土地还敞开了宽阔的胸怀,让人类发掘他的财富。
土地让人们种植粮食,养活一家人。而人们却不停的毁林开荒,导致水土流失,一片又一片的`绿洲变为戈壁和沙漠;将塑料袋不停的、随便的丢到地下,造成了土地的污染;无节制的抽取地下水,导致地下水位枯竭;大量开挖深埋地下的矿产资源,开挖后还不回复大地原貌,导致大地伤痕累累,而人类还在为所谓的利益伤害大地母亲!
人们啊,醒醒吧,从现在开始保护土地。
国家为了保护耕地已经划出了十八亿亩耕地红线,防止人们为扩建城市而过度占用耕地。国家还颁布一系列法律来保护土地,如《中华人民共和国土地管理法》《中华人民共和国森林法》《中华人民共和国草原法》等。
土地是立国之本。对于我们这样一个人口大国来说,土地更是重中之重,所以合理用地、节约用地、保护耕地尤为重要。针对我国土地资源利用存在的问题,国家将“十分珍惜、合理利用土地和切实保护耕地”作为一项基本国策,并采取有效措施加以落实。
让我们一起保护土地,保护我们的家园!!
动物是我们的朋友,这个道理谁都知道,可生活中没有几个人能真正去爱护它们。对待动物这个话题,大家一定都认为这是个老掉牙的话题。如果我再次说出“我们要保护动物”这个口号,大家定会笑掉大门牙的,但我则不这么认为。
目前,我所说的保护对象不在是那些珍贵的动物,而是那些就在我们身边的动物。例如:鸡、鸭、果子狸等等。为什么要担心它们呢?原来现在不是只有人类在威胁它们,还有像“非典”、“禽流感”这样可恶的病毒在迫害他们。在“非典”时期,人们得知“非典”病毒是从果子狸身上出来的,这给果子狸带来了灭顶之灾——广东的所有的果子狸都***光了,埋了,接着浙江,北京等地也一一效仿。这虽然保障了人们的.身心健康,但却给果子狸带来了似乎“南京大屠***”般的灾难。
我认为,其实果子狸是无辜的,而那些不听国家、人民劝告的人,才是大恶人。如果那些吃过果子狸的人不吃果子狸,果子狸身上的“非典”病毒又怎么会传给人类呢?而一到“东窗事发”,人们却坐以待毙,把一切责任都推倒无辜的果子狸身上,害得它们被蒙上了千古之怨。自从出现了“非典”,果子狸便招到大量的***害,这样一来,果子狸的死亡数大大的超过了出生数,那么果子狸必定灭亡在人们手中!我说,真得该惩治那些吃过果子狸的人! 大家还认为鸡、鸭的繁殖速度比较快,便可***之。当一到“禽流感”的时期,鸡、鸭又像果子狸一样遭到了灭顶之灾。
由于“禽流感”的出现,只要有一只鸡或鸭染上了“禽流感”,那么三公里之内的所有家禽都要遭到扑***,五公里之内的家禽都要打预防针。这样一来,又有成千上万只家禽要告别尘世。这虽然为人们防了病,但给家禽带来了极大的痛苦。这又要归根于人们,如果人们对家禽多些照顾,把它们看成朋友,那么家禽哪又会染上“禽流感”? 总而言之,动物的生病与扑***,人们有不可推卸的责任。如果人们对动物有些爱心与良心,那么哪会有“非典”与“禽流感”。我们要保护所有的动物,让它们也和我们一样,有一个生存的空间。
人与动物是密不可分的,天地对我们人类是公平的,我们不能因为自己的利益,而不对天地万物给予公道。
人与动物的关系是密切的。我们曾经学过《珍珠鸟》这篇文章,它主要讲述了作者精心饲养珍珠鸟,与它们建立了深厚的友谊。
这篇文章字里行间都流露着作者对珍珠鸟的喜爱之情。人和动物是好朋友,仿佛在千百年前就有了,这感情是无比深厚的。我还记得一个片段的大概内容:作者让珍珠鸟栖息在幽林似的环境中,而且不去打扰它们。《珍珠鸟》的作者不像其他养鸟者那样,只是为了欣赏鸟儿那色彩斑斓的羽毛,倾听鸟儿那美妙动听的歌喉,就让鸟儿成天生活在惊恐中。
某些家长把鸟儿买回来,放在笼子里,然后就对孩子们说:“这是给你们玩的!”孩子们就会听着他们的话对着鸟笼又踢又打,把木棍伸进笼子里挑弄鸟儿,促使让鸟儿惊恐地飞来飞去。大人们不但不加以阻止,还要拍手叫好。鸟儿本来是自由的,如果让那些养鸟人为鸟儿设身处地地想一想,也许他们就知道怎样做了。 还有一个令我记忆犹新的片段:珍珠鸟雏儿在作者伏案写作时,扒在作者的肩上轻轻地进入甜美的梦乡。
我读着,仿佛正亲眼看见这只雏鸟正甜美入睡的情景,眯着眼睛,多么可爱! 相比之下,现在,许多猎人为牟取暴利,去捕***人类的好朋友,大熊猫、孟加拉虎、非洲象……濒临绝种的原因,就因为它们拥有了人们渴望拥有的美丽的皮毛、洁白坚硬的象牙!在一场场模特表演上,模特儿们披着貂皮大衣,穿着鳄鱼皮鞋,戴着松鼠毛领巾,一转身,迎风摆动的不但是动物的生命,还有血腥!捕***动物!这是多么丧绝人性的行为!这还是人吗?简直是禽兽! 千百年前,动物是人类的朋友。
我希望从今以后,动物和人类永远和平共处,世世代代,永远是最好的朋友!
Giant Panda is our national treasure, the state can be said for the protection of giant pandas put a lot of human and material resources giant now has been the world's people the protection and care, which is a good thing, of course, the Tibetan antelope as the country's animal protection , The National People have been recognized, however, this tiger? The poor will be extinct Siberian tiger who is going to have a genuine concern and care a little bit?
