9月2日晚上,全国2亿多中小学生一起收看了中央电视一台播出的.《开学第一课》。这节课分为四个部分:探索美、创造美、传递美、和谐美。这是一堂不同寻常的课,是这一课让我重新认识了什么是美:美不一定是华丽的外表,内在的美才是真正的美。
在这节课上,给我印象最深的是邓丽老师。以前我也从电视中看过关于她的事迹,昨晚当我通过电视再次看到她时,我又一次被她征服了,邓老师的美深深地感动了我,她不仅年轻貌美,心灵更美。邓丽老师在她大学毕业后,选择了到海拔1800米的环境恶劣的小山村里当了一名支教老师,在那个只有几个教师的学校里,她是唯一的女教师。邓老师除了教孩子们上语文、数学课,她还主动承担起学校里的美术、音乐、舞蹈等其它科目的教学任务。在孩子们心中邓老师是最美的,她无时无刻不在创造着、传递着美。
尤其令人感动的是,邓老师在支教任务圆满完成后,她完全可以选择离开,去条件更好的地方工作。可是,面对山里孩子的极力挽留,看着那一双双渴望的眼睛,邓老师选择了留下,无怨无悔地留下。电视里笑容灿烂的邓老师搂着自己的两个因为担心她会离开而不断流泪的学生,连声说:“从来没想过离开,不必担心这个问题!”这朴素的话语,让我深深感动,也让我心生渴望,如果我能成为邓老师的学生,也许生活会艰苦许多,但我一定会像邓老师一样充满阳光,每时每刻把微笑、把自信、把快乐传递给身边的每一个人!
有人抱怨现在的社会缺少美,其实我们缺少的是发现美的眼睛,缺少的是自己像邓老师一样主动创造美的心灵。
美就在你我身边,让你我都来发现美、传递美、创造美!
“梦想永远离不开泪水和汗水,梦想需要脚踏实地”,这是我在观看《开学第一课》时感触最深的一句话。当我看到一个残疾的哥哥站在台上,大屏幕上放着他的故事时,我的泪水在眼眶里打转,他叫刘伟。
10岁时因为点击失去了双臂,这是一件多么令人痛苦的事情啊!但他为了实现自己音乐制作人的梦想,努力学习用脚趾弹钢琴,每天坚持练琴,这与他的泪水和汗水是分不开的,泪水是在一次次失败中产生的,而汗水又是在一次次刻苦练习中产生的,经过不懈的努力,他终于练成了用脚弹钢琴,而且脚趾像手指一样灵活。
当长城脚下传出他优美动听的琴声时,我不禁陷入深深的反思中:跟他比起来,我生活得多么幸福呀!我跟他一样,也需要每天练琴,我只需要花一点点时间就可以练好的曲目,相信大哥哥需要付出比别人几倍甚至百倍的努力!我知道练琴有多难,可哥哥为了梦想,不懈坚持,不懈努力,用自己的泪水和汗水,到达了成功的彼岸,他用自己的毅力证明了自己与正常人一样,我们也要像他一样,坚持梦想,实现梦想!而和他一样双臂截肢的男孩杨孟衡,很喜欢游泳,梦想能登上残奥会的领奖台上,他付出了泪水和汗水,满怀希望地参加了竞选国家队的比赛,可结果离梦想太遥远,他只取得了第九名的成绩,他修改了一下自己的梦想,他决定好好学习。虽然他已经两年没有上学了,跟着大家上高中也很吃力,但因为他的努力与勤奋,最终在今年的高考中以高分考取了中山大学。
事实证明,只要你努力,不论你多么与众不同,通过泪水和汗水,成功永远在你面前。每个人的成功都与泪水和汗水是分不开的,人有了梦想,就要朝着梦想的彼岸去努力,希望永远在前方。让我们设定一个自己的梦想,放飞梦想的雄鹰,一起努力!
粉笔,从不为称赞而生,它活着,只为尽一份力。它虽不如英雄般伟大,也不如玫瑰花般誉满天下,但它从无一句怨言。它在黑板上滑动,留下血肉之色,转眼间,这份呕心沥血的作品又无情的被板擦抹去。但是,它,笑着,它用自己的生命,为我们传授知识,为我们解疑答惑。缩短,缩短,再缩短;付出,付出,再付出。它,不是蜡烛,不是春蚕,因为它更无私,从它身上,我,看到了美——奉献之美!
