我的一个大学同学的英文作文【一】
记得上学期期末的时候，第二天就要期末考试了，我却病倒了。老师在讲台上讲课，我在课桌前捂着头，有气无力地爬在桌子上，这时，老师关切地问我：“王家兴，你怎么了？”我无力地说：“老师，我难受的不行，头痛！”老师又问：“你能受得了吗？要不回宿舍往吧！”“老师明天就要考试了，我能挺的住。”到了下课，老师还是让徐福元同学送我回宿舍。
那天正是冬季，天气很冷，就连不怕冷的老师们也都披上了羽绒服。
在回宿舍的路上，徐福元硬是要把他的`衣服给我穿上，我怎么也推辞不掉，最好还是给我披上了他的外套，他挠了挠头，用手揉了一下鼻子笑了。瞬间心头涌上了一股感激与辛酸……别看徐福元平日学习一般，但对别人非常友善，所以人缘一直不错。
回到宿舍，我躺在床上非常难受，正在这时，又是徐福元，他拿着一版药片送到了我的受里，这时又一股感激涌上心头……他帮我倒了一杯水，放在床头，等我喝完了药，他就匆匆忙忙的回班里上自习了。我也随之睡着了。
等我晕晕沉沉的醒来，发现床头旁有一个饭盒，饭盒上有一张小字条，上面写着：“饭，我帮你打回来了，小心点，别下床——徐福元。”顿时感激的泪水夺眶而出。看着这个饭盒，我的心情久久不能平静……
徐福元，他的学习不怎么好，我曾经还看不起他，但是今天，他的举动，使我从新熟悉了他，他让我很感动，由于他有一颗金子般的心。他是我学习的榜样，也是我终身难忘的好朋友。
我的一个大学同学的英文作文【二】
I read the Chinese version of “Camille” a few years ago. At that time I was deeply moved by the main character Marguerite Gautier. “Camille” or “The Lady of the Camellias” by Alexandre Dumas, fils, is the story of Marguerite Gautier, a young courtesan, or kept woman, in Paris in the mid 1800's, and how she falls in love with a young man, Armand Duval, and then tries to escape from her questionable past. Unfortunately, it comes back to haunt her and she ends up returning to that life and dies painfully and alone, but with the knowledge that she was a noble woman at heart. When I first began to read the book, I did not care for Marguerite or her attitude or lifestyle, but as I got further into the narrative, I realized that her saucy attitude was a front to cover the lonely woman that she really was. She felt used, abused and unloved, until the gentle Armand Duval came into her life and showed her that he loved her as a person and not for what she could do for him. It must have taken great courage for Marguerite to leave the life she had lived for so long, knowing all along that it was probably too good to be true and would not last indefinitely. And it also showed that Marguerite really loved Armand Duval for she could even change herself for him.
However, happiness didn’t last for long. When M. Duval, Armand's father, came to her, pleading for her to leave Armand to save both Armand's reputation and that of his younger innocent sister, Marguerite saw a way to become pure of heart, if not in body. She felt that it was her duty, because she loved Armand so much, to do this even though it meant giving up her own happiness and hurting Armand temporarily. She reluctantly returned to her former life, knowing that.some day Armand would forgive her. Sadly, she died in debt and basically alone, except for her one female friend, Julie Duprat, who helped her during her illness. She had her journal sent to Armand after her death, explaining why she had made the choices she had. I think Dumas's last few lines about Marguerite being the exception, not the rule were quite true, and I also agreed with his view that while her lifestyle could not be condoned, we as a society assume that all of these type of women are cold and heartless, while this may not always be the case. A person can make the wrong choices in life when they are young, and try to redeem themselves, but sometimes past situations prevent them from changing their lives, even though they desperately wish to do so. This applies to both men and women in many different types of circumstances: involvement in crime; drug or alcohol abuse; gambling; prostitution; financial problems; poor marriage choices; etc. And this is the fact, which exists in the whole society.
As far as the other characters in the book, I think Marguerite was right in saying that no one truly cared about her, but only wanted something from her, the only exceptions being Armand and Julie Duprat. Of course, the Comte de G. and Comte de N. wanted her body and appearance. The
Duke needed to “wake up and smell the coffee” and realize that she could never replace his dead daughter. If he truly cared, he could have helped her leave her lifestyle without “keeping” her himself. And lastly, Prudence was a blood-sucking leech who used Marguerite almost worse than the men. I also think she was jealous of the fact that Marguerite had so much more courage than herself and someone truly loved her.
