大学生打网络游戏的英文作文【一】
大学生打网络游戏的英文作文【二】
这个游戏考验我们的临场指挥能力，锻炼我们的作战技巧。在游戏中，我们不停地奔跑，体能也能得到充分的锻炼。
在打联合游戏中，我和张家瑞、赵校齐、耿佩伦是我们班的'最佳组合。一天中午，我们四个人又分到了一起，我是我们组老大。
游戏开始了，张家瑞上来就把金照峰定住了，紧接着赵校齐又被于川洋定住了。我和张家瑞藏在一个隐蔽的地方，商量怎么救出赵校齐。
张家瑞说：“要不然我出去当诱饵？”
我说：“那可不行，太危险了！你万一被于川洋定住，我再没有把赵校齐救走，那么我们组就大势不好了！”
我转了转脑筋，想出一个妙计，说：“你和我现在从于川洋的正反面一起冲过去，既不被定住，又能救出赵校齐。”
我们两个一起说：“冲！”只见于川洋手忙脚乱地守着赵校齐，但是“好虎架不住群狼”。最后，赵校齐被救而于川洋被定。在另一边的耿佩伦早已把唐梓喻给定住了。最后我们组胜利了。
这时候，看到他们输了的表情，我们张大了嘴巴，哈哈大笑起来……
在打联合游戏中，我们不仅体验到游戏的乐趣，也让我们了解到一个团队必须要团结，否则必定要失败。
我爱打联合。
大学生打网络游戏的英文作文【三】
This is a story about a special and unreserved woman who has been exposed to a hostile environment but continuously and fearlessly struggling for her ideal life. The story can be interpreted as a symbol of the independent spirit.
It seems to me that many readers’ English reading experience starts with Jane Eyer. I am of no exception. As we refer to the movie “Jane Eyer”, it is not surprising to find some differences because of its being filmized and retold in a new way, but the spirit of the novel remains----to be an independent person, both physically and mentally.
Jane Eyer was a born resister, whose parents went off when she was very young, and her aunt，the only relative she had，treated her as badly as a ragtag. Since Jane’s education in Lowwood Orphanage began, she didn’t get what she had been expecting——simply being regarded as a common person, just the same as any other girl around. The suffers from being humiliated and devastated teach Jane to be persevering and prize dignity over anything else.As a reward of revolting the ruthless oppression, Jane got a chance to be a tutor in Thornfield Garden. There she made the acquaintance of lovely Adele and that garden’s owner, Rochester, a man with warm heart despite a cold face outside. Jane expected to change the life from then on, but fate had decided otherwise: After Jane and Rochester fell in love with each other and got down to get marry, she unfortunately came to know in fact Rochester had got a legal wife, who seemed to be the shadow following Rochester and led to his moodiness all the time ----Rochester was also a despairing person in need of salvation. Jane did want to give him a hand, however, she made up her mind to leave, because she didn’t want to betray her own principles, because she was Jane Eyer. The film has finally got a symbolist end: Jane inherited a large number of legacies and finally returned. After finding Rochester ’s misfortune brought by his original mad wife, Jane chose to stay with him forever.
I don’t know what others feel, but frankly speaking, I would rather regard the section that Jane began her teaching job in Thornfield as the film’s end----especially when I heard Jane’s words “Never in my life have I been awaken so happily. ” For one thing, this ideal and brand-new beginning of life was what Jane had been imagining for long as a suffering person; for another, this should be what the audiences with my views hoped her to get. But the professional judgment of producing films reminded me to wait for a totally different result: There must be something wrong coming with the excellence----perhaps not only should another section be added to enrich the story, but also we may see from the next transition of Jane’s life that “Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you would get.”
