有关女权的英语作文【一】
There are two opposite gangs named socs and greasers. kids whose backgrounds are very rich are called socials, we name it as socs. the poor kids are called greasers, because their hair are covered with grease and they often wear greasy clothes. there are full of contradiction between them. the main character is ponyboy, he is the youngest greaser, and he hates the socs because he always gets jumped by them. darry and sodapop are his elder brothers, and they both dropped out of school to work in order to raise money for ponyboy ‘s study. through seeing a movie together with a rich but kind girl, cherry, ponyboy realizes that not all socs are bad. johnny is his best friend, he used to be very weak, but after being jumped by 4 socs, he becomes mad and usually brings a switchblade with him, and if there is anyone who wants to play tricks on him, he will kill that one. suddenly, in a week, johnny dies in a fire, bob(his friend is kill by someone unwillingly, dally(the most violent greaser kill himself because johnny’s death. ponyboy grows a lot, realize the love of his families and friends, and promises to be a good man, and not fight anymore..
This is really a heroic story, and i learnt a lot from it..
First of all, i realized that we shouldn’t assess anyone just by knowing about his background. in the book, ponyboy thought that life was unfair-socs always win, greasers always lose. socs could easily go to college, but greasers sometimes must drop out of school to work for their livings. so he hated socs as if from his birth. but he gradually realized that some socs are kind, but some greasers are alike a hood. so we should also know people deeply before judging them, and believe the truth more than our subjective things.
Secondly, no matter how our backgrounds and families are, we should have kind and brave hearts. in the story, ponyboy saw many greasers crime and fight just because of their identify, he thought that was totally wrong. even his dying friend, johnny told him to stay gold which means to be kind, simple and pure in a serious health condition. on the other hand, ponyboy thought gresers have the same rights as socs, and he never lowered his head in front of socs.
There are also something good about love. at the beginning, ponyboy thought that dally, his eldest brother fully concentrated on working and making money, but never cared about him and sodapop, and he was dislike a young man anymore, more like an adult. but once ponyboy was sick very seriously, he saw dally crying for the first time when he was asleep-going-to-waken-up. and when they were having a rumble with a gang of socs, he was always covered with his two elder brothers. from that, he knew his small family would never be short of love, and his brothers loved him much more than he could imagine. in my real life, when my teachers and parents are strict with me, i shouldn’t think that they don’t love me, it is just another, more deep way to love.
The writer wrote this book when he was only a teenager as fourteen-going-to-fifteen, in the same age as me. so it is more easy for me to get close to him and understand him. but he truly experienced all i experienced and something i have never imagined. so i should learn something good from him, and keep away from thing bad he had done.
This book really taught me a lot, and i will spare no efforts to do the good things it bring to me!
有关女权的英语作文【二】
1. 针对的是依据“性别中立（gender neutral）”来解释性别歧视。
“差异论（difference approach）”者接受这样一个事实：存在着对性别加以区别的正当事例。社会如果照顾***的妇女的利益或实施性别分开的体育比赛，就是把性别因素纳入了考虑。
但是差异论的成功相当有限，因为它忽视了这样一个事实：这些是在性别不平等的背景下被界定的。差异论认为只要妇女在性别中立的规则下能够依据自己的能力去竞争男人所界定的角色，这就是性别平等。但问题的关键在于，规则是男人界定的。比如，消防员、警察和军人这样的工作，往往规定申请者的身高和体重不得低于某一标准。这些官方规定是性别中立的，但是由于一般男性的身高体重都要大于一般女性，这些规定实际上把很多女性排斥到这些职位之外。
