就像我本人所经历的一件事。我一个很好的朋友,可以说是闺蜜,我们初三时坐在一张桌。初三的`时候,老师要我们交一篇征文。我便问了老师一句:“老师,用什么笔,什么纸写啊。”老师告诉我后,她问我:“你要交那篇啊?'我说:“为什么不交呢?交了还有可能得奖呢。”
而她却说了一番让我没有想到的话,她说:“就你那作文水平还交呢?”我回了她一句;"你作文水平好你交啊,我水平不好,我知道锻炼。”她说;"我作文水平不好我也不交,我也不丢那人。”
我当时就气哭了。后来,那篇作文我交了,而且,我还获了奖。她当时就无话可说了。
事后我想了想,其实,事情不仅仅只有那一面,如果不是她的那番话,或许我不会有那么大的动力去写那篇作文,也就不会得奖了;或许,我可以从这件事中看清她本来的面貌,可以知道她到底是不是真正的朋友;或许,这件事给我打了一个预防针,让我以后不会再被她所伤害。
凡事都要考虑周全,做什么事之前都要考虑好这件事情的多面性。不要只看单方面的有利条件就去做,要想想这件事是否会给你带来负面影响。
就像那句话。只有弱者才会把自己的不行归给于外界因素。如果你强大,整个世界都为你让路。这就是两种角度所带来的不同结果。
换一个角度去看事情。不同的角度,得到不同的结果。
大家是否还记得这样一个故事情节,在电影《搭错车》中,小美虽然不是佟林的亲生女儿,可是很小的时候,他就带着小美到工厂里上班,他的妈妈一直反对他抱养这个小女孩,可是他不顾妈妈的反对,一个人独自在外照顾小美,由于工厂里发生了一场火灾,让佟林失去工作,可是他并没有因此把小美送给他人。几年过去了,小美长大了,该到上学的年龄。佟林开始寻找工作来筹集女儿的学费,他毫不犹豫地选择了收卖废品这个职责。他的好朋友曾劝过他说:你有这么好的`技术,为什么不把它利用起来,到别处再找个与你学到的技术靠边的工作呢?他直摇头,他用笔在纸上写下了想对他朋友说的话,内容是:只要小美能够在我身边,即使工作再苦再累,也是值得的。听了这番话后,我们便由此被触动了,一位良师发现小美具有唱歌的天赋,即学习音乐的潜能,想让小美来省城读书,可是花费太高了,小美考虑父亲的状况,决定留爸爸在身边,可佟林偏要小美去读最好的学校。
终于,功夫不负有心人,佟林多年来一直坚持靠卖收废品来赚取女儿的学费,并将她送进了宜安市音乐学院,使她参加过多种比赛并因此而拿冠军,这些事迹打动了千万人的心。
看过《搭错车》,便想起我的爸爸,他常年一人在外打工,支撑我们这个家庭。他只是一个普普通通的工人,看他承载着家人的厚望,自己不舍得花钱,总是把最好的留给我和妈妈,以前看到别人同学的父母都是在公司,银行等体面的单位上班,觉得我的父母的职业很丢人。陪老爸一起看过《搭错车》之后,才真正明白了,不管做什么样的职务、事业,只要靠奋斗、拼搏而得来的果实,都是光荣的。其实做什么不重要,重要的是你以什么样的心态来面对你的职务和事业。人生无差别,事业也无差别,职业都是平等的。
This is a story about a special and unreserved woman who has been exposed to a hostile environment but continuously and fearlessly struggling for her ideal life. The story can be interpreted as a symbol of the independent spirit.
It seems to me that many readers’ English reading experience starts with Jane Eyer. I am of no exception. As we refer to the movie “Jane Eyer”, it is not surprising to find some differences because of its being filmized and retold in a new way, but the spirit of the novel remains----to be an independent person, both physically and mentally.
Jane Eyer was a born resister, whose parents went off when she was very young, and her aunt,the only relative she had,treated her as badly as a ragtag. Since Jane’s education in Lowwood Orphanage began, she didn’t get what she had been expecting——simply being regarded as a common person, just the same as any other girl around. The suffers from being humiliated and devastated teach Jane to be persevering and prize dignity over anything else.As a reward of revolting the ruthless oppression, Jane got a chance to be a tutor in Thornfield Garden. There she made the acquaintance of lovely Adele and that garden’s owner, Rochester, a man with warm heart despite a cold face outside. Jane expected to change the life from then on, but fate had decided otherwise: After Jane and Rochester fell in love with each other and got down to get marry, she unfortunately came to know in fact Rochester had got a legal wife, who seemed to be the shadow following Rochester and led to his moodiness all the time ----Rochester was also a despairing person in need of salvation. Jane did want to give him a hand, however, she made up her mind to leave, because she didn’t want to betray her own principles, because she was Jane Eyer. The film has finally got a symbolist end: Jane inherited a large number of legacies and finally returned. After finding Rochester ’s misfortune brought by his original mad wife, Jane chose to stay with him forever.
I don’t know what others feel, but frankly speaking, I would rather regard the section that Jane began her teaching job in Thornfield as the film’s end----especially when I heard Jane’s words “Never in my life have I been awaken so happily. ” For one thing, this ideal and brand-new beginning of life was what Jane had been imagining for long as a suffering person; for another, this should be what the audiences with my views hoped her to get. But the professional judgment of producing films reminded me to wait for a totally different result: There must be something wrong coming with the excellence----perhaps not only should another section be added to enrich the story, but also we may see from the next transition of Jane’s life that “Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you would get.”
What ’s more, this film didn’t end when Jane left Thornfield. For Jane Eyer herself, there should always be somewhere to realize her great ideal of being independent considering her fortitude, but for Rochester, how he can get salvation? The film gives the answer tentatively: Jane eventually got back to Rochester. In fact, when Jane met Rochester for the first time, she scared his horse and made his heel strained, to a certain extent, which meant Rochester would get retrieval because of Jane. We can consider Rochester’s experiences as that of religion meaning. The fire by his frantic wife was the punishment for the cynicism early in his life. After it, Rochester got the mercy of the God and the love of the woman whom he loved. Here we can say: human nature and divinity get united perfectly in order to let such a story accord with the requirements of both two sides. The value of this film may be due to its efforts to explore a new way for the development of humanism under the faith of religion.
© 2022 xuexicn.net,All Rights Reserved.