大学有什么英文作文【一】
踏入佛大的校园，体验大学的生活已有大半个学期了。在这个不长不短的日子里，面对学校安排的课程，身为大一新生的我，彷佛什么也没有学到。反而对大学的生活感到了前所未有的迷茫。在迷茫中，闲来的时候，我看了这本《读大学，究竟读什么》书。也对我在大学的看法有所感悟。
当初，寒冬腊月，手脚不能屈伸的时候，我想着心中美好的梦想坚持不懈；当初，酷暑难耐，汗流浃背的时候，我为着美好的梦而在题海中争渡。但是，经过高考及填报志愿后，我得知自己进入了佛大。我的心被一股低落的情绪所占据。
低落的我翻开这本书的时候，以师兄为身份的作者向我讲述了他在大学的体会。他面对别人说“现在的大学生满地都是”的时候，能底气十足地说“我是一个大学生”。但是对于我来说，我却不能自信地说出这句话。更说不出“我是佛大的学生”这句话。
无独有偶，在佛大中有许多学生都像我一样有这份自卑感。相信这份自卑感大部分是源于我就读的是佛大，这不上不下的学校。以及我认为自己的未来已经由读什么大学决定这种人生观。随着我对这本书的阅读，我懂得了作为大学生的我要在大学学什么。大学不是技校，我除了能学习一门技能外，更重要的是学习到一种思维，一种学会思考，分析问题的方法。这使我感到了一丝的欣慰。至少，我是和一般的技工有所区别。但仍然不能消除我心中的`自卑。
随着我对这本书的进一步阅读，以及在佛大的学习过程中。我发现我的人生观也许不是正确的，我的这份自卑感也许是庸人自扰。在我看的这本书中列举出大量的例子证明了名牌大学生中也所存在一定的问题。而且作者还道出一个本质：你所就读的大学再有名气，校园再美，硬件设施再齐全……到了毕业的时候，你什么也带不走。也就是说，你唯一可以带走的就是你在大学期间所学到的东西。从另一个侧面来讲，如果要学习的东西相同，在哪间大学都是一样的。
我尝试接受作者的观点，改变自己的学习观、人生观。后来我发现，自修的时候，有很多人都是专心致志的：课余期间，也有很多同学拿出从学校图书馆借来的书阅读；佛大的社团活动是那样的丰富充实。每个人都好像相当享受这种生活并期待着未来。在我读这本书之前，我看到的是河滨校区残破的校园，每个人心中都有一份自卑感在此生活。
观点上的改变，使我看到两个截然不同的佛大。
此刻，我不得不相信，学习观、人生观、世界观对一个人来说是多么的重要。套用书本的话就是人生观、世界观决定着人们实践活动的目标，人生道路的方向和对待生活的态度。作者与书本的观点不谋而合，而经过我的亲身体验，我觉得学习观、人生观、世界观影响着人的学习、生存方式，左右人的情绪，决定人的未来。
因此，我更加觉得人应该树立一个正确的人生观、学习观。对于像我一样就读在佛大或类似大学的人来说，面对各名牌大学，我们不必产生自卑感。因为名牌大学毕竟只占少数，而各名牌大学也存在着各种各样的问题。只要我们端正态度，积极地去看待。其实，名牌大学和我们的差别就只是他们基础比我们好一些。而这些差距完全可以通过四年的学习补上。对于一般技校的学生，我们也不能沾沾自喜，看不起别人。同样地，我们与他们的差别只是我们的基础比他们好一点。四年之后谁优谁劣，无人知晓。所以面对他们，我们要端正思想，时刻处于一种紧迫的状态，催自己奋发向上。
可见，正确人生观的重要性，尽管我之前早已定下的人生观因各种原因而根深蒂固，我也尝试着去改变它。通过树立高尚的人生目的，确立乐观的人生态度，用积极进取的目光去对待问题，来正确地把握人生，领悟人生的真谛。
从上文，我得出了正确的人生观对人一生的重要性。而人生态度是人生观的重要内容，它是人生观的表现和反映。
但是一个人的人生观相信通过以往的实践经历早已定格在一个人的心中，要去改变它是多么的困难。虽然人生观难以改变，但是要改变一个人的态度还是可以的。一个人的态度可能会受一首歌的影响，也可能会因为别人的一句话而发生转变。所以我们要树立正确的人生观应从态度做起。
我有一个同学也是考进了佛大，但是他觉得他读的专业太冷门而对他专业的课程吊儿郎当。还经常向我抱怨。正是因为他对自己专业的态度一直处于抗拒消极的态度，所以他感受不到大学的美好。专业冷门，就意味着将来没有前途吗？在我读的这本书中正好持相反的观点。作者认为我们应该换另一种眼光、态度去看待这个问题。其实只要我们用乐观积极的态度去看待，我们反而不难看出就读的专业冷，进入学术圈则更加可以大展身手，冷门专业比热门专业更容易获得成就。况且根据调查显示，大部分的学生将来从事的工作也不是和自身的专业对口。
所以，因为就读一间不太理想的大学，或者因为专业太冷而处于一种消极的态度是不可取的。我们应该端正我们的态度，从而树立正确的人生观，更好地把握自己的人生。
树立正确的人生观从端正我们自身的态度做起，我们须做到认真。需要每一件事都认真地去完成。不要因为就读的学校不理想，或专业太冷门而对学业漫不经心，吊儿郎当，甚至处于一种悲观消极的态度，这样不但不利于学习生活，还会影响自己的身心发展。
其次，我们还须做到务实。用这本书的说法就是我们要充实地过好自己的大学生活，有所选择地去学习。不要以为社团活动安排的满满的就叫充实，也不要以为用所有的时间来学习就是好。脱离实际，盲目学习是很难获得成功的。
乐观和进取也是端正我们态度的一大要素。就如上文所说的，我们应该看到的是名牌大学的学生差距只是他们基础比我们好，读冷门专业比读热门专业更能大展身手。相信以这种乐观、进取的心态去面对读大学，我们就有源源不断的动力向前迈进。
这本书，作者以一个师兄的角度，将自己如何去读大学的经验用相当亲切的话语告诉我，结合这几个月来我在佛大的学习生活，我的思想态度在一定程度上发生了变化。也使我明白到人生观，人生态度的重要性。而我自身的自卑感也消除了不少。
用积极上进的态度，正确的人生观指导自己，我们的每一天都有新开始，我们会越发觉得我们的生活是美好的。看了这本书，我的收获相当丰富。我相信它将指导我将来更好地去学习，更好地把握自己的人生。
大学有什么英文作文【二】