因此，解决之道不能只是消除歧视，还要拥有权力。平等的要求不只包括女性有平等机会去追求男性规定的角色，还包括女性有平等的权力去创造可由女性规定的角色，或者，去创造男性和女性都愿意平等追求的非基于性别的角色。
2. 针对的是群己权界（public-private distinction）。
虽然性别平等已经得到确认，但是人们仍然持有古典自由主义者那样的假设：性别平等只适用于家庭之外的关系。正义只关涉有契约依据的家庭之间的关系，而家庭由男性主导，所以正义关涉的是“公共领域（public realm）”—成年男性之间的行为准则就是双方的契约。而家庭内部关系则是只由自然本能或同情来进行管理的“私人领域（private sphere）”。
自由主义者拒绝对家庭行使干预，是因为他们信奉公域与私域的二分，把家庭视为私域的核心。“公域与私域的二分（dichotomy between the public and the private）”有两种观念。这两种观念都不认为家庭应该免于法律改革。
第一种源于洛克，是指政治领域与社会领域的区分，意思就是国家与公民社会的区分，国家是公共领域，公民社会是私人领域，这一观念下家庭落在了国家和公民社会以外的领域。政治谱系上几乎所有男性理论家都曾经赞同“把女性局限于家庭领域的依据就在于女性的特殊化、情绪化的非普遍属性。”
第二种源于受浪漫主义影响的自由主义者，是指社会领域与个人领域的区分。浪漫主义者把社会生活（国家和公民社会）当作公共领域，把个人私生活当作私人领域。这种观念下女性有个人隐私，甚至是家庭之内的个人隐私。
当代女权主义者接受自由主义者关于国家和社会的关系的基本看法。但自由主义的正义理论通常拒绝关注家庭，通常的'理由是：家庭属于私人领域。然而家庭是性别不平等的核心场所，女权主义者就不能认同这种忽略。
3. 这个论点声称，对正义的强调本身就反映了男性的偏见，而任何要想照应女性的利益和体验的理论，都要用对关怀的强调（emphasis on caring）去代替对正义的强调。
整个西方哲学史都在进行这样的区分：把据说是女性的家庭生活所要求的直觉、情绪和特殊气质与据说是男性的公共生活所要求的理性、公平和不带情感的思维区分开来。在性别的分界线上分离了“不同的道德劳动”。当代女权主义一个重要的分支论证说，我们应该严肃对待女性的不同道德，我们应该视之为一种独特的道德思维的模式；并且他们认为，女性的天生的直觉气质不只适用于私人领域，这种气质具有理性特征，并具有潜在的公共意义。吉利根（Carol Gilligan）认为，道德问题源于相互冲突的责任，而不是源于相互竞争的权利，要解决道德问题，就需要女性所倾向的“另一种方式”的思维模式—情境性的叙事思维模式而不是形式化的抽象思维模式。女性的道德观由于关怀行为，认为只有对责任和关系有了理解，才会有道德发展。
有关女权的英语作文【三】
This years Spring Festival, I read" the old man and the sea", is a famous American writer Hemingway wrote. I admire the old fisherman in the novel very much, he lets me understand that a person must have unremittingly spirit, could succeed. This novel is a description of a nearly sixty years old, alone in fishing, caught a big fish, but can not draw. The old fisherman and fish deal after several days, they find it is a big Malin fish over several times their own boats, while knowing that it is difficult to win, does not give up yet.
有关女权的英语作文【四】
This is a story about a special and ueserved woman who has been exposed to a hostile environment but continuously and fearlessly struggling for her ideal life. The story can be interpreted as a symbol of the independent spirit.
It seems to me that many readers’ English reading experience starts with Jane Eyer. I am of no exception. As we refer to the movie “Jane Eyer”, it is not surprising to find some differences because of its being filmized and retold in a new way, but the spirit of the novel remains----to be an independent person, both physically and mentally.
Jane Eyer was a born resister, whose parents went off when she was very young, and her aunt，the only relative she had，treated her as badly as a ragtag. Since Jane’s education in Lomon person, just the same as any other girl around. The suffers from being humiliated and devastated teach Jane to be persevering and prize dignity over anything else.As a reward of revolting the ruthless oppression, Jane got a chance to be a tutor in Thornfield Garden. There she made the acquaintance of lovely Adele and that garden’s owner, Rochester, a man with warm heart despite a cold face outside. Jane expected to change the life from then on, but fate had decided otherwise: After Jane and Rochester fell in love with each other and got down to get marry, she unfortunately came to know in fact Rochester had got a legal wife, who seemed to be the shadow following
Rochester and led to his moodiness all the time ----Rochester was also a despairing person in need of salvation. Jane did want to give him a hand, however, she made up her mind to leave, because she didn’t want to betray her own principles, because she was Jane Eyer. The film has finally got a symbolist end: Jane inherited a large number of legacies and finally returned. After finding Rochester’s misfortune brought by his original mad wife, Jane chose to stay with him forever.
