走进大学感受英文作文【一】
今天天气很舒适，老师带着我们去参观非物质文化遗产。
非物质文化遗产有用小三角做出来的仙鹤、福娃、龙虾、孔雀、水壶……五颜六色，非常好看。还有用纸剪出的蝴蝶、竹子;还有用糖做出的马、蛇、龙、小猪、长颈鹿;还有用手工做出来的鲜花戒指、冰激凌娃娃。用小珠珠穿出来的小球。其中鲜花戒指是最引我注目的，大人戴就把它拧大，小孩戴就把它拧小。还可以把它拧到铅笔头上，还可以用线绑在戒指的小环上当项链。它真是一个多功能的戒指啊。
观看了这么多的作品，一个个象真的一样让我大开眼界，增长了见识。我很高兴，我想到我不会做，我一下子又难过下来，但是我想到不会做可以学，我以后要好好学，发挥想象图片，观察力，争取给老师做的一模一样好看。
走进大学感受英文作文【二】
下了车，对面就是陕西历史博物馆，这是一个古色古香的建筑，颇具盛唐风采，井然有序，错落有致，雄浑庄重，让人不觉眼见一亮。
跟随着队伍走进了馆内，首先映入眼帘的是一头巨大的石狮子仰天长啸，好像一名魁梧的卫士忠诚的守卫着巍峨的博物馆。
我们首先要参观的是“大唐遗宝”专题展览。据介绍，这一批珍贵文物是在西安南郊何家村的一个基建工地上发现的。在这里，虽然我们只是欣赏到了出土的一小部分文物，但文物之精美;工艺之精湛，让人惊叹不已。
整个展览分为两部分。我们最先见到“玉润华光”部分，这一部分集中展示玉器、宝石等精品，其中不少都是海内外罕见的珍品。其中最让我感到惊喜的，就是镇馆之宝“镶金兽首玛瑙杯”。我在家中的书上频频发现它的踪迹，晶莹剔透的玛瑙闪烁着神秘的风采。一直希望有一天能见到它的实物。在这样的一次偶然的机遇下，能够见到它的“真身”，真让我有些受宠若惊。
第二部分“金银璀璨”表现了大唐工匠高超的技艺;更有数十枚银饼、银铤，留有唐代人錾刻铭文和墨书记录，为后人研究唐代历史留下了重要的资料。
不仅如此，还有不少带有异域风情的工艺品，以及由丝绸之路带来的异域钱币。体现了中华唐代时期民族的交流和发展，也体现了唐代开放的时代特征。
接着，我们参观了主馆。西安自古帝王都，历史上先后有十三个封建王朝在此建都，馆内的展厅设置也是如此，主要展现了周、秦、汉、唐代的精美文物。主要有反映古代先民生活情景和艺术追求的的彩陶，反映西周王都兴起青铜器，反映秦扫六合统一天下的青铜剑、兵马俑等，以及民族大融合文化遗存、佛教东渐的宗教文物，还有反映盛唐繁荣景象的唐代金银器和唐三彩等等，让人耳目一新。
走进大学感受英文作文【三】
This is a story about a special and unreserved woman who has been exposed to a hostile environment but continuously and fearlessly struggling for her ideal life. The story can be interpreted as a symbol of the independent spirit.
It seems to me that many readers’ English reading experience starts with Jane Eyer. I am of no exception. As we refer to the movie “Jane Eyer”, it is not surprising to find some differences because of its being filmized and retold in a new way, but the spirit of the novel remains----to be an independent person, both physically and mentally.
Jane Eyer was a born resister, whose parents went off when she was very young, and her aunt，the only relative she had，treated her as badly as a ragtag. Since Jane’s education in Lowwood Orphanage began, she didn’t get what she had been expecting——simply being regarded as a common person, just the same as any other girl around. The suffers from being humiliated and devastated teach Jane to be persevering and prize dignity over anything else.As a reward of revolting the ruthless oppression, Jane got a chance to be a tutor in Thornfield Garden. There she made the acquaintance of lovely Adele and that garden’s owner, Rochester, a man with warm heart despite a cold face outside. Jane expected to change the life from then on, but fate had decided otherwise: After Jane and Rochester fell in love with each other and got down to get marry, she unfortunately came to know in fact Rochester had got a legal wife, who seemed to be the shadow following Rochester and led to his moodiness all the time ----Rochester was also a despairing person in need of salvation. Jane did want to give him a hand, however, she made up her mind to leave, because she didn’t want to betray her own principles, because she was Jane Eyer. The film has finally got a symbolist end: Jane inherited a large number of legacies and finally returned. After finding Rochester ’s misfortune brought by his original mad wife, Jane chose to stay with him forever.