What ’s more, this film didn’t end when Jane left Thornfield. For Jane Eyer herself, there should always be somewhere to realize her great ideal of being independent considering her fortitude, but for Rochester, how he can get salvation? The film gives the answer tentatively: Jane eventually got back to Rochester. In fact, when Jane met Rochester for the first time, she scared his horse and made his heel strained, to a certain extent, which meant Rochester would get retrieval because of Jane. We can consider Rochester’s experiences as that of religion meaning. The fire by his frantic wife was the punishment for the cynicism early in his life. After it, Rochester got the mercy of the God and the love of the woman whom he loved. Here we can say: human nature and divinity get united perfectly in order to let such a story accord with the requirements of both two sides. The value of this film may be due to its efforts to explore a new way for the development of humanism under the faith of religion.
大学生打网络游戏的英文作文【四】
它确实是一个很受欢迎和喜爱的游戏。它能让你大汗淋漓，保你得到最大程度的锻炼；能让你至始至终笑个不停；还能提高同学们协同“作战”、全力配合的能力。更重要的是能培养大家准确判断和快速反应的能力。我想这样的游戏你也会非常喜欢吧。
游戏虽好，可你知道怎样玩吗？首先，大家围拢在一起，用手心手背的方法分成俩队，手心为一队，手背为另一队，然后，每队用石头剪子布分出老大、老二、老三，这俩只“战斗小组”就算分成了。每队的老大有权将对方老大以下级别的队员直接钉住，而低一级的队员不能将对方高一级的队员钉住，当同一级别的队员相遇时，则要通过比输赢的方法胜出大小，然后胜的队员可以钉住输的队员，各队的队员都可以营救被钉住的本队队员。最后，所有队员被钉住的一方为败，而另一方为胜。
你想游戏的快乐吗？那就听我给你讲讲吧。那是一个星期二的下午，天气晴朗，我班十二名同学来到了操场上准备玩打联合游戏，两只小队组成了。经过激烈的竞争，我当上了本队的老二。
一场游戏战开始了，两支小队摆开了阵势，彼此都静静地窥视着对方，用心地判断着对方的'级别，寻找着战机。过了一会，只见对方有紧紧盯住前方的、又好像什么都不怕似地，还有提心吊胆的、躲躲藏藏的。这时我已猜出那个胆小的一定是级别很低的。想到这里，我便迅速出击，冲动了他的前面大声问道：“你是老几？”对方胆战心惊地回答：“我是老四。”我心里高兴极了并对他大声地说：“我是老二！”随即伸出右手，啪地一声拍在他的肩上，“钉！”我兴奋地叫着。真可谓是旗开得胜呀。正当我充满斗志冲向另一双手时，突然发现了我队的老大、老三呆呆地站在那里一动不动。我的心情立刻紧张起来，“他们都是我队的主力，这样下去就很危险了，必须全力营救他们。”想到这里，我拼命地左躲右闪，绕过对方的队员，一个急转弯来到被定住的队友身边，啪啪两掌，他们依次被解救了。这时，本队的老四刚刚盯住对方一个队员，正捂着肚子仰天大笑时，不料被后面冲上一人将其钉住了，他老老实实，垂头丧气地站在那里，等待着救援。看到这里，大家都捂着肚子弯着腰笑个不停，真是乐极生悲呀，我也忍不住仰天大笑起来。就是这样，经过无数次的盯住、解救，我们终于胜利了。队员们坐在地上，喘着粗气，汗珠从同学那通红的脸上滚落。尽管这样大家还是忍不住开心地笑着。
大学生打网络游戏的英文作文【五】
I read the Chinese version of “Camille” a few years ago. At that time I was deeply moved by the main character Marguerite Gautier. “Camille” or “The Lady of the Camellias” by Alexandre Dumas, fils, is the story of Marguerite Gautier, a young courtesan, or kept woman, in Paris in the mid 1800's, and how she falls in love with a young man, Armand Duval, and then tries to escape from her questionable past. Unfortunately, it comes back to haunt her and she ends up returning to that life and dies painfully and alone, but with the knowledge that she was a noble woman at heart. When I first began to read the book, I did not care for Marguerite or her attitude or lifestyle, but as I got further into the narrative, I realized that her saucy attitude was a front to cover the lonely woman that she really was. She felt used, abused and unloved, until the gentle Armand Duval came into her life and showed her that he loved her as a person and not for what she could do for him. It must have taken great courage for Marguerite to leave the life she had lived for so long, knowing all along that it was probably too good to be true and would not last indefinitely. And it also showed that Marguerite really loved Armand Duval for she could even change herself for him.
