写一个电影的内容英文作文【一】
今天我们去淄博影院看一场名为《一个都不能少》影片。
剧中讲是水泉乡水泉小学高老师妈妈病，他要回家探望，于是便请一位年仅12岁魏敏芝做代课老师。高老师临走前再三叮嘱魏敏芝班里学生要一个都不能少。可是不久，张慧科因为家里穷去城里打工。魏老师就千里迢迢来到城里找张慧科。最后在电视台台长帮助下他终于找到张慧科。
水泉小学教室那么破旧，文具那么少，学生家境又那么贫寒。可是不管教室多么破旧，文具多么少，家境多么贫寒，他们仍然坚持学习。我们现在环境不知道比他们好多少倍，所以我们应该更加努力学习。
剧中魏老师对她学生那么好，我们王老师对我们也不差。老师为让我们长大有出息，无时无刻为我们辛勤忙碌着。同学生病，老师牺牲自己休息时间去看望同学，为同学补课。老师这样关心我们，爱护我们。我们要以优异成绩报答老师。
写一个电影的内容英文作文【二】
我去到一个黄金王国，钦博腊索山，科托帕克西山……
你牵着我的手，跨越奥里诺科河，越过火热的卡拉哈里沙漠，横过南非的蛮荒草原，经过旷野……
回到了家……”
金碧辉煌的音乐大厅，潮水般的狂欢，人群兴喜躁动的眼神
透过这一切，我看到你
站在十三岁的沙滩，我们牵着手，我们拥抱着彼此，我和你，曾靠得那么近
为了靠近你，我放弃了一切;为了靠近你，我深深地伤害你;为了靠近你，我终于失去了自己
天空很低，很蓝，海天交接的地方，像镀金的奶油，甜腻腻的
潮湿的沙滩，因着海水显得格外的柔软
悲伤的大提琴，和着海风，将你的轮廓一遍遍勾勒
其实，我一直如此深刻的爱着你，如此脆弱而倔强的爱着你
写一个电影的内容英文作文【三】
一部影片，一个故事，一份责任，一种感动。
今天，我有幸观看张艺谋导演影片《一个都不能少》，它主要讲述是关于一个代课老师魏敏芝故事，她只是个小学毕业人，今年才十三岁。因为高老师请假回家探病才来到水泉村小学，这个学校就有一个班，班里学生一到四年级都有，共二十八个学生……
在班里有一位名叫张慧科男同学，由于母亲生病，他家人带着他辍学到城里去打工。魏老师从学校一直到（知道以后，只身一人到）城里去找张慧科，历尽千辛万苦，终于找到他，把他带回家。其实她完全可以不用去找张慧科，因为她任务就是代好这一个月课，而她或许是为高老师临走之前一句话：“这个班已经流失十几个学生，再也不能少。！”我想：这就是责任所带来动力吧！
在这部影片中，最令我感动是魏老师为找张慧科在街头上四处寻找，广播找人，贴寻人启事一幕幕……可惜都没有找到张慧科。她渴，就喝街边自来水；饿，就吃小店客人剩下食物。她偶然遇到一个好心人，告诉她应该去电视台……可门口登计人员处处叼难她，不准她进去。她没有就此放弃，在大门外等三天三夜（一天一夜），而且她见到每个从里面走出来人就问：“你是不是台长？你是不是台长？”最终，她终于见到台长，并上电视，在圆圆镜头面前，她流下眼泪，说一席让人感动不已话：“张慧科我好想你，你在哪里？”
最终，魏老师找到张慧科，一起回到那个熟悉而陌生地方——水泉村希望小学。是啊，付出或许才会有回报，可不付出注定一无所获。而这个世上又有多少人能像魏老师一样，为一句话，为一个孩子，付出那么多艰辛和劳累呢？
因此，我希望所有贫困学子都能过上幸福生活，也希望那些已经辍学孩子能够早日重返校园。
写一个电影的内容英文作文【四】
Everyone knows that Meryl Streep is the high priestess of drama, but she never gets enough credit for her comedy skills. That should change with The Devil Wears Prada, a sinfully funny, deliciously glossy take on the 2003 best seller by Lauren Weisberger, who denies writing it as a poison-pen letter to her former boss, Vogue editor Anna Wintour. The names have been changed, of course, to ward off lawsuits. Stepping up to the plate as imperious fashion editor Miranda Priestly, Streep knocks every laugh out of the park. More remarkably, she humanizes a character who was little more than a bitch in Manolos on the page.
