人文学科的重要性英文大学作文【一】
读了《教师人文读本》后，我感触颇深。我是一个小学教师，作为小学教师我深知自己责任重大，因为我们培养的是基础的基础。我们就应以博大的胸怀去热爱、关心、教育好每一个孩子，使他们能茁壮成长，使家长满意、放心。所以我们教师具备的不仅是教育技能，还要爱学生、尊重学生。
一、尊重学生的爱好，给学生一种期待的目光。
研究表明，爱好是人一种趋向性的心理特征。一个人当他对某中事物发生兴趣爱好时，他就会主动积极、执着地探索。我们都知道，科学家法布尔，从小喜欢昆虫，常常迷到了忘我的境界。正是这种强烈的爱好，促使他30年如一日，孜孜不倦地观察，从而写成了一部10卷集的巨著《昆虫记》，为人类留下了一笔宝贵的遗产。
陶行知曾说，你的教鞭下有瓦特，你的冷眼里有牛顿，你的讥笑中有爱迪生。为此教师应尊重学生的爱好，给学生一种期待的目光。面对学生众多不足称道的小爱好，老师应多一份理智，少一份冲动。
二、尊重学生的差异，给学生一种进取的力量。
差异普遍存在。人的知识有多少，能力有大小，学生是一个有着强烈求知***的发展中的人。尊重学生的差异，不能以教材和考纲为本，必须以学生个性发展为本，给有差异的学生一份公正，让他获得一种进取的力量。
三、尊重学生的秘密，给学生一份自理的土壤。
随着学生的年龄增长，他们往往会把自己的苦恼、心事和秘密隐藏起来。只有遇到无法解决的问题，或确实遇到知己，才会袒露心迹，真心请教。
为此，教师在与学生相处中，应当主动做学生的知心朋友，倾听他们的心声，尊重他们的秘密，给学生一份自我料理的土壤。
《教师人文读本》给了我很多新的启示，我将在自己平凡的岗位上尽职尽责、努力向上。最后，让我用徐匡迪先生的一句话来结束此文吧！——教育是事业，事业的意义在于献身；教育是科学，科学的价值在于求真；教育是艺术，艺术的生命在于创新。
人文学科的重要性英文大学作文【二】
人文学科的重要性英文大学作文【三】
：大学英语；科学性；人文性；融合；必要性；途径党的十七届六中全会点燃了文明之光，文化体制改革“以人为本”的精神与理念，即把“人”作为教育的出发点与归宿，推进人文教育与科学教育的融合，体现了社会发展的需要，是学科发展和高等教育发展的需求，是高校教育取得成功的必由之路，同时也直接关系着独立学院的人才培养质量。在教学过程中注重培养学生的人文内涵与人文素养，是教学观念的变革，也是在教师的引导下学生学习方式的一场变革。人文素养作为语言教学的目标之一，越来越受到高校英语教师的关注。在这样的大背景下，我校独立学院加强大学英语教育的人文性与科学性的融合是必要的，也是必然的。
人文学科的重要性英文大学作文【四】
苏格拉底曾说过：“一个人能否有成就，只看他是否具有自尊心和自信心这两个条件。”
千百年来，在人们眼里，命运是神秘莫测，不可把握，无法控制的饿一种神秘力量，是主宰人们一生的至高无上的主任，而人类则永远是命运的仆人和奴隶，半个世纪以前，一位比利时智者莫里斯梅特林克先生告诉我们，人们是完全可以成为命运的主任而非奴隶，这种能够把握，主宰和战胜命运的首要条件就是自信。因此，我认为自信是成功的基石。
一个人要自信，就要克服自卑，树立自信。1951年，英国女医生弗兰克林从自己拍摄X射线衍射中发现了DNA双螺旋结构，经过研究，她大胆地提出了假设，并以此为题做了一次很出色的演讲，然而许多人对她的发现提出质疑，怀疑她的照片的真实性和假说的可靠性，在这些压力下，弗兰克林也开始怀疑自己：作为一个普通医生，提出这样高森的理论问题，或许太不自量力了吧？她动摇了。于是，她公开否认了自己提出的假说，也没有再继续研究下去，后来在1953年，其他科学家却证实了这个假说，不自信的弗兰克林与成功失之交臂了。
人生的航船由每个人自己掌舵，鼓起自信的风帆，千帆竞渡，抵达成功的彼岸。
著名天文学家，自然科学先驱哥白尼，第一个对影响人类达千年之久的托勒玫地心说提出怀疑，否认。遭到无数千万人的反对及压迫，但他自始自终都相信自己的“是地球绕太阳旋转而非太阳绕地球旋转”的理论，也没有轻言放弃，最终，其日心说被应证了，哥白尼也成功了。如果，他在人们提出怀疑的'时候也怀疑自己的能力，他就不会有后来的成功。
自信是人生成功的奠基石，人的成功之路必须踏着自信的石阶步步登高。有了自信，人才能达到自己所期望达到的境界，才能成为自己所希望成为的人，坚持自己所追求的信仰。无论在什么情况下，自信者的格言都是：“我想我能够的，现在不能够，以后一定会能够的！”所以我们每个人务必要把自信送给自己！
人文学科的重要性英文大学作文【五】
Many people simply regard Pride and Prejudice as a love story, but in my opinion, this book is an illustration of the society at that time. She perfectly reflected the relation between money and marriage at her time and gave the people in her works vivid characters. The characters have their own personalities. Mrs. Bennet is a woman who makes great efforts to marry off her daughters. Mr. Bingley is a friendly young man, but his friend, Mr. Darcy, is a very proud man who seems to always feel superior. Even the five daughters in Bennet family are very different. Jane is simple, innocent and never speaks evil of others. Elizabeth is a clever girl who always has her own opinion. Mary likes reading classic books. (Actually she is a pedant. Kitty doesn’t have her own opinion but likes to follow her sister, Lydia. Lydia is a girl who follows exotic things, handsome man, and is somehow a little profligate. When I read the book, I can always find the same personalities in the society now. That is why I think this book is indeed the representative of the society in Britain in the 18th century.