According to statistics, the Siberian tiger left at present, less than 20, still such a small number of these survive, has had imagined. Two years ago, in the mountains of Huanren, Liaoning found to be a man to die under the presentation of the Siberian tiger, from this we can see that the above countries and the people of the importance we attach to it, this first Manchurian tiger is actually how the dead do not Conclusion, and the other is only from the northeast where hu came to the place where the wonder and the third is the matter did not rise to the national media in particular. This really puzzled the other person you! Is it really the other tiger who fear love is not worth it, it really fate of the Siberian tiger so?
Towering mountains should not unique to human beings, should not have dense forest unique to human beings, rivers clear this should not be unique to human beings, the Siberian tiger survival of this nature should not be unique to human beings. Siberian tiger to the left of a piece of heaven and earth to survive it, the High IQ is the human species, there are still ways to leave that piece of local survival, and the tiger have to leave that piece of the local dead; you save tigers, is the human population control, engage in Family planning, and the Siberian tiger is scarce Rending it! Now we can hear the cries of tigers in the future even the Siberian tiger can be heard the cries.
I’m writing to tell you about the discussion we havehad about whether an entrance
fee should be charged for parks.
Dear editor,
I’m writing to tell you about the discussion we have had about whether an entrance fee should be charged for parks. 60% of us schoolmates think that an entrance fee do not meet people’s expectations, for a park is considered to be a place where the public can have a good time when they are not busy either at home or at work. If an entrance fee must be paid by the visitors for a park, it will be necessary to build a gate and surrounding walls. In the end a city will take on a bad look. 40% of us schoolmates think that an entrance fee can be accepted, but it must not be too expensive. The money from ticket selling can be used for paying the gardeners in the park and buying some other kinds of flowers and trees.
With regard to myself, I think an entrance fee is useful, for it can be used to protect a park. Do we share the same opinion, dear editor?
Yours truly,
Li Hua
© 2022 xuexicn.net,All Rights Reserved.