巍巍呼高山,汤汤乎流水。飞涧旁这段以诚相待,曲论相和的一瞬定格为千古佳话。知音难求,伯牙奏琴为子期,摔琴亦为子期。这情意如何不令人感动。而今,披肝沥胆的知音再也难觅。只缘人们拥有的纯洁太少。没有水的纯净,没有透明敞开的胸怀,着世间就无真诚可言。何不收其虚伪,展示真诚。
看着这透明如水晶的水,我们那颗被世俗之尘掩埋得太久的心,怎能没有冲见天日呼吸真诚的冲动。拥抱纯真,拥抱真诚,去成就一段马克思恩格斯般高尚的友谊,去结交一位誓友,莫逆,忘年,只要心相知,手相牵,意相同。
水教人真诚,正如叶尖那滴雨露,透明纯洁,折射出太阳的光芒。
天下之柔莫过于水。昼夜不舍的滴坠去赋予水无穷的力量。因渺小而被忽视,因忽视而暗中积攒着力量,直到将万年磐石一点点磨蚀,在世人惊叹的注目中有了穿石的壮举。
明白了持之以恒,竺可桢数十年如一日,观察记录天气情况,终成举世著名的气象学家,懂得了锲而不舍,贝多芬在静寂的世界中,用心灵演奏了命运交响曲的豪壮,有了水刚柔相济的力量,这世上多了几份执着,几份坚持。
水教人执着,正如那穿石得滴水,下坠,下坠,最终拥有成功的欢悦。
水,这就是水,水以其博大,纯净,力量感动着我,而我亦将用博大,纯净和力量去书写自己的人生,我不敢奢求拥有一段辉煌的人生,我只企盼今生无悔。
看完邹越的演讲已一周多了,一直想写点什么,总是静不下来。现在想想,也不知一天在忙乎啥。哎,一天又一天,匆匆忙忙,到底为了啥,到底为了谁呢?
记得看完演讲的第三天早晨去参加一个老人的葬礼,几个同学聚到一起谈起邹越,谈起那天的演讲,人人还兴奋不已,说得津津乐道。忽然一名同学的一句话让我陷入沉思。
她说,那天好多人都哭了,哭的人都内心都有愧呀。我半晌没说话。是呀,是内心有愧呀。比如说我,我哭的时候还真是心里有愧呀。
邹越的演讲我看过好几次录像了,看一次哭一次。这一次我又哭了,没有前几次厉害,因为我和学生说了我尽量不哭,但我还是忍不住哭了。
这次演讲,由于时间关系,只讲了三个板块,三个板块中都有让我感触最深的地方。
一是爱国篇。说到邓世昌在甲午海战中视死如归带领200多名兵士向日本舰队撞击的英勇表现时,我仿佛看到了那一壮烈的场面,看到了邓世昌站在船头指挥战船冲向敌人的英雄形象,我感动了,但我没哭。因为我无愧,我没做过甚至没有想过什么愧对祖国的事情,所以我没哭,但我感动了。
第二是爱师篇。邹老师说到老师为了学生,忽视了自己的孩子,我哭了。是呀,为了学生,儿子上小学时,我连续教初四毕业班,早上儿子还没起床,我就离开家了,只能看着孩子的小脸,轻轻地亲吻后慢慢离开。中午回到家吃晚饭,儿子又睡了,我也要休息睡一会儿,片刻的亲近之后儿子又睡了。晚上回家大都8点多了,孩子又要睡觉了。我时常看着孩子酣睡的小脸,坐在床沿上良久,就那样望着望着……
孩子小学五年,上学放学我没有接送过一次,课程学习我也没辅导过一次,孩子的课本我没摸过一次,孩子的家长会都是他爸爸参加。一次,孩子作文获奖了,我竟然不知道。他写的就是希望妈妈能多陪陪他,陪陪他看看书,陪陪他逛逛公园,坐坐木马小火车,转转摩天轮……
孩子上了初中,我开始教他,才发现孩子语文生字差得很多,课堂笔记跟不上,错字连篇。我当时火冒三丈,为什么会这样?然而,冷静之后,不得不承认错误在自己,是自己对孩子的管理实在太少了。我心急如焚,一切从头开始,给孩子补习文化课。一跟就是四年,孩子学啥我和丈夫就学啥,语文、数学、英语,孩子做的练习册,我和他爸都跟着做,孩子的作业我们每天都给判出来,并力求讲会。起早贪黑,家里不再有人看电视,外面的应酬一律推掉。坚持了四年,最后孩子终于考上了一中。欣慰之余我心也酸楚楚的,我也愧对孩子,如果小学就管理孩子,可能他会考上重点班,现在的成绩可能也会更好。但一切已经过去,时间不可能再倒流,生活也没有那么多“如果”和“可能”……
