写大学收获的英文作文（我在大学的收获英语作文） - 学习作文网

写大学收获的英文作文【一】

Many people simply regard Pride and Prejudice as a love story, but in my opinion, this book is an illustration of the society at that time. She perfectly reflected the relation between money and marriage at her time and gave the people in her works vivid characters. The characters have their own personalities. Mrs. Bennet is a woman who makes great efforts to marry off her daughters. Mr. Bingley is a friendly young man, but his friend, Mr. Darcy, is a very proud man who seems to always feel superior. Even the five daughters in Bennet family are very different. Jane is simple, innocent and never speaks evil of others. Elizabeth is a clever girl who always has her own opinion. Mary likes reading classic books. (Actually she is a pedant. Kitty doesn’t have her own opinion but likes to follow her sister, Lydia. Lydia is a girl who follows exotic things, handsome man, and is somehow a little profligate. When I read the book, I can always find the same personalities in the society now. That is why I think this book is indeed the representative of the society in Britain in the 18th century.

The family of gentleman in the countryside is Jane Austen’s favourite topic. But this little topic can reflect big problems. It concludes the stratum situation and economic relationships in Britain in her century. You can find these from the very beginning of this book.

The first sentence in this book is impressive. It reads: “It is a truth well known to all the world that an unmarried man in poss ession of a large fortune must be in need of a wife”. The undertone is very clear: the foundation of the marriage at that time is not emotion but possession.

People always think that Austen was an expert at telling love stories. In fact, the marriage in her book is not the result of love, but the result of economic needs. After reading this book, I know the truth is that a poor woman must be in need of a husband, a wealthy man.

I couldn’t forget how eager Mrs. Bennet wants to marry off her daughte rs. If you want to know why she is so crazy about these things, I must mention the situation in Britain at that time. Only the eldest son had the privilege of inheriting his father’s possessions. Younger sons and daughters who are used to luxurious lives have no choice but marry a man or woman in possession of a large fortune to continue their comfortable lives. Thus, we can see that getting married is a way to become wealthier, particularly for women without many possessions. Jane Austen told us that money and possession determined everything, including marriage and love in her century.

In “Pride and Prejudice”, the sister of Mr. Bingley strongly opposed his plan of marrying Jane because the Bennets don’t have many possessions and their social positions are much lower than them. From this, we can see there are a lot of obstacles for a not very rich woman to marry a wealthy husband. The society, the relatives would not allow them to get married.

In modern society, although the marriages of economic needs have decreased rapidly, the concept of “money determines everything” is still rooted in some people’s mind. A lot of parents try hard to interfere their children’s marriages. Education background, possessions, jobs remains the main reason that may influence one’s marriage. Marry for money is still a big problem in our

society. We can’t help thinking: can money determine everything?

Austen left this problem for us to think. The genius of Jane Austen lies in this perfect simplicity, the simplicity that reflects big problems. Although Austen was only 21 when she wrote “Pride and Prejudice”, her sharp observation of social lives makes the style of this book surprisingly mature and lively. The plots in her works are always very natural. The development of the plot is as inevitable as a problem in mathematics. I think the depth of Pride and Prejudice is the reason that makes this book prominent and classic. Today, her book still can be the guide telling us the economic relationships both at her time and in modern time.

写大学收获的英文作文【二】

这个暑假里我有很多收获，比如学会了游泳、出去旅游，增长了见识、还体验了超刺激的游戏。不过，我最大的收获应该是懂得了

——“坚持就是胜利”这个道理。

放暑假了，妈妈给我报了羽毛球班，我十分高兴。妈妈告诉我，上课时间是每天下午3：00——5：00，时间为一个月，并强调既然报了，就要坚持学完。听朋友说那儿的老师非常好，有幽默感，同学们都很喜欢他。于是，下午2：30我就拿上羽毛球拍兴冲冲地出发了。可是刚走出空调屋，瞬间就被一股热浪包围，于是我加快脚步跑下楼，谁知一股更加强烈的阳光向我射来，刺得我睁不开眼睛，晒得就像被火烤似的。我这才意识到，这个课时正是一天中最热的时候!虽然热但是心中有股莫名的力量驱使着我向前进。当我来到教室，发现这个教室没有空调，没有风扇，连窗户都没有，整个教室热得像蒸笼，不透气。天哪，一个月呀!意味着我要在这样的天气里行走30次。这可怎么办，我能坚持的下来吗?

