坚持造就了英雄,英雄在坚持下诞生。——题记
当事故发生时,一切都太快,快得让人没有时间去考虑如何营救。于是,他想都没想,一个箭步冲了上去,用手中的工具钩住了正向山下滑去的客车,车中一共有二十多人!
这是怎样的一种力量!可以拉动二十多个人和一辆大的客车。他不是超人,也不是蝙蝠侠,他只是一个普普通通的工人。直到救援人员到达,在这之前,他一直死死抓住手中的工具,不曾想过放弃,因为他知道,在他手的另一端系着二十多条人命啊!其实,他打可以松手,几十二十多人全部丧生,也没有人会怪她,他面对的可是一个庞然大物!但是,我想,在他冲上前去的时候就已经决定死也不放手,这是他自己的选择,就要坚持,尽管他有可能会被一起拉下去,但他肯定不会后悔,既然决定了就不能放弃。
但上天帮助了他们,那个工人和车上所有人都活了下来。可是,那个工人因为用力太大,时间太长,超越了极限,他永远失去了双臂和一条腿。但他用这些换回了二十多条人命,他是幸福的,他不愧做一个人。
是啊,人……
当那二十多人从危险中走出来的时候,去没有一个人想起他,想起他们的救命恩人,想起那个坚持到底,从未放弃过他们的工人。没有一个人来到这个重度残疾人面前说声:谢谢。他被遗忘在了角落。
可他不后悔。
在多少年后,当他抱着小孙子的时候,他可以自豪地告诉小孙子,他的爷爷坚持到了最后。他无愧于心,因为在那漫长的等待里,他不曾松过一口气。
这是一个真实的故事,那个工人是坚持造就的英雄。
生活中,当我们遇到挫折时,或感叹命运不公时,坚持就是最明智的选择。一定要坚持下去,哪怕这坚持的道路是多么漫长,崎岖,我们要在心中点燃一盏灯,告诉自己:不要放弃,不要放弃。彩虹不也是要在暴风雨后才能看到的吗?用坚持这种神奇的力量等待暴风雨的结束,不要轻言放弃,否则对不起自己。
达尔文着《物种起源》用了27年,司马光编《资治通鉴》用了19年,李时珍写《本草纲目》花了30年,歌德的《浮士德》写了60年……透过这一座座丰碑,我们仿佛看见了这些伟人毅力坚韧、百折不挠的高大身影。我们要从中吸取巨大的精神力量,去开拓自己事业的新天地。
无数事实证明,要想成就一番事业,就必须有忍耐精神。忍耐困难、忍耐折磨、忍耐压力、忍耐打击、忍耐嫉妒、忍耐讥笑、忍耐一切应该忍耐的痛苦。只有这样,咬紧牙关,往前走,不后退半步,别人做不到的事情,你才能做到。拿破仑说过:“胜利属于最坚忍之人”。
经过一段时间的犹豫,我终于报名参加了学校的第三届运动会。在离运动会还有几天的时间里,同学们为了为班里争光,都进入了紧张的训练中去。我也不例外!我参加的是800米和1500米的赛跑。因为我是第一次参加,所以心里很紧张。心里常常暗暗鼓励自己,要为班里争光!
这天终于来到了,该我上场了,我心里紧张极了!我参加的是800米的比赛。啪!发令枪响了,我和其他5名选手一起像离弦之箭一般离开了跑线,全力向终点冲去!可我不知是太紧张了、还是本来体力就不足,跑到一半就快跑不动了。更要命的是,当时我穿的是厚厚的长裤,跑起来的时候,就像有什么东西拉住了我的后腿,眼前有些发黑,气也喘得厉害,身体也开始摇晃起来。使我每跑一步都感到异常地吃力和难受。这时一个念头向我袭来,“算了,还是放弃吧!”在我的脚步就要停下来的那一瞬间,我的耳边突然响起了老师和同学们的欢呼声“加油!加油!……”这山呼海啸般的鼓劲声,使我的头脑一下变得清醒起来。仿佛有一个声音在我的耳边回响“不要放弃!不要放弃!做人一定要有骨气!”我一下振作起来,用尽力气向终点冲去。虽然我只获得了最后一名,但我对自己说:我胜利了!
坚持就是胜利!这是我的一次亲身经历,使它成为了我的一个信念。再接下来有12个人参加的1500米比赛中,在同样困难的情况下,我就是怀着这样的信念,终于获得了第五名!这成绩对别人来说也许算不了什么,但是,对我来说却是十分的宝贵!
坚持就是胜利。这句我亲身体验的座右铭,将永远成为鼓舞我克服困难、奋勇前进的动力!