I read the Chinese version of “Camille” a few years ago. At that time I was deeply moved by the main character Marguerite Gautier. “Camille” or “The Lady of the Camellias” by Alexandre Dumas, fils, is the story of Marguerite Gautier, a young courtesan, or kept woman, in Paris in the mid 1800's, and how she falls in love with a young man, Armand Duval, and then tries to escape from her questionable past. Unfortunately, it comes back to haunt her and she ends up returning to that life and dies painfully and alone, but with the knowledge that she was a noble woman at heart. When I first began to read the book, I did not care for Marguerite or her attitude or lifestyle, but as I got further into the narrative, I realized that her saucy attitude was a front to cover the lonely woman that she really was. She felt used, abused and unloved, until the gentle Armand Duval came into her life and showed her that he loved her as a person and not for what she could do for him. It must have taken great courage for Marguerite to leave the life she had lived for so long, knowing all along that it was probably too good to be true and would not last indefinitely. And it also showed that Marguerite really loved Armand Duval for she could even change herself for him.
However, happiness didn’t last for long. When M. Duval, Armand's father, came to her, pleading for her to leave Armand to save both Armand's reputation and that of his younger innocent sister, Marguerite saw a way to become pure of heart, if not in body. She felt that it was her duty, because she loved Armand so much, to do this even though it meant giving up her own happiness and hurting Armand temporarily. She reluctantly returned to her former life, knowing that.some day Armand would forgive her. Sadly, she died in debt and basically alone, except for her one female friend, Julie Duprat, who helped her during her illness. She had her journal sent to Armand after her death, explaining why she had made the choices she had. I think Dumas's last few lines about Marguerite being the exception, not the rule were quite true, and I also agreed with his view that while her lifestyle could not be condoned, we as a society assume that all of these type of women are cold and heartless, while this may not always be the case. A person can make the wrong choices in life when they are young, and try to redeem themselves, but sometimes past situations prevent them from changing their lives, even though they desperately wish to do so. This applies to both men and women in many different types of circumstances: involvement in crime; drug or alcohol abuse; gambling; prostitution; financial problems; poor marriage choices; etc. And this is the fact, which exists in the whole society.