现在,孩子上高中,有多少孩子妈妈都能去给自己的孩子送晚饭,而我,孩子吃饭的时候正是我组织学生们放学的时候。有时,放学后,我还要和某些学生的家长谈论学生在校表现以及如何提高其各方面素质,有时甚至很晚。
想到这些,我哭了,我对自己的孩子、我的儿子问心有愧呀。泪水湿润了我的双眼,流进了我的心里……
第三是爱父母。是呀,我为父母做的事情太少了。每天学校——家,家——学校,两点一线的生活。在学校要处理学生的日常生活,今天某同学有打架倾向了,明天某同学父母吵架该生没写作业了,哪天某学生遭父母暴打有逆反心里甚至轻生念头了,哪天某某同学没来上学了,等等。这些事情,有的我要找学生谈话,把问题消灭在萌芽状态中;有的我要找家长,让家里人和谐共处,给孩子营造良好的学习环境;有的,我要做家长的工作,学会用现代的方法教育现在的孩子。学生把我当成了说知心话的人,有时不和父母说的话他们都要和我说,我成了某些学生心灵的倾诉站,成了处理学生的校园家长。我又怎能让信任的心灵受伤?在学校,我要忙忙碌碌做学生的思想工作,还要上两个班的语文课,看自习,批作业。备课的时间大部分被占据了,于是回家备课成了每日必须的任务。所以回娘家看父母的时间少之又少。是呀,该常回家看看,哪怕陪父母说说话,给他们锤锤背、揉揉肩……今天身为父母的我们怎么就不想想自己的父母曾经的付出今日的企盼呀,他们不就是盼望儿女多回去看看他们吗?想到这些,我哭了,我对父母有愧呀。泪水打湿了我的`衣衫,打进的我的心里。
听完邹老师演讲那个周日,我给自己放了一个晚上的假,买点东西,回娘家和爸爸妈妈共进一次晚餐。看着父母看我就跟看久别回家的孩子的神情,我的心里酸酸的。我对父母有愧呀!父母生我养我,我现在生活好了,回去看他们、帮帮他们做点家务的时间又有多少呢?
这里,让我想起了毕淑敏的话:孝,是稍纵即使的眷恋;孝,是无法重视的幸福;孝,是一失足成千苦恨的往事……一些事情,当我们年轻的时候,无法懂得;当我们懂得的时候,已不再年轻。世上有些东西可以弥补,有些东西永无弥补。
是的,趁我们父母健在的时候赶紧尽一份孝心吧,任何理由都是无理由的搪塞。
今天,我终于知道了,自己该忙些啥了。学会分配时间,让自己一生无憾,这才是应该做的吧。但方方面面都照顾到,又谈何容易?舍就是得?有舍才有得?人生需要抉择!
水是一切有机体的主要组成部分,全球动植物和40亿人体内含有约11200亿吨水。人类社会依赖水而生存发展。古代,人类对水取利避害,适应水而生存;近代,人类对水兴利除害,兴建工程,开发水利,控制水害;现代,随着社会和生产的发展,地球上可资利用的水日趋短缺,水体受到污染,严重影响人类生存的环境,人类逐渐认识到水是一种重要资源和环境因素,从而在更高的水平上开始对水开展了新的兴利避害活动。
世界气象组织1996年初指出:缺水是全世界城市面临的首要问题,估计到2050年,世界2/3以上的人口将生活在城市,而全球有46%的城市人口缺水,必须平衡社会经济发展和城市淡水供应管理二者之间的关系,进行水资源的储存、输送和管理的大规模工程建设。
相关文章:
the importance of water(一
水的重要性(一)
the importance of water(一)
it is well-known that water is indispensable in existing, in producing and in living. and we should
not waste of a drop of water.