I read the Chinese version of “Camille” a few years ago. At that time I was deeply moved by the main character Marguerite Gautier. “Camille” or “The Lady of the Camellias” by Alexandre Dumas, fils, is the story of Marguerite Gautier, a young courtesan, or kept woman, in Paris in the mid 1800's, and how she falls in love with a young man, Armand Duval, and then tries to escape from her questionable past. Unfortunately, it comes back to haunt her and she ends up returning to that life and dies painfully and alone, but with the knowledge that she was a noble woman at heart. When I first began to read the book, I did not care for Marguerite or her attitude or lifestyle, but as I got further into the narrative, I realized that her saucy attitude was a front to cover the lonely woman that she really was. She felt used, abused and unloved, until the gentle Armand Duval came into her life and showed her that he loved her as a person and not for what she could do for him. It must have taken great courage for Marguerite to leave the life she had lived for so long, knowing all along that it was probably too good to be true and would not last indefinitely. And it also showed that Marguerite really loved Armand Duval for she could even change herself for him.
However, happiness didn’t last for long. When M. Duval, Armand's father, came to her, pleading for her to leave Armand to save both Armand's reputation and that of his younger innocent sister, Marguerite saw a way to become pure of heart, if not in body. She felt that it was her duty, because she loved Armand so much, to do this even though it meant giving up her own happiness and hurting Armand temporarily. She reluctantly returned to her former life, knowing that.some day Armand would forgive her. Sadly, she died in debt and basically alone, except for her one female friend, Julie Duprat, who helped her during her illness. She had her journal sent to Armand after her death, explaining why she had made the choices she had. I think Dumas's last few lines about Marguerite being the exception, not the rule were quite true, and I also agreed with his view that while her lifestyle could not be condoned, we as a society assume that all of these type of women are cold and heartless, while this may not always be the case. A person can make the wrong choices in life when they are young, and try to redeem themselves, but sometimes past situations prevent them from changing their lives, even though they desperately wish to do so. This applies to both men and women in many different types of circumstances: involvement in crime; drug or alcohol abuse; gambling; prostitution; financial problems; poor marriage choices; etc. And this is the fact, which exists in the whole society.
As far as the other characters in the book, I think Marguerite was right in saying that no one truly cared about her, but only wanted something from her, the only exceptions being Armand and Julie Duprat. Of course, the Comte de G. and Comte de N. wanted her body and appearance. The
Duke needed to “wake up and smell the coffee” and realize that she could never replace his dead daughter. If he truly cared, he could have helped her leave her lifestyle without “keeping” her himself. And lastly, Prudence was a blood-sucking leech who used Marguerite almost worse than the men. I also think she was jealous of the fact that Marguerite had so much more courage than herself and someone truly loved her.
Last morning, when tiding my bookshelf, I took this book out of the shelf, and a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. I held it against the morning light and blew on it. The soft breeze carried it away. Camille is just like the camellia, she could never escape from the destiny of withering. But it wasn’t her fault; it’s because of the evil of Capitalism and the hideousness of that society.
Suddenly, I remembered a saying: “Women are like the flowers”. Those pretty women are like those beautiful flowers; their delicate beauty makes people feel they are the miracle of life. However, even the God envies their beauty. It seems that beautiful women always have tragic endings. As we are normal persons, even we can see the hideousness of humanity that results in their fate of withering, we can at most ask quietly in our hearts: Where have those beautiful flowers gone? Where have they gone?
The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe
It seemed to be such a coincidence that the night after I finished reading The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe, I was to dine in a restaurant distinctly related to the book itself. This restaurant was no other than the famous American-styled “Friday ’s. ” The reason for mentioning this restaurant is quite straightforward to all the gentlemen, ladies and children who have read the novel and enjoyed it, which is the fact that this restaurant was, most likely, named after the American Native in Robinson Crusoe, called Friday. This restaurant offers very exceptional service, for instance when the waitresses are asked to order dishes they kneel rather than stand, which, unlike the other restaurants I have been to, makes it easier for the customers to hear them speak. Moreover, Friday’s friendly services to the customers help them to make better choices when ordering dishes. I remembered when I went to Friday ’s last time; the waitress kindly described the items on the menu with precise details. It turned out that the combo I initially wanted was designed to be shared among a large group, not to be eaten by one person. I think this restaurant shows many commendable features similar to that of Friday. Friday brought emotional warmth to the people around him with his appealing personality. I think it was this personality that affected Crusoe and made him say that he loved Friday when Crusoe didn ’t express love for his parents, brothers, sisters, or even his wife. “When he espied me, he came running to me, laying himself down again upon the ground, with all the possible signs of an humble, thankful disposition, making many antic gestures to show it to let me know how he would serve me as long as he lived.” This was what Friday did after Crusoe had rescued him from the two savages chasing him. It was easy for me to see why Crusoe had loved Friday. After sometime, Crusoe and Friday were to rescue Friday’s father. When Friday reunited with his father, the scene was easy to move anyone: “It would have moved anyone to tears to have seen how Friday kissed him, embraced him, hugged him, cried, laughed, halloed, jumped about, danced,
sung; and then sung and jumped about again, like a distracted creature. It was a good while before I could make him speak to me.” This is my favourite chapter in the whole book. It is hard to see why Friday is an ex-savage when he can have personalities more praiseworthy than many civilized people, viz. Crusoe himself. “When he (Friday went to him (Friday’s father, he would sit down by him, open his breast, and hold his father’s head close to his bosom, half an hour together, to nourish it; then he took his arms and ankles, which were numbed and stiff with the binding, and rubbed them with his hands.” Furthermore, Friday’s expression of loyalty in asking Crusoe to kill him rather than leave him is more heartfelt than anything Crusoe ever says or does.
