上大学有必要吗英文作文【一】
Many people simply regard Pride and Prejudice as a love story, but in my opinion, this book is an illustration of the society at that time. She perfectly reflected the relation between money and marriage at her time and gave the people in her works vivid characters. The characters have their own personalities. Mrs. Bennet is a woman who makes great efforts to marry off her daughters. Mr. Bingley is a friendly young man, but his friend, Mr. Darcy, is a very proud man who seems to always feel superior. Even the five daughters in Bennet family are very different. Jane is simple, innocent and never speaks evil of others. Elizabeth is a clever girl who always has her own opinion. Mary likes reading classic books. (Actually she is a pedant. Kitty doesn’t have her own opinion but likes to follow her sister, Lydia. Lydia is a girl who follows exotic things, handsome man, and is somehow a little profligate. When I read the book, I can always find the same personalities in the society now. That is why I think this book is indeed the representative of the society in Britain in the 18th century.
The family of gentleman in the countryside is Jane Austen’s favourite topic. But this little topic can reflect big problems. It concludes the stratum situation and economic relationships in Britain in her century. You can find these from the very beginning of this book.
The first sentence in this book is impressive. It reads: “It is a truth well known to all the world that an unmarried man in poss ession of a large fortune must be in need of a wife”. The undertone is very clear: the foundation of the marriage at that time is not emotion but possession.
People always think that Austen was an expert at telling love stories. In fact, the marriage in her book is not the result of love, but the result of economic needs. After reading this book, I know the truth is that a poor woman must be in need of a husband, a wealthy man.
I couldn’t forget how eager Mrs. Bennet wants to marry off her daughte rs. If you want to know why she is so crazy about these things, I must mention the situation in Britain at that time. Only the eldest son had the privilege of inheriting his father’s possessions. Younger sons and daughters who are used to luxurious lives have no choice but marry a man or woman in possession of a large fortune to continue their comfortable lives. Thus, we can see that getting married is a way to become wealthier, particularly for women without many possessions. Jane Austen told us that money and possession determined everything, including marriage and love in her century.
In “Pride and Prejudice”, the sister of Mr. Bingley strongly opposed his plan of marrying Jane because the Bennets don’t have many possessions and their social positions are much lower than them. From this, we can see there are a lot of obstacles for a not very rich woman to marry a wealthy husband. The society, the relatives would not allow them to get married.
In modern society, although the marriages of economic needs have decreased rapidly, the concept of “money determines everything” is still rooted in some people’s mind. A lot of parents try hard to interfere their children’s marriages. Education background, possessions, jobs remains the main reason that may influence one’s marriage. Marry for money is still a big problem in our
society. We can’t help thinking: can money determine everything?
Austen left this problem for us to think. The genius of Jane Austen lies in this perfect simplicity, the simplicity that reflects big problems. Although Austen was only 21 when she wrote “Pride and Prejudice”, her sharp observation of social lives makes the style of this book surprisingly mature and lively. The plots in her works are always very natural. The development of the plot is as inevitable as a problem in mathematics. I think the depth of Pride and Prejudice is the reason that makes this book prominent and classic. Today, her book still can be the guide telling us the economic relationships both at her time and in modern time.
上大学有必要吗英文作文【二】
有理想是有，可那究竟是个什么样的理想？我自己都不是太明白。
是作家吗？我固然有一丢这上面的天分，我自幼那股天马行空的想象力也不是摆设，只是与这“作家”二字有何关联？是想学网络作家编造一些新世界、新大陆、新天地吗？是想学秦鹏凭借一本《故国神游》被公司录取吗？定然不是。那，是想学朱自清字里行间的那种文气吗？答案也是否定的。我以前也曾经问过我，但我凭借着一句“我就是我，没有那个必要”掩盖了过去。然而再回首，依旧是给不出一个答复。
那么，画家呢？也是依着那点想象力，我的画作有我自己的味道，而不会再有其他人的气息，但我了解自己，我的实力远不足以创作，仅仅限于临摹罢了。我更知道，我连一连载都画不了，更别说有些意境深远的作品了。
出国留学？这应是每一个学生的梦想吧？我不盼着什么哈佛，也不说去加拿大、美国、法国哪儿的，仅仅是首尔大学而已，这个在亚洲韩国第一学府、排名第五、世界第三十一的韩国国立首尔大学，甚至比中国人尽皆知的“清华”、“北大”的'排名要低上一些，但是我真的可以吗？然而又有人说：“理想必高于现实。”于是，我默默的做着这个美丽而又遥远的梦，只是……只怕有一天，这个“理想”会变成“白日梦”。
现在看来，我仍是迷茫于“理想”二字，但在看先前的文字，模糊中透出一句话：“我了解自己，我理解自己，我要做我自己!”这不正是“理想”吗？做“自己”。