As far as the other characters in the book, I think Marguerite was right in saying that no one truly cared about her, but only wanted something from her, the only exceptions being Armand and Julie Duprat. Of course, the Comte de G. and Comte de N. wanted her body and appearance. The
Duke needed to “wake up and smell the coffee” and realize that she could never replace his dead daughter. If he truly cared, he could have helped her leave her lifestyle without “keeping” her himself. And lastly, Prudence was a blood-sucking leech who used Marguerite almost worse than the men. I also think she was jealous of the fact that Marguerite had so much more courage than herself and someone truly loved her.
Last morning, when tiding my bookshelf, I took this book out of the shelf, and a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. I held it against the morning light and blew on it. The soft breeze carried it away. Camille is just like the camellia, she could never escape from the destiny of withering. But it wasn’t her fault; it’s because of the evil of Capitalism and the hideousness of that society.
Suddenly, I remembered a saying: “Women are like the flowers”. Those pretty women are like those beautiful flowers; their delicate beauty makes people feel they are the miracle of life. However, even the God envies their beauty. It seems that beautiful women always have tragic endings. As we are normal persons, even we can see the hideousness of humanity that results in their fate of withering, we can at most ask quietly in our hearts: Where have those beautiful flowers gone? Where have they gone?
The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe
It seemed to be such a coincidence that the night after I finished reading The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe, I was to dine in a restaurant distinctly related to the book itself. This restaurant was no other than the famous American-styled “Friday ’s. ” The reason for mentioning this restaurant is quite straightforward to all the gentlemen, ladies and children who have read the novel and enjoyed it, which is the fact that this restaurant was, most likely, named after the American Native in Robinson Crusoe, called Friday. This restaurant offers very exceptional service, for instance when the waitresses are asked to order dishes they kneel rather than stand, which, unlike the other restaurants I have been to, makes it easier for the customers to hear them speak. Moreover, Friday’s friendly services to the customers help them to make better choices when ordering dishes. I remembered when I went to Friday ’s last time; the waitress kindly described the items on the menu with precise details. It turned out that the combo I initially wanted was designed to be shared among a large group, not to be eaten by one person. I think this restaurant shows many commendable features similar to that of Friday. Friday brought emotional warmth to the people around him with his appealing personality. I think it was this personality that affected Crusoe and made him say that he loved Friday when Crusoe didn ’t express love for his parents, brothers, sisters, or even his wife. “When he espied me, he came running to me, laying himself down again upon the ground, with all the possible signs of an humble, thankful disposition, making many antic gestures to show it to let me know how he would serve me as long as he lived.” This was what Friday did after Crusoe had rescued him from the two savages chasing him. It was easy for me to see why Crusoe had loved Friday. After sometime, Crusoe and Friday were to rescue Friday’s father. When Friday reunited with his father, the scene was easy to move anyone: “It would have moved anyone to tears to have seen how Friday kissed him, embraced him, hugged him, cried, laughed, halloed, jumped about, danced,
sung; and then sung and jumped about again, like a distracted creature. It was a good while before I could make him speak to me.” This is my favourite chapter in the whole book. It is hard to see why Friday is an ex-savage when he can have personalities more praiseworthy than many civilized people, viz. Crusoe himself. “When he (Friday went to him (Friday’s father, he would sit down by him, open his breast, and hold his father’s head close to his bosom, half an hour together, to nourish it; then he took his arms and ankles, which were numbed and stiff with the binding, and rubbed them with his hands.” Furthermore, Friday’s expression of loyalty in asking Crusoe to kill him rather than leave him is more heartfelt than anything Crusoe ever says or does.
