湖北工业大学英文作文【一】
“大山的子孙哟！爱太阳哟，太阳那个爱着哟，山里的人呐！”这是一首烩炎人口的高山民歌，它像一股清泉，一滴圣水，流在我的心中，滴在我的心田。
山歌朴实，宛转，悠扬，富有传奇色彩，拥有山的味道。作为湖北人，我心中也有一支歌，下面请大家欣赏我给大家唱的山歌。
第一支山歌——人才歌。
湖北位于祖国中部，物华天宝，地灵人杰，素有重教兴学，培养人才的优良传统。“惟楚有才，于斯为盛”，古今皆出人才。提起湖北名人，那真是闻名海内外。这里有开创浪漫主义诗风的一代伟人屈原，有世界上第一部茶叶专著《茶经》的作者茶圣陆羽，有活字印刷术的发明者毕昇，有学者、民主战士闻一多，有戏剧家曹禺……
这里单提一位，明代医药学家——李时珍。蕲春县蕲州镇人。他刻苦学习，积极钻研医学，同时遍读经史百家书，病人都“千里就医于门”，皆“立活不取值”。为了编好《本草纲目》，他学习“神龙尝百草”的精神，自1565年开始，历尽艰辛，先后到武当山等地收集药物标本和处方，并拜访渔人、药工、捕蛇者为师。有参考历代有关医药方面的书籍800余种，“考古证今，穷究物理”，收录了上千万字的札记和材料。于1578年完成192万字的《本草纲目》，这部书在世界科学史上占有重要地位，李时珍也被联合国评为值得纪念的世界十大杰出科学家之一。
听完了第一首歌，连我自己都被湖北的历史所吸引、感染了。
第二支山歌——山水歌。
湖北山清水秀，单是鄂西，就有数不完道不尽的山水资源。这里拥有世界上最多种类的第三纪大冰川动植物化石，是古生物的天然避难所；这里拥有对人体健康特别有益的物质硒，是全国独有的富硒之地；这里拥有长江三峡、武当山、神农架、清江山水画廊等世界奇观；这里有三峡大坝、葛洲坝工程、丹江口水库等人见奇迹。目前鄂西生态文化旅游圈拥有两处世界文化遗产（武当山和明显陵）、拥有国家级和省级历史文化名城七座，非物质文化遗产35个，国家级自然保护区7个……
这里的山，钟毓灵秀，青翠欲滴，这里的水，清澈见底，似练似纱。生活在这片山水中的各族儿女，纯朴善良，勤劳勇敢、心灵手巧，他们用自己的双手，把这片热土装扮的更美丽。一曲悠悠的山水歌，似乎把我们带进美丽的神话世界。
听完了这首歌，你是不是被湖北那如画的风景吸引住了呢？是不是也想去那里领略一下神仙的风采呢？那我们还得了解了解现在的湖北，下面就请来听第三首歌
第三支山歌——发展歌
湖北提出了符合实际独具特色的发展战略“两圈一带”。“两圈”指的是武汉城市圈和鄂西生态文化旅游圈。“一带”指的是长江经济带。
目前，以大城市武汉为核心，周边黄石等八个城市构成的经济联合体，趋于一体化的发展态势已经形成，其带动辐射作用日益增强。现在湖北每一个城市都在行动，用自己的优势，在经济、文化上奋起直追。
鄂西生态文化旅游圈发展也在火热进行中，鄂西各地，都在寻找自己的优势，发挥自己的特长。
长江经济带更是焕发生机活力，大型钢铁、化工、建材等产业不约而同的依江而建，伴水而生。武汉新港建设，重现“黄金水道”的魅力。今日的湖北正在奋起直追！
山歌朴实、宛转、悠扬，拥有山水的味道；湖北人纯朴、善良、美丽，弥漫传奇色彩！湖北如诗如画的.河山，像一幅渐渐展开的画卷；湖北近年来取得一连串辉煌骄人的成就，那么的令人陶醉。如此秀美的风景、悠久的历史，那么优美，恰似一支支山歌，包含深情，倾诉热爱，道出信心，她吸引着四面八方的客人，到湖北来探亲旅游、参观考察、投资兴业。我们相信，湖北的明天会更好，这支山歌会越来越有吸引力。
湖北工业大学英文作文【二】
回了北港后，把妈妈给妹妹，侄子们的衣服送出去后，便和妹妹坐着摩托车回了王家坡——外婆家。回去后，我看见外婆那张紧绷着的脸上绽放出了美丽的笑容，那种笑容是难能可贵的，这个笑容里蕴藏着见到亲人的'那种开心与激动。没经历过是无法那种快乐，但也有反的一面，当分别时，犹如刀割一般心痛，不舍，眼泪十分不听话的往外涌，一滴接一滴。
在王家坡，外婆经常要出去干活，因为外公早逝，我怕外婆孤单，有时也会跟着一起去。在路上，说说在深圳的趣事，看看笑着的外婆，我的心中不禁有一丝恐惧与无助，因为无法永远这样陪着外婆，无法让外婆永远怎么开心。我终究还是会去深圳念书。外婆会老，我会长大，我很害怕如果哪一天外婆去世后，我该怎么办？我自3个月大就是外婆一手带大的，我很难想象没有外婆的生活我该怎么办？我束手无策，也不敢继续往下想。
外婆干活时，我在旁边帮一下，玩一下，说下话，时不时笑一下。就这样，一个上午或一个下午就过去了。有时我会用草去编花环玩，有时会逗逗附近的野猫野狗。回到家，吃个饭，看看电视，一天过完了。一个平凡而充实的一天就这样过去了。
最近，外婆把花生给挖出来，那客厅都给堆满了。于是我便和外婆摘起花生，一边摘花生一边谈深圳的趣事，家里的趣事，不知不觉又谈到我的学习。外婆让我要努力地读书，将来考个好大学。我听了后，不禁鼻子一酸，从小到大，外婆十分宠我，到了这么大把年纪了，本来是享清福的，而她却还在为儿女们，孙儿们操心。我冲进洗手间，洗了把脸，出来后继续摘花生。有时摘到小的，就会直接剥了吃，但我发现一个很奇怪的现象，小花生米比大花生米要大，要饱满。我从花生悟出一个道理：不要小看别人，或许像那些成绩差一些的人，说不定长大以后会是大老板，因为他们承受能力要比别人强许多。而那些成绩好的就不一样了，他们天生好强好胜，容不得一点失误，正因为这样，他们容易被挫折折磨着。所以，我们应该正确对待每一个人，不要刻意去针对别人。
湖北工业大学英文作文【三】