Last morning, when tiding my bookshelf, I took this book out of the shelf, and a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. I held it against the morning light and blew on it. The soft breeze carried it away. Camille is just like the camellia, she could never escape from the destiny of withering. But it wasn’t her fault; it’s because of the evil of Capitalism and the hideousness of that society.
Suddenly, I remembered a saying: “Women are like the flowers”. Those pretty women are like those beautiful flowers; their delicate beauty makes people feel they are the miracle of life. However, even the God envies their beauty. It seems that beautiful women always have tragic endings. As we are normal persons, even we can see the hideousness of humanity that results in their fate of withering, we can at most ask quietly in our hearts: Where have those beautiful flowers gone? Where have they gone?
The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe
It seemed to be such a coincidence that the night after I finished reading The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe, I was to dine in a restaurant distinctly related to the book itself. This restaurant was no other than the famous American-styled “Friday ’s. ” The reason for mentioning this restaurant is quite straightforward to all the gentlemen, ladies and children who have read the novel and enjoyed it, which is the fact that this restaurant was, most likely, named after the American Native in Robinson Crusoe, called Friday. This restaurant offers very exceptional service, for instance when the waitresses are asked to order dishes they kneel rather than stand, which, unlike the other restaurants I have been to, makes it easier for the customers to hear them speak. Moreover, Friday’s friendly services to the customers help them to make better choices when ordering dishes. I remembered when I went to Friday ’s last time; the waitress kindly described the items on the menu with precise details. It turned out that the combo I initially wanted was designed to be shared among a large group, not to be eaten by one person. I think this restaurant shows many commendable features similar to that of Friday. Friday brought emotional warmth to the people around him with his appealing personality. I think it was this personality that affected Crusoe and made him say that he loved Friday when Crusoe didn ’t express love for his parents, brothers, sisters, or even his wife. “When he espied me, he came running to me, laying himself down again upon the ground, with all the possible signs of an humble, thankful disposition, making many antic gestures to show it to let me know how he would serve me as long as he lived.” This was what Friday did after Crusoe had rescued him from the two savages chasing him. It was easy for me to see why Crusoe had loved Friday. After sometime, Crusoe and Friday were to rescue Friday’s father. When Friday reunited with his father, the scene was easy to move anyone: “It would have moved anyone to tears to have seen how Friday kissed him, embraced him, hugged him, cried, laughed, halloed, jumped about, danced,
sung; and then sung and jumped about again, like a distracted creature. It was a good while before I could make him speak to me.” This is my favourite chapter in the whole book. It is hard to see why Friday is an ex-savage when he can have personalities more praiseworthy than many civilized people, viz. Crusoe himself. “When he (Friday went to him (Friday’s father, he would sit down by him, open his breast, and hold his father’s head close to his bosom, half an hour together, to nourish it; then he took his arms and ankles, which were numbed and stiff with the binding, and rubbed them with his hands.” Furthermore, Friday’s expression of loyalty in asking Crusoe to kill him rather than leave him is more heartfelt than anything Crusoe ever says or does.
Crusoe, on the absolute contrary, seems incapable of deep feelings, as shown by his account of leaving his family—he never shows any emotions. After a moving lecture from Robinson’s father about his future, he still decided to follow his own wandering ambition. Careless was he about the wishes of his parents to keep him alive and prosperous, as he was the only child left in the family. When he came back from the island which he had lived on for twenty eight years, he found that it had been too late to tell his parents that he was still alive, but yet again he did not feel sorry for them; he also did not feel sorry for the two people who had to live in misery for nearly thirty years under the allusion all of their sons were dead. He had the same feelings for his wife: when he was married, he said it was “not either to my disadvantage or dissatisfaction”, implying that it was also neither to his advantage nor his satisfaction. Moreover, after his wife died, Robinson did not think of looking after the three children they had, but went back to the island, which he had lived on for twenty-eight years. It was on this trip which Robinson Crusoe revisited “His Island ” as he called it. I feel that Robinson ’s indifference to his family is almost emotionally cruel.
