宽敞的大道上,平日里朴素得只有匆匆忙忙的车辆来装饰,旁边的花草树木只是略微做个陪衬罢了。到了新年之际,便也换上了新衣,浓妆梳洗了一番,擦上了胭脂和唇红。胭脂是那五彩的串灯,挂在光秃秃的树枝上,光亮着喜庆的气氛;而那唇红,就是一个个通明闪亮的红灯笼,映红了大街小巷……
小城的集市,在年的脚底下也是人山人海的,大家都摩肩接踵地挤着走,每个人都愉悦地与菜打交道,每家的店主也都微笑着迎接一拨拨客人。“走一走,瞧一瞧,今天菜价优惠哦!”也不知是哪家的大嫂喊了一嗓子,人们都蜂拥过去挑菜称菜了。我想此刻大嫂的脸上,必定全是玫瑰花。在人人满意的笑容中,年,哧溜一声,又不知钻到了何处。
抬头一望,已是夕阳满照,紫红色的天空显得格外美丽。想必这时,家家户户都在欢天喜地地享受着天伦之乐,远方的游子也踏上了回乡的车船。也不知又是哪家的娃,挑着个鞭炮到处跑,打破了玻璃一样的宁静,带人们真正走进了新年的大门。
倒是我家的冰箱受苦了,塞满了新鲜的肉和蔬菜。这些全是年饭的`加盟友。我此刻已经馋得口水直流,奶奶肯定会在初六会客的时候大露一手,到时候,享受的可全是美味佳肴。
如今,新年的大门已经敞开了许久,人们每天都匆匆地礼尚往来。年的气息久久不去,逗留在每一个人的笑脸上。赠人玫瑰,手有余香,那一件件礼品,就是亲情、友情中的玫瑰。
过夜了,一家家的灯光次第灭了。月光皎洁,照在树梢,小城又在渐渐消停的热闹中熟睡了。年,也睡在了他的脚底……
I read the Chinese version of “Camille” a few years ago. At that time I was deeply moved by the main character Marguerite Gautier. “Camille” or “The Lady of the Camellias” by Alexandre Dumas, fils, is the story of Marguerite Gautier, a young courtesan, or kept woman, in Paris in the mid 1800's, and how she falls in love with a young man, Armand Duval, and then tries to escape from her questionable past. Unfortunately, it comes back to haunt her and she ends up returning to that life and dies painfully and alone, but with the knowledge that she was a noble woman at heart. When I first began to read the book, I did not care for Marguerite or her attitude or lifestyle, but as I got further into the narrative, I realized that her saucy attitude was a front to cover the lonely woman that she really was. She felt used, abused and unloved, until the gentle Armand Duval came into her life and showed her that he loved her as a person and not for what she could do for him. It must have taken great courage for Marguerite to leave the life she had lived for so long, knowing all along that it was probably too good to be true and would not last indefinitely. And it also showed that Marguerite really loved Armand Duval for she could even change herself for him.
However, happiness didn’t last for long. When M. Duval, Armand's father, came to her, pleading for her to leave Armand to save both Armand's reputation and that of his younger innocent sister, Marguerite saw a way to become pure of heart, if not in body. She felt that it was her duty, because she loved Armand so much, to do this even though it meant giving up her own happiness and hurting Armand temporarily. She reluctantly returned to her former life, knowing that.some day Armand would forgive her. Sadly, she died in debt and basically alone, except for her one female friend, Julie Duprat, who helped her during her illness. She had her journal sent to Armand after her death, explaining why she had made the choices she had. I think Dumas's last few lines about Marguerite being the exception, not the rule were quite true, and I also agreed with his view that while her lifestyle could not be condoned, we as a society assume that all of these type of women are cold and heartless, while this may not always be the case. A person can make the wrong choices in life when they are young, and try to redeem themselves, but sometimes past situations prevent them from changing their lives, even though they desperately wish to do so. This applies to both men and women in many different types of circumstances: involvement in crime; drug or alcohol abuse; gambling; prostitution; financial problems; poor marriage choices; etc. And this is the fact, which exists in the whole society.
