大学英语作文消极【一】
奥运会是一场严肃的以国家利益为主导的比赛，其次才是个人。为了国家，这可以说是一种战略。如果说使劲浑身解数去赢不一定赢得了的对手到头来还要与自己国家的其他运动员在淘汰赛中一决胜负，那这个努力对于这个赛场来说虽然是“道德”的，却对这些运动员是不公平的。
为了国家荣誉，她们就冒险地赌了一把。然而如此明显的目的却仍然有人看不出来。新华社，作为一个国家媒体竟然贬低自己的选手近乎“垃圾”，即使再错，也不应该这样指责自己的选手。再者，赛场上的主角是她们，是那些训练时努力奋斗的运动员们，并不是观众。
观众不满完全可以不看——“不尊重观众”，确实，站在观众以及裁判的角度，这样的比赛让人实在愤怒。但是，他们是否一直站在运动员的角度呢？我承认，观众给予过热烈的掌声，但到后面慢慢的变成了嘘声。
谁又能肯定，这种消极比赛的想法开始也许很犹豫，但听到嘘声后，不是更加坚定了呢？而且，观众的嘘声难道就是道德的吗？你可以选择愤怒地离开，可以选择睡觉而不理比赛，但为什么偏偏选择了嘘声?这对运动员是不公平的。
在赛后练了多少年才换来四年一度的奥运会上的比赛资格，如果赢了倒也值得，但如果输了呢，接着是更加艰苦的训练。一个运动员的职业生涯很短暂，而在人才辈出的中国更是少。十岁就参加奥运，到了二十七八岁就可以算得上是老将了。
退役后，一些世界冠军对正常人的生活简直是奢望。刘菲，曾经的女子三项体育冠军，现在每月挣不到600元。这样的情况数不胜数，冷门项目的运动员退役后，由于文化低，年龄大，加上运动带来的职业病，努力最终换来的是地下室的.生活。
中国专业化训练体制让运动员从小就接受专门的训练，但他们的未来呢，就是幸苦努力，然后享受一段在领奖台上的光辉，退役后过着连正常人都不如的生活？如此严厉的责罚，让一个运动员失去一个四年也许都等不到的机会，对他以后的运动生涯都有可能带来情绪上的影响。
白岩松在赛后评论到：“任何不赢却可以获利的规则一定是糟糕的，而不应该仅仅是谴责个人！”要我说，消极比赛，错的更是规则的制定，却把责任都让运动员来承担。还好，声音中除了批评，更多的是鼓励。
这一次如此大的事件也许会推动羽毛球比赛规则的修改，引起更多人的关注，共同制定一个更公平的比赛规则！
大学英语作文消极【二】
其中在一般的社交信中，信内收信人的地址通常省略，但是在公务信函中不能。将收信人的姓名、地址等写在信头日期下方的左角上，要求与对信头的要求一样，不必再写日期。例如：
大学英语作文消极【三】
yesterday i read a book the name of the book is《dr bethune》.
dr bethune was a famous doctor from canada. in 1938 he came to china. at that time china was at war with japan. he worked as a doctor in the chinese army and saved many soldiers’ lives. he worked very hard and became sick. dr bethune died in 1939. he was only 49 years old. he was a good man and we remember him today.
i think the book is very very good!
written by wu qingxiang
mar. 31
how to do research
——reading after a science paper
these days i am busy preparing my dissertation which is about web usage mining . i read some english papers and learnt much from them . and now i want to say something about a paper titled “web usage mining：discovery and applications of usage patterns from web data”.
this is the first english paper i read about dissertation and gave me great help .
this paper is a review about web usage mining. it introduced web usage mining in detail . although it is a little old for it was published in its contents are very useful today . it is organized according to the sequence of web usage mining and the six main parts are introduction which tells me what is web usage mining the sources and abstraction of web data the three steps of web usage mining taxonomy and project survey websift overview privacy issues . the third and fourth parts are most important . it had a list of existing project about web usage mining which i saw many times in other papers but this paper is the one creating this list . besides it has been referred for more then twenty times . as we all know that the higher the referred number is the more important the paper is so i consider this paper to be an important and successful one in this region.
in my opinion the success of this paper dues to three reasons . the first reason is the profound computer knowledge owned by the authors . web usage mining relates to many subjects such as artificial intelligence ontology semantic analysis but the most basic knowledge is computer science . the four authors are all professors of department of computer science and engineering in university of minnesota . for myself i am not major in computer science and i am not very good at computers so i feel a little difficult to understand technologies used in this region.
second they had read a large number of papers before they wrote this paper . there are fifty nine references listed after main contents . “stand on the shoulders of giants” this sentence tell us a truth : one can never successful all by oneself . and what’s more learn from others can save a lot of time and energy especially for us new learner . how to learn from others is a skill all of us should master but learning doesn’t mean copy or plagiary . other people’s knowledge and production is just our foundation upon this foundation we must have our own thoughts and creation. there are many remarks in this paper where referred other’s production.
third the authors had the experience of developing a web usage mining project . they don’t just engage in idle theorizing so their comprehension on this issue is greatly profound. they know what we may meet in a real project development and they know how to resolve them . after reading this paper i also read some other papers written in chinese . some of them are not based on real project and can not give useful resolution . websift is the name of system they developed which can be used to data mining and analysis .
i wrote this article not only because it gave me much help in preparing my dissertation but also because it tells me how to study and how to do research . honesty and preciseness are two essential making a researcher must have . hard-working is the necessary condition leading to success . this is just the beginning of my dissertation i should learn from these four authors both their knowledge and their attitude to study.
大学英语作文消极【四】
a tale of two cities occupies a central place in the canon of charles dickens's works. this novel of the french revolution was originally serialized in the author's own periodical all the year round. weekly publication of chapters 1-3 of book 1 began on april 30, 1859. in an innovative move, dickens simultaneously released installments of the novel on a monthly basis, beginning with all of book 1 in june and concluding with the last eight chapters of book 3 in december. dickens took advantage of the novel's serial publication to experiment with characterization, plot, and theme. he described the work in a letter to his friend john forster, cited in rudi glancy's a tale of two cities: dickens's revolutionary novel, as "a picturesque story rising in every chapter, with characters true to nature, but whom the story should express more than they should express themselves by dialogue." the novel that emerged from his experimentation is now regarded as one of dickens's most popular and most innovative works.
dickens's work was very popular with the reading public when it was first published. one review in the magazine athenaeum stated that a tale of two cities had attracted the praise of a hundred thousand readers. on the other hand, a whole set of critics, most notably sir james fitzjames stephen writing in saturday review, criticized the novel precisely for its popularity. "most of the critics writing in the intellectual and literary journals of the day considered popular success a good reason to condemn a work," explains glancy. "if the public liked it, they certainly could not be seen to approve of it at all." modern critical opinion, however, has given the novel an important place among dickens's most mature works of fiction.