Crusoe, on the absolute contrary, seems incapable of deep feelings, as shown by his account of leaving his family—he never shows any emotions. After a moving lecture from Robinson’s father about his future, he still decided to follow his own wandering ambition. Careless was he about the wishes of his parents to keep him alive and prosperous, as he was the only child left in the family. When he came back from the island which he had lived on for twenty eight years, he found that it had been too late to tell his parents that he was still alive, but yet again he did not feel sorry for them; he also did not feel sorry for the two people who had to live in misery for nearly thirty years under the allusion all of their sons were dead. He had the same feelings for his wife: when he was married, he said it was “not either to my disadvantage or dissatisfaction”, implying that it was also neither to his advantage nor his satisfaction. Moreover, after his wife died, Robinson did not think of looking after the three children they had, but went back to the island, which he had lived on for twenty-eight years. It was on this trip which Robinson Crusoe revisited “His Island ” as he called it. I feel that Robinson ’s indifference to his family is almost emotionally cruel.
Before had clearly shown the contrast between Crusoe’s and Friday’s personalities, as when Friday, in his joyful reunion with his father, displayed far more emotion toward his family members than Crusoe, whereas Crusoe never mentions missing his family or dreams about the happiness of seeing them again. I think Defore is very successful in introducing Friday as part of the novel, it makes the whole novel seem much more complete and gripping to the reader, as well as proving that Defoe’s ideology of racism is civilized unlike many other Europeans at that time; natives and savages are not worse than others but can perhaps even be more modern and civilized. Those are the reasons of why I like The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe and Friday.
铁杵磨成针的故事早已是家喻户晓。李白正是因为看到了老婆婆磨针的一幕,受到了启发,最终发奋读书,成为唐朝的著名诗人。
《百喻经》中也有类似的故事。一个人日夜不停地磨一块大石头。坚持不懈、风雨无阻。不知过了几个春秋,终于将它磨成了一个小小的玩具牛。
两则故事都在告诉我们同样的道理坚持不懈,便可滴水穿石。只是,粗壮的铁杆,巨大的石块,何止只能成就一个细细的绣花针,一只小小的玩具牛呢?
坚持固然是好事,只是若没有选对方向,再如磐石般坚定不移也只是徒劳无功。最终落得黯然神伤的结局。
要去南方的楚国人,自信于马好,路费充足,车夫驾车技术高超,便向北而驰,背道而驰,便使旅行条件再优越,也只能越行越远,或许在行走数月,甚至数年后,他依旧坚信相北而驰可以到达南地,年复一年,最终只能带着“为什么到不了目的地”的困惑,消失在世界之中。
持之以恒本没有错,可若选错了目标,你就会走入歧途。目标是坚持的前提,选对了目标再坚持,才是成功的钥匙。
夕阳很美,可你若只盯着东方,你永远看不到夕阳之美;花开很美,可花若一心向地下生长,它永远得不到应有的赞誉;昙花很美,可若只在白日等待,你永远看不到那一瞬的倾城之美。
在正确的方向的指导下,你定能走一条准确无误的人生路。李易峰数年之前只是一个歌手,名声不大,关注度很小。那时的他,就好似生长在水中的浮萍,无依无靠。后来,他发现了自己所坚持的方向是错误的。他换了目标,换了方向,他改做演员。他用了几年时间坚持这一条正确的路。最终,他获得了成功。从20xx年《古剑奇谭》的轰动一时,到如今《活色生香》《盗墓笔记》《栀子花开》等一系列电视剧男主角。人气一直居高不下。那个当年被说成“靠脸吃饭”的“国名校草”在正确的目标和对的坚持下,终是在娱乐圈占有了一席之地。
成功,不可能是只靠一个方面就可以做到的。人生之路的正确与否,首先在于你是否选对目标。其次,才是坚持不懈,切莫在错误的领域坚持,让自己落个黯然神伤的结局。
因为在黑暗狭窄的空间里苦苦积蓄,烟花才能瞬间绽放出美丽的光芒;因为经历过风雨的吹打和滋润,花朵才能释放出沁人心脾的芬芳;因为经理过千万次起飞和跌落,雄鹰才能自由自在地在天空里翱翔;因为遭受了千里迁徙的劳累,大雁才能到达温暖的南方;因为经历过熊熊烈火的灼烧,瓷器才会在万物俱毁的火灾里幸存下来;因为感受过千雕百刻的苦痛,雕塑才能在千年风霜里不改变自己的形象……
也许你还在一个小岗位上埋头苦干,也许你还默默无闻,也许你看不到成功的曙光,也许你还在孤独的角落里编织自己的.梦想。那么,相信我,你会成功的。
没有不经风雨的彩虹,没有不受挫折的成功。如果你正遭受挫折,只要你坚持努力,那么你离成功已经不远。
没有司马迁忍辱负重的坚持,中国宝库里就不会有《史记》;没有李时针二十七年的苦苦努力,又怎么会有《本草纲目》传世?