As far as the other characters in the book, I think Marguerite was right in saying that no one truly cared about her, but only wanted something from her, the only exceptions being Armand and Julie Duprat. Of course, the Comte de G. and Comte de N. wanted her body and appearance. The
Duke needed to “wake up and smell the coffee” and realize that she could never replace his dead daughter. If he truly cared, he could have helped her leave her lifestyle without “keeping” her himself. And lastly, Prudence was a blood-sucking leech who used Marguerite almost worse than the men. I also think she was jealous of the fact that Marguerite had so much more courage than herself and someone truly loved her.
Last morning, when tiding my bookshelf, I took this book out of the shelf, and a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. I held it against the morning light and blew on it. The soft breeze carried it away. Camille is just like the camellia, she could never escape from the destiny of withering. But it wasn’t her fault; it’s because of the evil of Capitalism and the hideousness of that society.
Suddenly, I remembered a saying: “Women are like the flowers”. Those pretty women are like those beautiful flowers; their delicate beauty makes people feel they are the miracle of life. However, even the God envies their beauty. It seems that beautiful women always have tragic endings. As we are normal persons, even we can see the hideousness of humanity that results in their fate of withering, we can at most ask quietly in our hearts: Where have those beautiful flowers gone? Where have they gone?
The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe
It seemed to be such a coincidence that the night after I finished reading The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe, I was to dine in a restaurant distinctly related to the book itself. This restaurant was no other than the famous American-styled “Friday ’s. ” The reason for mentioning this restaurant is quite straightforward to all the gentlemen, ladies and children who have read the novel and enjoyed it, which is the fact that this restaurant was, most likely, named after the American Native in Robinson Crusoe, called Friday. This restaurant offers very exceptional service, for instance when the waitresses are asked to order dishes they kneel rather than stand, which, unlike the other restaurants I have been to, makes it easier for the customers to hear them speak. Moreover, Friday’s friendly services to the customers help them to make better choices when ordering dishes. I remembered when I went to Friday ’s last time; the waitress kindly described the items on the menu with precise details. It turned out that the combo I initially wanted was designed to be shared among a large group, not to be eaten by one person. I think this restaurant shows many commendable features similar to that of Friday. Friday brought emotional warmth to the people around him with his appealing personality. I think it was this personality that affected Crusoe and made him say that he loved Friday when Crusoe didn ’t express love for his parents, brothers, sisters, or even his wife. “When he espied me, he came running to me, laying himself down again upon the ground, with all the possible signs of an humble, thankful disposition, making many antic gestures to show it to let me know how he would serve me as long as he lived.” This was what Friday did after Crusoe had rescued him from the two savages chasing him. It was easy for me to see why Crusoe had loved Friday. After sometime, Crusoe and Friday were to rescue Friday’s father. When Friday reunited with his father, the scene was easy to move anyone: “It would have moved anyone to tears to have seen how Friday kissed him, embraced him, hugged him, cried, laughed, halloed, jumped about, danced,
sung; and then sung and jumped about again, like a distracted creature. It was a good while before I could make him speak to me.” This is my favourite chapter in the whole book. It is hard to see why Friday is an ex-savage when he can have personalities more praiseworthy than many civilized people, viz. Crusoe himself. “When he (Friday went to him (Friday’s father, he would sit down by him, open his breast, and hold his father’s head close to his bosom, half an hour together, to nourish it; then he took his arms and ankles, which were numbed and stiff with the binding, and rubbed them with his hands.” Furthermore, Friday’s expression of loyalty in asking Crusoe to kill him rather than leave him is more heartfelt than anything Crusoe ever says or does.