However, happiness didn’t last for long. When M. Duval, Armand's father, came to her, pleading for her to leave Armand to save both Armand's reputation and that of his younger innocent sister, Marguerite saw a way to become pure of heart, if not in body. She felt that it was her duty, because she loved Armand so much, to do this even though it meant giving up her own happiness and hurting Armand temporarily. She reluctantly returned to her former life, knowing that.some day Armand would forgive her. Sadly, she died in debt and basically alone, except for her one female friend, Julie Duprat, who helped her during her illness. She had her journal sent to Armand after her death, explaining why she had made the choices she had. I think Dumas's last few lines about Marguerite being the exception, not the rule were quite true, and I also agreed with his view that while her lifestyle could not be condoned, we as a society assume that all of these type of women are cold and heartless, while this may not always be the case. A person can make the wrong choices in life when they are young, and try to redeem themselves, but sometimes past situations prevent them from changing their lives, even though they desperately wish to do so. This applies to both men and women in many different types of circumstances: involvement in crime; drug or alcohol abuse; gambling; prostitution; financial problems; poor marriage choices; etc. And this is the fact, which exists in the whole society.
As far as the other characters in the book, I think Marguerite was right in saying that no one truly cared about her, but only wanted something from her, the only exceptions being Armand and Julie Duprat. Of course, the Comte de G. and Comte de N. wanted her body and appearance. The
Duke needed to “wake up and smell the coffee” and realize that she could never replace his dead daughter. If he truly cared, he could have helped her leave her lifestyle without “keeping” her himself. And lastly, Prudence was a blood-sucking leech who used Marguerite almost worse than the men. I also think she was jealous of the fact that Marguerite had so much more courage than herself and someone truly loved her.
Last morning, when tiding my bookshelf, I took this book out of the shelf, and a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. I held it against the morning light and blew on it. The soft breeze carried it away. Camille is just like the camellia, she could never escape from the destiny of withering. But it wasn’t her fault; it’s because of the evil of Capitalism and the hideousness of that society.
Suddenly, I remembered a saying: “Women are like the flowers”. Those pretty women are like those beautiful flowers; their delicate beauty makes people feel they are the miracle of life. However, even the God envies their beauty. It seems that beautiful women always have tragic endings. As we are normal persons, even we can see the hideousness of humanity that results in their fate of withering, we can at most ask quietly in our hearts: Where have those beautiful flowers gone? Where have they gone?