The family of gentleman in the countryside is Jane Austen’s favourite topic. But this little topic can reflect big problems. It concludes the stratum situation and economic relationships in Britain in her century. You can find these from the very beginning of this book.
The first sentence in this book is impressive. It reads: “It is a truth well known to all the world that an unmarried man in poss ession of a large fortune must be in need of a wife”. The undertone is very clear: the foundation of the marriage at that time is not emotion but possession.
People always think that Austen was an expert at telling love stories. In fact, the marriage in her book is not the result of love, but the result of economic needs. After reading this book, I know the truth is that a poor woman must be in need of a husband, a wealthy man.
I couldn’t forget how eager Mrs. Bennet wants to marry off her daughte rs. If you want to know why she is so crazy about these things, I must mention the situation in Britain at that time. Only the eldest son had the privilege of inheriting his father’s possessions. Younger sons and daughters who are used to luxurious lives have no choice but marry a man or woman in possession of a large fortune to continue their comfortable lives. Thus, we can see that getting married is a way to become wealthier, particularly for women without many possessions. Jane Austen told us that money and possession determined everything, including marriage and love in her century.
In “Pride and Prejudice”, the sister of Mr. Bingley strongly opposed his plan of marrying Jane because the Bennets don’t have many possessions and their social positions are much lower than them. From this, we can see there are a lot of obstacles for a not very rich woman to marry a wealthy husband. The society, the relatives would not allow them to get married.
In modern society, although the marriages of economic needs have decreased rapidly, the concept of “money determines everything” is still rooted in some people’s mind. A lot of parents try hard to interfere their children’s marriages. Education background, possessions, jobs remains the main reason that may influence one’s marriage. Marry for money is still a big problem in our
society. We can’t help thinking: can money determine everything?
Austen left this problem for us to think. The genius of Jane Austen lies in this perfect simplicity, the simplicity that reflects big problems. Although Austen was only 21 when she wrote “Pride and Prejudice”, her sharp observation of social lives makes the style of this book surprisingly mature and lively. The plots in her works are always very natural. The development of the plot is as inevitable as a problem in mathematics. I think the depth of Pride and Prejudice is the reason that makes this book prominent and classic. Today, her book still can be the guide telling us the economic relationships both at her time and in modern time.