Crusoe, on the absolute contrary, seems incapable of deep feelings, as shown by his account of leaving his family—he never shows any emotions. After a moving lecture from Robinson’s father about his future, he still decided to follow his own wandering ambition. Careless was he about the wishes of his parents to keep him alive and prosperous, as he was the only child left in the family. When he came back from the island which he had lived on for twenty eight years, he found that it had been too late to tell his parents that he was still alive, but yet again he did not feel sorry for them; he also did not feel sorry for the two people who had to live in misery for nearly thirty years under the allusion all of their sons were dead. He had the same feelings for his wife: when he was married, he said it was “not either to my disadvantage or dissatisfaction”, implying that it was also neither to his advantage nor his satisfaction. Moreover, after his wife died, Robinson did not think of looking after the three children they had, but went back to the island, which he had lived on for twenty-eight years. It was on this trip which Robinson Crusoe revisited “His Island ” as he called it. I feel that Robinson ’s indifference to his family is almost emotionally cruel.
Before had clearly shown the contrast between Crusoe’s and Friday’s personalities, as when Friday, in his joyful reunion with his father, displayed far more emotion toward his family members than Crusoe, whereas Crusoe never mentions missing his family or dreams about the happiness of seeing them again. I think Defore is very successful in introducing Friday as part of the novel, it makes the whole novel seem much more complete and gripping to the reader, as well as proving that Defoe’s ideology of racism is civilized unlike many other Europeans at that time; natives and savages are not worse than others but can perhaps even be more modern and civilized. Those are the reasons of why I like The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe and Friday.
Many people simply regard Pride and Prejudice as a love story, but in my opinion, this book is an illustration of the society at that time. She perfectly reflected the relation between money and marriage at her time and gave the people in her works vivid characters. The characters have their own personalities. Mrs. Bennet is a woman who makes great efforts to marry off her daughters. Mr. Bingley is a friendly young man, but his friend, Mr. Darcy, is a very proud man who seems to always feel superior. Even the five daughters in Bennet family are very different. Jane is simple, innocent and never speaks evil of others. Elizabeth is a clever girl who always has her own opinion. Mary likes reading classic books. (Actually she is a pedant. Kitty doesn’t have her own opinion but likes to follow her sister, Lydia. Lydia is a girl who follows exotic things, handsome man, and is somehow a little profligate. When I read the book, I can always find the same personalities in the society now. That is why I think this book is indeed the representative of the society in Britain in the 18th century.
The family of gentleman in the countryside is Jane Austen’s favourite topic. But this little topic can reflect big problems. It concludes the stratum situation and economic relationships in Britain in her century. You can find these from the very beginning of this book.
The first sentence in this book is impressive. It reads: “It is a truth well known to all the world that an unmarried man in poss ession of a large fortune must be in need of a wife”. The undertone is very clear: the foundation of the marriage at that time is not emotion but possession.
People always think that Austen was an expert at telling love stories. In fact, the marriage in her book is not the result of love, but the result of economic needs. After reading this book, I know the truth is that a poor woman must be in need of a husband, a wealthy man.
I couldn’t forget how eager Mrs. Bennet wants to marry off her daughte rs. If you want to know why she is so crazy about these things, I must mention the situation in Britain at that time. Only the eldest son had the privilege of inheriting his father’s possessions. Younger sons and daughters who are used to luxurious lives have no choice but marry a man or woman in possession of a large fortune to continue their comfortable lives. Thus, we can see that getting married is a way to become wealthier, particularly for women without many possessions. Jane Austen told us that money and possession determined everything, including marriage and love in her century.
In “Pride and Prejudice”, the sister of Mr. Bingley strongly opposed his plan of marrying Jane because the Bennets don’t have many possessions and their social positions are much lower than them. From this, we can see there are a lot of obstacles for a not very rich woman to marry a wealthy husband. The society, the relatives would not allow them to get married.
In modern society, although the marriages of economic needs have decreased rapidly, the concept of “money determines everything” is still rooted in some people’s mind. A lot of parents try hard to interfere their children’s marriages. Education background, possessions, jobs remains the main reason that may influence one’s marriage. Marry for money is still a big problem in our
society. We can’t help thinking: can money determine everything?
