大学生内卷的英文作文【一】
Dear Santa Claus:
It is my great pleasure for me to write to you while the Christmas is approaching.Since I love you so deeply and trust you so sincerely ,you are always appearing in my dreams which make me excited and happy all the time.I believe that you are so kind-hearted with geat magics to the young kids and all the people as well.I am writing to you,telling you that the world nowadays are totally a mess!Wars,disputes,pullutions and many natural disasters are torturing the world and the people.It seems that the earth is coming to its end where the human being cannot live any longer.Sincerely wish that you can help us and the earth.
Sincerely,Yours
大学生内卷的英文作文【二】
I read the Chinese version of “Camille” a few years ago. At that time I was deeply moved by the main character Marguerite Gautier. “Camille” or “The Lady of the Camellias” by Alexandre Dumas, fils, is the story of Marguerite Gautier, a young courtesan, or kept woman, in Paris in the mid 1800's, and how she falls in love with a young man, Armand Duval, and then tries to escape from her questionable past. Unfortunately, it comes back to haunt her and she ends up returning to that life and dies painfully and alone, but with the knowledge that she was a noble woman at heart. When I first began to read the book, I did not care for Marguerite or her attitude or lifestyle, but as I got further into the narrative, I realized that her saucy attitude was a front to cover the lonely woman that she really was. She felt used, abused and unloved, until the gentle Armand Duval came into her life and showed her that he loved her as a person and not for what she could do for him. It must have taken great courage for Marguerite to leave the life she had lived for so long, knowing all along that it was probably too good to be true and would not last indefinitely. And it also showed that Marguerite really loved Armand Duval for she could even change herself for him.
However, happiness didn’t last for long. When M. Duval, Armand's father, came to her, pleading for her to leave Armand to save both Armand's reputation and that of his younger innocent sister, Marguerite saw a way to become pure of heart, if not in body. She felt that it was her duty, because she loved Armand so much, to do this even though it meant giving up her own happiness and hurting Armand temporarily. She reluctantly returned to her former life, knowing that.some day Armand would forgive her. Sadly, she died in debt and basically alone, except for her one female friend, Julie Duprat, who helped her during her illness. She had her journal sent to Armand after her death, explaining why she had made the choices she had. I think Dumas's last few lines about Marguerite being the exception, not the rule were quite true, and I also agreed with his view that while her lifestyle could not be condoned, we as a society assume that all of these type of women are cold and heartless, while this may not always be the case. A person can make the wrong choices in life when they are young, and try to redeem themselves, but sometimes past situations prevent them from changing their lives, even though they desperately wish to do so. This applies to both men and women in many different types of circumstances: involvement in crime; drug or alcohol abuse; gambling; prostitution; financial problems; poor marriage choices; etc. And this is the fact, which exists in the whole society.
As far as the other characters in the book, I think Marguerite was right in saying that no one truly cared about her, but only wanted something from her, the only exceptions being Armand and Julie Duprat. Of course, the Comte de G. and Comte de N. wanted her body and appearance. The
Duke needed to “wake up and smell the coffee” and realize that she could never replace his dead daughter. If he truly cared, he could have helped her leave her lifestyle without “keeping” her himself. And lastly, Prudence was a blood-sucking leech who used Marguerite almost worse than the men. I also think she was jealous of the fact that Marguerite had so much more courage than herself and someone truly loved her.
Last morning, when tiding my bookshelf, I took this book out of the shelf, and a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. I held it against the morning light and blew on it. The soft breeze carried it away. Camille is just like the camellia, she could never escape from the destiny of withering. But it wasn’t her fault; it’s because of the evil of Capitalism and the hideousness of that society.
Suddenly, I remembered a saying: “Women are like the flowers”. Those pretty women are like those beautiful flowers; their delicate beauty makes people feel they are the miracle of life. However, even the God envies their beauty. It seems that beautiful women always have tragic endings. As we are normal persons, even we can see the hideousness of humanity that results in their fate of withering, we can at most ask quietly in our hearts: Where have those beautiful flowers gone? Where have they gone?