I don’t know what others feel, but frankly speaking, I would rather regard the section that Jane began her teaching job in Thornfield as the film’s end----especially when I heard Jane’s words “Never in my life have I been awaken so happily. ” For one thing, this ideal and brand-new beginning of life was what Jane had been imagining for long as a suffering person; for another, this should be what the audiences with my views hoped her to get. But the professional judgment of producing films reminded me to wait for a totally different result: There must be something wrong coming with the excellence----perhaps not only should another section be added to enrich the story, but also we may see from the next transition of Jane’s life that “Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you would get.”
What ’s more, this film didn’t end when Jane left Thornfield. For Jane Eyer herself, there should always be somewhere to realize her great ideal of being independent considering her fortitude, but for Rochester, how he can get salvation? The film gives the answer tentatively: Jane eventually got back to Rochester. In fact, when Jane met Rochester for the first time, she scared his horse and made his heel strained, to a certain extent, which meant Rochester would get retrieval because of Jane. We can consider Rochester’s experiences as that of religion meaning. The fire by his frantic wife was the punishment for the cynicism early in his life. After it, Rochester got the mercy of the God and the love of the woman whom he loved. Here we can say: human nature and divinity get united perfectly in order to let such a story accord with the requirements of both two sides. The value of this film may be due to its efforts to explore a new way for the development of humanism under the faith of religion.
走进大学感受英文作文【四】
Many people simply regard Pride and Prejudice as a love story, but in my opinion, this book is an illustration of the society at that time. She perfectly reflected the relation between money and marriage at her time and gave the people in her works vivid characters. The characters have their own personalities. Mrs. Bennet is a woman who makes great efforts to marry off her daughters. Mr. Bingley is a friendly young man, but his friend, Mr. Darcy, is a very proud man who seems to always feel superior. Even the five daughters in Bennet family are very different. Jane is simple, innocent and never speaks evil of others. Elizabeth is a clever girl who always has her own opinion. Mary likes reading classic books. (Actually she is a pedant. Kitty doesn’t have her own opinion but likes to follow her sister, Lydia. Lydia is a girl who follows exotic things, handsome man, and is somehow a little profligate. When I read the book, I can always find the same personalities in the society now. That is why I think this book is indeed the representative of the society in Britain in the 18th century.
The family of gentleman in the countryside is Jane Austen’s favourite topic. But this little topic can reflect big problems. It concludes the stratum situation and economic relationships in Britain in her century. You can find these from the very beginning of this book.
The first sentence in this book is impressive. It reads: “It is a truth well known to all the world that an unmarried man in poss ession of a large fortune must be in need of a wife”. The undertone is very clear: the foundation of the marriage at that time is not emotion but possession.
People always think that Austen was an expert at telling love stories. In fact, the marriage in her book is not the result of love, but the result of economic needs. After reading this book, I know the truth is that a poor woman must be in need of a husband, a wealthy man.
I couldn’t forget how eager Mrs. Bennet wants to marry off her daughte rs. If you want to know why she is so crazy about these things, I must mention the situation in Britain at that time. Only the eldest son had the privilege of inheriting his father’s possessions. Younger sons and daughters who are used to luxurious lives have no choice but marry a man or woman in possession of a large fortune to continue their comfortable lives. Thus, we can see that getting married is a way to become wealthier, particularly for women without many possessions. Jane Austen told us that money and possession determined everything, including marriage and love in her century.
In “Pride and Prejudice”, the sister of Mr. Bingley strongly opposed his plan of marrying Jane because the Bennets don’t have many possessions and their social positions are much lower than them. From this, we can see there are a lot of obstacles for a not very rich woman to marry a wealthy husband. The society, the relatives would not allow them to get married.
In modern society, although the marriages of economic needs have decreased rapidly, the concept of “money determines everything” is still rooted in some people’s mind. A lot of parents try hard to interfere their children’s marriages. Education background, possessions, jobs remains the main reason that may influence one’s marriage. Marry for money is still a big problem in our
society. We can’t help thinking: can money determine everything?
Austen left this problem for us to think. The genius of Jane Austen lies in this perfect simplicity, the simplicity that reflects big problems. Although Austen was only 21 when she wrote “Pride and Prejudice”, her sharp observation of social lives makes the style of this book surprisingly mature and lively. The plots in her works are always very natural. The development of the plot is as inevitable as a problem in mathematics. I think the depth of Pride and Prejudice is the reason that makes this book prominent and classic. Today, her book still can be the guide telling us the economic relationships both at her time and in modern time.