老师,不应是蜡烛,因为蜡烛的光太微弱;老师,不应是园丁,因为园丁在万物萧条的季节无须浇灌;老师,不应是太阳,因为太阳每天都会落下;老师,也不应是春蚕,因为春蚕寄生在桑树上。老师,更像是粉笔。早晨,最早到校的,是老师;放学后,离开学校最晚的也是老师。当我踏入小学开始,每一次跌倒,每一次成功,总有老师在我身边默默地陪伴着,鼓励着我,祝贺着我。我从一个写30字句子都要咬着笔头苦思冥想的孩子,到现在毫不费力能写500字的学生,这神奇的突破,离不开老师孜孜不倦的教诲和引导。老师,不求名利,在我们身后无私的鼓励我们高飞,我看到了真正的创造者的美!
老师,就如粉笔,默默奉献着,却不为己,消耗着他们的青春。当岁月的刻痕爬上脸庞,老师,还奋战在教书育人的岗位。
师恩难忘,难忘师恩!老师的恩情,是留在我心里最美的风景!
This is a story about a special and unreserved woman who has been exposed to a hostile environment but continuously and fearlessly struggling for her ideal life. The story can be interpreted as a symbol of the independent spirit.
It seems to me that many readers’ English reading experience starts with Jane Eyer. I am of no exception. As we refer to the movie “Jane Eyer”, it is not surprising to find some differences because of its being filmized and retold in a new way, but the spirit of the novel remains----to be an independent person, both physically and mentally.
Jane Eyer was a born resister, whose parents went off when she was very young, and her aunt,the only relative she had,treated her as badly as a ragtag. Since Jane’s education in Lowwood Orphanage began, she didn’t get what she had been expecting——simply being regarded as a common person, just the same as any other girl around. The suffers from being humiliated and devastated teach Jane to be persevering and prize dignity over anything else.As a reward of revolting the ruthless oppression, Jane got a chance to be a tutor in Thornfield Garden. There she made the acquaintance of lovely Adele and that garden’s owner, Rochester, a man with warm heart despite a cold face outside. Jane expected to change the life from then on, but fate had decided otherwise: After Jane and Rochester fell in love with each other and got down to get marry, she unfortunately came to know in fact Rochester had got a legal wife, who seemed to be the shadow following Rochester and led to his moodiness all the time ----Rochester was also a despairing person in need of salvation. Jane did want to give him a hand, however, she made up her mind to leave, because she didn’t want to betray her own principles, because she was Jane Eyer. The film has finally got a symbolist end: Jane inherited a large number of legacies and finally returned. After finding Rochester ’s misfortune brought by his original mad wife, Jane chose to stay with him forever.
I don’t know what others feel, but frankly speaking, I would rather regard the section that Jane began her teaching job in Thornfield as the film’s end----especially when I heard Jane’s words “Never in my life have I been awaken so happily. ” For one thing, this ideal and brand-new beginning of life was what Jane had been imagining for long as a suffering person; for another, this should be what the audiences with my views hoped her to get. But the professional judgment of producing films reminded me to wait for a totally different result: There must be something wrong coming with the excellence----perhaps not only should another section be added to enrich the story, but also we may see from the next transition of Jane’s life that “Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you would get.”
What ’s more, this film didn’t end when Jane left Thornfield. For Jane Eyer herself, there should always be somewhere to realize her great ideal of being independent considering her fortitude, but for Rochester, how he can get salvation? The film gives the answer tentatively: Jane eventually got back to Rochester. In fact, when Jane met Rochester for the first time, she scared his horse and made his heel strained, to a certain extent, which meant Rochester would get retrieval because of Jane. We can consider Rochester’s experiences as that of religion meaning. The fire by his frantic wife was the punishment for the cynicism early in his life. After it, Rochester got the mercy of the God and the love of the woman whom he loved. Here we can say: human nature and divinity get united perfectly in order to let such a story accord with the requirements of both two sides. The value of this film may be due to its efforts to explore a new way for the development of humanism under the faith of religion.
© 2022 xuexicn.net,All Rights Reserved.