Austen left this problem for us to think. The genius of Jane Austen lies in this perfect simplicity, the simplicity that reflects big problems. Although Austen was only 21 when she wrote “Pride and Prejudice”, her sharp observation of social lives makes the style of this book surprisingly mature and lively. The plots in her works are always very natural. The development of the plot is as inevitable as a problem in mathematics. I think the depth of Pride and Prejudice is the reason that makes this book prominent and classic. Today, her book still can be the guide telling us the economic relationships both at her time and in modern time.
赤条蜂十分搞笑,细细的腰,玲珑的身材,腹部分成两小节,下方大,上方小,中间好像是用一根十分细的线连起来一样,黑色的肚皮上围着一丝红色的腰带,这就是又娇小又美丽的赤条蜂。
在《昆虫记》当中,我学到了很多知识,我知道了有漂亮的昆虫,有聪明的昆虫,还有个性的昆虫……各种昆虫都有着自己的脱险方式、生活方式和捕食方式,其实,我从小就很不喜爱昆虫,但是,我在读了《昆虫记》之后,不但使我喜爱上了昆虫,而且我还喜爱研究昆虫了呢!
《昆虫记》这本书真是太好了!保护地球的标语
(一)意识落后,态度不积极
部分学生对英语教育的认识不足,没有认识到英语的重要性,英语学习的主动性较低[1]。这种不积极的态度导致英语教学活动很难得到深入全面地开展,而且部分心理较幼稚的学生甚至会出现对英语的轻视或敌视:英语不是我的母语,无须学习。这是艺术生和普通学生都会出现的问题,而在艺术生中这一问题会因为各种因素出现的频率更高。另外,艺术生一般心理较崇尚自由,部分学生养成了较为懒散的学习习惯,没有进行计划性的学习,对学习的任务也是采取敷衍的态度,导致学习没有深度。在课后,很少有学生主动进行英语学习[2]。这些意识的落后最终都体现为对英语的忽视,态度的不积极严重影响英语水平的提高。除了学生,部分教师对英语的重视程度也较低。很多的艺术类教师只注重对学生专业能力的培养,只注重表演、绘画、音乐等艺术涵养高、文化程度深的课程教学。他们忽视了英语作为语言的沟通作用,没有进行较高质量的英语教学,导致学生学习更加懒散。最后,学校的考核制度也不够合理,大多数学校采取期末的方法进行考核,而考试的监督又不够严格。这种考试制度使得学生的学习只是为了应付考试,教学的宽度有所下降。
(二)基础较差,教学难度大
艺术类专业的文化课程分数线较低,很多学生英语基础比较差,大多数都在60分左右,平均水平处于不及格的状态,甚至部分学生的英语成绩在20分左右,英语成绩在100分以上的比较少。一方面,学生的基础差,而教学内容是需要一定基础的,这一矛盾导致教学从最开始就没有进行良好的对接。随着教学的继续,学生之间的差距越来越大,整体水平甚至出现了倒退。另一方面,基础差使学生养成了一种无所谓的态度,抱着破罐子破摔的心理对待英语学习。英语作为一门语言类学科,学生在日常生活中使用得也较少,一旦教学出现了间断,就会出现倒退的现象。而且,艺术生的专业课占比极大,练习较多,学生没有课外时间进行英语学习,导致基础不牢固。
(三)方式单一,教学效果差
由于艺术类专业对英语不够重视,导致教学的方式没有变化,资源分配过少,加剧了教学模式的单一。大多数英语课堂仍然采取教师课上讲授、学生被动接受的教学模式。这种灌输式的教学方法损伤了学生学习的积极性,也不利于对教学的深度进行挖掘。尤其教授对象是艺术生这种思想较为活泼、性格较为开放的群体,这种死板的教学模式带来了沉闷的气氛,导致部分学生对英语教学出现了抵触的心理。
(四)难度不合理,实际意义低
目前边远山区的英语教学没有考虑艺术生的基础较差这一现状,导致教材与教学脱轨,很多学生无法理解教学内容。另外,在教学内容的分配上,英语的运用内容较少,这会造成教学的实际意义降低,无法适应高考及社会发展的需求。
In recent years, tourism has been popular and played an important role in our nation’s economic growth. However, I am afraid that if tourism develops over, it will bring harm to the environment and give rise to many problems.