Before had clearly shown the contrast between Crusoe’s and Friday’s personalities, as when Friday, in his joyful reunion with his father, displayed far more emotion toward his family members than Crusoe, whereas Crusoe never mentions missing his family or dreams about the happiness of seeing them again. I think Defore is very successful in introducing Friday as part of the novel, it makes the whole novel seem much more complete and gripping to the reader, as well as proving that Defoe’s ideology of racism is civilized unlike many other Europeans at that time; natives and savages are not worse than others but can perhaps even be more modern and civilized. Those are the reasons of why I like The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe and Friday.
我的一个大学同学的英文作文【三】
Many people simply regard Pride and Prejudice as a love story, but in my opinion, this book is an illustration of the society at that time. She perfectly reflected the relation between money and marriage at her time and gave the people in her works vivid characters. The characters have their own personalities. Mrs. Bennet is a woman who makes great efforts to marry off her daughters. Mr. Bingley is a friendly young man, but his friend, Mr. Darcy, is a very proud man who seems to always feel superior. Even the five daughters in Bennet family are very different. Jane is simple, innocent and never speaks evil of others. Elizabeth is a clever girl who always has her own opinion. Mary likes reading classic books. (Actually she is a pedant. Kitty doesn’t have her own opinion but likes to follow her sister, Lydia. Lydia is a girl who follows exotic things, handsome man, and is somehow a little profligate. When I read the book, I can always find the same personalities in the society now. That is why I think this book is indeed the representative of the society in Britain in the 18th century.
The family of gentleman in the countryside is Jane Austen’s favourite topic. But this little topic can reflect big problems. It concludes the stratum situation and economic relationships in Britain in her century. You can find these from the very beginning of this book.
The first sentence in this book is impressive. It reads: “It is a truth well known to all the world that an unmarried man in poss ession of a large fortune must be in need of a wife”. The undertone is very clear: the foundation of the marriage at that time is not emotion but possession.
People always think that Austen was an expert at telling love stories. In fact, the marriage in her book is not the result of love, but the result of economic needs. After reading this book, I know the truth is that a poor woman must be in need of a husband, a wealthy man.
I couldn’t forget how eager Mrs. Bennet wants to marry off her daughte rs. If you want to know why she is so crazy about these things, I must mention the situation in Britain at that time. Only the eldest son had the privilege of inheriting his father’s possessions. Younger sons and daughters who are used to luxurious lives have no choice but marry a man or woman in possession of a large fortune to continue their comfortable lives. Thus, we can see that getting married is a way to become wealthier, particularly for women without many possessions. Jane Austen told us that money and possession determined everything, including marriage and love in her century.
In “Pride and Prejudice”, the sister of Mr. Bingley strongly opposed his plan of marrying Jane because the Bennets don’t have many possessions and their social positions are much lower than them. From this, we can see there are a lot of obstacles for a not very rich woman to marry a wealthy husband. The society, the relatives would not allow them to get married.
In modern society, although the marriages of economic needs have decreased rapidly, the concept of “money determines everything” is still rooted in some people’s mind. A lot of parents try hard to interfere their children’s marriages. Education background, possessions, jobs remains the main reason that may influence one’s marriage. Marry for money is still a big problem in our
society. We can’t help thinking: can money determine everything?
Austen left this problem for us to think. The genius of Jane Austen lies in this perfect simplicity, the simplicity that reflects big problems. Although Austen was only 21 when she wrote “Pride and Prejudice”, her sharp observation of social lives makes the style of this book surprisingly mature and lively. The plots in her works are always very natural. The development of the plot is as inevitable as a problem in mathematics. I think the depth of Pride and Prejudice is the reason that makes this book prominent and classic. Today, her book still can be the guide telling us the economic relationships both at her time and in modern time.
