高中怎样提高英语作文写作能力【一】
文章的开始提出某college teacher认为:"High school English teachers are not doing their jobs ." 因为 His students has a bad command of English.
作者的反观点是：
1 It is inevitable for one generation to complain the one immediately following it. And it is human nature to look for reasons for our dissatisfaction.
2 The people who criticize the high school teachers are not aware that their language ability has developed through the years.
最后的结论是：The concern about the decline and fall of the English language is a generation, and is not new and peculiar to taday's young people.
议论文的这种结构特点决定了它的主要题型是作者观点态度题，文章主旨题以及推理判断题。只要发现了这种结构特点，解答问题的主要任务就变成了到段落内找答案， 基本上不存在任何困难。
通过研究以上的文章结构特点，我们不难发现，在四级考试阅读理解中无论任何体裁的\'文章都遵循着这样一个共同的模式：提出话题（观点或事例）---- 用事例分析原因(或批驳观点------得出结论。 对文章结构特点的把握有助于读者更加自觉地关注文章的开始和结尾，分清观点和事例，从而在四级考试的阅读理解中准确定位，快速答题。
高中怎样提高英语作文写作能力【二】
the sun rises in the east and sets in the west, which is caused by the rotation of the earth as you all know. but have you ever thought of the effect of the earths rotation on man and can you imagine what would happen if the earth stopped rotating?
the radius of the earth is about 6,370 kilometres. it takes the earth 24 hours to rotate once. objects on the earths equator move with the earth at a speed of 460 metres per second, and the air close to the earths surface turns at the same speed. if the earth stopped rotating suddenly, the air would keep flowing eastward at a speed of 460 metres per second. the wind would be fourteen times as powerful as a hurricane. at the same time sea water would rush eastward at a speed of several hundred metres per second, which might do damages much greater than a seaquake would do. obviously, men could hardly stand such a catastrophe.
even if such a catastrophe would not happen, there would be a great temperature difference on the two hemispheres of the earth, and the four seasons of the year would no longer occur because a day and a night would be as long as a whole year instead of 24 hours. all this would greatly affect the life of human beings, imals and plants and that would cause worse results than anything imaginable.
高中怎样提高英语作文写作能力【三】
分析说理能力的不足，在议论文写作中常常表现为以下三点：
1．单向思维。就是在论证时不考虑反面意见，片面选取对自己的立论有利的证据，却屏蔽那些对立论构成威胁的不利证据。比如，学生想证明“勤奋出人才”，会列举古今中外一大堆以勤奋著称的名人，证明这些人的成功离不开勤奋，这就是典型的单向思维。读者只需举出一个勤奋却没有成功的`反例，便可以轻而易举反驳论点。这种不考虑反面意见，立论与论证考虑不周、对论题认识褊狭与肤浅的现象，都会极大地削弱文章的说服力。
2．单层论证。即在同一个层面上，通过堆砌相同或相似的例子，对论点进行论证，而不是多角度多层次渐次展开论证，文章往往缺乏纵深感。比如，论证“社会需要诚信”，罗列各种负面新闻说明我们正面临诚信危机，整个行文的逻辑就是一个简单的因果分析，即，因为A、B、C、D……都缺乏诚信，所以呼唤诚信。这样的因果分析，显然过于简单化。
3．感情用事。指学生在议论文写作中出现倾向性、绝对化、煽情等理性不足的问题。比如以下这段文字：“大家熟知的居里夫人，曾两次获得诺贝尔奖，得过16枚奖章，得到各种头衔107个。是什么使她得到这么多令人羡慕的荣誉？是持久的决心！是什么使她得到这么多耀眼的桂冠？是持久的意志！”这里作者用斩钉截铁的语气，把居里夫人的成就归因于持久的决心和意志，显然犯了绝对化的错误，而连续两个设问，两个感叹号，有点煽情。在例证环节，学生最喜欢使用排比、对比、比喻等修辞手法，以增强说理的效果。直奔结论，却没有提供证据：堆砌材料，却不会展开分析。
分析说理能力不足，之所以会成为议论文写作的一个通病，跟写作教学缺乏这方面的方法论有关。有关议论文写作的指导，大多都围绕例证法开发相应的策略，如正反对比论证、归纳升华法等。对于议论文写作中分析什么、如何分析，缺乏整体性的思考。
下面这则教学案例，谈的是如何通过概念的辨析，来拓展学生思维的深广度。而概念辨析，是议论文分析很重要的一个部分。该案例给我们提供了很多有益的思考。