I read the Chinese version of “Camille” a few years ago. At that time I was deeply moved by the main character Marguerite Gautier. “Camille” or “The Lady of the Camellias” by Alexandre Dumas, fils, is the story of Marguerite Gautier, a young courtesan, or kept woman, in Paris in the mid 1800's, and how she falls in love with a young man, Armand Duval, and then tries to escape from her questionable past. Unfortunately, it comes back to haunt her and she ends up returning to that life and dies painfully and alone, but with the knowledge that she was a noble woman at heart. When I first began to read the book, I did not care for Marguerite or her attitude or lifestyle, but as I got further into the narrative, I realized that her saucy attitude was a front to cover the lonely woman that she really was. She felt used, abused and unloved, until the gentle Armand Duval came into her life and showed her that he loved her as a person and not for what she could do for him. It must have taken great courage for Marguerite to leave the life she had lived for so long, knowing all along that it was probably too good to be true and would not last indefinitely. And it also showed that Marguerite really loved Armand Duval for she could even change herself for him.
However, happiness didn’t last for long. When M. Duval, Armand's father, came to her, pleading for her to leave Armand to save both Armand's reputation and that of his younger innocent sister, Marguerite saw a way to become pure of heart, if not in body. She felt that it was her duty, because she loved Armand so much, to do this even though it meant giving up her own happiness and hurting Armand temporarily. She reluctantly returned to her former life, knowing that.some day Armand would forgive her. Sadly, she died in debt and basically alone, except for her one female friend, Julie Duprat, who helped her during her illness. She had her journal sent to Armand after her death, explaining why she had made the choices she had. I think Dumas's last few lines about Marguerite being the exception, not the rule were quite true, and I also agreed with his view that while her lifestyle could not be condoned, we as a society assume that all of these type of women are cold and heartless, while this may not always be the case. A person can make the wrong choices in life when they are young, and try to redeem themselves, but sometimes past situations prevent them from changing their lives, even though they desperately wish to do so. This applies to both men and women in many different types of circumstances: involvement in crime; drug or alcohol abuse; gambling; prostitution; financial problems; poor marriage choices; etc. And this is the fact, which exists in the whole society.