古往今来,真正成大事的人,没有哪一个是一帆风顺的。“失败是成功之母。”正因为那一次次的失败,才锤炼了他们永不言弃的精神。一次次的失败,砌成了他们走向成功的路。
所以,现在你默默无闻,你看不到未来,那不是绝路,是你正走在通往成功的路上。
亲爱的朋友,不要因为今天的不理想而灰心,不要因为你正遭受的挫折而气妥。挺起你坚实的身躯吧,困难来了,就使劲将它踩在脚下。
在通往梦想的路上,坚持你最初的方向。或许你多坚持一会儿,就会取得成功。
所以,朋友,抬起你高贵的头,不要认输。带上微笑,带上坚强,上路。为了你的理想而不顾一切吧!
Many people simply regard Pride and Prejudice as a love story, but in my opinion, this book is an illustration of the society at that time. She perfectly reflected the relation between money and marriage at her time and gave the people in her works vivid characters. The characters have their own personalities. Mrs. Bennet is a woman who makes great efforts to marry off her daughters. Mr. Bingley is a friendly young man, but his friend, Mr. Darcy, is a very proud man who seems to always feel superior. Even the five daughters in Bennet family are very different. Jane is simple, innocent and never speaks evil of others. Elizabeth is a clever girl who always has her own opinion. Mary likes reading classic books. (Actually she is a pedant. Kitty doesn’t have her own opinion but likes to follow her sister, Lydia. Lydia is a girl who follows exotic things, handsome man, and is somehow a little profligate. When I read the book, I can always find the same personalities in the society now. That is why I think this book is indeed the representative of the society in Britain in the 18th century.
The family of gentleman in the countryside is Jane Austen’s favourite topic. But this little topic can reflect big problems. It concludes the stratum situation and economic relationships in Britain in her century. You can find these from the very beginning of this book.
The first sentence in this book is impressive. It reads: “It is a truth well known to all the world that an unmarried man in poss ession of a large fortune must be in need of a wife”. The undertone is very clear: the foundation of the marriage at that time is not emotion but possession.
People always think that Austen was an expert at telling love stories. In fact, the marriage in her book is not the result of love, but the result of economic needs. After reading this book, I know the truth is that a poor woman must be in need of a husband, a wealthy man.
I couldn’t forget how eager Mrs. Bennet wants to marry off her daughte rs. If you want to know why she is so crazy about these things, I must mention the situation in Britain at that time. Only the eldest son had the privilege of inheriting his father’s possessions. Younger sons and daughters who are used to luxurious lives have no choice but marry a man or woman in possession of a large fortune to continue their comfortable lives. Thus, we can see that getting married is a way to become wealthier, particularly for women without many possessions. Jane Austen told us that money and possession determined everything, including marriage and love in her century.
In “Pride and Prejudice”, the sister of Mr. Bingley strongly opposed his plan of marrying Jane because the Bennets don’t have many possessions and their social positions are much lower than them. From this, we can see there are a lot of obstacles for a not very rich woman to marry a wealthy husband. The society, the relatives would not allow them to get married.
In modern society, although the marriages of economic needs have decreased rapidly, the concept of “money determines everything” is still rooted in some people’s mind. A lot of parents try hard to interfere their children’s marriages. Education background, possessions, jobs remains the main reason that may influence one’s marriage. Marry for money is still a big problem in our
society. We can’t help thinking: can money determine everything?
Austen left this problem for us to think. The genius of Jane Austen lies in this perfect simplicity, the simplicity that reflects big problems. Although Austen was only 21 when she wrote “Pride and Prejudice”, her sharp observation of social lives makes the style of this book surprisingly mature and lively. The plots in her works are always very natural. The development of the plot is as inevitable as a problem in mathematics. I think the depth of Pride and Prejudice is the reason that makes this book prominent and classic. Today, her book still can be the guide telling us the economic relationships both at her time and in modern time.
© 2022 xuexicn.net,All Rights Reserved.