我的一个大学同学的英文作文【四】
我已经上六年级，当然有很玩的好的朋友，我最有趣的哥们儿是袁基伟了！他是一个很“憨”的人，他得性格和外表都很“憨”！
他的头发卷卷的，中间是往上翘的，十分有味，一双小小的眼睛，恰似一个白中带黑的弹珠，一个小巧玲龙的小甜嘴，红润润的小嘴巴。把以上几个特点添到脸上，的却很“憨”。
有一次，他带了一大袋子东北松子拉里吃，分了我们一些，我们就一边吃一边玩“猫捉老鼠”。后来我被毛逮住了，回头一看发现一个熟悉的背影，走近一看是袁基伟，他竟耸立在哪儿，像一座小山，他身体笔直，脑袋朝地上看，我便偷偷的跑过去，看到他双手拿着松子壳，一粒白润松子在地上，他正发呆的盯着它，我看了一会儿，见他没反应，突然把他一抓。他突然想抽了电似得，脑袋猛地一抬，发了一下痴。然后我看了一下他，迟疑的问“你看着地上发呆干嘛？”他松了口气“我剥松子的时候，送子里突然蹦到了地上，我就一边看呀！一边想！“然后他嘴巴一抬，”捡捡还是不捡呢？“我看了他一眼，然后，两人同时疯狂大笑，笑完后，我赶紧摸了他脑门”没有发烧啊！
他还是一个很爱发颠的人，似乎脑袋的线接错了
“嘿！袁基伟！”我从车上跳了下来，看见袁基伟往学校走去，我跑到了他身边，他留过头看了看我，突然身体一转接着一跳，还在原地摆poss。，我被吓得半死。快走带学校门口时，我对小袁说：“你带了餐费没？我带了！”袁基伟突然一愣，把嘴巴拉了下来，“不早说！”他突然以喜，“我带了！”然后在那一边跺脚一边笑，“嘻嘻嘻……”的在那发颠！
我每次悲伤时想到他是都会开心起来！
他是我最难忘的同学！
我的一个大学同学的英文作文【五】
说起我最难忘的同学，那只然非我的同桌小昊莫属了。他长得略显稍微有点胖。看上去应该很强壮，可其实一点儿力气都没有，名副其实的虚胖。唉！真是枉费了他那一身的肥肉啊。他还很臭美，经常问别人：“我帅吗？”我在心里答：“衰！确实很衰！”
论品行，他在我的心中就是一个不折不扣的双面人。他在家是一副老实巴交的样子，在学校，他就揭下“面具”露出了疯疯癫癫的真面目。好像缺了一根筋似的，做事不考虑后果，还时不时冒出一句令人捉摸不透的话。这也应该和他喜欢暴漫（江湖人称——暴走漫画）有关。
说起暴漫，他是一个已经超神的暴漫迷，据小道消息透露：已经到了走火入魔的境界了。每天回家第一件事就是看暴走漫画。上电脑课也在看。他的生活除了暴漫还是暴漫。你看，刚刚下课还无精打采、垂头丧气的。但只要有人跟他讨论暴走漫画，他立刻变得生龙活虎起来，喋喋不休地向你聊暴漫。看他这副样子，谁还敢说他刚刚还无精打采的。我在想他是不是能把暴漫当饭来吃。
小昊还是一个十足的开心果，我们经常会被他给逗笑，他还经常抽搐。那样子很是诡异。
一天，在给小昊改古诗词的练习，我发现了一个错别字马上要他改正。老师说错一个字重新默写。这时，他又露出他的阴险狡诈的一面了，他说：“反正老师也不知道，你直接让我过就行啦！”我乃正人君子是也，怎么会秉公徇私呢？我大公无私地否定了他的哀求。并让他重新默一遍。前几次他还乖乖配合，但我一次又一次地找到他的错别字。他终于忍受不住了，他启用了他的天赋技能“抽搐”他开始又哭又笑，还开始摇来摇去，最后趴在桌子上一动不动，如果他嘴里再吐出一点白泡沫的话，那可真是一只离开了水的小鱼儿。他已经崩溃了，我是个吃软不吃硬的人，就让他草草过关了。唉！谁叫我心太软了。正当我放过他时，他又立刻变得生龙活虎。真拿他没办法！
这就是我的同桌，一个令人又喜又愁的同学。只要提起他的名字，我就想起他那奸诈的笑容和那抽搐的样子，他应该是我命中的克星吧！
我的一个大学同学的英文作文【六】
This is a story about a special and unreserved woman who has been exposed to a hostile environment but continuously and fearlessly struggling for her ideal life. The story can be interpreted as a symbol of the independent spirit.