人文学科的重要性英文大学作文【六】
1.科学化地定位大学英语教学目标
大学英语教学目标呈现出繁杂的现象，教师往往直接提出教学目标，没有进行宏观设计与全面思考。基于大学英语教学的现状和学生的学习情况，笔者认为，教师必须构建合理的大学英语课程目标。
2.人文化地设计大学英语教学内容
（1）融入文体学内容为适应社会的需要，高等学校大学英语教学指导委员会确定了21世纪我国高等学校人才的培养目标。《大纲》明确指出：“高等学校大学英语教学应培养具有英语语言基础和广博的文化知识并能运用英语的复合型英语人才。”因此，在大学英语教学中纳入文体学知识和文体分析，其主要任务是从语音、词汇、句法、语篇等方面研究各种文本的语言特征，目的是让学生更加准确和透彻地理解文本表达的内容，进而学会在不同场合恰当地运用语言。由于不同国家有着不同的`文化背景，使得语言中的某些成分被约定俗成地赋予了一定的文体色彩。学生只有了解语言中的文体功能，才能理解其文化含义，从而提高学生的文化素质。因此，教师应把教学重点放在培养学生的文体意识、文体洞察力和分析文体的能力上，帮助学生了解“为什么”和“怎么样”才能使文本具有特定的意义。如在分析课文内容时，教师可以分析文章的文体特点为主，从文章的语音效果、词汇特点、句法手段、语篇组织结构等相关的文体标志，去分析一篇文章独特的且与主题有关的语言特点，把握文章的思想内涵和作者的写作目的，从而加深学生对课文内容的理解，提高学生鉴赏英语文章的能力。学生只有了解英语文体学知识，才能更好地认识英语的特点，提高他们的英语欣赏水平，以及在不同的社会环境中运用英语的能力。如在以“范文教学”为特色的中国外语专业教学中，文体分析大有用处。（2）融入人文性的教学内容高校教师不仅要传授学生知识和学习策略，还要教会学生认识人生、认识自我，培养他们的自信心与独立自主的意识。大学综合英语课程设置了一些有关人生、人性、积极心理学、情绪处理、理想与现实以及幸福感等方面的主题，教师可以根据相应的教学内容，结合自己或他人丰富的人生经历，向学生输入积极、正面的情感，在人性化的互动课堂教学中向学生传递正能量，为学生步入社会铺垫人文关怀。
3.有计划地培养教师的人文素养和学生的人文意识
（1）教师的人文素养人文素养是指人应具备的基本品质、基本态度和基本能力，而人文素养的典型标志是人文精神。人文精神泛指人文科学体现出的对人类生存意义和价值的关怀。人文精神追求人生美好的境界，推崇感性和情感，注重想象性和多样性的生活，把一切追求和努力都归结为对人本身的关怀。无论是对社会，还是对个人来说，人文精神都是非常重要且必不可缺的。只有弘扬了人文精神，社会才会生机勃勃、兴旺发达，人才活得有意义，才算是一个真正的人。一位人文素养深厚的教师，肯定是一位有抱负、有追求的教师，往往呈现出人格形象完整、精神焕发、精力充沛、性格坚毅、乐观向上、作风严谨等特征，给人以力量感。在他的教育和影响下，学生必然会受到潜移默化的影响，耳濡目染地形成顽强的意志与自制力，因而更加富有理想，善于思考，发奋学习。而这，才真正体现了教育的最终目标，即人才的培养。大学英语教学的最高目标，正是培养高素质的人。（2）学生的人文意识当代大学生呈现出人文知识缺失的状态，主要体现在人文知识贫乏、文化底蕴浅薄、人文价值迷失、精神萎靡、缺乏社会责任感、价值取向功利化等方面。大学是人格养成之所，是人文精神的摇篮，大学英语课程的授课对象是所有在校大学生，它是培养学生人文精神的重要阵地。教师必须利用好这一阵地，努力培养学生的人文意识。
人文学科的重要性英文大学作文【七】
[1]朱艳，王丽芳.CALL中大学英语教师所面临的问题与对策[J].时代教育：教育教学刊，2008，（3）.