众所周知,在生产和生活中水是必不可少的。我们不应该浪费一滴水。
first, water is definitely important for life. as is known to us all, water is necessary to sup
port life. without water, human beings, animals and plants cannot exist at all.
首先,水对生命是非常重要的。众所周知,水是维持生命所必需的。没有水,人类,动物和植物都不复存在。 second, water is also significant for producing. for one thing, industrial production needs a lot of water, such as using water to generate electricity. for another, agricultural production is also in need of water, especially in irrigation.
I read the Chinese version of “Camille” a few years ago. At that time I was deeply moved by the main character Marguerite Gautier. “Camille” or “The Lady of the Camellias” by Alexandre Dumas, fils, is the story of Marguerite Gautier, a young courtesan, or kept woman, in Paris in the mid 1800's, and how she falls in love with a young man, Armand Duval, and then tries to escape from her questionable past. Unfortunately, it comes back to haunt her and she ends up returning to that life and dies painfully and alone, but with the knowledge that she was a noble woman at heart. When I first began to read the book, I did not care for Marguerite or her attitude or lifestyle, but as I got further into the narrative, I realized that her saucy attitude was a front to cover the lonely woman that she really was. She felt used, abused and unloved, until the gentle Armand Duval came into her life and showed her that he loved her as a person and not for what she could do for him. It must have taken great courage for Marguerite to leave the life she had lived for so long, knowing all along that it was probably too good to be true and would not last indefinitely. And it also showed that Marguerite really loved Armand Duval for she could even change herself for him.
However, happiness didn’t last for long. When M. Duval, Armand's father, came to her, pleading for her to leave Armand to save both Armand's reputation and that of his younger innocent sister, Marguerite saw a way to become pure of heart, if not in body. She felt that it was her duty, because she loved Armand so much, to do this even though it meant giving up her own happiness and hurting Armand temporarily. She reluctantly returned to her former life, knowing that.some day Armand would forgive her. Sadly, she died in debt and basically alone, except for her one female friend, Julie Duprat, who helped her during her illness. She had her journal sent to Armand after her death, explaining why she had made the choices she had. I think Dumas's last few lines about Marguerite being the exception, not the rule were quite true, and I also agreed with his view that while her lifestyle could not be condoned, we as a society assume that all of these type of women are cold and heartless, while this may not always be the case. A person can make the wrong choices in life when they are young, and try to redeem themselves, but sometimes past situations prevent them from changing their lives, even though they desperately wish to do so. This applies to both men and women in many different types of circumstances: involvement in crime; drug or alcohol abuse; gambling; prostitution; financial problems; poor marriage choices; etc. And this is the fact, which exists in the whole society.
As far as the other characters in the book, I think Marguerite was right in saying that no one truly cared about her, but only wanted something from her, the only exceptions being Armand and Julie Duprat. Of course, the Comte de G. and Comte de N. wanted her body and appearance. The
Duke needed to “wake up and smell the coffee” and realize that she could never replace his dead daughter. If he truly cared, he could have helped her leave her lifestyle without “keeping” her himself. And lastly, Prudence was a blood-sucking leech who used Marguerite almost worse than the men. I also think she was jealous of the fact that Marguerite had so much more courage than herself and someone truly loved her.
Last morning, when tiding my bookshelf, I took this book out of the shelf, and a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. I held it against the morning light and blew on it. The soft breeze carried it away. Camille is just like the camellia, she could never escape from the destiny of withering. But it wasn’t her fault; it’s because of the evil of Capitalism and the hideousness of that society.
Suddenly, I remembered a saying: “Women are like the flowers”. Those pretty women are like those beautiful flowers; their delicate beauty makes people feel they are the miracle of life. However, even the God envies their beauty. It seems that beautiful women always have tragic endings. As we are normal persons, even we can see the hideousness of humanity that results in their fate of withering, we can at most ask quietly in our hearts: Where have those beautiful flowers gone? Where have they gone?