Streep teams up hilariously with Anne Hathaway as Andy Sachs, the "smart fat girl" (she's a mere size 6 who applies for the job as Miranda's junior assistant at Runway magazine. Andy, a journalism major at Northwestern, had her eye on The New Yorker, but is told that if she can run the gantlet of Miranda for a year, there is no publishing Everest she can't climb. Before you can say "makeover,"Andy is transformed from a gawky giraffe into a swan who can trade up in lovers -- from sweet chef (Adrian Grenier to literary stud (Simon Baker -- and from cotton blends to chicest of Valentino, Chanel, Donna Karan, Bill Blass, Galliano and Prada. Guys who know squat about labels can take pleasure in the uberbabes wearing the threads.
Director David Frankel makes expert use of the light touch he brought to HBO's Entourage and Sex and the City. And screenwriter Aline Brosh McKenna leeches out the book's malice in favor of wicked sass. Does the movie bite the fashion hand that feeds it? You bet. But it also pays due respect to the artful details turning the wheels of an industry that only seems frivolous. There's no doubt Andy learns much from watching Miranda at work, even with all the insults and fool's errands. The script tries to paint Miranda into a corner -- the lonely careerist who can't keep a husband or find personal happiness -- but Streep won't wallow in the cliches of victimhood. In a party of a movie, her performance is a comic and dramatic tour de force. comic and dramatic tour de force.
写一个电影的内容英文作文【五】
After the appreciation of the film “Titanic”, I have noticed some meaningful details behind the peoples’ general impression of simply an affectional film. The wreck of the Titanic occurred in 1912, in which the great recession started from the end of the 19th Century still hasn’t ended. Most critics pointed out that the sinking of the Titanic represents the collapse of the Capitalism in the end of the 19th Century. However, I would like to say that, in this movie, the director had not only foreran the crisis of the Capitalism, but also showed some of the human nature, from both gloomy and brilliant aspects, like selfish, mammonish, vainglorious, and love, hope, bravery, faith, and so on. In this essay, I will first reveal this film’s indication of the social context of that age, then I will analyse the two contrary aspects of human nature indicated in this film through some impressive shots.
Under the development of industrial technology, the economy in the Capitalism countries took off. People lived a rich, luxury and expensive life, and this rapid economic development lasted for almost 20 years. People had got used to this kind of life. The huge development in machinery changed people’s life greatly. Innovations of transportation, such as vehicles and tankers, allowed people to travel around. The appearance of these modern transportations was an important milestone of the industrialization. People thus became very confident on human intellectual capabilities. They believed their power of conquering the nature is inapproachable. While the Titanic is also called “The Ship of Dreamers”, in this film, when it bearing in with the ocean in the darkness, the mysterious ocean represents the unknown nature and the ship itself represents the advanced material capabilities people owned. In a shot that Mr Bruce explains his design of the Titanic, he said “the ship possesses huge size, stability, luxury, and strength”, and that” the supremacy will never be challenged”. In fact, all these words can be thought of the symbols of the Capitalism of that time in many people’s eyes. They thought the Capitalism is just like the Titanic, which should be “unsinkable”. The wonderful way of developing economy would stay in good condition eternally. However, things do not always follow the way people wish to be. The economic recession suddenly attacked the Capitalism countries at the end of the 19th Century. It was not until then that people did not realize the impracticality of their idealized “unsinkable” Capitalism. Capitalism will sink. And unfortunately it did sink. Just like the