[2]范国睿.教育生态学[M].北京:人民教育出版社，2000.
[3]何克抗，吴娟.整合的教学模式研究之一——教学模式的内涵及分类[J].现代教育技术，2008，（7）.
[4]吴启迪.教育部副部长吴启迪同志在大学英语四、六级考试改革新闻发布会上的讲话[J].外语界，2005，（2）.
[5]范国睿.教育生态学[M].北京:人民教育出版社，2000.
[6]李森．论课堂的生态本质、特征及功能[J]．教育研究，2005，（10）．
[7]魏永红.任务型外语教学研究——认知心理学视角[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社，2004.
人文学科的重要性英文大学作文【八】
I read the Chinese version of “Camille” a few years ago. At that time I was deeply moved by the main character Marguerite Gautier. “Camille” or “The Lady of the Camellias” by Alexandre Dumas, fils, is the story of Marguerite Gautier, a young courtesan, or kept woman, in Paris in the mid 1800's, and how she falls in love with a young man, Armand Duval, and then tries to escape from her questionable past. Unfortunately, it comes back to haunt her and she ends up returning to that life and dies painfully and alone, but with the knowledge that she was a noble woman at heart. When I first began to read the book, I did not care for Marguerite or her attitude or lifestyle, but as I got further into the narrative, I realized that her saucy attitude was a front to cover the lonely woman that she really was. She felt used, abused and unloved, until the gentle Armand Duval came into her life and showed her that he loved her as a person and not for what she could do for him. It must have taken great courage for Marguerite to leave the life she had lived for so long, knowing all along that it was probably too good to be true and would not last indefinitely. And it also showed that Marguerite really loved Armand Duval for she could even change herself for him.
However, happiness didn’t last for long. When M. Duval, Armand's father, came to her, pleading for her to leave Armand to save both Armand's reputation and that of his younger innocent sister, Marguerite saw a way to become pure of heart, if not in body. She felt that it was her duty, because she loved Armand so much, to do this even though it meant giving up her own happiness and hurting Armand temporarily. She reluctantly returned to her former life, knowing that.some day Armand would forgive her. Sadly, she died in debt and basically alone, except for her one female friend, Julie Duprat, who helped her during her illness. She had her journal sent to Armand after her death, explaining why she had made the choices she had. I think Dumas's last few lines about Marguerite being the exception, not the rule were quite true, and I also agreed with his view that while her lifestyle could not be condoned, we as a society assume that all of these type of women are cold and heartless, while this may not always be the case. A person can make the wrong choices in life when they are young, and try to redeem themselves, but sometimes past situations prevent them from changing their lives, even though they desperately wish to do so. This applies to both men and women in many different types of circumstances: involvement in crime; drug or alcohol abuse; gambling; prostitution; financial problems; poor marriage choices; etc. And this is the fact, which exists in the whole society.
As far as the other characters in the book, I think Marguerite was right in saying that no one truly cared about her, but only wanted something from her, the only exceptions being Armand and Julie Duprat. Of course, the Comte de G. and Comte de N. wanted her body and appearance. The
Duke needed to “wake up and smell the coffee” and realize that she could never replace his dead daughter. If he truly cared, he could have helped her leave her lifestyle without “keeping” her himself. And lastly, Prudence was a blood-sucking leech who used Marguerite almost worse than the men. I also think she was jealous of the fact that Marguerite had so much more courage than herself and someone truly loved her.
Last morning, when tiding my bookshelf, I took this book out of the shelf, and a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. I held it against the morning light and blew on it. The soft breeze carried it away. Camille is just like the camellia, she could never escape from the destiny of withering. But it wasn’t her fault; it’s because of the evil of Capitalism and the hideousness of that society.
Suddenly, I remembered a saying: “Women are like the flowers”. Those pretty women are like those beautiful flowers; their delicate beauty makes people feel they are the miracle of life. However, even the God envies their beauty. It seems that beautiful women always have tragic endings. As we are normal persons, even we can see the hideousness of humanity that results in their fate of withering, we can at most ask quietly in our hearts: Where have those beautiful flowers gone? Where have they gone?