The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe
It seemed to be such a coincidence that the night after I finished reading The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe, I was to dine in a restaurant distinctly related to the book itself. This restaurant was no other than the famous American-styled “Friday ’s. ” The reason for mentioning this restaurant is quite straightforward to all the gentlemen, ladies and children who have read the novel and enjoyed it, which is the fact that this restaurant was, most likely, named after the American Native in Robinson Crusoe, called Friday. This restaurant offers very exceptional service, for instance when the waitresses are asked to order dishes they kneel rather than stand, which, unlike the other restaurants I have been to, makes it easier for the customers to hear them speak. Moreover, Friday’s friendly services to the customers help them to make better choices when ordering dishes. I remembered when I went to Friday ’s last time; the waitress kindly described the items on the menu with precise details. It turned out that the combo I initially wanted was designed to be shared among a large group, not to be eaten by one person. I think this restaurant shows many commendable features similar to that of Friday. Friday brought emotional warmth to the people around him with his appealing personality. I think it was this personality that affected Crusoe and made him say that he loved Friday when Crusoe didn ’t express love for his parents, brothers, sisters, or even his wife. “When he espied me, he came running to me, laying himself down again upon the ground, with all the possible signs of an humble, thankful disposition, making many antic gestures to show it to let me know how he would serve me as long as he lived.” This was what Friday did after Crusoe had rescued him from the two savages chasing him. It was easy for me to see why Crusoe had loved Friday. After sometime, Crusoe and Friday were to rescue Friday’s father. When Friday reunited with his father, the scene was easy to move anyone: “It would have moved anyone to tears to have seen how Friday kissed him, embraced him, hugged him, cried, laughed, halloed, jumped about, danced,
sung; and then sung and jumped about again, like a distracted creature. It was a good while before I could make him speak to me.” This is my favourite chapter in the whole book. It is hard to see why Friday is an ex-savage when he can have personalities more praiseworthy than many civilized people, viz. Crusoe himself. “When he (Friday went to him (Friday’s father, he would sit down by him, open his breast, and hold his father’s head close to his bosom, half an hour together, to nourish it; then he took his arms and ankles, which were numbed and stiff with the binding, and rubbed them with his hands.” Furthermore, Friday’s expression of loyalty in asking Crusoe to kill him rather than leave him is more heartfelt than anything Crusoe ever says or does.
Crusoe, on the absolute contrary, seems incapable of deep feelings, as shown by his account of leaving his family—he never shows any emotions. After a moving lecture from Robinson’s father about his future, he still decided to follow his own wandering ambition. Careless was he about the wishes of his parents to keep him alive and prosperous, as he was the only child left in the family. When he came back from the island which he had lived on for twenty eight years, he found that it had been too late to tell his parents that he was still alive, but yet again he did not feel sorry for them; he also did not feel sorry for the two people who had to live in misery for nearly thirty years under the allusion all of their sons were dead. He had the same feelings for his wife: when he was married, he said it was “not either to my disadvantage or dissatisfaction”, implying that it was also neither to his advantage nor his satisfaction. Moreover, after his wife died, Robinson did not think of looking after the three children they had, but went back to the island, which he had lived on for twenty-eight years. It was on this trip which Robinson Crusoe revisited “His Island ” as he called it. I feel that Robinson ’s indifference to his family is almost emotionally cruel.
Before had clearly shown the contrast between Crusoe’s and Friday’s personalities, as when Friday, in his joyful reunion with his father, displayed far more emotion toward his family members than Crusoe, whereas Crusoe never mentions missing his family or dreams about the happiness of seeing them again. I think Defore is very successful in introducing Friday as part of the novel, it makes the whole novel seem much more complete and gripping to the reader, as well as proving that Defoe’s ideology of racism is civilized unlike many other Europeans at that time; natives and savages are not worse than others but can perhaps even be more modern and civilized. Those are the reasons of why I like The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe and Friday.
大学生打网络游戏的英文作文【六】
支老师最近禁止打游戏，我很不情愿。但转念一想，支老师的要求肯定有他的道理，我还是先分析一下吧!
先想一下打游戏的好处：
一、打游戏可以放松身心，一次我飞快地写作业。终于，我的作业写完了，我感到十分疲劳。于是，我打开“我的世界”开启创造模式，搭建了一栋豪宅。看这我这壮观的作品，我顿时感到神清气爽。
二、他可以发泄情绪，有一次，我约几个同学一起玩滑板，有好几个人答应了，可到了约定的时候，他们却放我鸽子，一个也没来。我十分生气，跑回了家，打开iPad，打开“和平精英”，我落地就跳到了人多的地方，疯狂射击。我的.怒火伴随着子弹打在了其他玩家身上，冒出绿色的光。击***数每增加一个，我的心情就好了许多，最终我的击***数增加到了12个，我也终于平静下来。
三、它可以开发想象力，我的许多创意都来自于“我的世界”。
打游戏的坏处也不少：
一、玩游戏时要长时间盯着电子产品的屏幕，眼睛很容易就会近视。
二、游戏十分有意思，许多玩家没有在玩的时候也想着它，这样会影响到工作或学习。如果再过斑马线时，思绪进入游戏里，可能还会有生命危险。
三、一些不良游戏会影响身心健康。四、大部分游戏都是可以充值的，一些玩家控制不住就会去充钱。我在网上看到一个孩子，背着父母在一个游戏中充了100，000元人民币。
打游戏的弊大于利，但我认为，只要你的自控能力强，每个星期打一会儿不会有多大害处。而像我这样的自控能力一般的，还是去看看科幻小说，出去锻炼锻炼吧!