The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe
It seemed to be such a coincidence that the night after I finished reading The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe, I was to dine in a restaurant distinctly related to the book itself. This restaurant was no other than the famous American-styled “Friday ’s. ” The reason for mentioning this restaurant is quite straightforward to all the gentlemen, ladies and children who have read the novel and enjoyed it, which is the fact that this restaurant was, most likely, named after the American Native in Robinson Crusoe, called Friday. This restaurant offers very exceptional service, for instance when the waitresses are asked to order dishes they kneel rather than stand, which, unlike the other restaurants I have been to, makes it easier for the customers to hear them speak. Moreover, Friday’s friendly services to the customers help them to make better choices when ordering dishes. I remembered when I went to Friday ’s last time; the waitress kindly described the items on the menu with precise details. It turned out that the combo I initially wanted was designed to be shared among a large group, not to be eaten by one person. I think this restaurant shows many commendable features similar to that of Friday. Friday brought emotional warmth to the people around him with his appealing personality. I think it was this personality that affected Crusoe and made him say that he loved Friday when Crusoe didn ’t express love for his parents, brothers, sisters, or even his wife. “When he espied me, he came running to me, laying himself down again upon the ground, with all the possible signs of an humble, thankful disposition, making many antic gestures to show it to let me know how he would serve me as long as he lived.” This was what Friday did after Crusoe had rescued him from the two savages chasing him. It was easy for me to see why Crusoe had loved Friday. After sometime, Crusoe and Friday were to rescue Friday’s father. When Friday reunited with his father, the scene was easy to move anyone: “It would have moved anyone to tears to have seen how Friday kissed him, embraced him, hugged him, cried, laughed, halloed, jumped about, danced,
sung; and then sung and jumped about again, like a distracted creature. It was a good while before I could make him speak to me.” This is my favourite chapter in the whole book. It is hard to see why Friday is an ex-savage when he can have personalities more praiseworthy than many civilized people, viz. Crusoe himself. “When he (Friday went to him (Friday’s father, he would sit down by him, open his breast, and hold his father’s head close to his bosom, half an hour together, to nourish it; then he took his arms and ankles, which were numbed and stiff with the binding, and rubbed them with his hands.” Furthermore, Friday’s expression of loyalty in asking Crusoe to kill him rather than leave him is more heartfelt than anything Crusoe ever says or does.
Crusoe, on the absolute contrary, seems incapable of deep feelings, as shown by his account of leaving his family—he never shows any emotions. After a moving lecture from Robinson’s father about his future, he still decided to follow his own wandering ambition. Careless was he about the wishes of his parents to keep him alive and prosperous, as he was the only child left in the family. When he came back from the island which he had lived on for twenty eight years, he found that it had been too late to tell his parents that he was still alive, but yet again he did not feel sorry for them; he also did not feel sorry for the two people who had to live in misery for nearly thirty years under the allusion all of their sons were dead. He had the same feelings for his wife: when he was married, he said it was “not either to my disadvantage or dissatisfaction”, implying that it was also neither to his advantage nor his satisfaction. Moreover, after his wife died, Robinson did not think of looking after the three children they had, but went back to the island, which he had lived on for twenty-eight years. It was on this trip which Robinson Crusoe revisited “His Island ” as he called it. I feel that Robinson ’s indifference to his family is almost emotionally cruel.
Before had clearly shown the contrast between Crusoe’s and Friday’s personalities, as when Friday, in his joyful reunion with his father, displayed far more emotion toward his family members than Crusoe, whereas Crusoe never mentions missing his family or dreams about the happiness of seeing them again. I think Defore is very successful in introducing Friday as part of the novel, it makes the whole novel seem much more complete and gripping to the reader, as well as proving that Defoe’s ideology of racism is civilized unlike many other Europeans at that time; natives and savages are not worse than others but can perhaps even be more modern and civilized. Those are the reasons of why I like The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe and Friday.