There are a few reasons accounting for my views and I would like to list three of them. One of the examples is that a large number of woods and other plants were replaced by all kinds of accommodation facilities or scenic spots. That definitely breaks the ecological balance of these areas and destroys the natural beauty of the scenic spots. Worse still, more pressure has been placed environment protection in that many tourists left their garbage in the scenic spots. In addition, over-developed tourism will occupy large numbers of farmland and lead to the shortage of the land.
In a word, tourism will be harmful to our environment if it is over development. Thus, I do not advocate that we development tourism without considering the environment. And we should keep the balance between tourism development and environment protection so that we can achieve the sustainable development between our nation’s economy and the environment.
《昆虫记》是一部昆虫学的传世佳作,深刻地描绘一种或几种昆虫,比如:蜘蛛、蜜蜂、螳螂、蝎子、蝉、甲虫、蟋蟀等昆虫习性。作者说了昆虫的本能、习性、婚恋、繁衍、死亡。
读了《昆虫记》这本书,我知道了关于昆虫的很多不为人知的事情,比如在田野里经常闪烁着亮光,大家都知道是萤火虫的杰作吧!以前,我以为萤火虫只吃树叶、草,读了《昆虫记》后,我大吃一惊——萤火虫竟然是肉食性动物,主要猎物是蜗牛。萤火虫先用嘴里的两颗獠牙向蜗牛注射毒素,再用一种特殊消化液把肉汤液化,蜗牛就这样成了萤火虫的美食。萤火虫会发光是正因发光带上方有层白色涂层,是有一种十分细腻的颗粒构成的。然后由白色涂层供了可氧化物质,导管则输进了气流,当可氧化物质与气流相遇,变产生了光。
读了《昆虫记》,我知道了大自然的奇妙,昆虫界里还有很多不可思议的事情。从此刻开始,让我们好好学习,长大后去探究昆虫界的事情吧!完成法布尔还没完成的事。心情不好
我读了《昆虫记》中的卷心菜毛虫一部分。读完这部分使我得到了许多知识。
卷心菜是我们大家大家都很熟悉的一种蔬菜,它的历史也很悠久,在人类所食用的蔬菜中就应是最为古老的种类之一了。在人类开始吃它之前,它已经在地球上存在了很久很久,因此我们实在是无法知道究竟是什么时候它出现了。对于对人类而言,卷心菜是很有价值的,不仅仅是人类,就是别的动物也都与它有千丝万缕的联系。其中有一种普通大白蝴蝶的毛虫,就是靠卷心菜生长的。它们吃卷心菜皮及其一切和卷心菜相似的植物叶子,像花椰菜、白菜芽、大头菜,以及瑞典萝卜等,似乎生来就与这种样貌的莱类有不解之缘。它们还吃其它一些和卷心菜同类的植物。它们都属于十字花科——植物学家们这样称呼它们,正因它们的花有四瓣,排成十字形。白蝴蝶的卵一般只产在这类植物上。但是它们怎样知道这是十字花科植物呢?它们又没有学过植物学。这倒是个谜。“我”研究植物和花草已有五十多年,但如果要“我”判定一种没有开花的植物是不是属于十字花科,“我”只能去查书。此刻“我”不需要去一一查书了,我会根据白蝴蝶留下的记号作出决定——“我”是很信任它的。白蝴蝶每年要成熟两次。一次是在四五月里,一次是在十月,这正是我们那里卷心菜成熟的时候。白蝴蝶的日历恰巧和园丁的日历一样。当我们有卷心菜吃的时候
,白蝴蝶也快要出来了。
这次昆虫记又让我认识了卷心菜毛虫,我要好好记住这次收获。
© 2022 xuexicn.net,All Rights Reserved.