As far as the other characters in the book, I think Marguerite was right in saying that no one truly cared about her, but only wanted something from her, the only exceptions being Armand and Julie Duprat. Of course, the Comte de G. and Comte de N. wanted her body and appearance. The
Duke needed to “wake up and smell the coffee” and realize that she could never replace his dead daughter. If he truly cared, he could have helped her leave her lifestyle without “keeping” her himself. And lastly, Prudence was a blood-sucking leech who used Marguerite almost worse than the men. I also think she was jealous of the fact that Marguerite had so much more courage than herself and someone truly loved her.
Last morning, when tiding my bookshelf, I took this book out of the shelf, and a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. I held it against the morning light and blew on it. The soft breeze carried it away. Camille is just like the camellia, she could never escape from the destiny of withering. But it wasn’t her fault; it’s because of the evil of Capitalism and the hideousness of that society.
Suddenly, I remembered a saying: “Women are like the flowers”. Those pretty women are like those beautiful flowers; their delicate beauty makes people feel they are the miracle of life. However, even the God envies their beauty. It seems that beautiful women always have tragic endings. As we are normal persons, even we can see the hideousness of humanity that results in their fate of withering, we can at most ask quietly in our hearts: Where have those beautiful flowers gone? Where have they gone?
The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe
It seemed to be such a coincidence that the night after I finished reading The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe, I was to dine in a restaurant distinctly related to the book itself. This restaurant was no other than the famous American-styled “Friday ’s. ” The reason for mentioning this restaurant is quite straightforward to all the gentlemen, ladies and children who have read the novel and enjoyed it, which is the fact that this restaurant was, most likely, named after the American Native in Robinson Crusoe, called Friday. This restaurant offers very exceptional service, for instance when the waitresses are asked to order dishes they kneel rather than stand, which, unlike the other restaurants I have been to, makes it easier for the customers to hear them speak. Moreover, Friday’s friendly services to the customers help them to make better choices when ordering dishes. I remembered when I went to Friday ’s last time; the waitress kindly described the items on the menu with precise details. It turned out that the combo I initially wanted was designed to be shared among a large group, not to be eaten by one person. I think this restaurant shows many commendable features similar to that of Friday. Friday brought emotional warmth to the people around him with his appealing personality. I think it was this personality that affected Crusoe and made him say that he loved Friday when Crusoe didn ’t express love for his parents, brothers, sisters, or even his wife. “When he espied me, he came running to me, laying himself down again upon the ground, with all the possible signs of an humble, thankful disposition, making many antic gestures to show it to let me know how he would serve me as long as he lived.” This was what Friday did after Crusoe had rescued him from the two savages chasing him. It was easy for me to see why Crusoe had loved Friday. After sometime, Crusoe and Friday were to rescue Friday’s father. When Friday reunited with his father, the scene was easy to move anyone: “It would have moved anyone to tears to have seen how Friday kissed him, embraced him, hugged him, cried, laughed, halloed, jumped about, danced,
sung; and then sung and jumped about again, like a distracted creature. It was a good while before I could make him speak to me.” This is my favourite chapter in the whole book. It is hard to see why Friday is an ex-savage when he can have personalities more praiseworthy than many civilized people, viz. Crusoe himself. “When he (Friday went to him (Friday’s father, he would sit down by him, open his breast, and hold his father’s head close to his bosom, half an hour together, to nourish it; then he took his arms and ankles, which were numbed and stiff with the binding, and rubbed them with his hands.” Furthermore, Friday’s expression of loyalty in asking Crusoe to kill him rather than leave him is more heartfelt than anything Crusoe ever says or does.