大学生内卷的英文作文【三】
我写着封信主要想给你“谈判”一下。你上面的题太难了，可爸爸妈妈非让我做你，本来我以为他们只不过是说说算了，哪知他们竟动了真格，不做完一篇不让睡觉!这下可惨了，每天我不是睡眠不足就是熊猫眼，你仔细想想，你是不是有点太那个了?
别的\'不说，就说昨天，在我对老爸老妈“逆反”无效后，我极不情愿的进了书房。第一个和我过招的是小数点儿，他不好好在原地呆着，非跑来跑去，一会儿在这儿，一会儿在那儿，差点把我的眼睛给电花喽!
闯出了小数点的包围圈，我又进入了计算题的“火力口袋”，这个家伙也不好对付，什么脱式竖式递等式，个个难的要命!最后连九百九十九乘八百八十八都出来了，还有，那些递等式，不知为什么总给我下“套儿”，总将我的思路搅成一锅粥，去问老爸时，还得听他一句“笨死了!”真是麻烦!
好不容易让计算题“通融”了一下，我又被应用题缠上了，他们的“套儿”比计算题的厉害多了，举个例子，比如，“5除25得多少?”他非用“除”给我设个陷井才罢休，真是讨厌透了!
解决了应用题，终极boss――思考题出场了，这里的题都是难题怪题，也不知是你怎么搜罗来的，光是第一道就让我头大了，问老爸?得到的回答只有一个字：想!
数学卷先生，虽然你能提高成绩，但我希望，你不要剥夺我们快乐的童年生活，好吗?
一个普通的学生
大学生内卷的英文作文【四】
近日，一篇《躺平即是正义》的文章火了。作者在文中大谈“躺平即正义”，描述了自己是如何在两年没有稳定工作的情况下，通过极低的生活消费跟有一搭没一搭的打零工，维持一种“自由”的状态。不少网友读罢如获至宝，引得“躺平学”风行一时。
俞敏洪称年轻人不能躺平要讲奋斗精神
对此，在今日（5月30日）的第四届全国青年企业家峰会上，新东方董事长俞敏洪发言表示，现在年轻人躺平了生活，太佛系的话，国家的未来靠谁做？总不能靠他们这帮老头八九十岁还呱啦呱啦讲吧。
俞敏洪表示，台下和董明珠交流时，他赞同“我们这一代的企业家还是要为激起中国的年轻人的奋斗精神做点事情的，不能鼓励年轻人天天打游戏、贷款消费，要让年轻人努力为中国多创造财富，要讲讲奋斗精神”。
董明珠谈“躺平”、“内卷”：年轻人应该追求精神财富
珠海格力电器董事长董明珠出席则强调，媒体应该更关注企业家对社会所作出的贡献，而非财富。“过去社会的排行榜经常看到成功人士是财富多少，我想提醒媒体关注，有多少优秀年轻人为社会贡献多少？这是大家要一致达成共同梦想和追求”。
谈及最近被热议的“躺平”、“内卷”，董明珠强调，现在已经是物资不再匮乏的时代，年轻人应该追求精神财富。“我不认为吃得好，穿的好，手上有很多钞票，你就是成功者。每一个企业家都要为社会、为周边人创造一个和平、美好、安全的时代”。
新华社谈“躺平族”：“未富先躺”须警惕！
新华社也曾对“躺平族”青年发表评论。文章指出，与拼搏努力争取成功相对，“躺平族”在各种压力面前选择逃避。相比奋斗的收获，他们更愿意过与世无争的生活，甚至一躺了之。这种自外于传统主流观念的青年处世方式，值得引起社会的重视。
特定文化现象的出现往往根源于经济社会的转型。20世纪70年代，欧美国家面临高失业叠加高通胀的经济“滞胀”危机，朋克文化在承受巨大压力的社会底层中迅速兴起壮大，年轻人以简单的音乐结构、非主流的着装和无所顾忌的言语方式等表达对现实生活的抗争。在经历了20世纪90年代经济泡沫的破裂之后，日本开始了长时间的经济停滞，催生了不出社会、自我封闭的“蛰居族”，并逐渐形成了大前研一笔下的“低***社会”；而在20xx年全球金融危机深度影响全球经济的背景下，不上学、不工作、不进修的`“尼特族”日益发展壮大，逐步演变为当下世界性社会问题。
“躺平族”的兴起也有着深层次的经济社会背景。一方面，当下中国正在经历经济转型发展的关键时期，随着经济增长换挡降速和产业结构深度调整，行业发展空间受限，竞争更加激烈，最终反映到个人层面工作和生活上的“内卷”上。另一方面，中国巨大的经济发展成就为多元化的生活方式选择创造了条件。在物质相对丰裕的当下，人们可以有选择地放慢脚步，以相对舒适的工作方式换取足够的生活条件，或者依靠前期积累安逸度日。由此，那些思维活跃、不拘泥于传统的青年，自然会想到换一种轻松的生活方式——“躺平”。而与真正付诸行动在身体上躺平的人群相比，那些在岗位上早早失去斗志，消极应对工作的精神躺平者可能也不在少数。