在这样的情况下，我坚持了一个星期，初期的热情快没有了，我有点想放弃了，再也不想踏出空调屋半步了。每天午饭后，我都嘟嘟囔囔说不想去，希望得到妈妈的同意。可是妈妈耐心劝我：“我知道外面很热，可是学东西哪有那么容易的?如果一碰到困难就放弃，到头来什么都学不到。坚持就是胜利!”我突然想到了妈妈，她天天要干家务：买菜、做饭、洗衣、拖地、打扫房间等等，这些家务天天都需要人重复的做，妈妈不烦吗?但是她不是也天天在坚持吗?还有老师，她们日复一日，年复一年教着孩子们，她们不烦吗?如果他们放弃了，那这么多学生们怎么学习知识?医生们放弃了，病人怎么治病?司机们放弃了，车怎么开?工人们放弃了，工厂怎么运行?农民们放弃了，谁种庄稼?·····

是啊，“坚持就是胜利，胜利需要坚持”可是我从来都没有做到过。比如：每天坚持听、读英语，我没做到;每天认真做作业，不粗心，不马虎，我做不到;每天坚持读书，我做不到;每天早上起床晨练，我也做不到;每天坚持练琴，我还做不到;每天坚持写，我都做不到，等等。我想为什么我做事总是虎头蛇尾，三分钟热度。每次开学时，总是信心满满，又是目标又是计划，可时间一长，惰性就出现，不知不觉中就放弃了很多。这些看似简单的事情，如果都能坚持下来，会给我带来巨大的收获。所以这次，我一定要坚持，坚持就是胜利，胜利需要坚持!我赶紧拿起羽毛球拍，冲出家门，一路上，我的耳边一直回荡着那句话：“坚持就是胜利!”

我终于懂得了，什么叫做“坚持就是胜利”。以后，在我快要气馁的时候，我也要随时用这句话提醒自己“坚持就是胜利”我想这就是我暑假最大的收获!

写大学收获的英文作文【三】

I read the Chinese version of “Camille” a few years ago. At that time I was deeply moved by the main character Marguerite Gautier. “Camille” or “The Lady of the Camellias” by Alexandre Dumas, fils, is the story of Marguerite Gautier, a young courtesan, or kept woman, in Paris in the mid 1800's, and how she falls in love with a young man, Armand Duval, and then tries to escape from her questionable past. Unfortunately, it comes back to haunt her and she ends up returning to that life and dies painfully and alone, but with the knowledge that she was a noble woman at heart. When I first began to read the book, I did not care for Marguerite or her attitude or lifestyle, but as I got further into the narrative, I realized that her saucy attitude was a front to cover the lonely woman that she really was. She felt used, abused and unloved, until the gentle Armand Duval came into her life and showed her that he loved her as a person and not for what she could do for him. It must have taken great courage for Marguerite to leave the life she had lived for so long, knowing all along that it was probably too good to be true and would not last indefinitely. And it also showed that Marguerite really loved Armand Duval for she could even change herself for him.

However, happiness didn’t last for long. When M. Duval, Armand's father, came to her, pleading for her to leave Armand to save both Armand's reputation and that of his younger innocent sister, Marguerite saw a way to become pure of heart, if not in body. She felt that it was her duty, because she loved Armand so much, to do this even though it meant giving up her own happiness and hurting Armand temporarily. She reluctantly returned to her former life, knowing that.some day Armand would forgive her. Sadly, she died in debt and basically alone, except for her one female friend, Julie Duprat, who helped her during her illness. She had her journal sent to Armand after her death, explaining why she had made the choices she had. I think Dumas's last few lines about Marguerite being the exception, not the rule were quite true, and I also agreed with his view that while her lifestyle could not be condoned, we as a society assume that all of these type of women are cold and heartless, while this may not always be the case. A person can make the wrong choices in life when they are young, and try to redeem themselves, but sometimes past situations prevent them from changing their lives, even though they desperately wish to do so. This applies to both men and women in many different types of circumstances: involvement in crime; drug or alcohol abuse; gambling; prostitution; financial problems; poor marriage choices; etc. And this is the fact, which exists in the whole society.