我有理想，做自己！
上大学有必要吗英文作文【三】
??真的有梦想吗议论文最近都在苦想自己的梦想是什么，最终还是一无所获。也许你会认为无梦想是一件很可笑的事，但你是否想过，你真的有梦想吗？
我不敢说我对梦想这个词理解得很深，不同层次的人都梦想有着不同的理解，三国时期，英雄辈出，敢问诸位最首要的.是什么，当年刘备曹操煮酒论天下，论遍天下人，就承认刘备曹操是英雄，为何，抛开武艺计谋不说，一个人要成就大业，就需有远大志向与抱负，燕雀安知鸿鹄之志哉就是说的这个道理，这也是陈涉吴广起义成功的根本原因之一，如果无远大抱负，空有满腹经纶，即使取得暂时的胜利，那也定是昙花一现，不能取得最后的胜利，而这志向与抱负，也恰似今日人们所讲的梦想，依我愚见，梦想绝非你想干什么就是你的梦想，梦想，没有绝对，对于我们而言，那更像是一种偶然，需要的是一种缘分，为何？举个例子说吧，同学们夸夸其谈的“梦想”大学脱口而出，少则一间，多则数十间，我请你们舒心自问，你们是否真的渴望过了，渴望就像你厚着脸皮向你们父母讨要一件你梦寐以求的东西，你即使得不到它，哪怕是看上一眼都觉得满心欢喜甚至会为了得到它而不择手段，悲痛于现实的无奈与沉溺于虚幻的陶醉，这就是渴望。再次回想那些所谓的“梦想”大学，是不是觉得有点微不足道，有点不足一提呢？
梦想是可遇而不可求的，就像渴望是可遇而不可求的一样。读书啊，当初的冲动是不是找不回来了，可试问用自尊与孤傲维持的冲动又怎会不堪一击呢？我等都是芸芸众生，都是匹夫，满足于小小名利而毫无大志那便是无渴望于大学的根本原因，如果你真的决定要考上什么大学，或者说你真的渴望于那间大学，那考上那间大学岂不是轻而易举吗，这句话不过分吧，又怎会难过登天呢？大志何在，今天我还没察觉出来，明天定会有所收获，等着瞧吧！
上大学有必要吗英文作文【四】
上大学有必要吗英文作文【五】
This is a story about a special and unreserved woman who has been exposed to a hostile environment but continuously and fearlessly struggling for her ideal life. The story can be interpreted as a symbol of the independent spirit.
It seems to me that many readers’ English reading experience starts with Jane Eyer. I am of no exception. As we refer to the movie “Jane Eyer”, it is not surprising to find some differences because of its being filmized and retold in a new way, but the spirit of the novel remains----to be an independent person, both physically and mentally.
Jane Eyer was a born resister, whose parents went off when she was very young, and her aunt，the only relative she had，treated her as badly as a ragtag. Since Jane’s education in Lowwood Orphanage began, she didn’t get what she had been expecting——simply being regarded as a common person, just the same as any other girl around. The suffers from being humiliated and devastated teach Jane to be persevering and prize dignity over anything else.As a reward of revolting the ruthless oppression, Jane got a chance to be a tutor in Thornfield Garden. There she made the acquaintance of lovely Adele and that garden’s owner, Rochester, a man with warm heart despite a cold face outside. Jane expected to change the life from then on, but fate had decided otherwise: After Jane and Rochester fell in love with each other and got down to get marry, she unfortunately came to know in fact Rochester had got a legal wife, who seemed to be the shadow following Rochester and led to his moodiness all the time ----Rochester was also a despairing person in need of salvation. Jane did want to give him a hand, however, she made up her mind to leave, because she didn’t want to betray her own principles, because she was Jane Eyer. The film has finally got a symbolist end: Jane inherited a large number of legacies and finally returned. After finding Rochester ’s misfortune brought by his original mad wife, Jane chose to stay with him forever.
I don’t know what others feel, but frankly speaking, I would rather regard the section that Jane began her teaching job in Thornfield as the film’s end----especially when I heard Jane’s words “Never in my life have I been awaken so happily. ” For one thing, this ideal and brand-new beginning of life was what Jane had been imagining for long as a suffering person; for another, this should be what the audiences with my views hoped her to get. But the professional judgment of producing films reminded me to wait for a totally different result: There must be something wrong coming with the excellence----perhaps not only should another section be added to enrich the story, but also we may see from the next transition of Jane’s life that “Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you would get.”
What ’s more, this film didn’t end when Jane left Thornfield. For Jane Eyer herself, there should always be somewhere to realize her great ideal of being independent considering her fortitude, but for Rochester, how he can get salvation? The film gives the answer tentatively: Jane eventually got back to Rochester. In fact, when Jane met Rochester for the first time, she scared his horse and made his heel strained, to a certain extent, which meant Rochester would get retrieval because of Jane. We can consider Rochester’s experiences as that of religion meaning. The fire by his frantic wife was the punishment for the cynicism early in his life. After it, Rochester got the mercy of the God and the love of the woman whom he loved. Here we can say: human nature and divinity get united perfectly in order to let such a story accord with the requirements of both two sides. The value of this film may be due to its efforts to explore a new way for the development of humanism under the faith of religion.
