资深高考语文阅卷人、华东师大中文系教授王光祖坦承,由于作文阅卷主观性很强,就像做菜肴,各人的口味也不尽相同,所以每年都会有上千篇作文由于初评意见不一,被提交到阅卷中心组复议,改高改低的情况十分普遍。以今年为例,有篇作文初评时第一位老师判了20分,第二位老师给了43分,结果中心组反复阅读后,给出了64分的高分。而另一篇作文初评是70分,但中心组老师复评时一致认为,该文华而不实,脂粉气太浓,结果改到了60分以下。
I’m very happy to receive your letter, and I’m glad to hear that you will go to China to learn Chinese here. I have already found a fiat for you. It is on Fangcao Street, which is not far from Jianxin Chinese School. Bus No.11 can take you there, and it is one stop before the Chinese School. The flat is on the third floor with 3 rooms, one of which is bedroom, the other two are bathroom and kitchen. There are a bed, a sofa, a desk and some chairs in this 25 square-metres small fiat, and the rent is 500 yuan per month. Maybe this fiat is not as good as your wish, but I’ll try my best to meet your needs. If it is not suitable enough, write to me and I will look for another better place.
Hope you will come here soon!
All the best!
Yours,
Li Hua
对那篇已经见诸媒体的被提高到64分的作文,黄玉峰老师则提出了自己的看法,认为如果中学生们模仿该文的文体和立意,以为这样的“创新”就能在高考中得高分,这就很有可能形成误导,因为高考作文毕竟不是文艺创作,更注重考查的是学生对社会生活的辨析能力和逻辑思维能力。
而彭世强老师也无奈地说,高考毕竟要求多拿分数,不能太冒险,对于平时写作水平处于中等以下的同学来说,最好不要轻易地搞所谓的“创新”,对于写作基础较好的同学来说,可以在角度、结构上赋予点新意,但也不能太标新立异,要能让阅卷老师在短时间内看得下去,说得直白一点,考生作文中有好的东西,要善于主动“喂”给阅卷老师。
© 2022 xuexicn.net,All Rights Reserved.