As far as the other characters in the book, I think Marguerite was right in saying that no one truly cared about her, but only wanted something from her, the only exceptions being Armand and Julie Duprat. Of course, the Comte de G. and Comte de N. wanted her body and appearance. The

Duke needed to “wake up and smell the coffee” and realize that she could never replace his dead daughter. If he truly cared, he could have helped her leave her lifestyle without “keeping” her himself. And lastly, Prudence was a blood-sucking leech who used Marguerite almost worse than the men. I also think she was jealous of the fact that Marguerite had so much more courage than herself and someone truly loved her.

Last morning, when tiding my bookshelf, I took this book out of the shelf, and a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. I held it against the morning light and blew on it. The soft breeze carried it away. Camille is just like the camellia, she could never escape from the destiny of withering. But it wasn’t her fault; it’s because of the evil of Capitalism and the hideousness of that society.

Suddenly, I remembered a saying: “Women are like the flowers”. Those pretty women are like those beautiful flowers; their delicate beauty makes people feel they are the miracle of life. However, even the God envies their beauty. It seems that beautiful women always have tragic endings. As we are normal persons, even we can see the hideousness of humanity that results in their fate of withering, we can at most ask quietly in our hearts: Where have those beautiful flowers gone? Where have they gone?

The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe

It seemed to be such a coincidence that the night after I finished reading The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe, I was to dine in a restaurant distinctly related to the book itself. This restaurant was no other than the famous American-styled “Friday ’s. ” The reason for mentioning this restaurant is quite straightforward to all the gentlemen, ladies and children who have read the novel and enjoyed it, which is the fact that this restaurant was, most likely, named after the American Native in Robinson Crusoe, called Friday. This restaurant offers very exceptional service, for instance when the waitresses are asked to order dishes they kneel rather than stand, which, unlike the other restaurants I have been to, makes it easier for the customers to hear them speak. Moreover, Friday’s friendly services to the customers help them to make better choices when ordering dishes. I remembered when I went to Friday ’s last time; the waitress kindly described the items on the menu with precise details. It turned out that the combo I initially wanted was designed to be shared among a large group, not to be eaten by one person. I think this restaurant shows many commendable features similar to that of Friday. Friday brought emotional warmth to the people around him with his appealing personality. I think it was this personality that affected Crusoe and made him say that he loved Friday when Crusoe didn ’t express love for his parents, brothers, sisters, or even his wife. “When he espied me, he came running to me, laying himself down again upon the ground, with all the possible signs of an humble, thankful disposition, making many antic gestures to show it to let me know how he would serve me as long as he lived.” This was what Friday did after Crusoe had rescued him from the two savages chasing him. It was easy for me to see why Crusoe had loved Friday. After sometime, Crusoe and Friday were to rescue Friday’s father. When Friday reunited with his father, the scene was easy to move anyone: “It would have moved anyone to tears to have seen how Friday kissed him, embraced him, hugged him, cried, laughed, halloed, jumped about, danced,

sung; and then sung and jumped about again, like a distracted creature. It was a good while before I could make him speak to me.” This is my favourite chapter in the whole book. It is hard to see why Friday is an ex-savage when he can have personalities more praiseworthy than many civilized people, viz. Crusoe himself. “When he (Friday went to him (Friday’s father, he would sit down by him, open his breast, and hold his father’s head close to his bosom, half an hour together, to nourish it; then he took his arms and ankles, which were numbed and stiff with the binding, and rubbed them with his hands.” Furthermore, Friday’s expression of loyalty in asking Crusoe to kill him rather than leave him is more heartfelt than anything Crusoe ever says or does.

Crusoe, on the absolute contrary, seems incapable of deep feelings, as shown by his account of leaving his family—he never shows any emotions. After a moving lecture from Robinson’s father about his future, he still decided to follow his own wandering ambition. Careless was he about the wishes of his parents to keep him alive and prosperous, as he was the only child left in the family. When he came back from the island which he had lived on for twenty eight years, he found that it had been too late to tell his parents that he was still alive, but yet again he did not feel sorry for them; he also did not feel sorry for the two people who had to live in misery for nearly thirty years under the allusion all of their sons were dead. He had the same feelings for his wife: when he was married, he said it was “not either to my disadvantage or dissatisfaction”, implying that it was also neither to his advantage nor his satisfaction. Moreover, after his wife died, Robinson did not think of looking after the three children they had, but went back to the island, which he had lived on for twenty-eight years. It was on this trip which Robinson Crusoe revisited “His Island ” as he called it. I feel that Robinson ’s indifference to his family is almost emotionally cruel.