Crusoe, on the absolute contrary, seems incapable of deep feelings, as shown by his account of leaving his family—he never shows any emotions. After a moving lecture from Robinson’s father about his future, he still decided to follow his own wandering ambition. Careless was he about the wishes of his parents to keep him alive and prosperous, as he was the only child left in the family. When he came back from the island which he had lived on for twenty eight years, he found that it had been too late to tell his parents that he was still alive, but yet again he did not feel sorry for them; he also did not feel sorry for the two people who had to live in misery for nearly thirty years under the allusion all of their sons were dead. He had the same feelings for his wife: when he was married, he said it was “not either to my disadvantage or dissatisfaction”, implying that it was also neither to his advantage nor his satisfaction. Moreover, after his wife died, Robinson did not think of looking after the three children they had, but went back to the island, which he had lived on for twenty-eight years. It was on this trip which Robinson Crusoe revisited “His Island ” as he called it. I feel that Robinson ’s indifference to his family is almost emotionally cruel.
Before had clearly shown the contrast between Crusoe’s and Friday’s personalities, as when Friday, in his joyful reunion with his father, displayed far more emotion toward his family members than Crusoe, whereas Crusoe never mentions missing his family or dreams about the happiness of seeing them again. I think Defore is very successful in introducing Friday as part of the novel, it makes the whole novel seem much more complete and gripping to the reader, as well as proving that Defoe’s ideology of racism is civilized unlike many other Europeans at that time; natives and savages are not worse than others but can perhaps even be more modern and civilized. Those are the reasons of why I like The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe and Friday.
大学有什么英文作文【三】
Many people simply regard Pride and Prejudice as a love story, but in my opinion, this book is an illustration of the society at that time. She perfectly reflected the relation between money and marriage at her time and gave the people in her works vivid characters. The characters have their own personalities. Mrs. Bennet is a woman who makes great efforts to marry off her daughters. Mr. Bingley is a friendly young man, but his friend, Mr. Darcy, is a very proud man who seems to always feel superior. Even the five daughters in Bennet family are very different. Jane is simple, innocent and never speaks evil of others. Elizabeth is a clever girl who always has her own opinion. Mary likes reading classic books. (Actually she is a pedant. Kitty doesn’t have her own opinion but likes to follow her sister, Lydia. Lydia is a girl who follows exotic things, handsome man, and is somehow a little profligate. When I read the book, I can always find the same personalities in the society now. That is why I think this book is indeed the representative of the society in Britain in the 18th century.
The family of gentleman in the countryside is Jane Austen’s favourite topic. But this little topic can reflect big problems. It concludes the stratum situation and economic relationships in Britain in her century. You can find these from the very beginning of this book.
The first sentence in this book is impressive. It reads: “It is a truth well known to all the world that an unmarried man in poss ession of a large fortune must be in need of a wife”. The undertone is very clear: the foundation of the marriage at that time is not emotion but possession.
People always think that Austen was an expert at telling love stories. In fact, the marriage in her book is not the result of love, but the result of economic needs. After reading this book, I know the truth is that a poor woman must be in need of a husband, a wealthy man.
I couldn’t forget how eager Mrs. Bennet wants to marry off her daughte rs. If you want to know why she is so crazy about these things, I must mention the situation in Britain at that time. Only the eldest son had the privilege of inheriting his father’s possessions. Younger sons and daughters who are used to luxurious lives have no choice but marry a man or woman in possession of a large fortune to continue their comfortable lives. Thus, we can see that getting married is a way to become wealthier, particularly for women without many possessions. Jane Austen told us that money and possession determined everything, including marriage and love in her century.
In “Pride and Prejudice”, the sister of Mr. Bingley strongly opposed his plan of marrying Jane because the Bennets don’t have many possessions and their social positions are much lower than them. From this, we can see there are a lot of obstacles for a not very rich woman to marry a wealthy husband. The society, the relatives would not allow them to get married.
In modern society, although the marriages of economic needs have decreased rapidly, the concept of “money determines everything” is still rooted in some people’s mind. A lot of parents try hard to interfere their children’s marriages. Education background, possessions, jobs remains the main reason that may influence one’s marriage. Marry for money is still a big problem in our
society. We can’t help thinking: can money determine everything?
Austen left this problem for us to think. The genius of Jane Austen lies in this perfect simplicity, the simplicity that reflects big problems. Although Austen was only 21 when she wrote “Pride and Prejudice”, her sharp observation of social lives makes the style of this book surprisingly mature and lively. The plots in her works are always very natural. The development of the plot is as inevitable as a problem in mathematics. I think the depth of Pride and Prejudice is the reason that makes this book prominent and classic. Today, her book still can be the guide telling us the economic relationships both at her time and in modern time.