The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe
It seemed to be such a coincidence that the night after I finished reading The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe, I was to dine in a restaurant distinctly related to the book itself. This restaurant was no other than the famous American-styled “Friday ’s. ” The reason for mentioning this restaurant is quite straightforward to all the gentlemen, ladies and children who have read the novel and enjoyed it, which is the fact that this restaurant was, most likely, named after the American Native in Robinson Crusoe, called Friday. This restaurant offers very exceptional service, for instance when the waitresses are asked to order dishes they kneel rather than stand, which, unlike the other restaurants I have been to, makes it easier for the customers to hear them speak. Moreover, Friday’s friendly services to the customers help them to make better choices when ordering dishes. I remembered when I went to Friday ’s last time; the waitress kindly described the items on the menu with precise details. It turned out that the combo I initially wanted was designed to be shared among a large group, not to be eaten by one person. I think this restaurant shows many commendable features similar to that of Friday. Friday brought emotional warmth to the people around him with his appealing personality. I think it was this personality that affected Crusoe and made him say that he loved Friday when Crusoe didn ’t express love for his parents, brothers, sisters, or even his wife. “When he espied me, he came running to me, laying himself down again upon the ground, with all the possible signs of an humble, thankful disposition, making many antic gestures to show it to let me know how he would serve me as long as he lived.” This was what Friday did after Crusoe had rescued him from the two savages chasing him. It was easy for me to see why Crusoe had loved Friday. After sometime, Crusoe and Friday were to rescue Friday’s father. When Friday reunited with his father, the scene was easy to move anyone: “It would have moved anyone to tears to have seen how Friday kissed him, embraced him, hugged him, cried, laughed, halloed, jumped about, danced,
sung; and then sung and jumped about again, like a distracted creature. It was a good while before I could make him speak to me.” This is my favourite chapter in the whole book. It is hard to see why Friday is an ex-savage when he can have personalities more praiseworthy than many civilized people, viz. Crusoe himself. “When he (Friday went to him (Friday’s father, he would sit down by him, open his breast, and hold his father’s head close to his bosom, half an hour together, to nourish it; then he took his arms and ankles, which were numbed and stiff with the binding, and rubbed them with his hands.” Furthermore, Friday’s expression of loyalty in asking Crusoe to kill him rather than leave him is more heartfelt than anything Crusoe ever says or does.
Crusoe, on the absolute contrary, seems incapable of deep feelings, as shown by his account of leaving his family—he never shows any emotions. After a moving lecture from Robinson’s father about his future, he still decided to follow his own wandering ambition. Careless was he about the wishes of his parents to keep him alive and prosperous, as he was the only child left in the family. When he came back from the island which he had lived on for twenty eight years, he found that it had been too late to tell his parents that he was still alive, but yet again he did not feel sorry for them; he also did not feel sorry for the two people who had to live in misery for nearly thirty years under the allusion all of their sons were dead. He had the same feelings for his wife: when he was married, he said it was “not either to my disadvantage or dissatisfaction”, implying that it was also neither to his advantage nor his satisfaction. Moreover, after his wife died, Robinson did not think of looking after the three children they had, but went back to the island, which he had lived on for twenty-eight years. It was on this trip which Robinson Crusoe revisited “His Island ” as he called it. I feel that Robinson ’s indifference to his family is almost emotionally cruel.
Before had clearly shown the contrast between Crusoe’s and Friday’s personalities, as when Friday, in his joyful reunion with his father, displayed far more emotion toward his family members than Crusoe, whereas Crusoe never mentions missing his family or dreams about the happiness of seeing them again. I think Defore is very successful in introducing Friday as part of the novel, it makes the whole novel seem much more complete and gripping to the reader, as well as proving that Defoe’s ideology of racism is civilized unlike many other Europeans at that time; natives and savages are not worse than others but can perhaps even be more modern and civilized. Those are the reasons of why I like The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe and Friday.
© 2022 xuexicn.net,All Rights Reserved.