Before had clearly shown the contrast between Crusoe’s and Friday’s personalities, as when Friday, in his joyful reunion with his father, displayed far more emotion toward his family members than Crusoe, whereas Crusoe never mentions missing his family or dreams about the happiness of seeing them again. I think Defore is very successful in introducing Friday as part of the novel, it makes the whole novel seem much more complete and gripping to the reader, as well as proving that Defoe’s ideology of racism is civilized unlike many other Europeans at that time; natives and savages are not worse than others but can perhaps even be more modern and civilized. Those are the reasons of why I like The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe and Friday.

写大学收获的英文作文【四】

写大学收获的英文作文【五】

精彩的暑假生活就要结束了，在这个暑假中，我有很多收获，下面我就盘点一下。

在暑假中，妈妈帮我申请了一个博客。我还在我的博客中设置了美丽的图画，它可漂亮啦。我还写了好几篇文章呢，欢迎大家浏览。而且，还是我自己往电脑里敲的呢。妈妈还教我了怎样使用电脑，虽然我现在还不太熟练，但我相信以后我会用的很好。

我还天天在家练字，每天十个，我现在写的字可比以前好看多了。我想我以后还要继续练习，把我的'字写的更好。

我每天还要看书，共看完了三本书，另外还有一本快看完了。我现在的语言表达能力更强了。我最喜欢看杨红樱阿姨写的书，她写的《笑猫日记》我非常喜欢。恨不得把所有得《笑猫日记》都买下来。而且我还很喜欢去书店，因为到那里可以看到许多好看的图书。妈妈答应我每次放假都要带我去书店。我非常高兴。

我每天还要做四道奥数题。妈妈给我讲了四种类型的奥数题，分别是“和倍问题”、“差倍问题”、“和差问题”、“巧求周长”。我最喜欢的是“和倍问题”和“巧求周长”。我共做了66道题，我认为我的数学有了一定程度的提高。

这个暑假我还画了五幅画，这是绘画班老师留的作业。我开学后又要接着上绘画班了，并且每个周六都要上，绘画是我喜欢的事情。我画的画自认为还不错，等哪天让妈妈帮我传上来几幅，让大家看看。

我今年暑假还有一个最大的收获，那就是我上了一个游泳班。我已经基本学会了蛙泳。我觉得夏天在游泳池中游泳是最舒服的一件事。

我还有一件高兴事，我在学游泳的第一天就看见了我幼儿园的同学——王艺聪，她和我在一起学游泳，我们俩在一起可高兴啦!我们俩还天天晚上在一起玩。可惜马上就要开学了，所以我们俩平时就不能在一起玩了，只能在六、日才能玩。

我的暑假是不是很精彩也很有意义啊?总之，我认为是。

写大学收获的英文作文【六】

自从我迷上了网络游戏，视力就一直往下滑落。暑假前的一天早晨，我有意无意地闭上右眼，却大惊失色——眼前的世界一片模糊，近在咫尺的视力表居然只能朦朦胧胧地看清上三行!再睁开右眼，失调的世界终于回到了原来的模样，清晰的景象浮现在眼前。我在稍稍松了口气之余，心里不禁涌起一阵惶恐——我的左眼视力怎么办?

这个假期，我采取了“视力强训法”——拒绝电脑，拒绝电视，拒绝长时间看书!我还到网上查阅了许多有关保护眼睛的方法，什么一天必须做两次眼保健操啦，看书不可以一次超过40分钟啦……我全部一字不漏地抄在了笔记本上，希望这有助于我提高视力。

第一个星期我坚持得很好，能够按要求保护眼睛。爸爸对我的变化也十分惊喜，连连夸我：“长大了，懂事了!”