It seems to me that many readers’ English reading experience starts with Jane Eyer. I am of no exception. As we refer to the movie “Jane Eyer”, it is not surprising to find some differences because of its being filmized and retold in a new way, but the spirit of the novel remains----to be an independent person, both physically and mentally.
Jane Eyer was a born resister, whose parents went off when she was very young, and her aunt，the only relative she had，treated her as badly as a ragtag. Since Jane’s education in Lowwood Orphanage began, she didn’t get what she had been expecting——simply being regarded as a common person, just the same as any other girl around. The suffers from being humiliated and devastated teach Jane to be persevering and prize dignity over anything else.As a reward of revolting the ruthless oppression, Jane got a chance to be a tutor in Thornfield Garden. There she made the acquaintance of lovely Adele and that garden’s owner, Rochester, a man with warm heart despite a cold face outside. Jane expected to change the life from then on, but fate had decided otherwise: After Jane and Rochester fell in love with each other and got down to get marry, she unfortunately came to know in fact Rochester had got a legal wife, who seemed to be the shadow following Rochester and led to his moodiness all the time ----Rochester was also a despairing person in need of salvation. Jane did want to give him a hand, however, she made up her mind to leave, because she didn’t want to betray her own principles, because she was Jane Eyer. The film has finally got a symbolist end: Jane inherited a large number of legacies and finally returned. After finding Rochester ’s misfortune brought by his original mad wife, Jane chose to stay with him forever.
I don’t know what others feel, but frankly speaking, I would rather regard the section that Jane began her teaching job in Thornfield as the film’s end----especially when I heard Jane’s words “Never in my life have I been awaken so happily. ” For one thing, this ideal and brand-new beginning of life was what Jane had been imagining for long as a suffering person; for another, this should be what the audiences with my views hoped her to get. But the professional judgment of producing films reminded me to wait for a totally different result: There must be something wrong coming with the excellence----perhaps not only should another section be added to enrich the story, but also we may see from the next transition of Jane’s life that “Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you would get.”
What ’s more, this film didn’t end when Jane left Thornfield. For Jane Eyer herself, there should always be somewhere to realize her great ideal of being independent considering her fortitude, but for Rochester, how he can get salvation? The film gives the answer tentatively: Jane eventually got back to Rochester. In fact, when Jane met Rochester for the first time, she scared his horse and made his heel strained, to a certain extent, which meant Rochester would get retrieval because of Jane. We can consider Rochester’s experiences as that of religion meaning. The fire by his frantic wife was the punishment for the cynicism early in his life. After it, Rochester got the mercy of the God and the love of the woman whom he loved. Here we can say: human nature and divinity get united perfectly in order to let such a story accord with the requirements of both two sides. The value of this film may be due to its efforts to explore a new way for the development of humanism under the faith of religion.
我的一个大学同学的英文作文【七】
曾有那么一个人，在我高兴时，与我分享；当我伤心时，予我抚慰。就是这么一个人，陪我度过小学5年的生活。蓦然回首，才觉得这原来是一段挥之不去的美好回忆！
她有一双炯炯有神的大眼睛，一张樱桃般的小嘴。她的笑容是那么自然；她的小酒窝使她显得那么漂亮；她的小脾气让她觉得自己更有个性。其实，她最大的特点就是乐于助人。她，就是我们班的音乐课代表——侯婉婷。
那是一个烈日炎炎的夏天，一天上学，妈妈说：“我给你2元钱，你中午去买火烧吃！”我立刻答应了。到了学校，发现2元钱不见了，我那时是心急如焚，心想：怎么办呢？完了完了！脸上的汗珠一颗一颗的往下流。唉！连汗珠都欺负我，我一边找一边擦脸上的汗，可是，怎么也找不着。侯婉婷看见了，关心地问：“怎么了？”
“我……我……”“别支支吾吾的，快说，怎么了？”“我……我妈妈给我的2元弄丢了。”她立刻从书包里拿出2元，使劲往我手里塞，我把钱塞回她手里。我俩争执了好久，她说：“你拿着，以后我向你借的时候后你再借给我，ok？”“那好吧，我不客气了！”看见了吧！
随着光阴荏苒，我对此事的记忆已逐渐模糊，但我终身不忘的是——那个同学。她永远都在我心中！
