我也有兴趣,因而读了各种速读的书籍。虽然这么说,但如果以杠杆效果为目的来看的话,与其能读得很快,还不如掌握只对自己有用的重点,理解其内容并实践,这样比“速读”更重要。
《改变人性的“早上五分钟”速读学习法》的作者高岛彻治,曾在读完几本关于速读的书后,得出以下结论:
“纵然学会了速读法,也只是学会了和过去完全一样的读书法(即依据个人口味、记忆内容的读法。只是在不理解的情况下,让阅读的速度加快了而已。”
或许诚如他所说的.那样。速读,重视的是阅读的速度,就像运动员和时间竞赛一样,“一分钟能读多少字”,“以每分钟能读多少字为目标进行训练”等方式测量阅读速度。
然而我认为,纵然单纯的快速读完一本书,但这样不太有意义,不是吗?与其如此,不如抓出重点,读完后“如何活用这些内容”才比较重要,不是吗?
这不仅限于速读,对于一般的读书,也是同样的道理。重要的是,用读完后所得到的知识做什么?多读书之后获得了什么奖励?我所讲的就是指这个。事实上,多读几本书,并不是什么了不起的事。仅仅做“输入”的动作,只不过是自我满足而已。如何能“输出”使用,才是决定胜负的关键。如我一再强调的,多读是投资活动。总之,读到的内容活用在工作上,能够产生投资的成果,这才是最后的目的。为此,我一年要花100万日元左右的书籍费。在我20几岁,收入不多的时候,就决定把收入的10%用在购买书籍上。
速读是训练眼睛的移动法,是快速将整本书读完的一种技术。如果是这样的话,那么多读就可以说是切换没用部分的一种技术。提升取舍资讯的能力,没有必要的地方不要读,这样才能缩短读书时间。最后的终极目标是,在别人的经验上运用杠杆效益,把对实际事务有所帮助的技巧,变成自己的东西。
这是大家都会的简单读书方法,完全不用特别技术。这各为了攀比读书的量,硬要提高阅读速度或增加阅读数量的读书法,在目的上是完全不同的。
我绝对没有想要否定速度。我是认为,能够读得快速是很好,但更应该将此技术充分活用,而不是以速读为目的。
Since the 1970s, with the worsening oil crisis, the major businesses in the automotive internal combustion engine as much as possible to reduce the car's fuel consumption, while sparing no effort in the development of hybrid vehicles and new energy vehicles. There are hybrid gas-electric hybrid and mixed fuel in two forms, both in the car body design is no different with the traditional internal combustion engine vehicles, the future trend is nothing more than a continuation of current trends, efforts to reduce the drag coefficient, reducing weight while increasing strength and stiffness and so on.
Hybrid vehicle technology only in the product over, to really new energy vehicles, preparatory and experimental products, the ultimate trend or completely replace the existing traditional energy vehicles by the new energy vehicles.
City traffic is a big problem in some cities in the world, especially in big cities. To solve the problem, someone are in favor of developing buses as means of city traffic. Others are in favor of the subway. Between them,which is the better choice?
在世界上的一些城市中城市交通是一个大问题,尤其是大城市。为了解决这个问题,有人赞成发展公交车作为城市交通的方式。另一些人则赞成地铁。在它们之间,哪个是更好的`选择?
It is easier to take buses as means of city traffic than the subway trains because buses don't need special roads. But buses have also many disadvantages, some of which are very serious. They may cause louder noise and more traffic accidents. Buses give rise to serious air pollution and traffic jam. In order to stop what buses cause, a large amount of hand must be used to widen the roads. On the contrary, the subway train is of more advantages. Except the difficulty and high cost of building the subway, it is superior to the buses in many aspects.
公共汽车作为城市交通方式要比地铁容易,因为公共汽车不需要特别的道路。但是公交车也许多缺点,有些是非常严重的。他们可能会导致噪音和更多的交通事故。公共汽车也导致了严重的空气污染和交通堵塞。为了阻止公交车带来的后果,必须用大量的人力来拓宽道路。相反,地铁列车有着更多的优势。除了建设地铁的难度和高成本外,在许多方面它都优于公共汽车。
Taking the advantages and disadvantages together into consideration,I would be in favor of developing the subway train as soon as possible.
把优点和缺点一起考虑,我会赞成尽快发展地铁。
© 2022 xuexicn.net,All Rights Reserved.