可惜好景不长，我的自觉行为被一个电话给破坏了。那天，一位常在一起的网友向我大谈特谈游戏中新出现的东西，讲得我手痒痒心也痒痒，恨不得马上飞奔到电脑前，在游戏中遨游，那种感觉真是美妙阿!就好比是“饭后一根烟，赛过活神仙”。然而，就在我走到电脑前的一瞬间，“良心发现”了，依依不舍地退了回来，心里不住地叹息——唉!要是我有个好眼睛该多好呀!

有了第一次就肯定有第二次。游戏的诱惑太大了，好几次我已坐在电脑前，手握鼠标，都及时地退了回来。几次下来，我摸索到了一个方法，那就是想玩电脑时就大声朗诵网络游戏对眼睛的伤害，自然就会克服诱惑的。

还有一个诱惑来自看书。用老爸的话来说，我是看起书来不要命的那种。看40分钟书后，我常常不按要求放松眼睛，赖在书旁不起来，任凭闹钟扯破嗓子喊个不停，直到不断斥责自己不守规矩，眼睛也闹着嚷着要休息，我才念念不舍地放下书起身。后来，我请老爸作我的监督员，帮助我养成好的习惯。

一个假期过去了，我的左眼视力大有长进，我原以为这是我这个暑假的最大收获，爸爸却说：“我还得到了许多珍贵的保眼和一颗能够战胜自己的心”。

写大学收获的英文作文【七】

This is a story about a special and unreserved woman who has been exposed to a hostile environment but continuously and fearlessly struggling for her ideal life. The story can be interpreted as a symbol of the independent spirit.

It seems to me that many readers’ English reading experience starts with Jane Eyer. I am of no exception. As we refer to the movie “Jane Eyer”, it is not surprising to find some differences because of its being filmized and retold in a new way, but the spirit of the novel remains----to be an independent person, both physically and mentally.

Jane Eyer was a born resister, whose parents went off when she was very young, and her aunt，the only relative she had，treated her as badly as a ragtag. Since Jane’s education in Lowwood Orphanage began, she didn’t get what she had been expecting——simply being regarded as a common person, just the same as any other girl around. The suffers from being humiliated and devastated teach Jane to be persevering and prize dignity over anything else.As a reward of revolting the ruthless oppression, Jane got a chance to be a tutor in Thornfield Garden. There she made the acquaintance of lovely Adele and that garden’s owner, Rochester, a man with warm heart despite a cold face outside. Jane expected to change the life from then on, but fate had decided otherwise: After Jane and Rochester fell in love with each other and got down to get marry, she unfortunately came to know in fact Rochester had got a legal wife, who seemed to be the shadow following Rochester and led to his moodiness all the time ----Rochester was also a despairing person in need of salvation. Jane did want to give him a hand, however, she made up her mind to leave, because she didn’t want to betray her own principles, because she was Jane Eyer. The film has finally got a symbolist end: Jane inherited a large number of legacies and finally returned. After finding Rochester ’s misfortune brought by his original mad wife, Jane chose to stay with him forever.

I don’t know what others feel, but frankly speaking, I would rather regard the section that Jane began her teaching job in Thornfield as the film’s end----especially when I heard Jane’s words “Never in my life have I been awaken so happily. ” For one thing, this ideal and brand-new beginning of life was what Jane had been imagining for long as a suffering person; for another, this should be what the audiences with my views hoped her to get. But the professional judgment of producing films reminded me to wait for a totally different result: There must be something wrong coming with the excellence----perhaps not only should another section be added to enrich the story, but also we may see from the next transition of Jane’s life that “Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you would get.”

What ’s more, this film didn’t end when Jane left Thornfield. For Jane Eyer herself, there should always be somewhere to realize her great ideal of being independent considering her fortitude, but for Rochester, how he can get salvation? The film gives the answer tentatively: Jane eventually got back to Rochester. In fact, when Jane met Rochester for the first time, she scared his horse and made his heel strained, to a certain extent, which meant Rochester would get retrieval because of Jane. We can consider Rochester’s experiences as that of religion meaning. The fire by his frantic wife was the punishment for the cynicism early in his life. After it, Rochester got the mercy of the God and the love of the woman whom he loved. Here we can say: human nature and divinity get united perfectly in order to let such a story accord with the requirements of both two sides. The value of this film may be due to its efforts to explore a new way for the development of humanism under the faith of religion.