然而，“躺平族”显然对于经济社会发展有很多不利。当前我国的经济发展面临着人口老龄化等多方面挑战，实现高质量发展的目标离不开青年的创造性贡献。相较于“未富先老”这一特殊历史背景促成的客观趋势，“未富先躺”这一现实问题带来的主观倾向同样需要引起我们警惕。关注“躺平族”，让“躺平族”愿意奋斗，对于面临转型发展任务的我国尤为必要。
当然，这绝非要对“躺平族”进行批判与苛责。出于身心考量选择舒适生活理应得到理解，经过充分思考选择慢节奏生活也需得到更多尊重。基于现实环境自主做出适合个人的生活选择，本身就是社会发展成就的一方面体现。引导“躺平族”奋斗，更多是需要从培育良好的工作环境和积极的社会价值取向角度出发，通过国家、社会和学校等各方共同努力，给予这些青年更多的关怀。
奋斗的机会最终来源于经济发展本身。个人奋斗与经济发展相辅相成，国家采取鼓励创新创业、培育新的经济增长点等多方面政策举措，是推动经济转型和高质量发展的重要途径，也相应能够为人们提供更多的工作和成功机会。而打通经济高质量发展和个人奋斗的良性循环，需要在制度上更加重视营造公平竞争的市场环境，进一步打破制约企业积极性的制度壁垒，释放行业发展空间，推动不同行业、不同性质的企业平等地进入创新领域、把握创新机遇、收获创新成果。
奋斗的动力离不开积极理性价值观引导。以积极的价值观增强青年奋斗的动力，社会和媒体应更多关注平凡中的伟大，宣传脚踏实地爱岗敬业的身边人，推崇在普通岗位上做出可贵成绩的工匠们，赞美在各个领域默默奉献价值的劳动者；企业应充分重视各类型工作岗位的价值，在合理安排薪酬和晋升机制的基础上，更加重视青年的归属感和自我实现动机，让不同岗位员工的努力都能得到应有的认可，让奋斗者收获满意的成果。而作为思想引领的重中之重，学校教育应始终坚持正确的价值观导向，强化劳动教育，引导学生认同劳动本身的价值，促进在青年当中达成劳动光荣的共识，引导青年珍惜韶华、奋发有为。
大学生内卷的英文作文【五】
Dear Santa Claus:
Howdy!Arrive the Christmas festival soon again, did you want to" go to work" again?Would you still ride the floret deer trailer to come this time?
Can you arrive at my bed front?Do you put previous lists to line up the dry skates in the socks, like?I liked it too, putting on it many cool!
Can you arrive at the kid sister younger sister's bed front?Sing a lullaby for her at the time of she cry, coax her to enter the beautiful dream country quickly and quickly.
You can stop in the sky, to a peaceful seed?The people of now needed it too, for the sake of these the innocent peoples, letting them feel the sweet.
Santa Claus, you which the gift that come?You are how can anyone know the children demand what?
Wish you:
Happy every day!Healthy longevity!
大学生内卷的英文作文【六】
Christmas Day falls on the twenty-fifth of December.It is a very happy day for many boys and girls .Before the term ends in some schools ,the children act a nativity or “birth” play,showing how Jesus was born in a stable.