The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe
It seemed to be such a coincidence that the night after I finished reading The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe, I was to dine in a restaurant distinctly related to the book itself. This restaurant was no other than the famous American-styled “Friday ’s. ” The reason for mentioning this restaurant is quite straightforward to all the gentlemen, ladies and children who have read the novel and enjoyed it, which is the fact that this restaurant was, most likely, named after the American Native in Robinson Crusoe, called Friday. This restaurant offers very exceptional service, for instance when the waitresses are asked to order dishes they kneel rather than stand, which, unlike the other restaurants I have been to, makes it easier for the customers to hear them speak. Moreover, Friday’s friendly services to the customers help them to make better choices when ordering dishes. I remembered when I went to Friday ’s last time; the waitress kindly described the items on the menu with precise details. It turned out that the combo I initially wanted was designed to be shared among a large group, not to be eaten by one person. I think this restaurant shows many commendable features similar to that of Friday. Friday brought emotional warmth to the people around him with his appealing personality. I think it was this personality that affected Crusoe and made him say that he loved Friday when Crusoe didn ’t express love for his parents, brothers, sisters, or even his wife. “When he espied me, he came running to me, laying himself down again upon the ground, with all the possible signs of an humble, thankful disposition, making many antic gestures to show it to let me know how he would serve me as long as he lived.” This was what Friday did after Crusoe had rescued him from the two savages chasing him. It was easy for me to see why Crusoe had loved Friday. After sometime, Crusoe and Friday were to rescue Friday’s father. When Friday reunited with his father, the scene was easy to move anyone: “It would have moved anyone to tears to have seen how Friday kissed him, embraced him, hugged him, cried, laughed, halloed, jumped about, danced,
sung; and then sung and jumped about again, like a distracted creature. It was a good while before I could make him speak to me.” This is my favourite chapter in the whole book. It is hard to see why Friday is an ex-savage when he can have personalities more praiseworthy than many civilized people, viz. Crusoe himself. “When he (Friday went to him (Friday’s father, he would sit down by him, open his breast, and hold his father’s head close to his bosom, half an hour together, to nourish it; then he took his arms and ankles, which were numbed and stiff with the binding, and rubbed them with his hands.” Furthermore, Friday’s expression of loyalty in asking Crusoe to kill him rather than leave him is more heartfelt than anything Crusoe ever says or does.
Crusoe, on the absolute contrary, seems incapable of deep feelings, as shown by his account of leaving his family—he never shows any emotions. After a moving lecture from Robinson’s father about his future, he still decided to follow his own wandering ambition. Careless was he about the wishes of his parents to keep him alive and prosperous, as he was the only child left in the family. When he came back from the island which he had lived on for twenty eight years, he found that it had been too late to tell his parents that he was still alive, but yet again he did not feel sorry for them; he also did not feel sorry for the two people who had to live in misery for nearly thirty years under the allusion all of their sons were dead. He had the same feelings for his wife: when he was married, he said it was “not either to my disadvantage or dissatisfaction”, implying that it was also neither to his advantage nor his satisfaction. Moreover, after his wife died, Robinson did not think of looking after the three children they had, but went back to the island, which he had lived on for twenty-eight years. It was on this trip which Robinson Crusoe revisited “His Island ” as he called it. I feel that Robinson ’s indifference to his family is almost emotionally cruel.
Before had clearly shown the contrast between Crusoe’s and Friday’s personalities, as when Friday, in his joyful reunion with his father, displayed far more emotion toward his family members than Crusoe, whereas Crusoe never mentions missing his family or dreams about the happiness of seeing them again. I think Defore is very successful in introducing Friday as part of the novel, it makes the whole novel seem much more complete and gripping to the reader, as well as proving that Defoe’s ideology of racism is civilized unlike many other Europeans at that time; natives and savages are not worse than others but can perhaps even be more modern and civilized. Those are the reasons of why I like The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe and Friday.