大学生打网络游戏的英文作文【七】
Many people simply regard Pride and Prejudice as a love story, but in my opinion, this book is an illustration of the society at that time. She perfectly reflected the relation between money and marriage at her time and gave the people in her works vivid characters. The characters have their own personalities. Mrs. Bennet is a woman who makes great efforts to marry off her daughters. Mr. Bingley is a friendly young man, but his friend, Mr. Darcy, is a very proud man who seems to always feel superior. Even the five daughters in Bennet family are very different. Jane is simple, innocent and never speaks evil of others. Elizabeth is a clever girl who always has her own opinion. Mary likes reading classic books. (Actually she is a pedant. Kitty doesn’t have her own opinion but likes to follow her sister, Lydia. Lydia is a girl who follows exotic things, handsome man, and is somehow a little profligate. When I read the book, I can always find the same personalities in the society now. That is why I think this book is indeed the representative of the society in Britain in the 18th century.
The family of gentleman in the countryside is Jane Austen’s favourite topic. But this little topic can reflect big problems. It concludes the stratum situation and economic relationships in Britain in her century. You can find these from the very beginning of this book.
The first sentence in this book is impressive. It reads: “It is a truth well known to all the world that an unmarried man in poss ession of a large fortune must be in need of a wife”. The undertone is very clear: the foundation of the marriage at that time is not emotion but possession.
People always think that Austen was an expert at telling love stories. In fact, the marriage in her book is not the result of love, but the result of economic needs. After reading this book, I know the truth is that a poor woman must be in need of a husband, a wealthy man.
I couldn’t forget how eager Mrs. Bennet wants to marry off her daughte rs. If you want to know why she is so crazy about these things, I must mention the situation in Britain at that time. Only the eldest son had the privilege of inheriting his father’s possessions. Younger sons and daughters who are used to luxurious lives have no choice but marry a man or woman in possession of a large fortune to continue their comfortable lives. Thus, we can see that getting married is a way to become wealthier, particularly for women without many possessions. Jane Austen told us that money and possession determined everything, including marriage and love in her century.
In “Pride and Prejudice”, the sister of Mr. Bingley strongly opposed his plan of marrying Jane because the Bennets don’t have many possessions and their social positions are much lower than them. From this, we can see there are a lot of obstacles for a not very rich woman to marry a wealthy husband. The society, the relatives would not allow them to get married.
In modern society, although the marriages of economic needs have decreased rapidly, the concept of “money determines everything” is still rooted in some people’s mind. A lot of parents try hard to interfere their children’s marriages. Education background, possessions, jobs remains the main reason that may influence one’s marriage. Marry for money is still a big problem in our
society. We can’t help thinking: can money determine everything?
Austen left this problem for us to think. The genius of Jane Austen lies in this perfect simplicity, the simplicity that reflects big problems. Although Austen was only 21 when she wrote “Pride and Prejudice”, her sharp observation of social lives makes the style of this book surprisingly mature and lively. The plots in her works are always very natural. The development of the plot is as inevitable as a problem in mathematics. I think the depth of Pride and Prejudice is the reason that makes this book prominent and classic. Today, her book still can be the guide telling us the economic relationships both at her time and in modern time.