On the twenty-fourth of December,all children are very excited.Usually they are sent to bed early so that their parents can get the presents ready.The younger children think that Father Christmas will come down the chimney or fireplace ,so they hang up a sock for him to put presents in.The greedy ones even hang up a pillow-case or a sack to try to get more presents.Later that night,Father or Mother will put presents in the sock,and leave others at the side of the bed.
On Christmas morning,the children wake up very early.Some even turn on the light at two o'clock,and most of them are awake by six o'clock although it is not light in England for another hour or two at this time of the year.Children look for their presents,and the young ones play while the dinner is prepared.At about one o'clock in the afternoon,the Christmas dinner is brought in.The turkey or chicken is quickly eaten.Children search in their Christmas pudding for new coins which are hidden in it.The rest of the day is full of games and eating until the happiest of all Christmas hollidays comes to an end.
大学生内卷的英文作文【七】
Many people simply regard Pride and Prejudice as a love story, but in my opinion, this book is an illustration of the society at that time. She perfectly reflected the relation between money and marriage at her time and gave the people in her works vivid characters. The characters have their own personalities. Mrs. Bennet is a woman who makes great efforts to marry off her daughters. Mr. Bingley is a friendly young man, but his friend, Mr. Darcy, is a very proud man who seems to always feel superior. Even the five daughters in Bennet family are very different. Jane is simple, innocent and never speaks evil of others. Elizabeth is a clever girl who always has her own opinion. Mary likes reading classic books. (Actually she is a pedant. Kitty doesn’t have her own opinion but likes to follow her sister, Lydia. Lydia is a girl who follows exotic things, handsome man, and is somehow a little profligate. When I read the book, I can always find the same personalities in the society now. That is why I think this book is indeed the representative of the society in Britain in the 18th century.
The family of gentleman in the countryside is Jane Austen’s favourite topic. But this little topic can reflect big problems. It concludes the stratum situation and economic relationships in Britain in her century. You can find these from the very beginning of this book.
The first sentence in this book is impressive. It reads: “It is a truth well known to all the world that an unmarried man in poss ession of a large fortune must be in need of a wife”. The undertone is very clear: the foundation of the marriage at that time is not emotion but possession.
People always think that Austen was an expert at telling love stories. In fact, the marriage in her book is not the result of love, but the result of economic needs. After reading this book, I know the truth is that a poor woman must be in need of a husband, a wealthy man.
I couldn’t forget how eager Mrs. Bennet wants to marry off her daughte rs. If you want to know why she is so crazy about these things, I must mention the situation in Britain at that time. Only the eldest son had the privilege of inheriting his father’s possessions. Younger sons and daughters who are used to luxurious lives have no choice but marry a man or woman in possession of a large fortune to continue their comfortable lives. Thus, we can see that getting married is a way to become wealthier, particularly for women without many possessions. Jane Austen told us that money and possession determined everything, including marriage and love in her century.
In “Pride and Prejudice”, the sister of Mr. Bingley strongly opposed his plan of marrying Jane because the Bennets don’t have many possessions and their social positions are much lower than them. From this, we can see there are a lot of obstacles for a not very rich woman to marry a wealthy husband. The society, the relatives would not allow them to get married.
In modern society, although the marriages of economic needs have decreased rapidly, the concept of “money determines everything” is still rooted in some people’s mind. A lot of parents try hard to interfere their children’s marriages. Education background, possessions, jobs remains the main reason that may influence one’s marriage. Marry for money is still a big problem in our
society. We can’t help thinking: can money determine everything?
Austen left this problem for us to think. The genius of Jane Austen lies in this perfect simplicity, the simplicity that reflects big problems. Although Austen was only 21 when she wrote “Pride and Prejudice”, her sharp observation of social lives makes the style of this book surprisingly mature and lively. The plots in her works are always very natural. The development of the plot is as inevitable as a problem in mathematics. I think the depth of Pride and Prejudice is the reason that makes this book prominent and classic. Today, her book still can be the guide telling us the economic relationships both at her time and in modern time.