Crusoe, on the absolute contrary, seems incapable of deep feelings, as shown by his account of leaving his family—he never shows any emotions. After a moving lecture from Robinson’s father about his future, he still decided to follow his own wandering ambition. Careless was he about the wishes of his parents to keep him alive and prosperous, as he was the only child left in the family. When he came back from the island which he had lived on for twenty eight years, he found that it had been too late to tell his parents that he was still alive, but yet again he did not feel sorry for them; he also did not feel sorry for the two people who had to live in misery for nearly thirty years under the allusion all of their sons were dead. He had the same feelings for his wife: when he was married, he said it was “not either to my disadvantage or dissatisfaction”, implying that it was also neither to his advantage nor his satisfaction. Moreover, after his wife died, Robinson did not think of looking after the three children they had, but went back to the island, which he had lived on for twenty-eight years. It was on this trip which Robinson Crusoe revisited “His Island ” as he called it. I feel that Robinson ’s indifference to his family is almost emotionally cruel.
Before had clearly shown the contrast between Crusoe’s and Friday’s personalities, as when Friday, in his joyful reunion with his father, displayed far more emotion toward his family members than Crusoe, whereas Crusoe never mentions missing his family or dreams about the happiness of seeing them again. I think Defore is very successful in introducing Friday as part of the novel, it makes the whole novel seem much more complete and gripping to the reader, as well as proving that Defoe’s ideology of racism is civilized unlike many other Europeans at that time; natives and savages are not worse than others but can perhaps even be more modern and civilized. Those are the reasons of why I like The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe and Friday.
湖北工业大学英文作文【四】
Many people simply regard Pride and Prejudice as a love story, but in my opinion, this book is an illustration of the society at that time. She perfectly reflected the relation between money and marriage at her time and gave the people in her works vivid characters. The characters have their own personalities. Mrs. Bennet is a woman who makes great efforts to marry off her daughters. Mr. Bingley is a friendly young man, but his friend, Mr. Darcy, is a very proud man who seems to always feel superior. Even the five daughters in Bennet family are very different. Jane is simple, innocent and never speaks evil of others. Elizabeth is a clever girl who always has her own opinion. Mary likes reading classic books. (Actually she is a pedant. Kitty doesn’t have her own opinion but likes to follow her sister, Lydia. Lydia is a girl who follows exotic things, handsome man, and is somehow a little profligate. When I read the book, I can always find the same personalities in the society now. That is why I think this book is indeed the representative of the society in Britain in the 18th century.
The family of gentleman in the countryside is Jane Austen’s favourite topic. But this little topic can reflect big problems. It concludes the stratum situation and economic relationships in Britain in her century. You can find these from the very beginning of this book.
The first sentence in this book is impressive. It reads: “It is a truth well known to all the world that an unmarried man in poss ession of a large fortune must be in need of a wife”. The undertone is very clear: the foundation of the marriage at that time is not emotion but possession.
People always think that Austen was an expert at telling love stories. In fact, the marriage in her book is not the result of love, but the result of economic needs. After reading this book, I know the truth is that a poor woman must be in need of a husband, a wealthy man.
I couldn’t forget how eager Mrs. Bennet wants to marry off her daughte rs. If you want to know why she is so crazy about these things, I must mention the situation in Britain at that time. Only the eldest son had the privilege of inheriting his father’s possessions. Younger sons and daughters who are used to luxurious lives have no choice but marry a man or woman in possession of a large fortune to continue their comfortable lives. Thus, we can see that getting married is a way to become wealthier, particularly for women without many possessions. Jane Austen told us that money and possession determined everything, including marriage and love in her century.
In “Pride and Prejudice”, the sister of Mr. Bingley strongly opposed his plan of marrying Jane because the Bennets don’t have many possessions and their social positions are much lower than them. From this, we can see there are a lot of obstacles for a not very rich woman to marry a wealthy husband. The society, the relatives would not allow them to get married.
In modern society, although the marriages of economic needs have decreased rapidly, the concept of “money determines everything” is still rooted in some people’s mind. A lot of parents try hard to interfere their children’s marriages. Education background, possessions, jobs remains the main reason that may influence one’s marriage. Marry for money is still a big problem in our
society. We can’t help thinking: can money determine everything?
Austen left this problem for us to think. The genius of Jane Austen lies in this perfect simplicity, the simplicity that reflects big problems. Although Austen was only 21 when she wrote “Pride and Prejudice”, her sharp observation of social lives makes the style of this book surprisingly mature and lively. The plots in her works are always very natural. The development of the plot is as inevitable as a problem in mathematics. I think the depth of Pride and Prejudice is the reason that makes this book prominent and classic. Today, her book still can be the guide telling us the economic relationships both at her time and in modern time.