I don’t know what others feel, but frankly speaking, I would rather regard the section that Jane began her teaching job in Thornfield as the film’s end----especially when I heard Jane’s words “Never in my life have I been awaken so happily.” For one thing, this ideal and brand-new beginning of life was what Jane had been imagining for long as a suffering person; for another, this should be what the audiences with my views hoped her to get. But the professional judgment of producing films reminded me to wait for a totally different result: There must be something wrong coming with the excellence----perhaps not only should another section be added to eich the story, but also we may see from the next transition of Jane’s life that “Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you would get.” (By Forrest Gump’s mother, in the film “Forrest Gump”
What’s more, this film didn’t end when Jane left Thornfield. For Jane Eyer herself, there should always be somewhere to realize her great ideal of being independent considering her fortitude, but for Rochester, how he can get salvation?
The film gives the answer tentatively: Jane eventually got back to Rochester. In fact, when Jane
met Rochester for the first time, she scared his horse and made his heel strained, to a certain extent, which meant Rochester would get retrieval because of Jane. We can consider Rochester’s experiences as that of religion meaning. The fire by his frantic wife was the punishment for the cynicism early in his life. After it, Rochester got the mercy of the God and the love of the woman whom he loved. Here we can say: human nature and divinity get united perfectly in order to let such a story accord with the requirements of both two sides. The value of this film may be due to its efforts to explore a new way for the development of humanism under the faith of religion.
Life is ceaselessly changing, but our living principles remain. Firmly persisting for the rights of being independent gives us enough confidence and courage, which is like the beacon over the capriccioso sea of life. In the world of the film, we have found the stories of ourselves, which makes us so concerned about the fate of the dramatis personae.
In this era of rapid social and technological change leading to increasing life complexity and psychological displacement, both physical and mental effects on us call for a balance. We are likely to find ourselves bogged down in the Sargasso Sea of information overload and living unconsciousness. It’s our spirit that makes the life meaningful.
Heart is the engine of body, brain is the resource of thought, and great films are the mirrors of life. In
dubitably, “Jane Eyer” is one of them.
有关女权的英语作文【五】
Tonight I watched the movie for the third time. I really enjoy this film so much.
So what＇s your choice between being a common person or a hero with people＇s reects? Most people will choose the latter. But what will be your choice if the cost is laying your lover among the risks? What will it be if the cost is you can never tell the girl, who you love so much, that you love her? The ider man had this contradiction. But finally he still chose the latter, not in order to be a hero, but to make this word peaceful.
I was so moved by the words the Aunt Mary said:
You will never guess what he wants to be, the ider man. He knows the hero when he sees one, too a few characters out there, flying all around out there, saving old girls like me. Lord knows kids like Henry need hero courageous, sacrificing for people, setting examples for all of us. Everybody loves a hero. People enthrone them, cheer them, scream their names and years later they will tell how they stood in the rain for hours just to get a glimpse the one who taught them to hold on to stand longer. I believe there is a hero in all of us. They keep us be honest, give us strength, make us noble, and finally allow us to die with proud. Ever though sometimes we have to initiatively give up the thing we want most, even our dreams. Spider man did that for Henry, so he wants to know where he is gone. He needs him.
The ider man got much from these words, so did I. And what about you? what＇s the hero lying in you?
有关女权的英语作文【六】
i read the book written by luxun .it is called zhaohuaxishi. it includes 10 short articles about the writers stories .they are based on his own experience , when i read this book ,i feel very happy to see luxuns childhood. it was diffrent from ours,so we may find it intersting and exciting. luxuns langange is very great but maybe difficult to understand . but through his words ,we can find his happiness in his heart .
