. We can consider Rochester’s experiences as that of religion meaning. The fire by his frantic wife was the punishment for the cynicism early in his life. After it, Rochester got the mercy of the God and the love of the woman whom he loved. Here we can say: human nature and divinity get united perfectly in order to let such a story accord with the requirements of both two sides. The value of this film may be due to its efforts to explore a new way for the development of humanism under the faith of religion.
大学跟高中的不同英文作文【二】
“和”是指共生互动、相同互通、和而创新；“不同”则是相异互补。这种和而不同的思想正好用来解释三者的关系，人文、科学与生活三者之间既有着相同互通、共生互动的关系，又有着相异互补的区别。
想起电影《阿凡达》的结局不禁思考：为什么拥有了高科技的地球人最终却败给了原始的土著纳威人？其实思考后会得出这样一个道理：社会、人类要想和谐健康发展，既离不开科技的发达，也离不开人文精神的提升，而这一切都源于生活。就像材料所给的那个故事一样，如果没有瘟疫，也不会有人想去研究微生物，而有了瘟疫却没有显微镜的发明，那么单靠人文精神的力量是拯救不了那些瘟疫中奄奄一息的人们的。所以三者有了联系就要发挥各自的不同，在不同中朝一个共同的目标发展，只有这样才能达到最终好的效果。
1988年，当75名诺贝尔奖获得者聚集一堂的时候，有记者问获奖者：“您在哪所大学、哪个实验室学到了您认为最重要的\'东西？”一个白发苍苍的学者思考片刻后回答道：在幼儿园。“在幼儿园学到了什么重要的东西呢？”记者不解的问。“把自己的东西分一半给小伙伴，不是自己的东西不要拿，做错事要表示歉意等等。”学者这样回答了记者。正是这一番话给了我们很大的启迪，一位为世界科学做出重大贡献的人，影响他的东西不是哪个实验室，而是幼儿园，是幼儿园里渗透给他的一种人文精神，而这种人文精神来自于生活同时也作用于生活。所以说这种来自于生活的人文精神需要科学的力量做奠基，这正是它们三者相同互通的地方。
我们离不开人文情怀，也离不开科学探索。南丁格尔的事迹众人皆知：她开护士学校，并带领护士将战场的死亡率由42%降低到2%!没有心系国家，心忧百姓的人文情怀，她就不会做出这般举措。取而代之，她会尽情享受父亲提供的优厚的物质生活，终生活在上流社会的“幸福”中。没有科学探索，她不可能把救死扶伤做到极致。空有一腔爱国心，却没有任何的实际工作，只是站在战场上大喊“我要降低死亡率！”有何作用？因此，我们说，我们呼唤人文情怀，也追求科学探索。
玛丽修女的质问让大家感悟人文情怀，施图林格的回复让大家警卫科学探索。人文情怀饱含对自身的关切、对他人的关怀，对世界的关注；科学探索富有对物质本真的探究，对未知事物的探秘，对理想假说的探求。我想，对于个人至于全人类的幸福生活而言，总离不开悲天悯人、关注当下的人文情怀，更离不开务实求新、开拓进取的科学探索。
现如今社会，计算机技术快速发张，运算速度已可高达每秒万亿次以上，计算机应用的触角几乎深入到各领域，全世界成为一个地球村。然而网上的h客、病毒却肆意横行。这种科学的进步正需要合理的人文精神做导向，只有这样才能达到一种和谐和健康。有了正确的人文精神做导向后，要想让科学得到真正的进步和发展，我们需要从生活的点滴小事做起，很显然，这一切又回归到了生活中。人文、科学和生活这三者正是从“和而不同”的基点出发，在相同互通中进行相异互补。
